Receiver Technics SA700 Detailed Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 35

  • @martyjewell5683
    @martyjewell5683 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Technics was a very underrated brand. Good quality receivers compatible to those by Pioneer, Kenwood and Sansui. My wife still has the SA-80 I bought her in 1981 and my brother has a fully functional SA-5060 (12wpc). This end of 1970's SA-700 with 100wpc and fine S/N, THD, IM and damping specs is a powerhouse. A fine addition to any quality vintage hifi setup. Well done.

  • @floridaman2528
    @floridaman2528 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I bought one of these in '78 along with Micro Acoustics FRM-2A speakers. I really liked the setup. I did have problems with some of the knobs not working. I wish I still had it! Very good review. Much appreciated.

    • @martyjewell5683
      @martyjewell5683 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I auditioned the FRM-2A's along with Advents, Infinity, Polk and EPI. Finally decided on Ohm Acoustics model L speakers I purchased on Sept. 22, 1978 for $356 from tech hifi on West 45th street in NYC. Still use them as my living room speakers over forty years later. The FRM-2A's sounded very good, I just liked the Ohm's lifelike stereo imaging better. Bet your FRM's were sweet with that SA-700 receiver.

  • @Mark-py3rv
    @Mark-py3rv 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Finally someone who does a DETAILED review!!
    its always great to see a close up and clear look at EACH Toggle/Knob/Button and indicator light or VU meter..the bonus was the explanation which was very good considering English is not your first language...
    (FYI - the '4 MPX out' was designed for the implementation of broadcast quadraphonic sound which you would require a decoder box for..it never came about)
    Love to see a review of the Pioneer SX-1980/Technic SA 1000/Sansui G-33000

    • @duboweek
      @duboweek  8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks a lot for your kind words. Unfortunately, I don't have SA1000 in my collection...

  • @59Beatlefan
    @59Beatlefan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Still have mine. Purchase date, 3/10/80. Recently had cleaned/detailed. Still outstanding looking and sounding

  • @Mark-py3rv
    @Mark-py3rv 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Oh also..great that you reviewed the back panel of the receiver as well as looking under the hood!

  • @lennyrowe1121
    @lennyrowe1121 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have the dark face receiver I bought in Germany when I was in the air force. Bought it and other components in 1979. Still works but has some problems. When I get it to work right, it sounds awesome.

  • @Robert8455
    @Robert8455 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    An excellent review of this classic and highly desirable beautiful electronic art. Thank you for showing the insides too! I have a lower powered SA400 and will keep it forever.

  • @ralphreinhardt6020
    @ralphreinhardt6020 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just a little f.y.i. back in the day. The "devices" were called components. A very good and complete review. Great job sir.👍👍

    • @duboweek
      @duboweek  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks a lot!

  • @michaelmueller3228
    @michaelmueller3228 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My god, when my dad gave his away in 2015 I had no idea it was so desirable. I am also shocked he would buy such an expensive piece, guess he wasn’t always a cheapskate.

  • @paulmoitinho6029
    @paulmoitinho6029 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    AM Stereo was available in the early 80’s in some markets (in Canada at least). My 85 Chrysler K-car came with an FM & AM Stereo radio. The frequency range was typical of a regular AM (decent lows and mids but probably nothing above 7~8 KHz). However, the stereo separation was discernible enough to make AM listening a little more interesting. There were a few different, competing formats but C-quAM (not sure it’s spelt correctly) was the one my radio supported. Now a days I simply don’t bother with AM any more so can’t tell you if stations are still transmitting in that format any more.

    • @duboweek
      @duboweek  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ooooh, thanks for details!!!

  • @rayh53
    @rayh53 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Still have mine that I bought new in ~78. It really really needs a good cleaning. The controls are very noisy. Always loved cranking it up, now its mostly digital, but I also have the turntable and a box of noisy albums!

    • @duboweek
      @duboweek  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Well, the controls require maintenance, indeed, but the sound is great especially with old good music and a favorite drink!

    • @paididoy
      @paididoy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@duboweek 👍

  • @rakosipeter7446
    @rakosipeter7446 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really miss the FM programming switches in the construction. That's why I have a Yamaha RX-500 receiver.

  • @dxhunter01
    @dxhunter01 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    nice review, lots of useful info but, please next review please no background music. It makes it (for me) difficult to understand. Thanks.

  • @Badassvidsz
    @Badassvidsz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Awesome

  • @53gb
    @53gb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the awesome review.

    • @duboweek
      @duboweek  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you liked it!

  • @Mark-py3rv
    @Mark-py3rv 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    gorgeous vintage badboy !!

    • @duboweek
      @duboweek  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks a lot!

    • @mrmikeorsomething.5223
      @mrmikeorsomething.5223 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not everything is a knob. There are buttons and switches. This is a 200 watt receiver, 100 per channel. The controls are self explanatory. This was a kick ass receiver but the long drug out review was unnecessary.

  • @nsacrooks
    @nsacrooks 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Problems: differential pair giving bad static/dc. TR601 and TR602. Replace with 2SA992 emitters soldered and heat grease. No radio replace AN217P. I have one for sale. Built like a tank.

  • @dntlss
    @dntlss 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Gorgeous unit,love the LED'S, whats the name of the song or singer at 16:40 ? thank you!!

    • @duboweek
      @duboweek  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +dntlss Thanks a lot! Tried to identify the song, but could not do it fast enough. I think it is either track by Kognitif or some other net label artists.

  • @natturner3543
    @natturner3543 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent review! I'm getting ready to sell mine.

  • @willestes4678
    @willestes4678 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i have a Realistic STA 90 Am/FM's Stereo Receiver my speakers stop working good speakers was working good.

  • @yipee44
    @yipee44 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, may I know what is SAFETY (Green indicator) for?

    • @duboweek
      @duboweek  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      This indicator illuminates when receiver is operating normally, and does NOT illuinate if there is an abnormal condition in the output circuitry.

  • @mrmikeorsomething.5223
    @mrmikeorsomething.5223 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also, technics never made an sa 90.