Piper Diesel DX Flight Demo

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
  • Piper is touring Europe with its new Archer DX diesel, and later this summer, the airplane will appear in the U.S. While in Europe, AVweb took a flight demo in the airplane, and here are some impressions.

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @kentnielsen5602
    @kentnielsen5602 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    LOVE THIS PLANE. I had the honor of doing, the first ferry flight to Europe in it, from South Caroline to Denmark in june15.

  • @yamascott
    @yamascott 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Their voices lack enthusiasm. I think this plane was a good decision for Piper. I love the sound of this engine/prop combo. The lower fuel cost, longer range, and the ease of just a throttle lever make this a winner.

  • @LanceWinslow
    @LanceWinslow 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, I like it very much. Perfect for Europe.

  • @dreamaviation381
    @dreamaviation381 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like this aircraft for the new pilot owners and trainers. It's very cost efficient,and finding jet-A is everywhere outside of the U.S. Easy on startups and mixtures are automatically controlled.

    • @davebethel7159
      @davebethel7159 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      There are no mixtures in a Diesel engine.

  • @64jorthom
    @64jorthom 10 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Could be better flying with diesel or with avgas? What about maintenance costs?

  • @kopronko
    @kopronko 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you :-)

  • @naeemsiddiqui1116
    @naeemsiddiqui1116 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It climbs better than the gasoline version once out of the initial climb due to the turbocharger.The gasoline version is also not a true 4 seat plane. The range is outstanding 848 NM (1,570 KM) vs 522 NM (967 KM) for gas version. US pilots will have access to higher flight levels giving better economy over Europe.
    What i don't get is the 25deg flap on takeoff roll like a shortfield takeoff.

    • @hammotox83
      @hammotox83 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Naeem Siddiqui My Archer II will easily carry 4 passengers topped off with fuel

    • @lorenjackson8961
      @lorenjackson8961 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hammotox83 Yeah...those 4 passengers had better be sick emaciated individuals. You've only got about 635 pounds to work with if the tanks are full.

    • @hammotox83
      @hammotox83 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lorenjackson8961 it does depend on weight. I have an Archer II and carried myself, dad, mom, and brother on vacation with 75 lbs of bags in the back topped off. We were a few lbs below max gross. But we’re not super heavy. I’m 160, dad was 185, mom was 145, brother was 160.

  • @ConvairDart106
    @ConvairDart106 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This configuration gives it a useful load more in line with a Skyhawk. One reason people love the Cherokee. A true 4 seater! I would like to see a bigger diesel installed on an Arrow! Cessna put a
    constant speed prop in the Cardinal, (loved it), but Piper never gave
    that option on the Archer, with the same Lycoming 0-360. Why a turbo
    diesel, and fixed pitch? If you are going to fly higher, the reason the
    turbo was invented, why be stuck with a flat prop in thin air? When you
    switch from fixed pitch to constant speed, you really see the
    difference! If you want the full advantage of the turbo, you need to retract the gear, and match it to a prop that can grab thin air! The normally aspirated Archer is down to about 60% power at 10,000 feet.

  • @DroneShots_UK
    @DroneShots_UK 10 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Piper rep didn't seem too comfortable with the comments & questions regarding climb rate and revs on climb.

  • @caprica_13
    @caprica_13 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do you get diesel fuel at an airport? The ones I've flown to only have AvGas and Jet-A. Do you have to borrow the crew car and go to the nearest gas station with a couple of tanks? Sounds a little inconvenient.

    • @kaefermichaify
      @kaefermichaify 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can fly it with Jet-A. It is certified for that.

    • @caprica_13
      @caprica_13 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting. That makes sense I guess since Jet-A is basically just kerosene. Jet-A is only marginally cheaper over here though, but maybe it's different in Europe. Still fascinating though.

  • @jstuttgart
    @jstuttgart 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    How feasible is this for GA stolports. In my experience most don't have diesel tanks and infrastructure.

    • @MrCollindpyle
      @MrCollindpyle 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good question, JET-A fuel is found at many GA airports and has a very similar chemical structure and energy density as diesel. These engines are tuned to run on JET-A allowing them to utilize JET-A fuel at airports.

  • @gryzman
    @gryzman 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    that's not A20 you're wearing, is it ?

    • @andrewc9234
      @andrewc9234 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      TomCook1993 no that's the X the predecessor of the a20

  • @hammotox83
    @hammotox83 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I like the idea of more fuel efficient diesel engines, but if you're gonna give an aircraft 4 seats, give it enough power to carry 4 people.

    • @PistonAvatarGuy
      @PistonAvatarGuy 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      More power means more weight, and diesels are HEAVY.

    • @ConvairDart106
      @ConvairDart106 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I agree. I would like to see a bigger diesel installed on an Arrow! Cessna put a constant speed prop in the Cardinal, (loved it), but Piper never gave that option on the Archer, with the same Lycoming 0-360. Why a turbo diesel, and fixed pitch? If you are going to fly higher, the reason the turbo was invented, why be stuck with a flat prop in thin air? When you switch from fixed pitch to constant speed, you really see the difference!

    • @gregorymalchuk272
      @gregorymalchuk272 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ConvairDart106
      Are there diesels available with variable pitch propellers?

    • @mdickinson
      @mdickinson 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tell that to Mooney 😁

  • @MAGApepe
    @MAGApepe 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    so about 2 hrs of flying and you make up the extra engine weight in fuel saving weight