How the Chinese Communist Party Works

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ต.ค. 2022
  • Support PolyMatter & watch this video ad-free on Nebula: nebula.tv/videos/polymatter-h...
    Sources: pastebin.com/QCmV2qk8
    Twitter: / polymatters
    Reddit: / polymatter
    Email: polymatter@standard.tv
    How I Make These Videos: skl.sh/2OW1YQR
    Music by Graham Haerther (www.Haerther.net)
    Audio editing by Eric Schneider
    Motion graphics by Vincent de Langen
    Thumbnail by Simon Buckmaster
    Writing & Direction by Evan
    This includes a paid sponsorship which had no part in the writing, editing, or production of the rest of the video.
    Music by Epidemic Sound: epidemicsound.com
    Video supplied by Getty Images
    Maps provided by MapTiler/OpenStreetMap Contributors and GEOlayers 3
    Research and data collected with help from Statista / @statistaofficial
    Select footage from the AP Archive

ความคิดเห็น • 2.6K

  • @PolyMatter
    @PolyMatter  ปีที่แล้ว +548

    Hey all - part 2 of missile defense is still coming! This is a quick detour to another topic because China's Party Congress is currently happening in Beijing. You can be the first to watch the next missile defense video with Nebula, which at $15/year is frankly just a steal of a deal: curiositystream.com/polymatter

    • @skeetrix5577
      @skeetrix5577 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      love your channel man I can't get enough of anything communist/Soviet it's just so goddamn interesting

    • @heidirabenau511
      @heidirabenau511 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      When is the next episode of China Actually

    • @_Mike.P
      @_Mike.P ปีที่แล้ว

      Do they finally support PayPal?

    • @zyansheep
      @zyansheep ปีที่แล้ว

      Woooo!!!!

    • @gelinrefira
      @gelinrefira ปีที่แล้ว

      Why used such language as veneer of inclusiveness? China does something somewhat bad, ban hammer down. China tried to do something do right, the west use deliberately provocative language to dismiss their efforts. I'm really disappointed in you.

  • @MasayaShida
    @MasayaShida ปีที่แล้ว +3845

    Chinese politics is actually really interesting even for outsiders.

    • @Mario123007
      @Mario123007 ปีที่แล้ว +193

      Indeed, but imo it can be extremely confusing too.

    • @davidT.C
      @davidT.C ปีที่แล้ว +129

      Yah it’s really unique and very different from the US politics

    • @MasayaShida
      @MasayaShida ปีที่แล้ว +70

      @@Mario123007 yep still trying to learn about the different factions and infighting between princelings and technocrats.

    • @MasayaShida
      @MasayaShida ปีที่แล้ว +99

      @@davidT.C not US citizen but yeah US is more transparent so its like a reality TV for the world to see 😂
      Quite different

    • @spacetoast7783
      @spacetoast7783 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      @CantWait Chill

  • @xlUIblisUlx
    @xlUIblisUlx ปีที่แล้ว +1762

    Georgy Malenkov was *not* removed because he died, there were a series of back-and-forth political struggles between he and Khrushchev, which culminated in his exile to Kazakhstan, expulsion from the Party, but ultimately a peaceful death in 1988.

    • @beastrule
      @beastrule ปีที่แล้ว

      People should watch the death of stalin

    • @aluminium5738
      @aluminium5738 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Exactly, I hope he sees this.

    • @Chastity_Belt
      @Chastity_Belt ปีที่แล้ว +105

      Lenin also was not quite removed because he died. Actually, Lenin was isolated from the rest of bolshiveks by Stalin, and de-facto Stalin seized power already when Lenin was still alive and de-jure still the leader of the bolshevik's party.
      Anyway, still there was no sustained way how to transit power from previous leader to next one. Soviet leaders remained in power until they died or became so weak, that somebody overthrow them.
      Not quite reliable way of ruling the country.

    • @kingace6186
      @kingace6186 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Oh I see. Honestly, I tend to forget about Malenkov due to his extremely short tenure.

    • @eaterdrinker000
      @eaterdrinker000 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@kingace6186 : I forgot about him until I watched the dark political comedy "The Death of Stalin."

  • @feels.like.coffee
    @feels.like.coffee ปีที่แล้ว +903

    Chinese politics sounds a lot like office politics. You don't get elected, you get promoted. And people don't listen to you based on title alone, you have to earn the respect and obedience of your peers and subordinates.

    • @alexpotts6520
      @alexpotts6520 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      Partially. Sounds like Xi Jinping however principally got to the top not by commanding respect but by destroying everyone who stood in his way.

    • @feels.like.coffee
      @feels.like.coffee ปีที่แล้ว +187

      @@alexpotts6520 Well. .. That's not uncommon in office politics too 😂

    • @taknaknak4957
      @taknaknak4957 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@alexpotts6520 Sometimes you need to swallow the bitterness of reality bro
      Reality can't be twisted such you said aforementioned

    • @Renaresca
      @Renaresca ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@alexpotts6520 I mean technically by destroying ppl in your way is also a way to get respect, they know not to mess with you and to take you seriously. XD

    • @slayergut
      @slayergut ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@alexpotts6520 well... that's the point right? Part of power and influence is when people dont want to mess with you.

  • @ThishandlefeatureISdumb
    @ThishandlefeatureISdumb ปีที่แล้ว +640

    12:35, fun fact his dad was actually purged before. Not the Soviet style purge but the jailed and demoted to a factory worker but still alive type. He was also the one that set up the special economic zones in China and namely was the one Shenzhen’s current success can be somewhat attributed to. It’s probably also why Xinjinping had so much influence. Shenzhen is basically if you combined NYC with silicon valley in the US.
    Edit: to be clear his success came AFTER the purge not that he got purged later. Here’s his wikipedia page if you are interested: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xi_Zhongxun

    • @twitter.comelomhycy
      @twitter.comelomhycy ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Very cool info

    • @vaclevsta
      @vaclevsta ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Deng Xiaoping himself had been purged and helped rehabilitate many economic reformers like Xi's father when he eventually took power

    • @MrNicoJac
      @MrNicoJac ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @Lone Wolf
      How do you mean Shenzhen is if you combined NYC with Silicon Valley; is the biggest Chinese stock exchange also centered in Shenzhen?
      (I thought/assumed Shanghai)

    • @newstartyt3700
      @newstartyt3700 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Xi Zhongxun was actually way more reformist than Xi Jinping, his beliefs were pretty similar to that of Hu Yaobang and Zhao Ziyang.

    • @alejosssdo
      @alejosssdo ปีที่แล้ว +10

      soviet purges were the same, there have never been mass executions

  • @Homer-OJ-Simpson
    @Homer-OJ-Simpson ปีที่แล้ว +1560

    9:52 Deng Xioaping is a good example of how general Secretary isn’t necessarily the power. Another example was Putin 2009-2012 when he had to step down due to term limits and put a puppet in charge while Putin was *Prime Minister (corrected). In weak democracies or non democracies, the leader position isn’t always the most powerful.

    • @msasociality
      @msasociality ปีที่แล้ว +30

      putin served as prime minister at that time

    • @KevinJohnson-cv2no
      @KevinJohnson-cv2no ปีที่แล้ว +144

      That's not just democracies, that's any structure of power. This is known as the difference between De Facto power & De Jure power; De Facto rulers hold actual power and can make things happen, De Jure are merely faces that hold the public titles more-so than anything.
      Edit: If a power structure is healthy and transparent, then the De Jure & De Facto should be the same individuals. If not, then you'll see an increasingly large divide between those who hold official positions and those who can actually make things happen.

    • @Homer-OJ-Simpson
      @Homer-OJ-Simpson ปีที่แล้ว +24

      @@KevinJohnson-cv2no democracies have more set power in positions. Non democracies or weak democracies, the positions means less and sometimes mean nothing.

    • @MoonatikYT
      @MoonatikYT ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @Ramzan Kadyrov hidenburg was a doddering old man who died in 1934, barely a year into hitler's term as chancellor

    • @pradhyudh
      @pradhyudh ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Watch vice from Adam McKay,
      India under manmohan singh

  • @hylacinerea970
    @hylacinerea970 ปีที่แล้ว +359

    people havr asked me "why are you so interested in China, and largely Asia as a whole" and I tell them there has never been a single boring moment on that side of the world. it has been a string of regular show tier events since hominids arrived

    • @justice_crash2521
      @justice_crash2521 ปีที่แล้ว +77

      Game of thrones would look like Cartoon Network if you start reading some of their history 😂

    • @juno3254
      @juno3254 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      That’s such a funny response. I feel kinda flattered to hear this as an East Asian
      XD

    • @MrNajibrazak
      @MrNajibrazak ปีที่แล้ว +23

      @@juno3254 as a mixed Japanese Chinese it is somewhat depressing. Having lived in China suffice to say it does feels like WW2 isn't over and the Korean war is still in progress. Warmongering propagandas is a daily thing and I learnt how to hate before I learnt how to read. Revenge for the opium war is still alive and well as well.
      Would not go back for all the money and women in the world. Hateful place.

    • @NightTimeDay
      @NightTimeDay ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@MrNajibrazak I'm glad you're out and can see things as they are now. Sounds like a valuable lesson to learn.

    • @justice_crash2521
      @justice_crash2521 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Jack Smith no it’s real

  • @PyroFloe
    @PyroFloe ปีที่แล้ว +205

    Just a correction at the start of the video, Georgy Malenkov didn't rule until he died when he briefly succeeded Stalin, he was deposed and his premiership was stripped from him by the power struggle with Khrushchev

    • @PseudoProphet
      @PseudoProphet ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@Maxxxie Lorenzo neither of those examples were peaceful transitions of power and he obviously doesn't have enough time in a single video to explain all of this.

    • @PseudoProphet
      @PseudoProphet ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Maxxxie Lorenzo hahahaha 😂😂
      Just because there was no civil war doesn't mean it was peaceful, exactly the same way as Xi's rise to the supreme leadership is anything but peaceful. 🙄🙄

    • @PseudoProphet
      @PseudoProphet ปีที่แล้ว

      @Maxxxie Lorenzo of course the power transfer in America this time was not peaceful, only blind ideological idiots from the US would call it peaceful.
      They're even trying to put Trump behind bars, that's almost as far from peaceful as it can be in America. Maybe it'll become even more violent in the coming years.

    • @indiasuperclean6969
      @indiasuperclean6969 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      WOW VERY DANGEROUS SIR! 😠 😠THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗

  • @alexandrechen3081
    @alexandrechen3081 ปีที่แล้ว +773

    This is such a high-quality video. As a Chinese who have been interested in Chinese politics for more than 10 years. I can say that I am familiar with 80% of the content and it is very accurate. I also learned from the rest 20% of the content that I wasn't quite familiar before watching. Great job!

    • @user-fi4ut6jl9l
      @user-fi4ut6jl9l ปีที่แล้ว +27

      @@cyberwar4111 it's not about language. CPC's formal name is Communist Party of China, this is officially determined by Chinese communists themselves a few decades ago.The OF aims to highlight the internationalism of the communist movement, and this party is just a part of it, still a part of it and they will always be a participant of it. And China not Chinese means PRC is the only legitimate government in China. I'm a Chinese but not a member of CPC yet, but I'm familiar with this history.

    • @finnbar3042
      @finnbar3042 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@cyberwar4111 CCP is the westernised scare acronym. It's meant to sound like the soviet CCCP, which was mentioned in a lot of cold war propaganda

    • @firewoodloki
      @firewoodloki ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AnglersUAE Get off your slippery slope already. Trying to defy the whole video with a tiny mistake as a wumao is not effective.

    • @difficiliscarere9838
      @difficiliscarere9838 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@AnglersUAE i´ve learned quite a lot, like: ruling party > everything else, or that the prince boys still had such high standing after Mao (wouldnt have expected that and always thought Xi was something like the last unicorn). Not gonna remember any party/organiziation ,mentioned in this video , by name , specialy not names of the past . this (among others) is a place for me to learn about the basics of all the different countries and this "mistake" doesnt change anything in that regard. And it aint even a mistake CPC=CCP, or are there actually 2 seperate bodies at the moment? How do u even notice something irrelevant like this , while at the same time ignoring the elephant in the room? "Communist" and current China aint compaitble in the slightest and the party shouldnt even carry on this name. Shaaaady

    • @dekumutant
      @dekumutant ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@AnglersUAE I can not imagine grasping at straws so much that your main way to try to discredit a video is "he said chinese communist party instead of communist party of china" LMAO

  • @Yirui9500
    @Yirui9500 ปีที่แล้ว +263

    I'm Chinese 3:37 I wanna correct you about VPN. VPN is fairly easy to get and it's working perfectly and you don't need to be a technologically savvy. Many foreign owned companies in major Chinese cities will provide its employees (not only expats, personal experience) VPN as an essential tool for work, they are doing it on a corporate level, so you can't say that the government is not aware of this. I guess using VPN is not going to get you into trouble as long as you are using it for leisure or work purposes.

    • @stefanli1755
      @stefanli1755 ปีที่แล้ว +59

      Lots of schools (mostly International high schools, research universities) have VPN built into wifi networks

    • @curtishawkins8052
      @curtishawkins8052 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I guess the most important question is: Can you access a VPN not sanctioned by the government? If you can't then it doesn't really serve it's purpose which is to mask your identity and protect your location from being discovered.

    • @kimjongun505
      @kimjongun505 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@curtishawkins8052 You can, its easy as hell to find and set one up. Every office i worked at in china had a vpn, most teenagers even had vpns (so to watch certain contents)

    • @curtishawkins8052
      @curtishawkins8052 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kimjongun505 That is good news, I was under the impression that the chinese government controlled the VPN's and could track people and had the power to turn them on or off whenever they wanted. If that is not true, we could see a lot of media come out of China.

    • @JoseRodriguez-pn8yj
      @JoseRodriguez-pn8yj ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kimjongun505 So why the dumb censorship? Why the great firewall? What’s the purpose of having a law you’re not interested in enforcing, thankfully 😳

  • @MarkAhrens-HeritageFilms
    @MarkAhrens-HeritageFilms ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Very impressive production and density of information!

  • @Ella-gn8zp
    @Ella-gn8zp ปีที่แล้ว +499

    As a Chinese myself, I´m truly astonished at the high quality of this video! Such vast amount of Information are highly compressed into such a short video, complex concepts and structures are very vividly explained. I do admire the work the creator devoted into! Thanks for uploading!

    • @tiansuohaoer
      @tiansuohaoer ปีที่แล้ว +7

      是这样的

    • @Greg-yu4ij
      @Greg-yu4ij ปีที่แล้ว +6

      What do you think of Hu’s purge?

    • @user-ko3lu9et1f
      @user-ko3lu9et1f ปีที่แล้ว +22

      看了开头本来以为又是一个无脑黑的,但出乎意料的准确。

    • @mathersmarshall8235
      @mathersmarshall8235 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Greg-yu4ij where's the purge?😂

    • @jamesyu1414
      @jamesyu1414 ปีที่แล้ว

      are you sure?I think it's talking shit in some aspects, it's not a normal introductory vedio

  • @Panashe__S
    @Panashe__S ปีที่แล้ว +54

    Thank you @PolyMatter for yet another detailed and insightful examination!

  • @abdiganiaden
    @abdiganiaden ปีที่แล้ว +260

    Having power without gov title is actually the norm in most of world except for west.
    Example is when US disbanded Ba’ath party of Iraq after toppling Sadam expecting population to then listen to gov bureaucrats with just fancy titles. Obviously didn’t work.

    • @TheZachary86
      @TheZachary86 ปีที่แล้ว +65

      This would happen in the US too if the government lost legitimacy/destabilized. It’s not unique to the west. People don’t realise centuries of institutions are already in place in the west. And sometimes it is also very fragile

    • @hamzabajwa1960
      @hamzabajwa1960 ปีที่แล้ว +93

      You can actually see how it works in practice with Trump. A figure who is nominally an ex-President and doesn't have a title within the party, but due to his popularity with voters, commands almost complete obedience from the party. Obviously, if he was more competent and had half a brain, he would wield this power more intelligently, being more of a king maker rather than having his overt lust for the title of President.

    • @KevinJohnson-cv2no
      @KevinJohnson-cv2no ปีที่แล้ว +20

      As explained in another comment, this is a possible fault of any power structure. De Facto power vs De Jure power is a constant in any structure, De Facto leaders being the ones with actual power and De Jure merely being the ones who occupy public positions.
      Ideally, a countries De Facto & De Jure individuals are the same, but obviously; this isn't always the case.

    • @davidford3115
      @davidford3115 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@hamzabajwa1960 Same could also be said of the leaders of the DNC. But then folks rarely understand how POPULISM actually works. Populism doesn't recognize ordained offices.

    • @anakinthemannequin69
      @anakinthemannequin69 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Its true in many Western countries too.

  • @BomChickyBowWow
    @BomChickyBowWow ปีที่แล้ว +25

    I’ve always wondered about everything you covered in this video. VERY informative and entertaining. Thank you, well done.

  • @jatinraj4974
    @jatinraj4974 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Man your videos are so crisp and well produced. I am really curious to know if you write your script word to word???

    • @yannick245
      @yannick245 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are funded by the Falun Gong cult.

  • @diggoran
    @diggoran ปีที่แล้ว +220

    1:01 I wish we had this maximum age on American presidents too. Can we please have someone running the country who actually has a stake in the future they are creating??

    • @sc1338
      @sc1338 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Well, we need an intelligent 35 yo to run!

    • @Moses_VII
      @Moses_VII ปีที่แล้ว

      Someone without dementia, you mean?

    • @jonathanodude6660
      @jonathanodude6660 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      we dont need another biden or trump. please 70 is the absolute limit, 65 preferable, its not like they wont be 69 by the end of their first term.

    • @denniscorbin5328
      @denniscorbin5328 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@sc1338 l

    • @xiphoid2011
      @xiphoid2011 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      There is no age limit on CCP general secretaries either. As this video mentioned, ruler in China has no age or term limit.

  • @darkbrightnorth
    @darkbrightnorth ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Great video. I’m guessing the only reason it didn’t do better is because of how many people had midterms and studying when it came out, because a video this important and high quality should get all the views

  • @RBG-ez7pd
    @RBG-ez7pd ปีที่แล้ว

    Literally was wondering the video title question just yesterday! Thanks for the video.

  • @capncat8097
    @capncat8097 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for uploading a new video!

  • @RuiEspinha
    @RuiEspinha ปีที่แล้ว +209

    This is a really fascinating video. Chinese politics are a world of its own and your journalism work in this video is just insane. Thank you so much!

    • @MrNajibrazak
      @MrNajibrazak ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it surely does makes the established traditional main stream media look clueless, in which they totally are.

    • @indiasuperclean6969
      @indiasuperclean6969 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      WOW VERY DANGEROUS SIR! 😠 😠THIS WHY IM SO LUCKY LIVE IN SUPER INDIA THE CLEANEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD 🇮🇳🤗 , WE NEVER SCAM! WE GIVE RESPECT TO ALL WOMEN THEY CAN WALK SAFELY ALONE AT NIGHT AND WE HAVE CLEAN FOOD AND TOILET EVERYWHERE 🇮🇳🤗🚽, I KNOW MANY POOR PEOPLE JEALOUS WITH SUPER RICH INDIA 🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗🇮🇳🤗

    • @chaofengli1411
      @chaofengli1411 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@indiasuperclean6969 I know you are kidding. I got it.

    • @user-hc3ju5bv5f
      @user-hc3ju5bv5f 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@indiasuperclean6969you managed to make me laugh

    • @NazriB
      @NazriB 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lies again? Serie A Leader Torino

  • @nolancarte6015
    @nolancarte6015 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This video was very insightful. Please make more videos like this

    • @davidtran862
      @davidtran862 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please make a vn vlog. Thanks

  • @snekula5353
    @snekula5353 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Technically Hua Guofeng the leader of China between 1976 - 1981 did peacefully hand over his power when he was forced into resignation by Deng Xiaoping. He lead a quiet life after his resignation until he died in 2008 at the age of 87.

  • @Volition1001
    @Volition1001 ปีที่แล้ว +180

    I recommend a podcast series called “The Prince” by the economist for any interested. It isn’t perfect but it goes into pretty good detail about the rise of Xi Jinping

    • @MasayaShida
      @MasayaShida ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Just finished it today while working. Great podcast! Interesting to learn Xi have old friends in Idaho

    • @sstff6771
      @sstff6771 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I started listening to it and its great

    • @paulinbrooklyn
      @paulinbrooklyn ปีที่แล้ว +7

      A surprisingly interesting comment. While I have been a fan of their flagship publication my entire adult life, I generally don’t even bother to consume The Economist’s free content as it has invariably been low quality superficial crap.

    • @PutXi_Whipped
      @PutXi_Whipped ปีที่แล้ว +22

      If it’s from The Economist it’s guaranteed to be garbage.

    • @PutXi_Whipped
      @PutXi_Whipped ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@josephk1342 “Tankie” is what neocons yell when they have no argument or are losing the argument.
      So much cope in you.
      Edit: you sub Vox, Destiny and State Dept sponsored VICE, no wonder you’re such a hopeless dummy.

  • @dontmindme8709
    @dontmindme8709 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    Your videos are always so well made! I'm seriously tempted to get Nebula especially to see your series there! I'm just afraid that I'd sink even more time into watching videos then :'^/

    • @Ingenius_
      @Ingenius_ ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yea same it’s not the ridiculously low prize that keeps me from getting Nebula, but the fact I simply don’t have the time to dive into all the rabbitholes I could find there.. lol

    • @MasayaShida
      @MasayaShida ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well I'd say go for it but if you don't want to spend too much time then stay away from RealLifeLore coz they got documentary length stuff

    • @Ingenius_
      @Ingenius_ ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@MasayaShida I may be going for it someday but at the moment I‘m already "wasting" way too much time on Educational creators TH-cam channels alone

    • @Ninjaeule97
      @Ninjaeule97 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Ingenius_ Why do you consider that wasted time? If you enjoy it and even learn something on top, that's not wasted time. I would only start worrying if it interferes with the rest of your life.

    • @extrapolate
      @extrapolate ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s worth it! No ads too

  • @JanuszKrysztofiak
    @JanuszKrysztofiak ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Generally, this is pretty similar to the way Eastern Block countries operated. The main deviation being no general secretary/the first secretary after the Stalinist period had position comparable to that of Xi Jingping (Romania and non-Eastern Block communist countries: Yugoslavia, Albania being exceptions, as Ceausescu, Tito and Hoxha respectively held the "for life" power grip, being also surrounded by the cult of personality).

  • @yunleung2631
    @yunleung2631 ปีที่แล้ว

    you are the reason why I finally subbed for Nebual
    that and a few others like Tech Altar

  • @Atropos790
    @Atropos790 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Malenkov was ousted, he did not die while in power

  • @-haclong2366
    @-haclong2366 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    08:30 In Mandarin (also in Vietnamese and Korean) the word for a "President" of a Communist country is already "general secretary", this is why the President of the Republic of China, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Vietnam all have / had different titles from their Communist counterparts.

    • @Redknight535
      @Redknight535 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No its not...

    • @deanzaZZR
      @deanzaZZR ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Curious, according to the Chinese language Wiki his governmental title is 中华人民共和国主席 - so Chairman which is translated as president for the global audience. I thought chairman was only used on the party side for Mao.

    • @jamsonren9640
      @jamsonren9640 ปีที่แล้ว

      It means first chair

    • @user-qf7ym5vc7o
      @user-qf7ym5vc7o ปีที่แล้ว

      Why Korea is here??

    • @voidvector
      @voidvector ปีที่แล้ว +3

      English word "president" comes from Latin "to sit before" -- prae (“before”) and sedeō (“sit”). So lexically is very similar to the Chinese title.

  • @yukunliu8348
    @yukunliu8348 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great video! It’s the most accurate video on Chinese gov I’ve seen on TH-cam

  • @mohitshukla4609
    @mohitshukla4609 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good study!! Thanks a lot for creating this content.

  • @pyeitme508
    @pyeitme508 ปีที่แล้ว +177

    CCP: "That's BS!"

    • @atulsodhi8985
      @atulsodhi8985 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That's classified comrade

    • @shashankgadamsetty508
      @shashankgadamsetty508 ปีที่แล้ว

      U missed a T

    • @dennisestradda9746
      @dennisestradda9746 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They go by CPC now well doesn’t matter CCP

    • @williamrosswhite
      @williamrosswhite ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​​@@dennisestradda9746 that like a Judean Peoples Front vs The Peoples Front of Judea kind of situation?

    • @Natogoon
      @Natogoon ปีที่แล้ว

      Funny?

  • @CivilisPrinceps
    @CivilisPrinceps ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Hey PolyMatter, you made a mistake on 0:17 Georgy Malenkov didn't rule until he died, he was forced to resign as he couldn't gain the support of the various Soviet factions competing to take power after Stalin's death, which paved the way for Nikita Khrushchev to consolidate power and gain the support of the Soviet inner circle. He died in January 14th 1988

    • @CivilisPrinceps
      @CivilisPrinceps ปีที่แล้ว

      @Maxxxie Lorenzo Great point didn't notice glad to see someone with a background knowledge. His narrative in theme from the beginning was false, what you brought up about Deng Jioping was very true.

  • @connorbrotcke254
    @connorbrotcke254 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    China Actually is one of the best internet doc series available, it’s single-handedly kept me subbed to Nebula.

  • @hamslicemcdooogle8080
    @hamslicemcdooogle8080 ปีที่แล้ว +224

    At first glance I thought the title was “How the Chinese Communist Party got woke” and damn near spewed my drink from my nose

    • @DrOtto-sx7cp
      @DrOtto-sx7cp ปีที่แล้ว +9

      👍😆

    • @aturchomicz821
      @aturchomicz821 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ok?🙄🙄

    • @grimkahn3775
      @grimkahn3775 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@aturchomicz821 ??

    • @proviptk
      @proviptk ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@aturchomicz821 Hey man, if your comment doesn't add anything to the conversation, you might as well save your time and not replying.

    • @hamslicemcdooogle8080
      @hamslicemcdooogle8080 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@aturchomicz821 trash reply

  • @xxxzzz8221
    @xxxzzz8221 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Hu Jintao never really had true power during his time as leader. Jiang Zemin, even after transferring political power, still held onto military control until Hu's second term in office. Additionally, Jiang had placed many officials around Hu, effectively turning him into a puppet who only followed Jiang's orders. In contrast, Xi Jinping was granted complete power from the outset. Hu handed over both political and military control, while most of Jiang's subordinates were too old to pose any threat to Xi. The sole reason behind Xi's anti-corruption campaign was the rampant corruption among party officials, which damaged the Party's reputation. He had to combat corruption to maintain the Party's rule, but this inevitably led to a large number of officials being investigated and made it difficult for Xi to choose a successor.

  • @ianng4633
    @ianng4633 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    "Intra party democracy"
    Tories: Write that down, WRITE THAT DOWN

    • @larshofler8298
      @larshofler8298 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      🤣🤣

    • @firewoodloki
      @firewoodloki ปีที่แล้ว +18

      I think Japan and Singapore have similar approaches as well. Obviously better than China tho.

    • @twitter.comelomhycy
      @twitter.comelomhycy ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Haha yes as a brit I hope this is the case

    • @larshofler8298
      @larshofler8298 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@firewoodloki Because in Japan and Singapore, there is still a healthy space of civil society, and a reliable regime of personal rights.

    • @larshofler8298
      @larshofler8298 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@firewoodloki But I do think democracy is overrated. Japan is a good example, showing us how a country can be run in a good way without much democratic voting. Half of the voters vote, and they almost always vote the same Party and the same politicians into power. but Japan works fine,

  • @SunYat-sen
    @SunYat-sen ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Another amazing video as always

  • @px5ix4pz6j
    @px5ix4pz6j ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can you do a video on the chain of command for their government? From military to civilians

  • @enormouzyt
    @enormouzyt ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love it when Polymatter new video :D

  • @MarkNealon
    @MarkNealon ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Good video but it would have been good to discuss how networks of influence are built through guanxi

    • @silverchairsg
      @silverchairsg ปีที่แล้ว

      Favours, bribes, patronage, blackmail, honeypot traps, joining a preestablished clique...

  • @everynametaken
    @everynametaken ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Um, pretty sure Malenkov was overthrown, not ruling until he died.

    • @aaronplunkett7773
      @aaronplunkett7773 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah he most definitely didn't die nor was he general secretary, he was chairman of the council of ministers making him head of government, Krushchev was General secretary and then forced Malenkov out assuming the role of chairman. He was then exiled to Kazakhstan

    • @DeathsquadDemongods
      @DeathsquadDemongods ปีที่แล้ว

      THIS. Maybe he thought the same fate that happened to Beria happened to him?

  • @nouhowlmao2809
    @nouhowlmao2809 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The soviets were silly to not think about the future in so many aspects but this one is so damn simple

    • @kingwing3203
      @kingwing3203 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      In China's five thousand years of history, there are many situations of power replacement, but it is easy to find which one is more perfect.

  • @DeathToMockingBirds
    @DeathToMockingBirds ปีที่แล้ว +59

    I thought I would learn about chinese political party structure, not just the congress or Xi. A chart and explanation of how people climb, vote, participate, the actual government structure, the departments... that would follow your title.

    • @Amanda-10702
      @Amanda-10702 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Starting from 5:55

    • @suspicionofdeceit
      @suspicionofdeceit ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I agree, this didn’t really explain how it all works.

    • @firefly4784
      @firefly4784 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@suspicionofdeceit Other channels such as Reports on China have that kind of content I think

    • @shiningflag2737
      @shiningflag2737 ปีที่แล้ว

      That would be quite long to explain such topic since the running rules of chinese gov is so different from the western. This video just provides a glance to the top structure of CCP and its relationship with Chinese government(and surprisingly, rather objective even from chinese's view like me)... But that would be a great start if you're interested in it.

    • @mathersmarshall8235
      @mathersmarshall8235 ปีที่แล้ว

      As PolyMatter said in the video, the party represents the nation in China. So the People's Congress(similar to the US congress which is for people) almost equals with the Party's Congress(which is for CPC) or can say there're only trivial differences which can be ignored. The voting and electing activities of the two organizations are individually held.
      If an ordinary person want to serve as a government officer he can take an examination for government functionaries then take several years or decades to climb from the bottom. If an ordinary person want to be a party member he can apply for it then CPC will inspect him for a period of time and decide whether to recruit him(there's one CPC member among nearly 14 Chinese so they're very common). A government officer is always a party member so his levels of the two identities can be considered consistent more or less.
      Regarding to the government structure you can refer to the Wikipedia page of "State Council of the People's Republic of China" which serve as "the national government". Otherwise only low-level ones are called "government" such as "People's Government of xxx Province/xxx City".

  • @kingace6186
    @kingace6186 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wow. I would have expected this to be a Nebula special.

  • @cadhlaohanlon4443
    @cadhlaohanlon4443 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    To properly understand the Chinese political system and mindset, you have to understand or at least be able to distinguish the difference between the Chinese culture and the western culture if there’s any at all. Learning a bit of the Chinese history also helps a big time. It’s a mature civilization after all.

    • @RonaldCasey
      @RonaldCasey ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You do find the point!

    • @FloofyMinari
      @FloofyMinari ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Sure, but countries like Korea, Japan, and Taiwan have been able to make Democracy work.
      "Chinese Culture" is a poor excuse to justify an authoritarian one party system.

    • @user-ut6mj4in8p
      @user-ut6mj4in8p ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FloofyMinari Don't lie to yourself, South Korea and Japan are all colonies of the United States. The US military in these countries has more troops than South Korea and Japan.
      The reason why they are allowed to carry out so-called "democratic elections" is just to facilitate the cultivation of puppets that the United States chooses to support. Let these countries serve the United States.
      Taiwan has been receiving aid from the United States since the last century, and both political parties in Taiwan are puppets of the United States.

    • @LouayKouki-zl6iv
      @LouayKouki-zl6iv ปีที่แล้ว +17

      ​@@FloofyMinarithey've us client states

    • @kunzhang8977
      @kunzhang8977 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @@FloofyMinari 1)They were all occupied and colonized by Western countries for long time. Enough to almost destory old east culture and ideology influence. Meanwhile China was never completely colonized.
      2)They also all had their own quite long time with dictatorship, only thrown after people's life being unsufferable. Meanwhile CPC reform itself after disaster governing period in 60s/70s. Effort for democracy will not be seen now when mostly citizen are enjoying rapid improvment of their standard of living.

  • @justthatfast13
    @justthatfast13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing video! Thanks for making this!

  • @RileyEvansProduction
    @RileyEvansProduction ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What a fantastic video! Excellent job!

  • @JustATempest
    @JustATempest ปีที่แล้ว +41

    10:34 the power struggle and saving face cliche in most webtoons are starting to make more sense now. The stereotypical do you know who my grandfather brother is!

  • @KARL-el3hr
    @KARL-el3hr ปีที่แล้ว +14

    This is a great video once again from polymatter!❤️.

  • @EpicWink
    @EpicWink ปีที่แล้ว +54

    I would highly recommend Kevin Rudd's (former Australian prime minister, current head of The Asia Society) write up "The World According to Xi Jinping" (in Foreign Affairs) or his book "The Avoidable War" for more analysis on Chinese international relations

    • @julioduan7130
      @julioduan7130 ปีที่แล้ว

      He is another fake so-called China expert. He knows little about China even if he looks like to know a lot.

    • @andrewlim7751
      @andrewlim7751 ปีที่แล้ว

      Too much Anglo-Saxons self entitlement.

    • @josesamala1801
      @josesamala1801 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Xi is a DICTATOR. Xi plans to stay in power by POLICE POWER. XI will soon be overthrown by Chinese Citizens. Xi and Putin will both be overthrown, and killed by their citizens.Xi plans to invade Taiwan and all democratic countries of Asia.

    • @supa3ek
      @supa3ek 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kevin rudd was a clown. All his books are his own speculations and fears. Stay sane, don't read them !!!

  • @Dash-td8rl
    @Dash-td8rl ปีที่แล้ว +7

    You see the slimiest person carry a car
    The weakest person build a city
    The saddest person make theme parks
    The most afraid person goes to war
    This is why China is so powerful
    The people and the government

  • @suekis2903
    @suekis2903 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    As a chinese, there are several statements that i disagree, but overall it is an informative video. Well done

    • @RishiRaj-bh6lb
      @RishiRaj-bh6lb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can you please mention those? I am eager to know .

    • @user-im3de9eq6m
      @user-im3de9eq6m หลายเดือนก่อน

      比如全国人大 实际上全中国的人都十分关注人大 换句话说就是从所谓‘’无聊“”的会议中去提取真实信息 和猜谜语一个意思 @@RishiRaj-bh6lb

  • @sichengwei6688
    @sichengwei6688 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    as a chinese myself, I personally divide PRC as three periods.
    1. 1949-1976, the Mao Dynasty, in which Mao Zedong clear out his opponents inside and outside the party.
    2. 1976-2013, the First Republic, in which Deng, Jiang, and Hu allowed limited democracy within the party. Also, the liberty of press and speech was also partially achieved.
    3. 2013-today, the Xi Dynasty, in which Xi Jinping again clear out lol his opponents in the party and change the constitution completely.

    • @WissHH-
      @WissHH- 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am genuinely curious how are u watching this video. Isnt internet and therefore TH-cam banned in China?

    • @sichengwei6688
      @sichengwei6688 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@WissHH- the interesting thing is, i am not living in china right now.
      I left china after covid.
      but, it is quite common to use vpn in mainland china, especially for programmers.

    • @WissHH-
      @WissHH- 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sichengwei6688 maybe can i ask why? Did you leave because the economic turmoil after COVID or maybe because you didnt like how the whole pandemic was hangled??

    • @sichengwei6688
      @sichengwei6688 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@WissHH- Both, the most important thing is, I am getting more and more disappointed at the government.
      Sadly, I can do nothing to change the system.
      Economic turmoil? Absolutely! Our economy heavily relies on real estate, and its collapse is on the horizon. We had our last chance back in 2015-16, our gov failed to seize it.
      Covid? Partly, I live in Wuhan during the covid periods. At the beginning, blockade was acceptable, since covid was really fatal in 2020.
      But later, the blockade and daily PCR testing became gesture politics. It was burden for every people, economically, politically and psychologically.
      I hope china can be a better country, but I am worried that things might get worse.
      I think it is better to leave and wait until Xi resign.

    • @WissHH-
      @WissHH- 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@sichengwei6688 really thanks for such a genuine answer my friend. Its good to have some insight from a chinese person,that doesnt repeat the argument constantly and can see the good and bad and have critical thinking.I hope u doing well, i share the same worries and in how will this end...i also wish the best for chinese people, we are all humans and deserve a good and free life. Government≠ people.
      Good day my friend.

  • @GunboyzElite
    @GunboyzElite ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I’ve been watching since you argued about Fahrenheit and Celsius and i love your style of content

  • @bo514
    @bo514 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Great explanation, but this type of video would benefit from a summary/conclusion. The transition from your final point to your sponsorship is smooth yet somehow jarring and abrupt, and could use an intermediary summary. Otherwise awesome video, appreciate your content.

    • @KJ4EZJ
      @KJ4EZJ ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, the video just abruptly ends. It is particularly bad on Nebula or with Sponsor Block because there isn't even any outro.

  • @RXH88
    @RXH88 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing video and explanation! I could watch 10h of this!

  • @giannb5145
    @giannb5145 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    The first thing to understand (especially for Westerners) is that a very large percentage of CCP members are ideologically loyal Marxists-Leninists. Most people can't understand this, pointing out that China is capitalist now, so please read carefully:
    * There was also capitalism under Mao until 1957-58, and even after that, at the height of Maoism, that there was a huge black market, especially in agricultural products. The USSR itself also had a huge black market, as does North Korea today.
    * The economic reforms weren't such a theoretical shock for Marxist "theology", as the USSR had used them in the 1920s under Lenin
    * The prime inspiration and know-how for the reforms came from Communist Yugoslavia and Hungary, as well as from Overseas
    Chinese and (to a lesser extent) Singapore. It wasn't as if Deng Xiaoping became fascinated with Wall Street Journal.
    * China today isn't really capitalist, in the sense that there are no legal property rights. Yes, you read that correctly. If the CCP wishes, it can crush every single individual, association or enterprise in five minutes.
    * The "shock therapy" of the 1990s in East European countries and the bloody dissolution of Yugoslavia, coupled with the financial meltdown of 2008 and the EU debt crisis have strengthened every single aspect of CCP ideology, emphasizing utter contempt for financial markets, belief in national unity through smashing ethnic separatism and an alliance with all "anti-hegemonic" powers.

    • @snowlee-ml7rr
      @snowlee-ml7rr ปีที่แล้ว

      If the Chinese government is as evil as you say, why does China attract the most foreign investment in the world? Are investors all fools? Or are you too smart?😂

  • @Ejsmich
    @Ejsmich ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I live in china, and for the last few days the vpn's stop using which is actually good but there is a thing called "secret" or something on our vpn and we have are able to contact the outside world (note i am not from china)

  • @bobbobson760
    @bobbobson760 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow, thanks PM! Interesting trends.

  • @cetofox
    @cetofox ปีที่แล้ว +75

    Chinese economics are pretty interesting. Have you considered producing a video about that?

    • @nggyunglydngraady
      @nggyunglydngraady ปีที่แล้ว +12

      He has many videos about specific parzs of the economy.A video about the whole economy would be about 6 hours long

    • @globalaiinsights
      @globalaiinsights ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@nggyunglydngraady Are there any specific parts of the economy that you would be interested in seeing?

  • @lashlarue7924
    @lashlarue7924 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a fantastic analysis, very high quality. Liked and subscribed.

  • @cristofori2230
    @cristofori2230 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    One comment I have to make, especially about your more recent content is the theses that you drop with no follow up EXCEPT AN AD FOR BRILLIANT OR NEBULA. Don't get me wrong segways are great for getting to ads, but don't just drop a major and interesting thesis and have no follow up. Use something that has less of an impact. Or perhaps lead it into another video of yours that talks about it.
    Having too much impact on a transition can have the opposite effect. Make the transitions smoother so we hardly notice it, not questioning where the rest of the video is.

  • @bugsygoo
    @bugsygoo ปีที่แล้ว +12

    One of my three vpns still works!

  • @sonye-jin6737
    @sonye-jin6737 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In Vietnam the General Secretary of the VCP and the President of Vietnam are two different persons. Their national assembly also has something resembling real debates.

    • @user-qf7ym5vc7o
      @user-qf7ym5vc7o ปีที่แล้ว

      You are right, but the General Secretary holds all the power while the President of Vietnam is just a puppet doing paper works. And the National Assembly usually debates shitty and nonsense stuff or proposes some rules that are internally agreed upon by the Party.

  • @zacharywong483
    @zacharywong483 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice video Polymatter team!

  • @jiamingzhang147
    @jiamingzhang147 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    0:18 Malenkov didn’t die in office, he just gave up power to Khrushchev

  • @ferboots
    @ferboots ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent work!

  • @MarvinChenFantasy
    @MarvinChenFantasy ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There's discussions in acient China that by which way is better to decide the successor, by positions in the family hierarchy or by ability. There's a saying that a stable and consistent handover is worthy more than a good emperor. Sometimes, certainty is already good enough. What's the most stable form of handover? No handover.

  • @hsheuw
    @hsheuw 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let’s also discuss Singapore’s PAP power structure next!

  • @bigawdays5724
    @bigawdays5724 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you for posting this. People need to know the CCP have different people standing on different opinions

  • @ethanmye-rs
    @ethanmye-rs ปีที่แล้ว +41

    老好人 is quite literally a “good ol boys” type of person

    • @TJfromEarth
      @TJfromEarth ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Lao hao ren makes them seem so harmless and cheery. Quite ironic

    • @gaoda1581
      @gaoda1581 ปีที่แล้ว

      那些人老不好了

  • @danieltengdin
    @danieltengdin ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have a subscription to Nebula and I would use it, but the streaming on Nebula is so inferior to TH-cam

  • @mangudaimonger8915
    @mangudaimonger8915 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    This video isn't so much as a commentary on how Chinese politics works as it is a subliminal slander of the current government and blatant favoritism towards different government systems. I expected to find a video with helpful information and insights about the mechanics of how a one-party system works, or whether China is truly a one-party system at all; how the dynamics of power work within the party, what makes it strong, what makes it weak, et cetera...
    Instead, all I found were trite comments referring to the National Assembly like, "creating a veneer of harmony" 3:12, and "the whole thing is a giant spectacle" 3:18. He proceeds to talk about how there's more clapping than the American State of the Union, and how boring it is-- very relevant information indeed. Then, he talks about how VPN's are shut off, and how people who are already established as being dangerous are stopped from causing trouble, but all with clever wording to spin it in a malicious way. AT 4:20, he reminds us that the Communist Party of China is reminiscent of Lenin's Party, further adding to my annoyance at his silly labeling and name-calling. He then goes on to talk about jargon, and how he doesn't understand it, and how that somehow makes it "vague."
    After an introduction full of spurious language, potshot critiques on less than minor issues, and ad hominems, PolyMatter finally presents us with some useful information about how elections take place, which members serve what role, and other interesting facts. But all of this is cleverly wound in with irrelevant moral propositions on how the Party is deceitful (9:04) and misleading in their use of names (9:20). The escapade advances, calling out China on what he perceives to be their use of discreet names to hide who is truly in power, the abandonment of age limits somehow being unscrupulous, little notes like "[Xi Jinping's] hUnGeR fOr PoWeR" 12:13 in a fashion typical of those who stand firmly against the political philosophy of the Chinese government. He continues his verbal abuse against Xi, condemning his "privilege and sense of entitlement" 12:39. Underneath all of this lies very subtle, uncanny music, something that you might hear in a horror film during a suspenseful scene.
    I actually don't mind at all if somebody wants to criticize the Chinese government. Do it all you like-- but not once in this video does PolyMatter offer a thoughtful comment or a genuine critique of the system of government. The issues that he tries to present as moral problems are petty and arbitrary, instead of attacking real moral issues, and the entire video is riddled with subtle verbal abuses and demeaning comments. The worst part of it all is that this is hidden underneath a pile of charts, graphs, and interesting photographs, further adding to the deceptive manner of the presentation. Seriously, try listening to the audio without listening to the video, you'll see what I mean-- the visuals only serve to distract from the preposterous comments that he lazily lays along the way like bread crumbs for you to follow along with. The video's title makes one think that it will be a presentation on the details of how the Chinese government is run. But no, it's anything but that.
    I am so tired of people who, when attempting to put together a thoughtful critique of China's government, instead just resolve to verbally abusing it. I don't care if you don't like the government, or what they do, or what they say. If the Chinese government has a problem that needs to be fixed, then explain how they're wrong and offer a solution, or if it has a REAL moral issue, then point it out.
    If you're going to reply to my comment, please read the whole thing carefully before you do.

    • @GordonMcWilliams
      @GordonMcWilliams ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Exactly, this video is terrible

    • @mirrored464
      @mirrored464 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a solution democracy 🤯🤯 freedom 🤯🤯

    • @mangudaimonger8915
      @mangudaimonger8915 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@mirrored464 You totally missed the point of my comment

    • @HoSiva
      @HoSiva ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You nailed it so well that i don't even have anything else to add. But i do like to point out that the so-called "vague party jagons" are not so vague to us Chinese and he can't be more wrong in saying that the meeting was "boring " and that no one in China pays attention. In fact, all concerned Chinese follow closely the speeches made during the meeting and related reports as they paint a clear picture of where our nation will be heading and what our goals and missions are for the upcoming 5years. It's only the sheer arrogance and ignorance of the western world that prevent them from truly understanding China and the truth of its governing body.

    • @mangudaimonger8915
      @mangudaimonger8915 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HoSiva Thank you for your informative answer. I'm glad that you can see the Chinese Communist Party in a positive light. It's a good thing that is extremely lacking in the West.

  • @kingace6186
    @kingace6186 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This might be my favorite video on the People's Republic of China that PolyMatter has released on TH-cam.

  • @giantWario
    @giantWario ปีที่แล้ว +8

    0:19 That's just wrong, Georgy Malenkov didn't die in 1953, he died in 1988. He did, in fact, relinquish power to Khrushchev peacefully although his position was always supposed to be temporary,

  • @rodrigomarolv
    @rodrigomarolv 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Short answer: very well
    Long answer: they work quite well!

  • @bubluberstrublers8974
    @bubluberstrublers8974 ปีที่แล้ว

    great production quality

  • @RobertLeclercq
    @RobertLeclercq ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think we are being a little dramatic here. Roosevelt was on his 4th term when he died. 3 terms for Xi ain't dictator. Lets be fair.
    'Merca

  • @jeriejames5617
    @jeriejames5617 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Chinese politics much like an office workplace politics and less about team red vs blue debate soap opera

  • @JollyJ3rk
    @JollyJ3rk 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1:04 "by the age of 68 was expected to retire" Le Xi JinPing:

  • @Brick-Life
    @Brick-Life ปีที่แล้ว

    8:44 Awesome Guangdong number plates!

  • @davidcheung8595
    @davidcheung8595 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    next topic:
    CIA: How Color Revolution Works

  • @randomguy2108
    @randomguy2108 ปีที่แล้ว

    You should do a video on Malaysia's upcoming election. It has got to be the most interesting political story in the world now

  • @jonc6157
    @jonc6157 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great work bro!

  • @Tiger_Woo_dds
    @Tiger_Woo_dds ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Just call him by his English name: winnie the pooh 😶

  • @philj9681
    @philj9681 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    It is interesting that when it comes to China's political system, Westerners be like looking at an alien system. Actually, Westerners should be very familiar with this mechanism. That is how a company works. Are all companies the same? Well, they all function in a similar way from the high level, but their performance and outcomes can be drastically different. Is this system good or bad? Well, at least in highly competitive markets, we haven't seen a well-survived company function in a fundamentally different mode. There are deep reasons. Equalizing and demonizing this class of political systems is at least oversimplified.

    • @justanormalguyhere2408
      @justanormalguyhere2408 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hi Chinese bot 13

    • @philj9681
      @philj9681 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@justanormalguyhere2408 Not gonna argue with trolls with untenable beliefs.

    • @Vitorruy1
      @Vitorruy1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      In a company the CEO doesn't suddenly lose power to the janitor because he is more connected or something.

    • @Jason-wp2nq
      @Jason-wp2nq ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Vitorruy1 um, that is possible if your CEO do not have any shares in the company and is chosen by a board who owns the company and that random janitor is related/more liked by the board.

    • @user-ci5vz8yv6u
      @user-ci5vz8yv6u ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justanormalguyhere2408 HI

  • @khonable
    @khonable ปีที่แล้ว

    “Spectacle “ is a good description of China and its politics.

  • @pierce9019
    @pierce9019 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love learning about the inner functions of the CCP at 1am. Just brings a whole different feeling to it

  • @asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791
    @asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    China Actually is the Love Actually sequel we didn't think we needed.

  • @zsarimaxim692
    @zsarimaxim692 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    While Xi kept his head down, Bo was flamboyant. If the party only prompted those that’s obedient, then Bo would never become a challenger to Xi.

    • @twitter.comelomhycy
      @twitter.comelomhycy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yep

    • @firewoodloki
      @firewoodloki ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That's where luck comes in place. They needed a head down person when Xi was there.

    • @royhuang9715
      @royhuang9715 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bo tried, he got no chance which is why he was arrested and his wife was put on the death roll. Bo was defeated completely.

  • @gouthamkrishnas7517
    @gouthamkrishnas7517 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Unlike other political parties, communist party systems are very disciplined and structured.

  • @ZyahCatDragonCat
    @ZyahCatDragonCat 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I may not necessarily agree with Xi on everything, but I think its an important reflection of how Marxism-Leninism "with chinese characteristics" (lol) should function. At least in theory. Its attempting to create a true meritocracy, and that often includes our worst human aspects, but if they can continue to progress, and follow through, it could be magical in like 20-40 years.
    If were not all dead by climate change or global war. Ya know.

  • @jermasus
    @jermasus ปีที่แล้ว +34

    In the immortal words of Godd Howard: “It just works.”

    • @thecryingsoul
      @thecryingsoul ปีที่แล้ว

      I didn't know Todd achieved godly status lol

    • @LucidFL
      @LucidFL ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thecryingsoul After reselling Skyrim an untold number of times, the gods welcomed Todd into their ranks.

  • @MultiSciGeek
    @MultiSciGeek ปีที่แล้ว +3

    14:20 Wtf is the Y axis measuring? Wtf is "political network"... Like that graph looks straight outta Prager U lmao

  • @Veni_Vidi_Vici101
    @Veni_Vidi_Vici101 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think it's the central committee that elects the politburo and the politburo standing committee, and not the politburo that elects the politburo standing committee. The central committe also elects the general secretary.

  • @Sirgosza2
    @Sirgosza2 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    0:28 - actually, we had a peaceful transition of power between communist party and democrats in People's Republic of Poland.

  • @gsoahm
    @gsoahm ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please read constructing china by mobo gao.
    This is typical of the phenomena mentioned and discussed in the book about how information is produced for particular consumption by an type of audience brought up and primed to be ready to consume the particular knowledge.
    While you can critique any system you should also be aware of the life of ideas that take on particular forms in order to match the state of things.

    • @farcenter
      @farcenter ปีที่แล้ว

      How does that fit into Xi more or less being an accident? That is the party that tailored and produced that information thought he was a a safe bet until he purged them. I feel like you can critique the system and Xi, but also this is a bit of a triage moment and Xi is an existential threat, the party and system may not be.

  • @bjornneuhauser6636
    @bjornneuhauser6636 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yes. Just yes. Never clicked on a video faster.

  • @MegaTunamelt
    @MegaTunamelt ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The thumbnail is almost correct. The red square 🟥 on mao's face should be a circle and just big enough to cover his nose 👃