The pretended neutrality fallacy is one of the greatest cons Secularism has ever foisted on a society. Always remember, there is no such thing as neutral when it comes to worldview issues.
Grow up, fool. Secularism has nothing to do with conning anyone about anything. Not believing in Primitive childish man-made Gods is purely common sense.
@@thenonartist4366 Anything is better than a Christian theocracy? By what standard do you determine that? Who's going to decide what's better, who defines better or good? You either have a God that has revealed Himself and has determined ultimately how things are to be done, He is good and is the standard of goodness, or you are left with a world ran through total arbitrariness and subjectivity. Is majority opinion going to determine better? Or if for example, what's good is what brings the most happiness to the most amount of people, I'd ask, why? That's arbitrary, why is happiness good? People can be happy about what some evil thing that has befallen someone or derive happiness from torturing people. And also, how could you possibly measure it? If you don't have an absolute and non-arbitrary way of determining what is good and what is evil, then your statement means nothing. You might as well be talking about which flavor of something you think is better.
@@dece870717 In order to even begin to engage with this topic you must answer two vital questions: 1. First you have to prove this God exists. Since you are making the positive claim, the burden of proof is on you. If you are unable to prove God's existence then your argument falls apart immediately. 2. Second, even if can prove God exists you have to argue why His moral system would be better than others, and why I should follow it. The God of the Bible expressly permits genocide, slavery, eternal torture, and ethnic cleansing. Why are you under the impression that God is somehow "good?" If you actually read the Bible, He's a monstrous piece of shit with an egomaniacal personality complex. Usually, we would call someone who destroys 99% of humanity in a flood sadistic and psychopathic monster, but you do you. Lmfao.
@@dece870717 Summed it up perfectly. The rationalists said that society would be better as more people stopped believing in God. They were obviously wrong because look at the moral decay of the last few decades. As a Christian I don’t agree with some of Nietzsche points, but he was right when he said that as Christianity decreased it would lead to a societal collapse of values and therefore Nihilism.
i really enjoyed the conversation, especially about citizenship; i am not trying to be a complainer but i didn't see any pointers on how to enable anyone to embrace power. we keep talking about the same things but we need concrete ideas on how to circle the wagons since...let's be frank...the country as we ever knew it is gone-this was proved by the midterms. we know they are hypocrites and pedo's...how do we overcome them or at least protect ourselves and families?
Become a sheriff, police officer, city counsel member, whatever your job start snubbing your enemies in your day to day life. That is the first option. The second option is to repent and begin the spiritual life and hope God has mercy on us. Some combination of both is probably best.
I always feel like Allie's channel should have more subscribers - I'm stunned it's as small of a show as it is. You see all these garbage channels with weak generic content and hosts that have several hundred thousand or millions of subs. Wth Allie has a beautiful studio and production control, great guests, she's a TRULY excellent communicator, she's gorgeous, and the content is so needed. I hear her consumerbase is female heavy, I'm a guy and I love her show. Hers and Mike Winger's.
@@prudentpenny another way of saying the same thing. The idea that conservatives don’t want change is obviously wrong though. Conservatives wanted Roe changed. Conservatives want all sorts of change. Conservative is not about being against change. It’s about the truths in the constitution
@@beefsupreme4671 Conservatives want to conserve the ideals of the Constitution, liberty, Judeo-Christian ideology, and other gifts of history that led to this (formerly) great nation (then Boe Jiden happened)
I'm not totally opposed to this. The problem is, when a theocracy decays, you end up with something like the Dark Ages, where the elites oppressed the entire world... but told them, "God demands we do this," etc. And so, the depraved and degraded government then also blasphemes God on top of oppressing the people. The reality is, there is NO. ANSWER. TO. HUMAN. CORRUPTION. besides Jesus, and He will be the only one, in all of history, to establish a perfect government. We can and should try, in the meantime, but all attempts will eventually fail, until He comes back.
@@aninymouse1651 well, the answer to human corruption is Satan. He is behind every corrupt act or situation or ideology. And the reason he seems to “win” is bc the church that Jesus established on earth, His kingdom, has weakened. Satans smoke has penetrated the church. Why? Bc of the division in the church, lack of prayer and dependency on God. People have become self reliant these days and they don’t seek God. So, yes, Jesus is the only one to cleanse this world from corruption with FIRE.
My sister is a liberal that voted for Trump the first time but she's always supported all LGBT whatever, although she said she doesn't agree with puberty blockers for children. I said all that to say, she doesn't understand or agree when I explain to her that "gay marriage" was the Trojan horse for alllll of this sadistic crap. I don't understand how people are unable to see the direct correlation/causation??? The exact same special interest advocacy groups that were behind gay marriage (like GLAD) are the exact same groups pushing the trans ideology and gender theory.
So true, and of course GLAAD has a decidely out-of-touch name. I think being called a homosexual or Lesbian is, and should be, quite defamation enough.
1:11:00 - "In a moment the dogs came bounding back. At first no one had been able to imagine where these creatures came from, but the problem was soon solved: they were the puppies whom Napoleon had taken away from their mothers and reared privately. Though not yet full-grown, they were huge dogs, and as fierce-looking as wolves." George Orwll - Animal Farm (1945)
Great point by Allie about the real "colonialism" going on. For some truly unimaginative, inflexibly awful people, the word is always attached to white faces.
Savage is a huge Zionist but he's so right on so many things, 15+ years ago he warned over and over and over about Marxism creep and Bolshevikism in DC and no other conservatives really took that angle at all. He was more or less right about everything, let for Middle East wars and how those ended / continued.
These are questions any FREEDOM LOVING Citizen *should* know the answer to. Why? Because it's YOUR COUNTRY TOO! 01) What form of government do we have? 02) Why is it important to know the CORRECT answer? 03) Was the 16th amendment actually ratified, and more importantly why doesn't it matter? 04) What does article 1, section 8, clause 5 of our Constitution say... and how does it pertain to the Federal Reserve 05) What IS the Federal Reserve... and what is it NOT? 06) Why are there TWO signatures on our "money?" 07) Where does the term "Legal Tender" come from, and what does it MEAN? 08) What are the 17 ennumerated powers in the Constitution, and what does the Supreme Court say about the "promote the General Welfare Clause?" 09) What did the Supreme Court say in a 1924 case about where the government could impose an income tax on (C)itizens, and where it COULD NOT impose it? 10) How did the Supreme Court define "Tax Payor" and "Non Tax Payor" in a 1972 case, and more importantly.... Which one are YOU? 11) How did the recent "Obamacare" decision of the Supreme Court completely IGNORE settled Supreme Court decisions in MULTIPLE cases regarding the government inability to regulate certain things, and NOT having the power to levy a "tax" on that item in order to control it, yet decide that the government could NOT regulate whether someone bought health insurance, but could TAX them if they didn't.. and why is that UNCONSTITUTIONAL even If the court said it was... To their everlasting SHAME?! 12) What does the term "Natural Born Citizen" mean... where does it come from... why is it in our Constitution? 13) What is the difference between Citizen (capital C), and citizen (NON-capital c).... and why is that important? 14) What IS the Federal Register, and why is it VITAL we know that, and what it MEANS to us? 15) What did the Supreme Court say about there being THREE definitions to the term "United States," and why does the Income Tax only apply to ONE of them? 16) What did the Supreme Court say about Social Security in 1935, and why have they decided in two separate case since then that YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS... That it is up to the Federal government to give you the money... but only IF they want to... out of the "goodness of their hearts"? 17) Why is Social Security DOOMED no matter what the govenment PROMISES you... (hint: it's basic math!)? 18) How did we get to this EXREME distortion of the "Executive Order" we're operating under today. (Hint: Executive Orders have always been there, but they were unconstitutionally changed at some point. Why... and When)? 19) What was one of the biggest topics of discussions in congress (and one of the most embarrasing) the year the 16th amendment was "ratified"? 20) What are the 3 branches of government? 21) Where do ALL spending bills have to originate? 22) Why was the Electoral College one of the smartest things our Founding Fathers ever came up with? 23) Where does the Federal government have jurisdiction... Where does it NOT? 24) Why is a "National Sales Tax" UNCONSTITUTIONAL? 25) Why does every section of the IRS tax code have a statute number that backs up that section listed on every page of that section.. EXCEPT the income tax section, which has NO statute listed at all? 26) Why doesn't the 14th amendment mean that everyone simply born within this country's border is a citizen? 27) Why was the 2nd Ammendment written, and what is the PRIMARY (most important) section? 28) Why do Senators have to come forward and sign their oath of office during Impeachment proceedings, when the Oath they uttered during their swearing in supposedly covers "everything they do" during their term? 29) Why did the Supreme Court say the Federal government "does not have the power to tax that which it does not have the power to regulate," and how is that being ignored in everything the government does? 30) How did Lincoln actually destroy our Constitution, when he "supposedly saved" it... While setting in motion what has come a Federal Government that operates so far outside the Constitution they've forgotten how to SPELL Constitution? 31) How did FDRs "New Deal" build on Lincolns shredding of our Constitution, and send our countrys drive toward Socialism into hyper drive? 32) Why did our Founding Fathers give the election of Senators to the various State Legislatures, and why was the 17th Amendment so destructive to our country? Ok... That's enough, but if you think that's "overkill," I have LOTS more I could toss out. The sad thing is that out of the hundreds, if not thousands I've talked to over the last 15-20 years, 99.9% can't even answer the FIRST question correctly. And if they can, even less know the difference in the CORRECT answer and the answer the 99.9% who get it wrong think we have. And YES... I am just egotistical enough to think that I **AM** more infomed that a lot of the people who vote. The saddest thing is that I DIDN'T USED TO BE! Today most people either don't CARE, or "think" they know the truth, based on what whoever their favorite politician or main stream media outlet TELLS them to think. Personally *I* think it long PAST time people became PASSIONATE ABOUT THEIR COUNTRY! End of soapbox..... For now...
I know some of those but definitely not all or even a majority. Any recommendations on where to get educated on this? Might make a fun game with our young adult kids for a game night/ learning experience
@@Julia29853 °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° I wish I did. The thing is I didn't write v those questions, then go "searching for the answers." I was researching a single topic, and got pulled "down the rabbit hole," so to speak. I wrote the "questions" as I found the "answers" while. I was doing my research.
@@Julia29853 °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° This is a SIMPLE example of why I don't try to post the answers to my list of questions. These "answers" are the simplified version. I could delve into each answer more deeply, expanding & explaining in more detail. Imagine if I tried to answer all of them... The answers ARE out there. The ironic thing is I didn't search for the answers... I was doing In-depth research into this country, and wrote the list of questions based on what my research revealed. °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° Questions 4, 5, 6, 7 from my "list of questions every American should know the answer"... WITH the answers. °°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°° 04) What does article 1, section 8, clause 5 of our Constitution say... and how does it pertain to the Federal Reserve * "CONGRESS shall have the power to COIN money, and REGULATE THE VALUE THEREOF. 05) What IS the Federal Reserve... and what is it NOT? * A private banking cartel. The words "Federal Reserve" was just used to deceive the people. 06) Why is there TWO signatures on our "money?" * Because it's NOT "money." it's a PROMISSORY NOTE... And you need two signatures on a promissory note. 07) Where does the term "Legal Tender" come from, and what does it MEAN? * It was invented out of thin air by Lincolns Secretary of the Treasury. Later, as Chief Justice of the Suoreme Court, he ruled that the term "Legal Tender" could NOT be used because "it was a made up term, had no value, and the only reason to use it would be to COMMIT FRAUD!"
Republican Conservativism isn't about small government, it's about elite government. This is what the Roman Republic deliverd. An elite aristocracy and senate. Liberalism comes from Greek democracy and It believes in a multi state lead by all the people. It was adopted from Judaism. Jewish culture isn't Israeli culture, it's rooted in the land of Judah. Jewish people were from Hebrew culture similarly Israel and they were originally held as intellectual slaves. When Judah developed in the middle east, Israel was formed as an opposition. They were sent by the pharaoh (or those in control of Egypt, Assyrian and Babylonian force at the time) to conquer and recapture lost property. They eventually conquered Judah and the back and forth began. In the middle of divide, Assyrian and Babylonian forces conquered them. Eventually the people of Judah were brought to Babylon as captives where Cyrus the great sent them to Palestine. From Palestine to Europe through Greek and Roman culture. Fast forward ages and we have Jewish people being held once again as intellectual slaves in European independent states. Literally with seprate laws and oppressions. There our American history begins through Italian, British, French, Portuguese, Spanish and Dutch colonisation. Those were all former Roman Republic States. When western socialism was introduced all those people considered property in Europe and America got freedom and education. Something the aristocracy didn't want. They wanted to keep them in class system without rights to education and land ownership. Today we have communities in America. Townships (Tow-n-ship). Did anything change, or are we dealing with a new version of the same thing? If you've ever seen the movie star wars, you should know exactly what's about to happen and current. th-cam.com/video/f6ylVMwhI9Q/w-d-xo.html
Before my question I would like to say that I very much like and respect Allie. I have purchased 2 copies of her book for my daughters and I love to listen to her. I do not agree with her on everything especially when it comes to Calvinism. (I wish she would interview Leighton Flowers) My question is this. Does anyone else feel like Calvinists especially Postmilenial are starting to act more and more like Dominionists of NAR? I don't see any clear distinction between them two anymore. I mean Jesus said clearly that they hated him and they will hate us and persecut us even more. How is that consistent with winning the world for Chist? If you listen extremists like Durbin or White it is like listening to NAR nuts minus the witchcraft. Is this just my own subjective observation or anyone else is noticing this?
Same. At first, I liked how this guy was describing his political journey from his Rush Limbaugh days (same here, until circa 2007-9 when Obama came on the scene & Glenn Beck made some big moves - those were my first glimmers of thinking outside-the-talk-show-box). He seems the everyman... But around 5 minute mark, he started sounding like he would progress not further into the direction of a Rand Paul Christian individualism (what I call Open Bible Individualism, and Bill Of Rights, Universally applied in moral messaging) It sounds like he's moving into the direction of trying to "go big" in a "go big or go broke" type of political push toward centralization. This mirrors some weird rhetoric I saw on a minor show over at CBN recently too. I'm only at the 6:18 mark, but his tone and the TITLE of this episode does not give me confidence. Embrace Power? (What the hell? In the Rev 20 sense of hell. Hell is outside the true city, that's what hell is.) The only use of broad political power in the huge epic sense - should be the direct & swift defeat, capture, and punishment of large-scale war criminals. Adolf Hitler, Stalin, Mao, ... the Clintons, Bill Gates, Putin. You know, Nuremburg #2 level events. Tyrants who butcher & kill massive numbers of people need to be brought down & people protected from them. MAYBE temporary broad-scale powers for something of an epic nature such as that. OTHERWISE: no. Why? Why? For what? (I'm listening. I just don't like the siren song I'm hearing thus far. And Allie seems into it, more than a little intrigued! Ok ... here we go.) I for one, do not trust the siren song of political power. I don't trust it. If I could combine Ed Snowden, Rand Paul, R.J. Rushdoony, Clarence Thomas, Tim Pool, Joseph Farah, and Ted Cruz into one person, I would. There is a way to embrace power: think about the Bill Of Rights, the Abraham Accords, the Open Bible and it's Evidences, and how to free people to own & afford their own vocations & houses. Follow Rand Paul, Mises, Rothbard, Moses (those portions that apply to today). Power should be seen as security for decentralized, individualistic bible-believing home life. Beyond that, it isn't power. It's injustice. And I'm not that dumb. I won't be joining such a Trumpian push (a man who seemed to like things like, say, eminent domain - the political version of "name it and claim it") I had such hope for the direction that America was taking in macro sense from 1980's - mid-2000's. Stable progress. Reasoning together. Rugged Individualism. Scientific advance. Government almost imperceptible and not in your way. Christian faith continuing to develop into more free, individualist, reasoning, responsible, credible forms - complete with Young Earth Creationism evidences, and Intelligent Design evidences & critiques, and the dream & ability of being able to discuss these. The dream of some form of non-trinitarian belief in the word-for-word Bible to be present and widely accepted and a part of normal life. A down-to-earth & mature everyday interacting with each other in 'the body of Christ' as neighbors, and seeing/experiencing God's Voice and Miracles every day. Competent vocational businesses & networks. Righteousness abounding. The science of pre-born development known to everyone and simply being a factual part of how we all see the world (human, living, individual consciousness = person, etc.) MUCH OF THIS HAS BEEN OUR PROGRESS. But Darwinian Malthusians (under Marx's banner of Socialism and "Partnering" for Environmentalist Collective top-down schemes) are using the momentum of Keynesian Fiat Inflation to push all of culture into an abyss of hell. "Together". Well. The thing is this: when has human nature changed in the last 6026 years? Do you REALLY believe it will change in the near future? OR ARE BOTH the individualist trend going to continue on one side, along with the fiat collapse into darwinian posthumanist games on the other? The wheat and tares mature together, until they are not together. And Netanyahu, the Abraham Accords & "One For Israel" is our coalition now, such as there is one.
We need to wise up about a few hard truths; We live in a captured corporate oligarchy & the free market is long dead & not coming back. The government is largest built bureaucractic juggernaught in human history & "conservatives attempt at small government" has failed, utterly. Israel is a pariah state & our politicans have been bought off by zio money.
AH, right. Right on. Ok. (I'm impatient.) I get it, at 9:49. I think he's in agreement with our pal at New Discourses. Amiright? James Lindsay is probably THE leader in defining some elements of Marxism (I would argue his own atheism as well) as a metaphysical set of propositions that even harbor their own eschatology and meaning - that requires definition AS A RELIGION not as science or neutral thought. Marxism isn't neutral. (Neither is anti-theism or atheism.) So, a simple redefinition is actually the REVERSE of expanding central gov't "power." It would be to campaign on free speech - freer than this country has been (likely ever, in actual practice). To re-label marxism (and even atheism?) as religion: would mean a decentralization and shrinking of that centralized statist power that has been robbed from the people, grown into our public schools & other tax-funded institutions, and is now threatening the biological family of humanity itself!
Auron does some excellent analysis, but you will never see him discussing Zionism or Jewish Power in media, Hollywood, advertising, and professional sports! This is why he's now working for The Blaze!
If we are to climb up the ladder of influence, subverting these mainstream outlets even in a small degree, is a necessity. Whether you like it or not, it means a slow and gradual process. Not one where it's all laid bare for all to immediately see. You should already now better by now that the average person, normies, will not take up the views they've yet to fully understand. You should already be aware of what happens when you present something like jq bare front and ridiculously believe normies to just rationally process what they're seeing, people aren't rational, it takes time to break through the global regime beliefs the majority have been taught to take to heart.
I didn't break through it just because someone showed me a video or pdf to download with information, it took time to actually build trust in the people who were trying to get through to me, and when I finally trusted them enough, when all of the initial global regime nonsense was mostly ridden of, that's when I could start listening to things related to the J. Auron is a stepping stone in the right direction for normies. I've grown weary of people who demand the jq to just be immediately mentioned or discussed, as though it'll all immediately make sense to normies when they've yet to fully escape the mainstream.
@@jacobj3933 I know! I know! Pamper and coddle the ignorant! If you have time for it Jacob, go for it! I have nothing but Nietzschean contempt! I think Auron does some great stuff, but I'm here to tell you that,- at this point in his life at least- he's not going to address Jewish power, even if it was the final hurdle that was left for him. He's one of these guys that thinks that it's usually some kind of non-sequitur to introduce it into a discussion, a superfluous standpoint in how we've arrived to where we are currently, or, that it doesn't exist to the extent that it truly does! Hell! He doesn't even touch Zionism, even periodically! And that's Jewish Power Light! When it comes right down to it, he's probably like most, in that, he doesn't want to be called an antiseeeeemite! Sticks and stones baby! Plus, now that he's employed by The Blaze, he can never go there, at all, without losing his job now! And, he's probably liking the new-found security and money quite well at this point! And, not everyone awakens with the same "gradualism" that you're addressing- I know I didn't! Socrates said that, those prisoners who leave the shadows of the Cave, everything will become IMMEDIATELY CLEAR TO THEM! For those who are not ready, the Light is a source of fiery discomfort; they will seek the comforts and confines of the Cave once again!
@@edkiely2712 Alright, I'm going to be honest with you, you sound like a complete f°° going off on a personal, and seemingly emotional rant like this. There's been plenty of people who are trusted in the dr/ethn/so on, whatever you want to call it, who despite not entirely talking about the J, still are fully aware of it, but does literally every single person HAVE TO touch it at some point? There's enough people who've talked about it already, and who still are talking about it. My god get a grip man because not everyone's role is going to be talking about the j's, nor does it have to be.
@@jacobj3933 Well! Than nothing will get solved partner! Understanding our predicament requires us understanding and speaking about the Jews and their history! What, you think people like Auron are slowly going to work a Gramscian-180, and recapture all the institutions that are under their complete capture and control now? Good luck with that homie! Also, there's other people that have zero issue with sticking their neck out! It's because they have courage! Guys like Devon Stack, E. Michael Jones, Henrik & Lana, and numerous others! Guys like you and Auron are ok with half-measures and limited effort because you don't possess the strength of an Achilles to meet the challenges head-on and call a spade a spade! You'll wait until the "normies" are ripe for it, huh? Enjoy the wait JJ! Allow the Black Forest hermit himself to speak from the past! "In the age of the world night, the abyss of the world must be experienced and endured. But for this it is necessary that there be those who reach into the abyss. The turning of the age does not take place by some new god, or the old one renewed. Where would he turn on his return if men had not first prepared an abode for him? How could there ever be for the god an abode fit for a god, if a divine radiance did not first begin to shine in everything that is? The gods who "were once there," "return" only at the "right time"- that is, when there had been a turn among men in the right place in the right way"- Heidegger
@@righteousgod8376 Jews are at the head of everything lol all the best conservatives are Jews too. But notice how the left has a bunch of jewish people but they hate israel? And also.. no offence to women.. but its also a bunch of jewish women haha well shoot women in general.
Glad to see Auron. Hopefully he'll red-pill the Blaze.
Restricting immigration is simply rational.
I just started binging this guys work. Can’t wait for this.
The pretended neutrality fallacy is one of the greatest cons Secularism has ever foisted on a society. Always remember, there is no such thing as neutral when it comes to worldview issues.
Grow up, fool. Secularism has nothing to do with conning anyone about anything. Not believing in Primitive childish man-made Gods is purely common sense.
Anything is better than a Christian theocracy however
@@thenonartist4366 Anything is better than a Christian theocracy? By what standard do you determine that? Who's going to decide what's better, who defines better or good?
You either have a God that has revealed Himself and has determined ultimately how things are to be done, He is good and is the standard of goodness, or you are left with a world ran through total arbitrariness and subjectivity. Is majority opinion going to determine better? Or if for example, what's good is what brings the most happiness to the most amount of people, I'd ask, why? That's arbitrary, why is happiness good? People can be happy about what some evil thing that has befallen someone or derive happiness from torturing people. And also, how could you possibly measure it?
If you don't have an absolute and non-arbitrary way of determining what is good and what is evil, then your statement means nothing. You might as well be talking about which flavor of something you think is better.
@@dece870717 In order to even begin to engage with this topic you must answer two vital questions:
1. First you have to prove this God exists. Since you are making the positive claim, the burden of proof is on you. If you are unable to prove God's existence then your argument falls apart immediately.
2. Second, even if can prove God exists you have to argue why His moral system would be better than others, and why I should follow it. The God of the Bible expressly permits genocide, slavery, eternal torture, and ethnic cleansing. Why are you under the impression that God is somehow "good?"
If you actually read the Bible, He's a monstrous piece of shit with an egomaniacal personality complex. Usually, we would call someone who destroys 99% of humanity in a flood sadistic and psychopathic monster, but you do you. Lmfao.
@@dece870717 Summed it up perfectly. The rationalists said that society would be better as more people stopped believing in God. They were obviously wrong because look at the moral decay of the last few decades. As a Christian I don’t agree with some of Nietzsche points, but he was right when he said that as Christianity decreased it would lead to a societal collapse of values and therefore Nihilism.
I’m not a Republican. Not a conservative. I’m a Christian.
Humongous difference! Truly.
Oh, that means he/she is delusional. 😂
Very very interesting show and guest! There is so much work to be done.. we need strong leaders. We need to stop apologizing and placating!
Yep, no more retreating, not one step back.
You're shrinking, atheism is taking over!! Your children leave the church because christianity is fascist!!!
Thank you for your work, Ms. Stuckey and Mr. MacIntyre.
i really enjoyed the conversation, especially about citizenship; i am not trying to be a complainer but i didn't see any pointers on how to enable anyone to embrace power. we keep talking about the same things but we need concrete ideas on how to circle the wagons since...let's be frank...the country as we ever knew it is gone-this was proved by the midterms. we know they are hypocrites and pedo's...how do we overcome them or at least protect ourselves and families?
Become a sheriff, police officer, city counsel member, whatever your job start snubbing your enemies in your day to day life.
That is the first option.
The second option is to repent and begin the spiritual life and hope God has mercy on us.
Some combination of both is probably best.
I always feel like Allie's channel should have more subscribers - I'm stunned it's as small of a show as it is. You see all these garbage channels with weak generic content and hosts that have several hundred thousand or millions of subs. Wth
Allie has a beautiful studio and production control, great guests, she's a TRULY excellent communicator, she's gorgeous, and the content is so needed. I hear her consumerbase is female heavy, I'm a guy and I love her show. Hers and Mike Winger's.
Agreed! She and Mike Winger are my faves! 💯
I usually listen on podcast… maybe a bigger presence there?
Conservative does not just conserving things. Being a conservative means conserving the constitution
I thought it was conserving truth
@@prudentpenny another way of saying the same thing. The idea that conservatives don’t want change is obviously wrong though. Conservatives wanted Roe changed. Conservatives want all sorts of change. Conservative is not about being against change. It’s about the truths in the constitution
@@beefsupreme4671 Conservatives want to conserve the ideals of the Constitution, liberty, Judeo-Christian ideology, and other gifts of history that led to this (formerly) great nation (then Boe Jiden happened)
That's not happening either.
@@annamineer2521 what is not happening???
More of this talk!!! And guests that believe this stuff!
I’ve been waiting for your input on this!!!! Thank you 😎
Episode is fire
we should just go all out and create a theocracy.
Establish* the * God-first republic * of our Framers
I'm not totally opposed to this. The problem is, when a theocracy decays, you end up with something like the Dark Ages, where the elites oppressed the entire world... but told them, "God demands we do this," etc. And so, the depraved and degraded government then also blasphemes God on top of oppressing the people.
The reality is, there is NO. ANSWER. TO. HUMAN. CORRUPTION. besides Jesus, and He will be the only one, in all of history, to establish a perfect government. We can and should try, in the meantime, but all attempts will eventually fail, until He comes back.
@@JohnGramer06 gnostic founding fathers .
The Bolshevik DC politician fears the republic theocracy.
@@aninymouse1651 well, the answer to human corruption is Satan. He is behind every corrupt act or situation or ideology. And the reason he seems to “win” is bc the church that Jesus established on earth, His kingdom, has weakened. Satans smoke has penetrated the church. Why? Bc of the division in the church, lack of prayer and dependency on God. People have become self reliant these days and they don’t seek God. So, yes, Jesus is the only one to cleanse this world from corruption with FIRE.
My sister is a liberal that voted for Trump the first time but she's always supported all LGBT whatever, although she said she doesn't agree with puberty blockers for children. I said all that to say, she doesn't understand or agree when I explain to her that "gay marriage" was the Trojan horse for alllll of this sadistic crap. I don't understand how people are unable to see the direct correlation/causation??? The exact same special interest advocacy groups that were behind gay marriage (like GLAD) are the exact same groups pushing the trans ideology and gender theory.
Sympathetic,Normalize then demonize LGBTQAI agenda since early 1970s
Stay mad, boomer knuckle dragger lmfao.
The world is moving on without you and you're scared and alone, it's ok.
@@thenonartist4366 Boomer
Man that's a good one!
Did you just think of that all by yourself???
So true, and of course GLAAD has a decidely out-of-touch name. I think being called a homosexual or Lesbian is, and should be, quite defamation enough.
Such a good conversation
1:11:00 - "In a moment the dogs came bounding back. At first no one had been able to imagine where these creatures came from, but the problem was soon solved: they were the puppies whom Napoleon had taken away from their mothers and reared privately. Though not yet full-grown, they were huge dogs, and as fierce-looking as wolves."
George Orwll - Animal Farm (1945)
Allie, you remind of girls I've always admired growing up.
I admire Christian women.
Awww for a second, in the thumbnail, I thought the guest was going to be David Wood. You really should have him on.
😂 I did too! Has she ever interviewed him?
I thought the same thing! LOL!
Even better she should have on Keith Woods
Allie-brings up the Fall of Rome
Auron-need to know more intensifies.
Great interview that was very interesting.
Great point by Allie about the real "colonialism" going on. For some truly unimaginative, inflexibly awful people, the word is always attached to white faces.
Progressivism is definitely a religion
Phil Collins!
Much safer and much more pleasant, and much more thoughtfully rightist, than Elijah Schaffer.
It's just good vs evil. Nothing has changed
Let's not be abstract about our world, about humanity. If we have the biblical view of humanity then we will not be 'abstract' about people
Language culture and borders? Heard this first decades ago. Dr Michael savage
Savage is a huge Zionist but he's so right on so many things, 15+ years ago he warned over and over and over about Marxism creep and Bolshevikism in DC and no other conservatives really took that angle at all. He was more or less right about everything, let for Middle East wars and how those ended / continued.
These are questions any FREEDOM LOVING Citizen *should* know the answer to. Why? Because it's YOUR COUNTRY TOO!
01) What form of government do we have?
02) Why is it important to know the CORRECT answer?
03) Was the 16th amendment actually ratified, and more importantly why doesn't it matter?
04) What does article 1, section 8, clause 5 of our Constitution say... and how does it pertain to the Federal Reserve
05) What IS the Federal Reserve... and what is it NOT?
06) Why are there TWO signatures on our "money?"
07) Where does the term "Legal Tender" come from, and what does it MEAN?
08) What are the 17 ennumerated powers in the Constitution, and what does the Supreme Court say about the "promote the General Welfare Clause?"
09) What did the Supreme Court say in a 1924 case about where the government could impose an income tax on (C)itizens, and where it COULD NOT impose it?
10) How did the Supreme Court define "Tax Payor" and "Non Tax Payor" in a 1972 case, and more importantly.... Which one are YOU?
11) How did the recent "Obamacare" decision of the Supreme Court completely IGNORE settled Supreme Court decisions in MULTIPLE cases regarding the government inability to regulate certain things, and NOT having the power to levy a "tax" on that item in order to control it, yet decide that the government could NOT regulate whether someone bought health insurance, but could TAX them if they didn't.. and why is that UNCONSTITUTIONAL even If the court said it was... To their everlasting SHAME?!
12) What does the term "Natural Born Citizen" mean... where does it come from... why is it in our Constitution?
13) What is the difference between Citizen (capital C), and citizen (NON-capital c).... and why is that important?
14) What IS the Federal Register, and why is it VITAL we know that, and what it MEANS to us?
15) What did the Supreme Court say about there being THREE definitions to the term "United States," and why does the Income Tax only apply to ONE of them?
16) What did the Supreme Court say about Social Security in 1935, and why have they decided in two separate case since then that YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS... That it is up to the Federal government to give you the money... but only IF they want to... out of the "goodness of their hearts"?
17) Why is Social Security DOOMED no matter what the govenment PROMISES you... (hint: it's basic math!)?
18) How did we get to this EXREME distortion of the "Executive Order" we're operating under today. (Hint: Executive Orders have always been there, but they were unconstitutionally changed at some point. Why... and When)?
19) What was one of the biggest topics of discussions in congress (and one of the most embarrasing) the year the 16th amendment was "ratified"?
20) What are the 3 branches of government?
21) Where do ALL spending bills have to originate?
22) Why was the Electoral College one of the smartest things our Founding Fathers ever came up with?
23) Where does the Federal government have jurisdiction... Where does it NOT?
24) Why is a "National Sales Tax" UNCONSTITUTIONAL?
25) Why does every section of the IRS tax code have a statute number that backs up that section listed on every page of that section.. EXCEPT the income tax section, which has NO statute listed at all?
26) Why doesn't the 14th amendment mean that everyone simply born within this country's border is a citizen?
27) Why was the 2nd Ammendment written, and what is the PRIMARY (most important) section?
28) Why do Senators have to come forward and sign their oath of office during Impeachment proceedings, when the Oath they uttered during their swearing in supposedly covers "everything they do" during their term?
29) Why did the Supreme Court say the Federal government "does not have the power to tax that which it does not have the power to regulate," and how is that being ignored in everything the government does?
30) How did Lincoln actually destroy our Constitution, when he "supposedly saved" it... While setting in motion what has come a Federal Government that operates so far outside the Constitution they've forgotten how to SPELL Constitution?
31) How did FDRs "New Deal" build on Lincolns shredding of our Constitution, and send our countrys drive toward Socialism into hyper drive?
32) Why did our Founding Fathers give the election of Senators to the various State Legislatures, and why was the 17th Amendment so destructive to our country?
Ok... That's enough, but if you think that's "overkill," I have LOTS more I could toss out. The sad thing is that out of the hundreds, if not thousands I've talked to over the last 15-20 years, 99.9% can't even answer the FIRST question correctly. And if they can, even less know the difference in the CORRECT answer and the answer the 99.9% who get it wrong think we have.
And YES... I am just egotistical enough to think that I **AM** more infomed that a lot of the people who vote. The saddest thing is that I DIDN'T USED TO BE!
Today most people either don't CARE, or "think" they know the truth, based on what whoever their favorite politician or main stream media outlet TELLS them to think.
Personally *I* think it long PAST time people became PASSIONATE ABOUT THEIR COUNTRY!
End of soapbox..... For now...
I know some of those but definitely not all or even a majority. Any recommendations on where to get educated on this? Might make a fun game with our young adult kids for a game night/ learning experience
@@Julia29853
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
I wish I did.
The thing is I didn't write v those questions, then go "searching for the answers."
I was researching a single topic, and got pulled "down the rabbit hole," so to speak.
I wrote the "questions" as I found the "answers" while. I was doing my research.
@@Julia29853
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
This is a SIMPLE example of why I don't try to post the answers to my list of questions.
These "answers" are the simplified version. I could delve into each answer more deeply, expanding & explaining in more detail.
Imagine if I tried to answer all of them...
The answers ARE out there. The ironic thing is I didn't search for the answers... I was doing In-depth research into this country, and wrote the list of questions based on what my research revealed.
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
Questions 4, 5, 6, 7 from my "list of questions every American should know the answer"... WITH the answers.
°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
04) What does article 1, section 8, clause 5 of our Constitution say... and how does it pertain to the Federal Reserve
* "CONGRESS shall have the power to COIN money, and REGULATE THE VALUE THEREOF.
05) What IS the Federal Reserve... and what is it NOT?
* A private banking cartel. The words "Federal Reserve" was just used to deceive the people.
06) Why is there TWO signatures on our "money?"
* Because it's NOT "money." it's a PROMISSORY NOTE... And you need two signatures on a promissory note.
07) Where does the term "Legal Tender" come from, and what does it MEAN?
* It was invented out of thin air by Lincolns Secretary of the Treasury. Later, as Chief Justice of the Suoreme Court, he ruled that the term "Legal Tender" could NOT be used because "it was a made up term, had no value, and the only reason to use it would be to COMMIT FRAUD!"
FDR's policies saved the US from total economic collapse you knuckle dragger
This is God's world. Be gracious with the part of the world where he put us.
Please have Bryson gray on
Well we need to return to Christ
Republican Conservativism isn't about small government, it's about elite government. This is what the Roman Republic deliverd. An elite aristocracy and senate.
Liberalism comes from Greek democracy and It believes in a multi state lead by all the people. It was adopted from Judaism.
Jewish culture isn't Israeli culture, it's rooted in the land of Judah. Jewish people were from Hebrew culture similarly Israel and they were originally held as intellectual slaves. When Judah developed in the middle east, Israel was formed as an opposition. They were sent by the pharaoh (or those in control of Egypt, Assyrian and Babylonian force at the time) to conquer and recapture lost property.
They eventually conquered Judah and the back and forth began. In the middle of divide, Assyrian and Babylonian forces conquered them.
Eventually the people of Judah were brought to Babylon as captives where Cyrus the great sent them to Palestine. From Palestine to Europe through Greek and Roman culture.
Fast forward ages and we have Jewish people being held once again as intellectual slaves in European independent states. Literally with seprate laws and oppressions.
There our American history begins through Italian, British, French, Portuguese, Spanish and Dutch colonisation. Those were all former Roman Republic States.
When western socialism was introduced all those people considered property in Europe and America got freedom and education. Something the aristocracy didn't want. They wanted to keep them in class system without rights to education and land ownership.
Today we have communities in America. Townships (Tow-n-ship).
Did anything change, or are we dealing with a new version of the same thing?
If you've ever seen the movie star wars, you should know exactly what's about to happen and current.
th-cam.com/video/f6ylVMwhI9Q/w-d-xo.html
Before my question I would like to say that I very much like and respect Allie. I have purchased 2 copies of her book for my daughters and I love to listen to her. I do not agree with her on everything especially when it comes to Calvinism. (I wish she would interview Leighton Flowers)
My question is this. Does anyone else feel like Calvinists especially Postmilenial are starting to act more and more like Dominionists of NAR? I don't see any clear distinction between them two anymore. I mean Jesus said clearly that they hated him and they will hate us and persecut us even more. How is that consistent with winning the world for Chist? If you listen extremists like Durbin or White it is like listening to NAR nuts minus the witchcraft. Is this just my own subjective observation or anyone else is noticing this?
i missed this one >(
Same. At first, I liked how this guy was describing his political journey from his Rush Limbaugh days (same here, until circa 2007-9 when Obama came on the scene & Glenn Beck made some big moves - those were my first glimmers of thinking outside-the-talk-show-box). He seems the everyman...
But around 5 minute mark, he started sounding like he would progress not further into the direction of a Rand Paul Christian individualism (what I call Open Bible Individualism, and Bill Of Rights, Universally applied in moral messaging)
It sounds like he's moving into the direction of trying to "go big" in a "go big or go broke" type of political push toward centralization.
This mirrors some weird rhetoric I saw on a minor show over at CBN recently too.
I'm only at the 6:18 mark, but his tone and the TITLE of this episode does not give me confidence. Embrace Power? (What the hell? In the Rev 20 sense of hell. Hell is outside the true city, that's what hell is.)
The only use of broad political power in the huge epic sense - should be the direct & swift defeat, capture, and punishment of large-scale war criminals. Adolf Hitler, Stalin, Mao, ... the Clintons, Bill Gates, Putin. You know, Nuremburg #2 level events. Tyrants who butcher & kill massive numbers of people need to be brought down & people protected from them. MAYBE temporary broad-scale powers for something of an epic nature such as that. OTHERWISE: no. Why? Why? For what? (I'm listening. I just don't like the siren song I'm hearing thus far. And Allie seems into it, more than a little intrigued! Ok ... here we go.)
I for one, do not trust the siren song of political power. I don't trust it. If I could combine Ed Snowden, Rand Paul, R.J. Rushdoony, Clarence Thomas, Tim Pool, Joseph Farah, and Ted Cruz into one person, I would.
There is a way to embrace power: think about the Bill Of Rights, the Abraham Accords, the Open Bible and it's Evidences, and how to free people to own & afford their own vocations & houses. Follow Rand Paul, Mises, Rothbard, Moses (those portions that apply to today).
Power should be seen as security for decentralized, individualistic bible-believing home life.
Beyond that, it isn't power. It's injustice.
And I'm not that dumb. I won't be joining such a Trumpian push (a man who seemed to like things like, say, eminent domain - the political version of "name it and claim it")
I had such hope for the direction that America was taking in macro sense from 1980's - mid-2000's. Stable progress. Reasoning together. Rugged Individualism. Scientific advance. Government almost imperceptible and not in your way. Christian faith continuing to develop into more free, individualist, reasoning, responsible, credible forms - complete with Young Earth Creationism evidences, and Intelligent Design evidences & critiques, and the dream & ability of being able to discuss these. The dream of some form of non-trinitarian belief in the word-for-word Bible to be present and widely accepted and a part of normal life. A down-to-earth & mature everyday interacting with each other in 'the body of Christ' as neighbors, and seeing/experiencing God's Voice and Miracles every day. Competent vocational businesses & networks. Righteousness abounding. The science of pre-born development known to everyone and simply being a factual part of how we all see the world (human, living, individual consciousness = person, etc.) MUCH OF THIS HAS BEEN OUR PROGRESS. But Darwinian Malthusians (under Marx's banner of Socialism and "Partnering" for Environmentalist Collective top-down schemes) are using the momentum of Keynesian Fiat Inflation to push all of culture into an abyss of hell. "Together". Well. The thing is this: when has human nature changed in the last 6026 years? Do you REALLY believe it will change in the near future? OR ARE BOTH the individualist trend going to continue on one side, along with the fiat collapse into darwinian posthumanist games on the other? The wheat and tares mature together, until they are not together. And Netanyahu, the Abraham Accords & "One For Israel" is our coalition now, such as there is one.
We need to wise up about a few hard truths; We live in a captured corporate oligarchy & the free market is long dead & not coming back. The government is largest built bureaucractic juggernaught in human history & "conservatives attempt at small government" has failed, utterly. Israel is a pariah state & our politicans have been bought off by zio money.
Lmao
This is the most boomer thing i've ever read
AH, right. Right on. Ok. (I'm impatient.)
I get it, at 9:49. I think he's in agreement with our pal at New Discourses. Amiright?
James Lindsay is probably THE leader in defining some elements of Marxism (I would argue his own atheism as well) as a metaphysical set of propositions that even harbor their own eschatology and meaning - that requires definition AS A RELIGION not as science or neutral thought. Marxism isn't neutral. (Neither is anti-theism or atheism.)
So, a simple redefinition is actually the REVERSE of expanding central gov't "power." It would be to campaign on free speech - freer than this country has been (likely ever, in actual practice).
To re-label marxism (and even atheism?) as religion: would mean a decentralization and shrinking of that centralized statist power that has been robbed from the people, grown into our public schools & other tax-funded institutions, and is now threatening the biological family of humanity itself!
Uh Oh! Allie must have made the trans-lords angry with her live stream. Poof! Did youtube kill the stream?
Auron does some excellent analysis, but you will never see him discussing Zionism or Jewish Power in media, Hollywood, advertising, and professional sports! This is why he's now working for The Blaze!
If we are to climb up the ladder of influence, subverting these mainstream outlets even in a small degree, is a necessity. Whether you like it or not, it means a slow and gradual process. Not one where it's all laid bare for all to immediately see. You should already now better by now that the average person, normies, will not take up the views they've yet to fully understand. You should already be aware of what happens when you present something like jq bare front and ridiculously believe normies to just rationally process what they're seeing, people aren't rational, it takes time to break through the global regime beliefs the majority have been taught to take to heart.
I didn't break through it just because someone showed me a video or pdf to download with information, it took time to actually build trust in the people who were trying to get through to me, and when I finally trusted them enough, when all of the initial global regime nonsense was mostly ridden of, that's when I could start listening to things related to the J. Auron is a stepping stone in the right direction for normies. I've grown weary of people who demand the jq to just be immediately mentioned or discussed, as though it'll all immediately make sense to normies when they've yet to fully escape the mainstream.
@@jacobj3933 I know! I know! Pamper and coddle the ignorant! If you have time for it Jacob, go for it! I have nothing but Nietzschean contempt!
I think Auron does some great stuff, but I'm here to tell you that,- at this point in his life at least- he's not going to address Jewish power, even if it was the final hurdle that was left for him. He's one of these guys that thinks that it's usually some kind of non-sequitur to introduce it into a discussion, a superfluous standpoint in how we've arrived to where we are currently, or, that it doesn't exist to the extent that it truly does! Hell! He doesn't even touch Zionism, even periodically! And that's Jewish Power Light! When it comes right down to it, he's probably like most, in that, he doesn't want to be called an antiseeeeemite! Sticks and stones baby! Plus, now that he's employed by The Blaze, he can never go there, at all, without losing his job now! And, he's probably liking the new-found security and money quite well at this point!
And, not everyone awakens with the same "gradualism" that you're addressing- I know I didn't! Socrates said that, those prisoners who leave the shadows of the Cave, everything will become IMMEDIATELY CLEAR TO THEM! For those who are not ready, the Light is a source of fiery discomfort; they will seek the comforts and confines of the Cave once again!
@@edkiely2712 Alright, I'm going to be honest with you, you sound like a complete f°° going off on a personal, and seemingly emotional rant like this. There's been plenty of people who are trusted in the dr/ethn/so on, whatever you want to call it, who despite not entirely talking about the J, still are fully aware of it, but does literally every single person HAVE TO touch it at some point? There's enough people who've talked about it already, and who still are talking about it. My god get a grip man because not everyone's role is going to be talking about the j's, nor does it have to be.
@@jacobj3933 Well! Than nothing will get solved partner! Understanding our predicament requires us understanding and speaking about the Jews and their history! What, you think people like Auron are slowly going to work a Gramscian-180, and recapture all the institutions that are under their complete capture and control now? Good luck with that homie! Also, there's other people that have zero issue with sticking their neck out! It's because they have courage! Guys like Devon Stack, E. Michael Jones, Henrik & Lana, and numerous others! Guys like you and Auron are ok with half-measures and limited effort because you don't possess the strength of an Achilles to meet the challenges head-on and call a spade a spade! You'll wait until the "normies" are ripe for it, huh? Enjoy the wait JJ! Allow the Black Forest hermit himself to speak from the past!
"In the age of the world night, the abyss of the world must be experienced and endured. But for this it is necessary that there be those who reach into the abyss. The turning of the age does not take place by some new god, or the old one renewed. Where would he turn on his return if men had not first prepared an abode for him? How could there ever be for the god an abode fit for a god, if a divine radiance did not first begin to shine in everything that is? The gods who "were once there," "return" only at the "right time"- that is, when there had been a turn among men in the right place in the right way"- Heidegger
Haha yeah progressivism is rhetorically A religious, but functionally hyper religious. Seems to me closer to Islam than Judaism for sure.
If you examine, even worldwide, Jews are at the forefront of every left-wing, progressive and globalist cause.
@@righteousgod8376 Jews are at the head of everything lol all the best conservatives are Jews too. But notice how the left has a bunch of jewish people but they hate israel? And also.. no offence to women.. but its also a bunch of jewish women haha well shoot women in general.
Is it Auran or Aaron
Auron. Like the final fantasy 10 character. (Or-ahn)