✅ Mental Math For Pilots | Easy Math Hacks Every Pilot Must Know

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
  • In this video I will share with you hacks and tricks for simple mental math we pilots use in flight.
    Mathematics for pilots.
    ==============================
    Make multiple passive income sources (USD19K per week) here
    Join this step by step course to earn your USD 19,357 per week: bit.ly/3iMIKkc
    ==============================
    How to calculate crosswind component mentally and easily
    How to calculate top of descent mentally and easily
    How to calculate rate of descent easily and quickly
    in-flight math for pilots
    DME Arc distance calculation mentally and easily
    All math required by pilots
    How much math do pilot use
    Rule of thumbs for pilots and shortcuts most tricks and hacks

ความคิดเห็น • 64

  • @toddcianciulli921
    @toddcianciulli921 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The crosswind math is genius as is the crab angle. Thank you very much for that.

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  ปีที่แล้ว

      You're welcome I am glad you've found it helpful

  • @FA18Training
    @FA18Training 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    At time 4min55, for me,
    TOD = ((Current Altitude -Target Altitude)/100)/desired angle of descent
    = ((Current Altitude -Target Altitude)/100)/3.
    In example time 5m42, my calcul is:
    TOD= ((5500-1500)/100)/3
    = (4000/100)/3
    = 40/3
    = 13Na
    If we choice an angle of descent 5°
    TOD= ((5500-1500)/100)/5
    = (4000/100)/5
    = 40/5
    = 8Na

  • @fitrafi7645
    @fitrafi7645 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Please do a similar version of admission test for emirates cadeT pilot training. Syllabus to cover, what maths and physics topic should we practice, what type of physics and maths can we expect during the training etc.

    • @yuvrajsharma1149
      @yuvrajsharma1149 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey , do u know what to prepare for emirates pilot cadet assessment, as I am abt to go for it , pls

    • @cherrysoulmate6690
      @cherrysoulmate6690 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yuvrajsharma1149 have you taken the assessment yet?

    • @IzlaNiya_
      @IzlaNiya_ 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@yuvrajsharma1149did you join?

  • @koller8930
    @koller8930 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can do fourier and laplace tranform with pen and paper
    But I can't do 84*24 in my head in under 30sec .... :/

  • @nikolamalakov8721
    @nikolamalakov8721 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Captain I have a question regarding the XWC. What if I encounter the situation of a tail wind. And it is above 90 degrees diference. Example:
    HDG 290
    Wind from 170/20
    290-170= 120 degrees difference
    180-120= 60 degrees
    With the graph you provided 60 deg is WIND -1 so:
    XWC = 20-1 = 19
    WCA = 8 degrees to the left
    HDG CORRECTED 288 degrees
    Is this simplification correct?

  • @Cosme422
    @Cosme422 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My suggestion is to please use a microphone so that the audio can have good quality. It’s a lot of noise.

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you for your suggestion

  • @1Mr.Legend1
    @1Mr.Legend1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    5:33 Your calculation does not match exactly. This is correct; 5500-1500=4000ft GS120KTS 120kts/60h=2nm path per munite 4000ft/600fpm=6,66 minute (descends in 6.66 minutes with 600fpm) 6,66*2= 13,32nm. (it make progress 13.32 nm in 6,66 minutes at 120 kts.)

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  ปีที่แล้ว

      You are using two different methods at the same time. you wont get the correct answer that way. I see the point you're trying to make here but that method of your corresponds to high altitude/high performance aircraft where during the descent the GS changes. if you are looking for Propeller/Low Altitude operations stick to the method in the video it's pretty accurate to manage your VNAV profile/TOD.
      thanks for your comment

    • @1Mr.Legend1
      @1Mr.Legend1 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, I just calculated it on 120 kts. The process changes if we take wind into calculate. You shared a method without taking the wind into calculate, but it was not exactly correct.@@ATPLStudent

  • @alejordann2fly411
    @alejordann2fly411 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Gran Tip de video , me ayudo bastante en ejercicios de GNAV

  • @MashaoSidwell
    @MashaoSidwell 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I learned so much

  • @jacmwo9865
    @jacmwo9865 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I come your channel and it's very educative and easy to understand as i will be joining PPL classes in 5 months time from now,i thumb you up mate👍🏼!.Great work.

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks and welcome

    • @Lecichipsinc
      @Lecichipsinc หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Do it

  • @dsd-downshiftdave8056
    @dsd-downshiftdave8056 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Did I miss something how did you get FL260- FL110= 15000ft- isn't cruise altitude 5500 minus target altitude 1500 would be 4000
    Which would make rate of decent 4000/10= 400

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I think you are confusing two examples with each other.
      FL260 is 26000 and FL110 is 11000. So, 26000 - 11000 = 15000
      Got it ?

    • @dsd-downshiftdave8056
      @dsd-downshiftdave8056 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@ATPLStudent I must have missed that somewhere- at what part of the video is that

  • @barryfitzgerald3839
    @barryfitzgerald3839 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Not exactly a mathematician

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thanks for watching

  • @danielndala4598
    @danielndala4598 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm new but already fall in love with my first video on channel really thank you💞💞

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re welcome 😊

  • @Zfx13
    @Zfx13 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The DME ARC rule can be used for NBD arcs as well?

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Of course it can, provided you know the radius of the arc (how far away the arc from the NDB) if it’s about 13/14/15/16 miles then you may use the rule of thumb as explained in the above video.

  • @VinceCartierBeats
    @VinceCartierBeats ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why did you mulipl GS*5 for rate of descent. Just trying to get an understanding of where you got the 5 from and not any other number?

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's a rule of thumbs for easy mental math. it comes from the glide path in percent 3 degree glide path = 5.2% so it is actually GS x 5.2 but we drop the 0.2.
      If you want to go deeper of where it comes, you will find out that it comes a result of basic trigonometry

    • @VinceCartierBeats
      @VinceCartierBeats ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ATPLStudent thank you man!

  • @bruno84
    @bruno84 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How can you assume the WCA is half of the crosswind component without taking into account your airspeed?
    Your example would only apply if your were flying at 120kts. Any other speed and you'd have to apply a different w.c.a..

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  ปีที่แล้ว

      You are right, that is why I mentioned that that method is applicable mostly for General Aviation and single engine low performance aircraft where the TAS is about 100 to 130 kts

    • @bruno84
      @bruno84 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I didn't see you mentioning it. That's why I commented so that people wouldn't think it would be always half the crosswind coponent.
      Anyway one easy rule to calculate your w.c.a. with any aircraft and speed is to divide the crosswind component by your speed in Nautical Miles per Minute.
      E.g. 120kt = 2nm/min.
      Given a 20kt crosswind:
      20/2 = 10 degree w.c.a.
      300kt (5nm/min)
      20/5 = 4 degree w.c.a.
      Easy to apply to any speed.
      Still, thanks for the video!

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@bruno84 Thank you for your comment as well as for the trick, I learned something today. Much appreciated

  • @AaronWbirdman
    @AaronWbirdman 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great!

  • @FitXhub
    @FitXhub ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you do another video on mental math on Hold/fuel calculations ? As well as more examples from this video please

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sounds like a good idea, thank you for your suggestion will consider it.

    • @FitXhub
      @FitXhub ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ATPLStudent thank you. Please soon!!

  • @FitXhub
    @FitXhub ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why do you divide by 4 on the DME arc ?

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Because of the 1 in 60 rule.
      For a 60 NM DME Arc each degree is1 min
      30 NM DME Arc each degree is 30 sec
      15 NM DME Arc each degree is 15 sec
      and since this calculation is merely a rule of thumb we consider 12/13/14 all as 15NM DME Arc. because of 15 seconds is 1/4 of a minute we multiply by 1/4 or simply divide by 4 the difference in radials.
      Hope this has clarified your doubt

  • @1Mr.Legend1
    @1Mr.Legend1 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:50 290-220=70 70*15=1050 1050/tas(100)= 10.5 degrees to wind.

  • @louditalian1962
    @louditalian1962 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Once you get the hang of it is easy.

    • @isaiah732
      @isaiah732 ปีที่แล้ว

      For real, once you write main takeaways, and breakdown the formulas(which he’s already done) it’s very easy

  • @jhonatan64184
    @jhonatan64184 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excelente video!!!! Muchas gracias 🙏

  • @USA2041
    @USA2041 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My dear are there another formula for arc distance anyway 🙋‍♂️🙏

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for watching buddy, I'm afraid the 1 in 60 rule is the best Rule of Thumb to find ARC distances

  • @dusitthehto1946
    @dusitthehto1946 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is helpful thanks!

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're very welcome mate

  • @vaishnavraj5205
    @vaishnavraj5205 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    superb sir thank you sir

  • @donolsen6141
    @donolsen6141 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Are calculators allowed when factors like sinus come in play? And are basic calculators there in the interviews, or is it purely mental!
    Thanks for the vid btw!

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      You hardly ever get to use sin and cos in flight, there are many rules if thumb for most of the calculations needed in flight, so don’t worry about that. As for ground school especially in Gnav and Mass and balance you are allowed to use a calculator. In interviews they only expect you to know rules of thumb and 1 in 60 rule and other very basic mental calculations just like the ones demonstrated in the video above.

    • @donolsen6141
      @donolsen6141 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ATPLStudent Thank you very Much!

  • @mrsumeetsaxena
    @mrsumeetsaxena ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good One !

  • @tsunghanlee9044
    @tsunghanlee9044 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    GIVEN: True course : 105 degree , True heading : 085 degree , True
    airspeed : 95 kts , Groundspeed : 87 kts. Determine the wind direction and
    speed.
    (A)020 degree and 32 knots. (B)030 degree and 38 knots. (C)200 degree and 32
    knots.
    According to u video the answer should be (B)
    but the answer is A
    why?

    • @richievaldez3607
      @richievaldez3607 ปีที่แล้ว

      105-085= 20 degrees
      95-87= 8kts crosswind
      According to table, 20 degrees is closer to 15 degrees off track = 1/4 of wind speed so:
      8x4= 32kts wind speed
      So answer (A) is correct.

  • @ihorkohut7290
    @ihorkohut7290 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cool tips, thanks!

  • @hermitamrat143
    @hermitamrat143 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Easyyy

  • @criminalsxxx4394
    @criminalsxxx4394 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How are you figuring this out in the air? You got a calculator ?

    • @ATPLStudent
      @ATPLStudent  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You don't need a calculator, you will get used to it with practice