Sir, hats off to you. This scholarship of yours has surely not come easily, but is the result of painstaking reading and research. I am grateful to you for preserving the Rishi tradition of Bharath and for passing on this knowledge to me. Dhanyosmi, sir.
Tantric literature also connects Krishna to Tripurasundari, that Krishna is masculine form of Vishnu materializing Tripurasundari’s desire to manifest so 🙏🏼
Regarding the Kaali - Krishna connection, there are two prominent narratives that I have heard of from Tantra - 1) Krishna is none other than Kaali manifested in the masculine form as Shiva expressed a desire to be the feminine and love Mahadevi as her beloved. Hence, Maa Kaali manifested as Krishna and Lord Shiva manifested as Raadhaa. 2) That Maa Kaali is the mother of Krishna and hence in Bengal, there is a version of Kaali worshipped as “Krishna-Maataa Kaali. I am not sure if Krishna can be equated with Shiva as Mahaakaal. None of the Devi stotrams or Sahasrananaams mention Shakti/Kaali as the consort of Krishna/Vishnu. They all categorically call Kaali and all forms of Dasha Mahavidya as partners of Shiva (Bhairava). The only exception to that is Dhumaavati as she doesn’t have a Bhairava (and is considered to have consumed/swallowed Shiva/Bhairava himself).
Just below 5000 Likes for such a marvelously Supreme discourse is really a shame...
Sir, hats off to you. This scholarship of yours has surely not come easily, but is the result of painstaking reading and research. I am grateful to you for preserving the Rishi tradition of Bharath and for passing on this knowledge to me. Dhanyosmi, sir.
Tantric literature also connects Krishna to Tripurasundari, that Krishna is masculine form of Vishnu materializing Tripurasundari’s desire to manifest so 🙏🏼
Regarding the Kaali - Krishna connection, there are two prominent narratives that I have heard of from Tantra -
1) Krishna is none other than Kaali manifested in the masculine form as Shiva expressed a desire to be the feminine and love Mahadevi as her beloved. Hence, Maa Kaali manifested as Krishna and Lord Shiva manifested as Raadhaa.
2) That Maa Kaali is the mother of Krishna and hence in Bengal, there is a version of Kaali worshipped as “Krishna-Maataa Kaali.
I am not sure if Krishna can be equated with Shiva as Mahaakaal. None of the Devi stotrams or Sahasrananaams mention Shakti/Kaali as the consort of Krishna/Vishnu. They all categorically call Kaali and all forms of Dasha Mahavidya as partners of Shiva (Bhairava). The only exception to that is Dhumaavati as she doesn’t have a Bhairava (and is considered to have consumed/swallowed Shiva/Bhairava himself).
What about tabmate 1...will the csp 3 support v01?
जय श्री राम 🌹💐🙏
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Reconcile? Who says shaktha is in loggerheads with rigvedic traditions ? There are differences & debates though.
"Reconcile" seems a bit dangerous.
Clickbait.
True..better word can be extension of Vedic teachings
There are so many people out there who declare Tantras as Avedik, tamasik etc. Etc.
Guruji.
Rahul Gandhi was tchg The Upanishads in France.
You should
Allow him an opportunity to teach us.
He may learn to recognize Truth!!
What did the unfortunate people of France do to deserve this?
Rahul Gandhi is the vidur of Mahabharata. Though lacking the wisdom of vidur. Perhaps he knows how to make gold out of potato.
Just nonsense philosophy. Tantra's essence is in it's practice. This is just crap. Will do nothing .