Algebraic Structures: Groups, Rings, and Fields

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 98

  • @mikegoldsmith3600
    @mikegoldsmith3600 7 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Extremely clear and covers all the basics. The best gentle introduction to algebraic structures I've been able to find!

  • @arify7344
    @arify7344 7 ปีที่แล้ว +218

    Good luck in your Algebra exams, fellow students

    • @ArifYunando
      @ArifYunando 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Hello Arif

    • @its_roggy
      @its_roggy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks, we have one tomorrow

    • @imcloudy1909
      @imcloudy1909 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Y am I doing this in year 9...?

    • @daytonrowen4515
      @daytonrowen4515 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i know it is quite off topic but does anyone know a good site to stream newly released movies online?

    • @supongmenwalling5318
      @supongmenwalling5318 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I failed...ooooooo😭🤣

  • @hermanaksom5303
    @hermanaksom5303 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    No doubts, it is the best introduction to the subject I ve ever seen

  • @nadaabdulla7556
    @nadaabdulla7556 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I finished the course 2 years ago, I didn't understand it then, but now I'm interested and regret that I didn't do my best :(

  • @plaustrarius
    @plaustrarius 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    cannot thank you enough for this video!!

  • @orang1921
    @orang1921 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Imagine a student in Algebra I or Pre-Algebra finding this video ... RIP
    Also great video

  • @mcmoodoo
    @mcmoodoo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Absolute Gold! Thank you, sir!

  • @johntryl8009
    @johntryl8009 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The example of Z mod n (when n=prime) being a field and not a ring is the coolest thing ever. Furthermore, your explanation of why complex numbers are a vector space made things finally click ... it has scalar multiplication and it has addition, but it just has even more properties. This was so helpful. Thank you for being super approachable and clear!

    • @shivanya816
      @shivanya816 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

      heyy how come... Z mod n is a field but not a ring? isnt a field a commutative ring? please clarify 😊

  • @leylaalkan6630
    @leylaalkan6630 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for these amazing clarifications.

  • @lamalamalex
    @lamalamalex ปีที่แล้ว

    I do agree with you that you built up according to complexity of the structures. With vector spaces appropriately at the end. So that’s why I find it very strange that that’s where we start students at. Linear algebra being such an early class students takes. It can even be taken before a multi variable calculus course.

  • @rithikseth1404
    @rithikseth1404 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks very helpful for my engineering studies ....

  • @clu5ter892
    @clu5ter892 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for this vid from Russia)

  • @jasminefitzsimons896
    @jasminefitzsimons896 ปีที่แล้ว

    ok I literally love you

  • @aritraroygosthipaty3662
    @aritraroygosthipaty3662 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A very helpful lecture.

  • @eset3649
    @eset3649 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Crystal clear, thank you sir.

  • @MunkyChunk
    @MunkyChunk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are a... GENIUS!!! Thank you!!

  • @Ivane.h
    @Ivane.h 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Single-handedly getting me trough ADM mit Gittenberger...

  • @c0t556
    @c0t556 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good explanation! Thank you so much!

  • @anantrelan4071
    @anantrelan4071 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @12:01 Field is a ring with two operations .
    @18:12 F is a Field under (only) Multiplication .
    Q. Why is there only 1 operation for the field F at @18:12 ?
    Thanks

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A field always has two operations, addition and multiplication. I'm distinguishing the field multiplication (scalar times scalar) from "scalar multiplication" (scalar times vector).

    • @anantrelan4071
      @anantrelan4071 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HamblinMath oh ok
      Thanks for the Reply !!

  • @LucyMuthoni
    @LucyMuthoni 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much for this video. Be blessed!

  • @DavidVonR
    @DavidVonR ปีที่แล้ว

    Too cool! I love group and ring theory :)

  • @katelikesrectangles
    @katelikesrectangles 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That was really helpful, thank you!

  • @arnabdasphysics
    @arnabdasphysics 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Superb!

  • @josvandeneynde5849
    @josvandeneynde5849 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! I thank you!

  • @AkamiChannel
    @AkamiChannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was great. I just wish you had gone into what an algebra is. I'm on a mission to understand that, but google and youtube search results are completely worthless to me because they're full of content explaining ordinary algebra.

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      An "algebra" is a vector space over a field that has multiplication of vectors. Complex numbers are an example of an algebra.

    • @AkamiChannel
      @AkamiChannel 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@HamblinMath Yes, I had realized as much. Was thinking of a more formal explanation like one often sees for vector spaces. I did find one on youtube yesterday. It seemed to me, though, that the formal definition of an algebra is so general that just having a vague idea of it is enough.

  • @shrimp8594
    @shrimp8594 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you:) Really helpful video.

  • @asmamokr1345
    @asmamokr1345 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    thk'x a lot but i have a question ... for groups the first example for the inverse (-a) don't belong to Z ( but in the rule it should belong ) ...i am confusing 😣😣

    • @MathMaster19
      @MathMaster19 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      -a belongs to Z, it doesn't belong to N

  • @Caleb-qr6lo
    @Caleb-qr6lo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    lol I see xor symbol and get really confused.

  • @AyushSharma-ux4fk
    @AyushSharma-ux4fk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can you please share the slides that you are using to teach?

  • @pragyapathak8660
    @pragyapathak8660 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice vedio sir but in group definition closure property is not mentioned

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Closure is typically understood to be part of what you mean when you say that the operation is "on" the set G.

  • @TheHuggableEmpire
    @TheHuggableEmpire 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So addition and multiplication in rings doesn't necessarily mean the usual sum and product?

    • @janoprivracki1992
      @janoprivracki1992 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Correct, these are abstractions. Don't mind me commenting a year later... rofl. Hopefully it's helpful to someone in the future

    • @evrenunal3644
      @evrenunal3644 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@janoprivracki1992 it indeed helped me, thanks

  • @SzechSauce
    @SzechSauce 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explnantions thanks!

  • @osebrainquestfoundation9631
    @osebrainquestfoundation9631 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It knowledgeable. Thanks

  • @fraktallyfractals2083
    @fraktallyfractals2083 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    About Z as a group, at the beginning of the video, does that mean that zero is its own opposite?

  • @goumuk
    @goumuk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One more property of Groups - Closure property. If A , B belong to G, then if A ⊕ B = C, C also belongs to G.

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Using your notation, if "A ⊕ B" didn't belong to G, what are we even talking about? This is often rolled into the definition of what it means for "⊕" to be an operation on the set G.

    • @goumuk
      @goumuk 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@HamblinMath I guess you are right, but making it explicit may help beginners, so thought of mentioning here.

  • @harirao12345
    @harirao12345 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    very clear ... thank you!

  • @sunildhull8878
    @sunildhull8878 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    at 5:43 set of integers mod n became non negative integer which not follow inverse property over addition so it not supposed to be grp i.e. |-3|+|3|=6 not 0 plssss reply

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sunil, in arithmetic mod n, you take the remainder when the number is divided by n. For example, in arithmetic mod 7, the inverse of 3 is 4 because 3+4 = 0.

  • @joeflaubert5597
    @joeflaubert5597 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you

  • @lamalamalex
    @lamalamalex ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don’t understand why y’all want to hide the operations of ➕ and ✖️ and then just talk about those. I mean, what else is there? Why the back and forth?

    • @privateaccount1266
      @privateaccount1266 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because the operation symbol could be either + or x. For example when you saw the properties that characterise a group there was a symbol. And something could be a group with + or a group with x. You use + or x depending on the question.

  • @48_subhambanerjee22
    @48_subhambanerjee22 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    love it

  • @safofoh
    @safofoh 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks, it's very useful

  • @gunjanrathore9337
    @gunjanrathore9337 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is division for any R' N' Q' is made an algebraic structure???
    R set of real no
    N set of natural no (1, 2,3...)
    Q set of rational no

  • @rushikeshkavar6128
    @rushikeshkavar6128 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video. But is Ring Definition correct? According to Wikipedia, There should be additive identity and additive inverse. Am i wrong? Please clarify.

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Kavar Rushikesh R being a commutative group under addition includes those properties.

  • @monsieurfrog
    @monsieurfrog 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wouldn't Monoids be the simplest algebraic structure? When defining a group (M, #), it must first be a monoid, in addition for each element having an inverse.

  • @poomalaip2620
    @poomalaip2620 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Give each definition examples

  • @footage6402
    @footage6402 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How does a group differ from a field?

    • @MagikarpKano
      @MagikarpKano 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      a field has 2 operations and an inverse. A ring does not always have an inverse and a group only has 1 operation.

  • @andreiparaschiv3257
    @andreiparaschiv3257 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great video
    one of my concerns is that people could get the idea that you can prove a property by trying out random examples, as you did with the multiplicative inverse over Q[radical 2] by choosing a=3 and b=4. it has to be generalised, and that means not assigning specific values. that could have been made a little clearer in the clip.

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I do specifically say "this isn't a proof"...

  • @ebrimagajaga4639
    @ebrimagajaga4639 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Please help me answer this question…
    Is (N, +) a group ? N is a set of natural numbers…

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, because not every element of N has an inverse.

    • @tunistick8044
      @tunistick8044 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@HamblinMath so in Z it's true?

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  26 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@tunistick8044 The set of integers is a group under the addition operation.

  • @Ambagaye
    @Ambagaye 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Closure

  • @Okapi000
    @Okapi000 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why don't you include closure as a necessary property to be a group?

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      "Closure" is typically assumed when we say that "+ is an operation on G."

  • @DantalionNl
    @DantalionNl 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is the property A * B = B * A called identity and not commutativity ?

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Commutativity says "for all A and B in the set, A*B=B*A." It's not called identity. Read the "identity" property carefully.

  • @shiina_mahiru_9067
    @shiina_mahiru_9067 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I dont think R is a field since 0 has no multiplicative inverse, but R* would be

    • @Enriquecav
      @Enriquecav 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The multiplicative inverse is defined for all numbers except 0, so R is a field

  • @AlessandroZir
    @AlessandroZir 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤️❤️❤️🙏🙌

  • @felixhsu9583
    @felixhsu9583 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    祝我信安数基能及格🌝

  • @alex-my8hp
    @alex-my8hp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you missed out closure

    • @HamblinMath
      @HamblinMath  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      While "closure" is sometimes included as a group/ring axiom, it's not really necessary, since for the operation on two elements to make any sense, the result of the operation must be in the set you're talking about.

    • @alex-my8hp
      @alex-my8hp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@HamblinMath oh, fair enough

  • @haentertain8383
    @haentertain8383 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please send to me solved ring examples all

  • @a_ghoul
    @a_ghoul 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i am only in the 2nd grade how do I find x 2x+2=6

    • @qusai05
      @qusai05 ปีที่แล้ว

      subtract 2 from both sides, u get 2x=4, then divide by 2 on both sides, u get x=2

  • @yasser-l3x
    @yasser-l3x 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Zb ybki

  • @soseipirialadick-iruenaber7273
    @soseipirialadick-iruenaber7273 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You're talking too fast and I'm not understanding 😔

  • @joeyquiet4020
    @joeyquiet4020 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you