Beauty is Interested in the Beast Who Can Be Civilized | Jocko Willink & Jordan B Peterson
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มี.ค. 2018
- A good man is a very, very dangerous man. In order to transform your personality you must integrate that part of you that's terrible and capable of breaking rules and make it apart of you.
The full video:
• Jocko Podcast 98 w/ Jo...
Want to support this channel?
Patreon: / jordanbpeterson
Relevant Links: JB Peterson
Online Psychological Programs:
NEW: BFAS Personality Assessment: www.understandmyself.com
Self Authoring: selfauthoring.com/
Books:
12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos: jordanbpeterson.com/12-rules-...
Maps of Meaning: The Architecture of Belief: jordanbpeterson.com/maps-of-m...
Jordan Peterson Website: jordanbpeterson.com/
Podcast: jordanbpeterson.com/jordan-b-p...
Reading List: jordanbpeterson.com/2017/03/gr...
Twitter: / jordanbpeterson
Beauty and the Bucko
😂😂😂😂😂
Sometimes people ask me how not to get suck in the rut.. I usually respond with.
Get comfortable with being uncomfortable.. no, be enthusiastic about pushing yourself to the brink of discomfort. Growth isn’t comfortable.
just brilliant and inspiring. reading 12 rules for life now
*A harmless man is NOT a good man. A good man is very dangerous man who has it under voluntary control.*
This entire videoclip is gold, and the goldest part of it is this statement above.
After 0:44 I wondered who was he talking about when he said "Milosevik" only to realize in a second it is Miloshevich who is being mentioned here, despite my confusion for saying that ex Yugoslavia was part of the Soviet Union, which it was not.
The problem with his targeted victims is exactly the fact that they were weak and naive while thinking of themselves as "good people" for being such harmless snowflakes.
No wonder their ethnic group is despised even today as they remain almost the same as they were 30 years ago. Nobody respects someone they can beat up. It's nature's law.
LOL you're even more clueless than JP
@@alterego157 About what exactly?
Jordan Peterson is just absolutely amazing
Dud30ify hes a fool.
Invictus nah he isn't. 😐 He makes so much sense and it is easy to understand.
Santos bonacci is similar.. yall just don't know about him.
When Greta Garbo watched Jean Cocteau's beautiful retelling of this story in his 1941 film, "La Belle et La Bete", at the end, when the Beast was transformed into a prince, she shouted out, "Vhat haf you done to my beautiful Beast?!" I felt the same way when I watched the film. As a friend of mine said, "I have always wanted to have a big hairy [actual] animal who is stoked on me!" The standard ending of the story is just an embarrassed evasion of the real desire.
Wow
Monster fuckers huh? But same.
And then they leave you
The beast was not the village alpha male. Gaston was and Belle hated his ass.
Exactly....
In my view, Belle was a female who did not respect or care for the mainstream value structures, and the Beast was the same.
Belle valued uniqueness and loyalty above the mainstream value structures (of good looks, money, social class, and basically her status among other villagers).
Hence why the Beast, possesing these, rated high in her value structures. This is the true message of the movie for me.
Only in looking beyond the value structures that society presents to you as the most valuable, and taking into consideration those people that others consider Beasts, will you be able to find someone with the qualities you value/desire. Don't disqualify based on reputation nor appearance, judge them yourself.
I have thought about this as well. In the story, appearance is misleading and true value is only within. But when the occasion asks for it, the beast defends Belle against a herd of wolves for which he gains Belle's trust.
@@jeryjack I disagree. The beast possesses money and social class. He's a prince in a castle. He's filthy rich. When he turned back to human, he's handsome! He possesses all the structures humans value. We can argue that Belle didn't go for that when she was with him, but it's not a coincidence that the man she chose just happened to have all three (looks, status, and money).
@@aquilaaltaire3007 and in spite of his riches she initially tried to escape yo return to her father. She did not seek the beast out.
Hey Mister P! Please make a statement about Libertarianism!
that fable only addresses successful engagement of a mate. what about the rest of life? surely the mother archetype is the ultimate - even though the doctor's previous point about dysfunctional nurturing is very apt.
now, exactly how useful is telling girls about making good choices, when they are so prone to reject culpability for every bad choice and its consequences. it's that irresponsibility that undermines relations across the board.
3:22
How do I integrate the shadow. Suggestions?
if analytic methods fail, you can always get a brute force approximation to the area under the curve, by, for example, superimposing a grid and then just counting the number of squares of that grid which are dark and multiplying that count by the area of an individual square
Gilbert977 The best shot you have is to practice radical honesty.
@@paperEATER101 how did I not understand this at all, but it made perfect sense....
@@paperEATER101 LMAO... Nice.
That's it boys... I'm going Walter White, breaking bad!
Whats that Carl Jung quote Jordan is referring?
Kind of a circular argument that a non-threatening man is the most threatening? Perhaps what he means is that the most dangerous man is the one that confuses being in control of the external world with true power? Beauty and the Beast is a very interesting story from a Christian perspective since it touches on what might be the overarching theme of the entire Bible: taming the beast within (except "beast" may not mean exactly what we think it does). JP frames it in terms of Carl Jung and Enlightenment but it appears to be the same idea. Beauty has two different kinds of beasts within, and comparing the two can be quite instructive. They both have a reason to want her for their own self interest. One ultimately does gain what he wants because he is willing to sacrifice it for HER interest. The other actually ends up destroying himself because he can't let go of his self interest.
But Gaston is not a beast for he is not dangerous. He is simply handsome and rich but also a douche. While you could make the point that the beast is a douche too, he is also dangerous. In other words he can back himself up. You can see it in the real world too. A lot of people going to the gym are using steroids to get big but they're not the guys that are getting all the women because they're taking the easy way out and aren't becoming much more dangerous. I also believe that Gaston isn't interested in the beaty but rather the idea of having her. He doesn't know her personally, the only thing that sets her apart to him is that she isn't interested (and for good reason too).
Is this Mr. Dr. Prof. Thug Lyf Peterson Channel!?
Yes his selected clips. His main will be listed in the about of this channel.
So who can be civilized?
???????
mine always bully md
That’s all well and good, but how exactly do you know what it is you’re capable of that’s terrible?
Imagination helps with that. If you can imagine yourself being mean to other people when necessary and if you feel good about it then you are capable of hurting others.
If you can tell your best friend to fuck off when he does something you don't agree with then you are capable of being mean. It means you are not afraid.
Insanity Perhaps I have misunderstood, but it seems you are saying that the ability to hurt people in some way is what he’s referring to, whereas in your example, if your friend does something wrong and you pull them up on it, that’s not exactly being mean is it, it is supposedly helping them and not hurting them after all.
As to hurting someone when necessary, I don’t understand the notion that you should feel good about it?
No you did not misunderstand me and you are right my example isn't all that good.
In my example I'm trying to illustrate that you are capable of hurting others as long as you have enough motivation to do so. Trick is in the motivation.
Sometimes you will argue with someone and hurt his feelings because you believe truth is more valuable than his feelings. Sometimes you will punch someone in the face because he is being mean to your little brother. Sometimes you will beat someone nearly to death because he was harassing your loved one or even worse, outright kill a person. And who knows what you would do if you were given even more motivation.
Jordan B. Peterson talks about being able to do what you feel is right no matter the consequences. (Sometimes you believe what you are doing is wrong, but your feelings tell you to do it anyway, revenge is one of those things). Jordan B. Peterson says that there is no difference between a monster and a nice guy, the only difference is in the motivation they both have.
In my life it just means being able to stand up for yourself. That's the quality of the beast. It's the ability to disregard other people if the situation demands it.
And you are right, it's not exactly a good feeling. Hurting someone when necessary can make you feel... justified? I'm not sure how to describe that feeling, it's not exactly a good feeling but it's not a bad feeling either, it's a weird feeling. I think you feel good because you know you did the right thing, but you feel bad because you hurt someone. For example I can be mean to a person who refuses to take responsibility for his problems by pointing out that he is the cause for his problems, that's when I have this weird feeling.
Ah right I see.
Well, I certainly have the capacity for that, I think then perhaps my problem is that I avoid it too much because I try to find a less objectionable way to solve such problems. Excepting the case of defending someone from physical violence, it’s pretty difficult to stop that without actually laying hands on someone.
I think I get what he’s saying now, thanks bro.
How do you know what you're capable of?
Step up and live life on that edge for a bit... Push yourself... Learn a martial art... Sleep outside... Hunt, kill, butcher, cook, and eat an animal... Build something with your own hands... Stand up to a bully and don't cower away... Man up and ask a woman for a date... When it's serious, ask her father for his permission... Be there for your child no matter what... Live up to your word... Don't lie... Be their for your loved ones when they need you.... when they're sick... When they're dying.... Be the person people can rely on at your father's funeral...
Choose to be a man, and you won't wonder about what you're capable of for long.
Imperial
Yugoslavia wasn't in the Soviet Union.
He's talking about Batman
1:00 Yugoslavia was never part of the Soviet Union.
krileayn He was referring to the USSR domination of Yugoslavia.
"Former Soviet Union in Yugoslavia"
USSR never dominated Yugoslavia. Tito avoided Stalin's assassins
"To Joseph Stalin: Stop sending people to kill me! We've already captured five of them, one of them with a bomb and another with a rifle... If you don't stop sending killers, I'll send a very fast working one to Moscow and I certainly won't have to send another."
Robert Service, Stalin: A Biography (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2005), p. 592.
Message found among the personal effects of Joseph Stalin.
@@krileayn True. Still Titoism was Stalinism without Stalin.
@@boki98737 Oh yea it was still shitty communism.
Some of these fairytales are cosmic, rather than social.
For instance, Snow Whiite is the snow-whiite moon who is followed by her seven dwarves - the Moon followed by the seven planets that follow the moon in a long line around the ecliptic.
The evil witch is the Milky Way, who is being outshone by the glamorous snow whiite moon. So she puts a corset on snow whiite, to make her thinner and thinner, until she dies. Just as the waning moon gets thinner and thinner in the heavens above, until it ‘dies’ (the New Moon).
But just as the moon dies (the new moon) she kisses the Sun-prince in an solar eclipse, and comes back to life as the waxing moon. And remember that a solar eclipse can only happen with a ‘dead’ New Moon.
Snow White is a tale of the Cosmos.
RE
THE LORD is good. Jesus Christ, The Son of God is awesome.
Jordan Peterson...curious on your thoughts or stance of the States gun control issue? Holy is it ever dividing people and I feel children are being ignored (almost mocked) to some extent by the right leaning archetypes. Help!!
There’s a reason we don’t let kids run things, they are dumb, roughly speaking.
E Johnson It’s not even a matter of disarming people; it just might be reformed legislation. Like for example courses prior to gun purchase? Or background checks with witness character affidavits? I’m sure there’s a solution to decrease school shootings.
Orca Spirit Bear shall not be INFRINGED
"witness character affidavits"
why? what's the point of abiding by the law one's whole life to be treated like some parolee?
SonderBeyondHer gun’s aren’t violent
Silly jordan that's not the moral of the story the moral of the story is (to change ur man)😂
First