Lawyer's Chilling Text Revealed After Bayesian Superyacht Sinks
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.ย. 2024
- "There are deaths." The chilling text from one of the survivors of the superyacht that sank off the coast of Sicily paints a harrowing picture of the night's horrors.
#Superyacht #Disaster #Text
Voiceover By: Tim Bensch
Official Grunge Website
www.grunge.com
Read Full Article: www.grunge.com...
How she recovered the baby after losing grip and then managed to keep it and herself alive is pretty close to miraculous.
Rest in peace, sailors.
68 years ago. My mother lost my then-baby brother in a horrific hurricane. After our overturned trailer came to rest, my father found him beneath steps my father had built, sleeping bundled in his heavy blanket. Apparently, he fell out a window as the trailer rolled over and over, finally coming to rest in a gully supported by those steps. My father was an excellent engineer, and those wooden steps were his greatest work among things like Spacecraft. You never know destiny, so put your best effort into everything you do.
While supposedly laying off with the baby on the deck during a storm
Thanks I saved 3:21 minutes 😊
@@overlycreative1wallahu snackbar
a mother will do anything to save her child
Hannah Lynch’s body was just recovered. May she rest in peace. A life gone too soon. 😰🙏🏼💗
All now accounted for.
according to who.?? Gods perfect timing.
@@unclewazza777vile
I can’t help thinking it is too much of a coincidence that this accident happened just a couple of days after the other person involved in the alleged Fraud case (maybe wrong word) was killed by a car!
Strange the crew was saved , but everyone else drowned , & no time sound alarms for the others !!
@@dixieblonde2208One crew member (the chef) died.
Here we go, conspiracy theory number 2,349
@@annegiorgio5602give it a minute, like all the others time is relative.
Well you know what they say about KARMA
It’s very fishy, the co-dependent in the the lawsuit was also killed in an unrelated incident thousands of miles away…..
Too coincidental that both men involved in a top court case died in the same week!
No coincidence!!!
"The sail wasn't furled?" Which sail? They were at anchor, so all sails would have been furled, meaning, they would have been "closed" and unable to "catch" any wind. Boats don't have unfurled sails at anchor.
Correct, liztaylor, you know your sea shells from your barnacles....all the Bayesian's sails were furled and wrapped away at anchor, and the height of the mast should not have been a problem if the keel had been fully lowered and all the hatches secured to stop an influx of seawater when the boat listed.... it all smacks of terrible human error and incomprehensible negligence, rather than any malign intent on the part of any party....
I think it's already been reported that the yacht's mast was completely intact!!!
respect to whoever made the mast
No its not completely. Still somehow attached but It bent from the base like an uprooted tree.
They tell us something different every day, all bullshit....They ain't letting anyone talk either.
Like all communist countries.....
Yow!@@Nikitateagurl_77
Of course it’s bent at deck level, the yacht is lying on its side…
I would ignore everything the BBC says as it's just a propaganda channel.
Much of this report is absolutely wrong!!
The only sensible reports on this incident to be seen on YT are posted by Esysman.
I would like to second that. This is a shockingly inaccurate report full of conjecture. What a disgrace when there are some facts emerging to still talk such absolute trash. You should be shamed.
What’s wrong?
This report is absoloutely correct. There is not a shadow of doubt.
Now, here's the definitive proof; I spoke with Cardinal Amerigo Wall-Street, of the Vatican Bank, who swore me to silence, and said, ' our holy bank at the Vatican has received 123,000,000,000.00 ,' that's billions, I think and our 'investigations show this money was ET from a luxurious yacht .' So, we had to save the good name of the Holy See.
No j9king. The Lord acts very mysteriously. Who can know His mind? Rev. 12:22 Amen!
@@t-rex4211the mast did not snap ,the sails were furled ,the boat was anchored the boat could not capsize as a result of the water depth .just a ton of conjecture .
They had 18 mins to evacuate. Thats an eternity in an emergency. If your house was on fire and i said you "only" have 18 mins to get out, would you be worried? Someone didn't raise the alarm when they should of done. 18 mins is plenty of time to get everyone on deck
@@brettrigby2226 it wasNOT an emergency till the downburst struck in seconds knocking the yacht 90+degrees over dooming it
Maybe people who didn't get out were caugt in areas that were sawmped rapidly, Could happen if the large doors on a luxury boat were lelt open for cooling.
16mins!
@@brettrigby2226 the survivors said in an instant they found themselves in the water
A strategic strike successfully carried out.....oh look shiny thing....
“Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and vermin destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moths and vermin do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also”
ROMANS 8:18
Amen
We take no material goods with us. Queen Elizabeth 1st on her death bed commented that she had so very much for such a small period of time.
Religion is a scam
@@user-hi1et2tb5u The good thing about promotional advertising on TH-cam is that it’s free.
The mast didn’t “bend and snap.” The Baysien was hit by a water spout, essentially…a water borne tornado. The device used to keep the yacht balanced when sailing (not motoring) is kalled a keel, it’s extremely heavy and lowers into the water from underneath the ship. When at anchor, the keel is kept in a retracted position, thereby not giving the yacht any counterbalance when the mast was hit by the high winds. The mast is huge on this yacht, it acted like a sail and pushed the yacht over, somewhere near 90 degrees. The yacht quickly took on water…end of story. A sad - 1 in a million - freak accident.
The media have become obsessed with the "snapping mast". I've seen reports like " the mast snapped and so the boat turned over...." In other words they haven't got a clue what they're talking about.
Haven't heard one witness say they saw a water spout. There was no mention of one until 2 days after the event.
Hard to say what a keel does when it's not uncommon for a yacht to lay on its side under full sail. Why didn't the crew retract the sail if no passengers were on deck? While the Bayesian certainly isn't the dinghy I sailed on, below deck is NOT where you want to be in a storm
@@luislongoria6621 What you’re referring to is heeling. It’s something that’s done (usually) when the boat is sailing upwind or close-hauled. On this 50+ meter yacht, the keel would be lowered in those conditions. The maximum angle of the mast would be 20-30 degrees. The mast on Baysien is the 1st or 2nd tallest of for a ship her size. The mast alone, at anchor, is large enough to act as a sail and push the boat over to 90 degrees. There is video on youtube of a similar size vessel being caught in a similar wind event, the mast was pushed all the way to the water. Fortunately, that ship righted itself. Actually, that same video shows a 55’ catamaran being picked up and blown backwards and landing in the water upside down. Both of those vessels were tied up in a marina. What needs to be determined is…how did the Baysian take on so much water so quickly. This vessel had - at least - 3 water tight compartments, helping to keep the water compartmentalized. As I said, how did this vessel take on so much water so quickly?! This was a modern and safe vessel.
@@luislongoria6621 For heaven's sake. It was at anchor. The sails WERE "retracted", as you call it. As to what a keel does, it acts as a counterweight to the pressure of the wind on the sails. It's true that in what's called a knock-down a boat can be pushed right over on its beam ends but the further over it goes the more leverage the keel exerts and the boat will immediately right itself.
There are no coincidences. The other person in the recently dismissed or settled lawsuit was hit by a car and died a few days before.
Is the ocean is also in on this conspiracy?
I’ve just made a similar comment,then saw yours!
What are the chances? Maybe someone should do a Bayesian analysis.
Maybe Karma? Bad juju?
Princesa died also died in a car.. very strange..thing like that hardlly ever happens !!🤔something very strange..🤔
Fascinating that this yacht was the only one affected by the water spout!!! Or that the weather pictures had been turned off during the time of this yacht being sunk......
@@mabaker391 it’s record high mast with multiple radars, antennas gave it more wind resistance leading to the severe unrecoverable knockdown. A one in a million chance. The waterspout was probably at the high range of wind speed 125 mph .
@@annsheridan12no
@@V0YAG3R so in your opinion the record high mast had no effect on the capsizing?
What do you mean weather pictures off ?
@@mabaker391 the downpour obscured the video
We'll all have to wait until the boat is salvaged to find out what exactly happened, I've been a boatbuilder for 23yrs and it doesn't quite stack up that it can take on that amount of water to sink that fast..even if some portholes were open. Time will tell.. skipper probably shouldn't leave the country.
As a boat builder you should know it doesn't have opening portholes, it"s HVAC equipped so all openings would be closed for that to be efficient. It does have some doors that can open when it on it's side which if the keel was raised, with the conditions that occurred, could happen quite easily and that would allow it to sink very quickly. But yes, time will tell. Also at an estimated cost of about 15 to 20 million dollars recovering the boat is probably not going to happen, although it could.
@Leistung.Autohaus I actually don't know if it had open portholes above the waterline etc.. I don't know if any hatches were open. Clearly they shouldn't have had anything open in those condition. But Human error occurs. I don't know or haven't studied the exact layout of the vessel.. but to sink within 60 secs something was ajar. Not just the main cabin glass doors. For 15million pounds I'd be salvaging it..especially with so many unanswered questions. I guess up to the families and insurance, clearly there will be serious environmental Implications leaving it there.
@@Leistung.Autohaus why so much, I'd have thought a few thousand as most. A long air line, pump it full of air to displace the water and she'll float up in no time .
@@Leistung.Autohaus Just because a sailboat has A/C does not mean it won't have opening portholes. On sailboats any opening portholes are usually above the deck level, otherwise those portholes would be under water (or very close to it) while the boat is heeled over under sail.
@@print-master I only quoted estimates from others but it's definitely not as simple as you make it sound, water is heavier than air to start with.
Gosh almighty she saved her baby like that? Extraordinary luck . Im glad theyre safe
A miracle❤
So the crew were woken up at 4:00 in the morning and the boat sank at 4:35 but nobody thought it would be a good idea to wake up the owner in the guests
Good example of what would really happen if the world goes to hell and billionaires retreat to their bunkers… their staff would take over
Don't listen to the BS. THIS STINKS 100% And will be covered up 😢
HAARP?
y'all provide such great entertainment. I bet JFK Jr was involved too, right? 😂
@@charles1964 -- What do you know about HAARP? -- Are you one of those seeking alternative answers to 9/11?
The yacht was laid flat by the squall, which has happened to me several times crossing oceans, usually at night, at you can't see what's coming. Most ocean going yachts have small hatchways, that prevent water entering even when the yacht is laid 90 degrees over. Super yachts have large doors opening into the interior. When laid flat or worse, these doors are likely under water and will fill the interior volume in minutes.
Human failure ok I'm like you a experienced sailor had many close encounters including whales menace of Spanish coast .this to me is irresponsible crew and it will come out in future .crew employed young and very little experience crwed by lousy agencies fact .I've met plenty in Monaco and other marinas around the world .they told me some of them were hired because of there good looks and young fact and polite spoken .I was amazed at how little they knew deep water sailing .and never one did I encounter that knew about laws of sea or respect for it many were hoping to meet rich guys to marry and some did fall lucky .I'm sad about the beautiful yacht being sunk .another lost to lousy crews
@@staceyalbright3323 nothing would have made a difference in the outcome since a downburst can have wind speed of 150 mph sufficient to lay the yacht flat even with the keel down.
Fishy , fishy....
There’s a video that the coast guard shows to deep sea sailors taking life boat training classes, it depicts a huge vessel working in Alaskan waters, not a fishing vessel. The vessel is overcome by a set of large swells, not waves, perhaps two swells overtakes the whole boat in a matter of 5 minutes. There are no obvious storm in the vicinity, the weather seems clear. Not sure why the helicopter filmed this vessel but maybe the engines went down and it was without power.
Oh! I didn't know he owned Autonomy, the company was purchased by HP that had the big lawsuit against him for cooking the books to make it look like his company was worth more. So the plot thickens!
Yes strange but this yacht was sunk by incompetent crew ok not tornados I'm experienced sailor and it's human error .
" super yatchs aren't built for bad weather despite their cost"! Seriously??
No they’re vacation toys
The mast never snapped as that would have given it more bouncy and stated earlier in news about this that the mast is still on the ship under water.
Oil rig divers: dive to 150m for hours to fix a pipe
Italian rescue divers: can only dive to 50m for 12 minutes
?????
Yes correct but north sea divers use diving bell to get to depth then exit to work site by umbinicals attached to them and bell ok so can dive for up to 7 hours then back to bell and raised to diving vessel by winch .ok
@@staceyalbright3323 aren't they saturation divers. Stay in a pressurised chamber for several days and only enter the bell to drop to work.
@@paultempany2053 You have that the wrong way around, during diving theirs no risk. It is when they surface, they go into a decompression chamber.
At depth, gasses in the air are absorbed into the blood due to the pressure. When the pressure reduces as they surface the gasses bubble out like opening a can of coke. The gasses then collect in the heart, leading to cardiac arrest. During slow decompression, the gases expel via the lung vacuoles.
I just speculate that it wasn´t the mast snaping. It was the keel snaping under extreme forces or the keel was retracted. I cannot imagine other cause for these sudden behaviour of any sail boat.
My deep condolences to all families and friends.
While it is intact the sailboat is one of the best to face rough seas since the centre of gravity is under water line.
I was watching a video by eSysman...he stated that this yacht was equipped/built with a retractable keel to allow the vessel entry to shallower ports...it'll be interesting once the underwater video is released whether the keel was retracted or not during the storm.
@@robmeier9416The keel was retracted/lifted/raised. Designer or someone like said the keel wasn't needed at anchor, only for "performance" underway. Seems the thinking was to not think about the keel at all, because of that statement. Most experienced sailors understand the physics enough to know better. 😢
@@liz6034 Thanks for the feedback! I hadn't heard a definitive on the keel position yet. My suspicion is that investigators already have that information and that has likely contributed to the rapid opening of the manslaughter investigation by the Italians. I'm guessing, some people may become educated on CoG (Center of Gravity!) when it's all said and done. 🙂
The keel was retracted. If it had been down, they’d probably have been ok
@karenandrews4224 Given the info coming about the down burst, it's likely the keel being down would not have prevented disaster. But, had it been down, it's reasonable to think that degree of the disaster may have been much less. It was an easy, common-sense (to experienced sailors) action to take. One of several factors, not the only one, and also, one that needs to be questioned.
Shady alittle...
🏳️🌈🌀
A lot....
Thank God that mother and baby were alright
They were on deck and ended up in the water as the vessel was knocked down and rapidly sank
The sailboat I had always turned sideways to the wind in strong winds at anchor. If the bow had remained into the wind it wouldn't have sunk. Powerboats without a mast usually stay bow into the wind at anchor, sailboats don't, they turn sideways and that's why it sank.
The sailboat had radar and weather features available to see the storm coming in advance.
But it was at 4AM so there may have been only one person on watch, and it was reported that the storm came upon them very, very suddenly… perhaps very little to to do anything before it was then evident the situation was dire. eSysman Superyachts YT channel has been having excellent coverage on this event.
Why is that?
@@johnclapperton8211 I don't know. It didn't matter how the rudder was set either because I tied the tiller straight but at anchor in strong wind it would always go sideways to the waves and it had a swing keel as well and up or down it would do it.
It was a waterspout though, what do you do in that case?
This was a whirlwind. no particular DIRECTION OF THE WATER TORNEDO WATER SPOUT.
Amazing how all the important people die and the chef, but not the crew. Not suspicious at all.
Not amazing (potentially) criminal…. just heard reporting now being investigated as a possible case of murder.
@@gavsvasili5041 DUH! The crew were on deck , the guest were in their cabins
Another chef!..as a cook i hope his soul is saved.
Just like Obama chef that's still a little shady
😊 redeemed 🤌
Simple physics. Very tall mast = strong moment arm in high wind condition, and it appears the retractable keel (which provides significant stability when extended) was partially or fully retracted when the strong winds began. This caused the tall mast to force a rolling motion severe enough to capsize the boat, and some of those in the cabins below were not able to evacuate fast enough. If this is the cause, the crew will be skewered for retracting the keel in 150 ft. of water, and the boat designer will have a heard of ambulance chasers soon in pursuit.
Yep. That's a massive oversight to not retract the keel. Especially when the boat has a ridiculously tall mast like that. It's a massive PP measuring contest with yacht owners, but the crew still should have known better.
@@DalerMehndisTurban Agreed.......I hope I was wrong about the crew not retracting the keel, but it's the most probable explanation. If it's true, their fates are sealed.
Nope, the video of the yacht disappearing shows the mast almost stationary and then its gone.
@@will7its Last report I heard is that the divers have confirmed the mast is still attached to the sunken boat.
@@DalerMehndisTurban The keel should have been lowered fully (deeper) into the water, NOT "retracted". Retracted (shorter) means there would be LESS stability and resistance to tipping over.
This tragedy illustrates how luck and fortune plays such a 3:21 large role in destiny a mother and her infant survive while others perish. Where your exact location on that yacht was at the time this incident occurred determined your fate.🤔
The mother was upstairs everyone should have been upstairs or taken ashore
Tornado will no doubt be sued for wrongful death.
What cellphone does she have - if it works after being in sea water then it’s good…. Or this isn’t true.
iPhones 12 onwards are IP68 rated so can withstand 6m depths for up to 30 minutes. If it’s rinsed soon after then the charging contacts won’t fur up
The kind of phone that you can't afford 🤭
The Reaper and Fate are very democratic. Don't care about how rich and powerful you might be....
Hmmmmm looks like to much of a coincidence after the guy getting hit and killed by a car the week before. All a bit BS tbf 🙄
The mast did not snap, it’s been reported to be 100% intact as is the rest of the ship.
do you thing she was scuttled by someone paid off?
@@print-master I have no idea but the timing is highly suspicious regardless of what happened.
Only time will heal the hearts of the family`s left behind, " Such a lose, strange storm that took out this yacht & not others that were in the harbour... Beyond sad event.
So nobody was on anchor watch and everyone was sleeping ? If so , the captain is in serious trouble. Everyone should have been at a designated muster station with life preservers on.
The crew probably were and that’s why all but the chef survived. Not sure how many crew were onboard, I’d guess 6?
@@t-rex4211 10
Yep
This is nonsense. A 190 ft sailing yacht like this could sail anywhere you chose to take it.
Yes built to sail anywhere except Antarctica ice fields .beautiful yacht lost by crew incompetence .
PRAYERS FOR THE FAMILYS ❤❤❤
Designers can actually build boats to be very resistant to fast sinking, but the desire is not there, and most people do not want the inconvenience or visual of extra bulk heads.
I listened to the interview with the captain of the nearby boat and don’t remember him saying anything about the mast snapping. He said that it was behind them, and then the next time they looked back it was gone. Where did you get the information about the mast having snapped?
Many years ago, the sailing 'university' Albatross with students on board, was laid over and sunk in the Gulf of Mexico in minutes by what was called 'White squall'. Only a few survived that, too.
@1:44 ...."the only phone that had a battery" ????? what is this 1995? The lies are exhausting.
".. this implies that the Bayesian's sail wasn't furled.." The Bayesian would normally have _two_ sails set when sailing.. but the sinking implies nothing of the sort. Blatant misinformation.
CIA hit ?
The most expensive sailing ship in the area sank. The others didn't. Right...
Human error
What’s crazy is that if the boat settled at the bed upright, the mast would still be sticking out the water about 25m 🧐
@@t-rex4211 it’s lying on its starboard side
Doesn't matter how rich you are when the Grim Reaper comes your dead 🤣
No. Not True. There is something called Premature DEATH.
The reason people try to avoid danger is to try to avoid
Premature DEATH. Yes, of course humans must leave
This present world... but myriads have left too soon.
This is another reason why Salvation is utterly important,
Lest a Soul be Flung into a permanent Hell before taking
Out time to reconcile with our Holy Lord. Repent and be Saved Today.
People die and you think it's funny, get help you sick f.
And you think that it is funny?
@@JK-lp6uw Yes his Money didn't save him 🤣
Laughing at someone’s death because they were rich and you’re poor is exactly why you will remain poor and pathetic.
This whole story is B.S. and everyone knows it.
That's the quickest ever investigation by Italian authorities then.
Relax folks, you will never know if this was a ship design failure. The simple reasons is - this would have devastating effect to Italy's GDP, as it simnifically depends on luxury boat industry. UK and US better send their own oversight and maybe few divers too,
The yacht by design was unable to recover from a knockdown of 90 degrees or more with keel retracted. IMHO that’s precisely what happened with the salon doors open and the vessel below horizontal she rapidly flooded and sank❤.
73 degrees retracted, 88 w keel down. Keel was retracted.
@@liz6034 even with the keel down and all the wind resistance of that huge mast with all the radars and other devices on it would the vessel survive a maximum waterspout wind of 125 mph from the side? IMHO the answer is no.
@@annsheridan12 There is the survival of the vessel, and then the survival of human life. I agree, like most do, that the vessel was a sitting duck for the weather conditions. However, what was done or not done that caused the loss of life? I'm just clarifying the maximum heel according to the designers. Maybe if they had the keel down, they may have had another few minutes. Maybe it would not have mattered at all. But 15 degrees is not insignificant and I suspect it could have made a huge difference. And it could have been done with the press of a button, I imagine.
I can't imagine any reason the captain and crew would NOT have put the keel down, unless they had been told not to. More likely, they had been told by the designers that it was unnecessary, and if they believed that, it brings the seamanship of both them and the designers into question.
@@liz6034 actually they ink put the keel down when sailing to windward. At anchor it was noisy as the vessel rolled slightly hence never down at anchor.
@@liz6034 a down burst can have maximum wind of 150mph which would have produced the same result even with the keel lowered.
Why do people have time to text, but not save themselves….
Texting was probably what saved them...
My heart goes out to the survivors and the families of those who were lost.
Factual error: the sails were furled.
If the BBC says it it must be true Right !!!! and the colour of Oranges are ?
When a water spout travels over an anchored yacht, the center of the spout would be generating a very low pressure area sucking up water and any thing in its way, including any thing on the deck of this yacht. If the base of this spout was twenty feet wide and it traveled over the deck it , the hullwould have drawn the mast up and over to one side as the spout moved on, thus applying extremely pressures to the rig fixing points.
The mast will have been vacummed up trying to lift the hull from the water and then over to onside perhaps the mast and rig broke under uneven stress applied by the spout.
The mast may have fallen off to onside of the hull, the hull may have dropped one side down and with the stern first into the water.
With the vacuum affect of the spout the interior of the hull effectively was at very low pressure and would have drawn water in while the atmosphere was forcing the sea in to equalies below decks, hull will have sunk rapidly like a bucket full of water.
how anyone can believe this appalling BS is beyond me
take HP for billions, & get away with it, this is the result
try spending it now...
@@mark.lawrence the jury did not agree with your assertion
I think the mast was far to tall and was built out of steel , will be interesting when a coroner’s report comes out .
The msst was uprooted like a tree and when the boat sank and rested on the ground sideway...the mast kinda corrected itself too looking like it still intact
Mast was aluminum.
Still wondering how some got out when everyone should have been asleep at 4am.
ALLEGEDLY it was reported that 9 out of the 10 staff survived
Any boat can be overwhelmed and sink given the right circumstances
Smells like the Titanic 🔑
Olympic
Why not go for the deck like Angela!
I will state that these are ocean going vessels and graded as such with strict parameters met. They are not flimsy toys.
Were there no life jackets?
People onboard a huge yacht asleep at 4AM with life jackets on?
@@festerofest4374 = they will now !
They had know time to put on life jackets
Exactly where is Jason Bourne?
I know this is a joke but it's scary to think it may be accurate with how shady all this reporting has been
RIP to passengers and crew.
RIP the chef, couldn't give a sht for the others.
@@matoko123 What is it about the others that makes you feel that way?
@@Reach41 Nobody amasses these sums of money without trampling heartlessly over many people. He's accused of intimidating and paying off witnesses in his recent court case. These people look down on the likes of us. They are all tax dodgers, the connected law firm specialises in it. The ship itself is registered in the Isle of Man (Tax avoidance land of the rich) in a company in his wife's name. A complete tax dodge. Meanwhile his lowly bottom feeding workers have 20% tax removed before they even see their wages. I've no time for multi millionaires or the systems that allow them to exist. Good riddance.
Wow!
It smacks of Divine Justice doesn’t it? I can’t wait to hear from the zealots….😅
:)
the sails were not furled? In the middle of the night? Is that what he said? Any sailor knows that you don't go to bed with your sailboat ready to fly away, or sink in this case.
I like the way he pronounced: Publica, as: Pube licker. Much more fun.
Why was the yacht designed with deep stair wells in the side decks which would allow tons of water into the saloon when heeling at a moderate angles with the deck under water that often happens when sailing hard?
These rumours do not sound very promising. More stories are coming out and some serious questions still remain without any answer sofar.
Why could they save themseoves and Not passenger? Were they alerted?
There were no sails visible in the video, and they were at anchor, so I don't think the sails were raised.
Rich dudes dead? Oooh no!.. anyway.
One of their lawyers was executed by a hit-and-run in a different country THAT SAME DAY?
The Lord had his hand in this deal and he got rid of some corruption
Yeah coz the lord be very worried about money. He sent a tornado! 😂
Money is evil they had enough money to buy a country or two and change the world economics
Then it’s also your lord who made them so rich and you so poor
What about the 16 yrs old daughter of Linch .....Sad 😪
This was no accident nor freak of nature. It is not a coincidence that his business partner was run down by a car and killed the same week. The sinking of the yacht is not a plausible accident either. The crew did NOT ACCIDENTALLY decide to leave safe port and chose to anchor in the path of a storm. The inside bulkhead flotation hatches where NOT ACCIDENTALLY left open. The 100 Ton Keel was NOT ACCIDENTALLY raised at sea. The Mast & sail was NOT just ACCIDENTALLY left unfurled during the storm. The Anchoring points at both front and rear did NOT ACCIDENTALLY pivot the boat towards all oncoming waves. The large lounge doors and stern side boat launch garage opening & Side Lazarette where NOT all ACCIDENTALLY left open ((this is ridiculous)... Too many accidental coincidences is simply not probable. The boat was scuttled. The fact that those responsible then abandoned the boat ahead of the other occupants is NOT just negligence. Just so it is absolutely clear - The keel is never lifted at sea, it is only lifted in safe shallow ports. That keel is a counterbalance and would have allowed the boat to flatten its mast to the surface of water without it capsizing. Even if it did roll because of a large wave hitting simultaneously it would simply roll back over. This is why the crew lifting the keel at sea is nonsensical unless it was the intention.
When you sell your soul to the devil he's bound to collect sooner than later 😓 lawyers can't get you out of the wrath of god 😒
There is a photo online of a "door" open on the front of the hull of the yacht.
RIP Chef
What looked like the mast breaking off was probably the ship tipping over. If the mast broke, its lights probably would have lost power.
When I hear the cost of that floating coffin, and think of how many homes could be paid for in full to help those less fortunate - I can only think how greed got them nowhere in the end.
A slap in the face to poverty
@@Irishwoman004 not greed,great business success
Many inaccuracies in this video. All of which are easily correctable or verifiable; shameful when deaths are involved.
The very concept of a 70m boat at anchor sinking due to pressure on its rigging is ridiculous. You’d have to be a child to believe that.
Crew failure here ok
@@kenziecampbell4605 or ignorant of the power of nature
That’s why this type of thing happens all the time. 😂
@@kenziecampbell4605 merely look at the video of a big sailboat at anchor getting knocked down in a storm that also flipped over a 50’ catamaran. A waterspout can have winds up to 125 mph.
@@kenziecampbell4605 merely watch the video where a big sailboat is heeled way over and a 50’ catamaran is lifted into the air and flipped over.
🤣🤣🤣 the tornado in italy... funny, really funny.
Very good reporting...thank you
The masters intact the boat is intact the story is completely and utterly inaccurate
fitting that this british
dude had all the money in the world and still has a set of teeth that looked like they got knocked out and put back into his mouth.
You try finding an nhs dentist.
HP + HAARP = ☠
"JESUS DIED TO RESCUE US ALL AT THE CROSS HE GAVE ALL TO REDEEM US HUMANITY ❤❤❤
The sails would have been furled..This is done at the push of a button on a Perini Navi, the entire operation of setting and stowing the sails is entirely mechanised on these yachts.
This was no accident.Controlled extreme weather event.
If only they had gone to church to celebrate the court victory, the arrogance of the rich
To celebrate fraud, at church? He did scheme, for the sale of his company. He just got a lucky verdict from the Judge. Or perhaps through bribes or coercion. The supreme court judges have also accepted bribes called gifts, after the fact or judgement.
You’re correct, the United States Supreme Court is corrupted
All the crew, including the captain, survived. Normally the captain goes down with his ship. But that wasn't the plan.
@@karelius7085 the entire crew were on deck and ended up in the water as the ship rapidly sank
@@annsheridan12 why would the entire crew be scrambled on deck at 3:57am? Had they had been alerted "all hands on deck" but didn't lower the keel, didn't close any opening, and didn't go after the sleeping passengers? Indeed was someone monitoring the weather situation and sounded the crew alarm, but no alarm for the passengers? So that logic dictates that the six passengers who did survive must have been up top with the crew at that time? i.e., Ayla Ronald & partner, Golunski & partner & baby, ... and Lynch's wife. Whilst five were trapped below in sleeping quarters, all in one room together swimming up to the high side to breathe the remaining pocket of air as the water rose? Except for Hannah, by herself in her room. So Lynch's wife wasn't sleeping below with hubby? Make it make sense.
@@michelekirby7907 easy! There is ALWAYS a crewman on anchor watch all nite. He alerted the crew to secure everything on deck hence the crew were all on deck. The passengers were not alerted because the crew did not see the weather as unsurivable , merely a squall. The woman with the baby were sleeping on deck , not below.
A water spout has winds from 50 to 125 mph IMHO the one that sank the yacht was toward the high figure.
@@michelekirby7907 simply because the crewman which is on anchor watch all night alerted the rest of the crew to secure everything that wasn’t secure on the deck in the squall. The guests were not notified because no one anticipated the severity of the wind which heeled the vessel over so far as to cause it to flood and sink.
Waterspouts can have winds up to 125 Mph.
@@michelekirby7907 easy! The crew on anchor watch alerted the rest of the crew to secure everything on deck , it was just a squall till the waterspout hit instantly knocking the yacht over 90+degrees dooming it as well as those below decks.
The storm is blowing for 45 minutes before it sang please get your story straight
You can never relax and assume everything on the water.
The person who hit the guy with car was a woman who stopped at the scene and has been questioned