As someone that just recently discovered it's own passion for physics...Thank you for this!!! Honestly, a great channel and amazing detailed content; your channel deserves more atention and recognition!
I just found your channel. This is a really excellent, insightful, explanation of thrust. My only issue with it is using the word "impulse". That is a jargon-y word that has meaning to initiates of physics and rocket science, but not to someone new to this. So, best to leave that word out, until you explain it in its own video, as it's not clear what you mean by saying "impulse" from this video, on its own ... imo ... Other than that, this is by far the best, and most clear, explanation of thrust that Ive seen. Very nice job
Hey! Really great explanation and illustrations. I am curious on one point though: at 8:40 you use "mv" for impulse. Is it permissible to define it this way? I've learned impulse as the change in momentum, so I expected a [delta]p there, or even "mv_f - mv_i". Thanks!
As someone that just recently discovered it's own passion for physics...Thank you for this!!!
Honestly, a great channel and amazing detailed content; your channel deserves more atention and recognition!
Glad you enjoy it!
Landed here via a Hohmann transfer from Kerbal Space Program :-) Great content and excellent explanation!
Thanks!
How does this channel not have a million subs?
...In progress.
11:00 How about a vertical-launch example??? Thanks.
I just found your channel. This is a really excellent, insightful, explanation of thrust. My only issue with it is using the word "impulse". That is a jargon-y word that has meaning to initiates of physics and rocket science, but not to someone new to this. So, best to leave that word out, until you explain it in its own video, as it's not clear what you mean by saying "impulse" from this video, on its own ... imo ... Other than that, this is by far the best, and most clear, explanation of thrust that Ive seen. Very nice job
Thank you. You make a very good point about where to start.
Hey! Really great explanation and illustrations. I am curious on one point though: at 8:40 you use "mv" for impulse. Is it permissible to define it this way? I've learned impulse as the change in momentum, so I expected a [delta]p there, or even "mv_f - mv_i".
Thanks!
provided vi is 0 then it works.
@@INTEGRALPHYSICS understood, thank you
Good explanation, but I'm confused, I thought J = kg m^2 s^-2, not kg m s^-1...
'J' is impulse not Joules.... physics dropped the ball on that one.
Thank you!
In which direction does the thrust of rocket occur