Thank you for all of your informative videos! I am new to this and want to inquire how to interpret the following 3 sets: whip bouquet dog; mice child man; ring anchor woman. Still working on combination reads. Thank you!
No. That's the thing about Mini Tableaus, they're not like the Grand Tableau. So you read the minis like a portrait - just with more cards. If you want the guarantee of the Man/Woman showing up, best do a Grand Tableau.
I liked the last way of laying the cards for the past, present and future. Do you consider their sequence (the first of the 3 cards is read first, then the second etc.) or do you look at each combination of cards in general?
No I do not Sandra, because then it is a portrait. I read the past cards as the past, present as present, and future as future, without combining them horizontally.
They represent the readee based on gender, and the significant other. Some Readers remove them for some layouts - I personally don't. And yes, they need to be part of the GT. I do have another video about the Man & Woman - I call them significators. Do look it up! It's also on my blog here: www.lenormandreader.com/blog/the-man-and-woman-the-lenormand-significators
Hi, I would like to ask how to read the GT if we set timing for ahead in the future eg. I set the intention to look ahead for 6 months and lay out the GT. What is the role of the signifactor in this case? Thanks
It would just represent you/ your significant other. In this case, you read the whole GT as set in the future - no past/present/future dividing of the columns.
Beautiful explanation! So easy to understand ❤ thank you 🙏
Deserves more views!!!!!
Thank you so much Leila!! I love watching all your videos, you are a great teacher in Lenormand 💜📖🌿🌿
Fantastic teacher!
Thank you Layla. Your energy and time is much appreciated ✨
Beautiful ...❤
Great explanation! Thank you so much Layla!
Thank you for all of your informative videos! I am new to this and want to inquire how to interpret the following 3 sets: whip bouquet dog; mice child man; ring anchor woman. Still working on combination reads. Thank you!
Love this! Thank you ❤❤
Hi Layla, what to do if the querent (man/woman card) doesn’t show up in mini Tableau? Do I need to reshuffle the cards?? Much appreciated 🙏
No. That's the thing about Mini Tableaus, they're not like the Grand Tableau. So you read the minis like a portrait - just with more cards. If you want the guarantee of the Man/Woman showing up, best do a Grand Tableau.
I liked the last way of laying the cards for the past, present and future. Do you consider their sequence (the first of the 3 cards is read first, then the second etc.) or do you look at each combination of cards in general?
No I do not Sandra, because then it is a portrait. I read the past cards as the past, present as present, and future as future, without combining them horizontally.
Are the man/woman cards removed at past, present, future readings? Not in GT. If not, what is their role? Thanks
They represent the readee based on gender, and the significant other. Some Readers remove them for some layouts - I personally don't. And yes, they need to be part of the GT. I do have another video about the Man & Woman - I call them significators. Do look it up! It's also on my blog here: www.lenormandreader.com/blog/the-man-and-woman-the-lenormand-significators
Hi, I would like to ask how to read the GT if we set timing for ahead in the future eg. I set the intention to look ahead for 6 months and lay out the GT. What is the role of the signifactor in this case? Thanks
It would just represent you/ your significant other. In this case, you read the whole GT as set in the future - no past/present/future dividing of the columns.
You have very beautiful hands
Thank you
لا افهمك ليلي أرجو أن تضعي ترجمة على حديثك 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢