Can I just write the rule as this type: This element is satisfied when a reasonable person apprehended that she faced harm. Usually a weapon will satisfy this element, but, further, while verbal threats are not enough to lead to a reasonable belief of harm, either where the victim had already initiated an attack but not unambiguously ended it or the defendant had the knowledge of the victim;'s history of aggression, the reasonable person standard is satisfied. My Writing is somehow bad, and pleas egive me some advice on that. Thanks.
Can I just write the rule as this type: This element is satisfied when a reasonable person apprehended that she faced harm. Usually a weapon will satisfy this element, but, further, while verbal threats are not enough to lead to a reasonable belief of harm, either where the victim had already initiated an attack but not unambiguously ended it or the defendant had the knowledge of the victim;'s history of aggression, the reasonable person standard is satisfied. My Writing is somehow bad, and pleas egive me some advice on that. Thanks.
Nice
Omg more necessary and sufficient LSAT stuff 🫡