Power of Charisma: What was Hitler like one-on-one? | Jeremi Suri and Lex Fridman
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 พ.ค. 2024
- Lex Fridman Podcast full episode: • Jeremi Suri: History o...
Please support this podcast by checking out our sponsors:
- LMNT: drinkLMNT.com/lex to get free sample pack
- Munk Pack: munkpack.com and use code LEX to get 20% off
- Belcampo: belcampo.com/lex and use code LEX to get 20% off first order
- Four Sigmatic: foursigmatic.com/lex and use code LexPod to get up to 60% off
- Eight Sleep: www.eightsleep.com/lex and use code LEX to get special savings
GUEST BIO:
Jeremi Suri is a historian at UT Austin.
PODCAST INFO:
Podcast website: lexfridman.com/podcast
Apple Podcasts: apple.co/2lwqZIr
Spotify: spoti.fi/2nEwCF8
RSS: lexfridman.com/feed/podcast/
Full episodes playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast
Clips playlist: • Lex Fridman Podcast Clips
SOCIAL:
- Twitter: / lexfridman
- LinkedIn: / lexfridman
- Facebook: / lexfridman
- Instagram: / lexfridman
- Medium: / lexfridman
- Reddit: / lexfridman
- Support on Patreon: / lexfridman - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
This podcast is extremely underrated. Really educational and also makes me reflect on my own self in a positive manner.
Since Joe went to Spotify I’ve had that podcast void filled by Lex
pretty outstanding someone besides myself comprehends what's happening
@@DannySullivanMusic what you mean? your not the only one with a brain bro
Yea Lex won me over. Favourite podcast 100%.
@Michael Fox
"Special thinkers"
Now that is confidence
The film „Der Untergang“ (The Downfall) portrays Hitler‘s last days, through the perspective of his typist and secretary Traudl Junge. She was one of his four permanent secretaries from 1942 to 1945. She wrote a memoir in 1947, describing these events, but published it 2002, shortly before she passed. Her book was mainly used for the movie made in 2004. The last three years of his life, Hitler showed a strong dislike of the military, calling them „incompetent idiots“ in front of his female entourage. Once he told his generals „these women (the four typists) have more guts than my entire army“. Later, from 1944 onwards, he would insist to have dinner with only the four, discussing arts, architecture, food, culture, music, films, but never the war, nor the „enemy“ (communists, Jews, etc.)
As Junge described: „He never used the word defeat, but after Stalingrad, he became a loner. He didn’t invite the officers to his home, he fell into a monotony; getting up at noon, having lunch with us, going for a walk, then taking a break for a nap, dinner was always late, as he would walk around the house talking to everyone and to himself, till 5 AM in the morning. Then he would fall asleep, completely exhausted. But he was always polite. He never lost his temper in front of female company. Not once. And we were young. We didn’t understand half of what he was talking about. But he always asked how we were. He was very much interested in our own well-being.“
Later, when they moved from his mansion in Obersalzberg to the bunker in Berlin, things changed. They were all cramped up in less than 3086 sq ft, and often tensions ran high. He was surrounded by people he really hated: the military. The typists had to listen to tirades most of the time. One of the four said in an interview, that it is true, that he said in front of the entire staff: „If we lose the war, it’s all on you! Stalin did well to get rid of all his generals, while I pampered mine!“
Interesting read, thank you
@@yessir4878 he was An amazing man turned Germany that was supposed to be bankrupt for 100 years into a powerhouse
@@9pktheories who genocided 6 million Jews and had 11 million propose slaughtered during his regime?🤡🤡
It’s a popular movie
@@9pktheories Not sure if amazing is the correct word, but he was exceptional for sure. That being said, he is credited by a lot of things, that wasn't his doing. Economic growths is probably the most important of them. The thing is, he was very lucky in what Germany was handed to him and how it was diferent from Germany 5 years ago.
When Hitler became chancellor, it was right after a start of economic recovery and uptrend and all work left was done by Hjalmar Schacht. He was also handed a military secretly built by monarchists/military conservatives.
When talking to someone who seems charismatic, you should always reach for added reserves of skepticism, before agreeing to their point.
Charles Trenet, a famous French singer, told me about his personal meeting with Hitler while touring Germany before WWII. He said he met a very charming, mindful, humble, cultivated and very sensitive man, miles away from what people said about him. Then he saw another reality, like everybody else, and he told me he never trusted his judgment and feelings again
Douce France, cher pays de mon enfance
well, i think the man must've had a kind of charming personality or charisma or something along these lines, at least in the beginning of his political career if one wants to call it this, even though he turned into what he finally turned into. this comes from the basic assumption that a man needs to have some likeable personality traits to gather initial support and to create somewhat of an inner circle of folks which are backing the ideas spread out from their leader and multiply a movements momentum quickly.
I still can’t believe I once watched his machine learning videos, and now he does this.
Never in a million years would I expect him to have the charisma and communication skills to be an interviewer. Now I think he is one of the best, probably my other favorite outside of Rogan.
Love your podcast agent Lex, you have had quite the career.
I was a tour guide in New Orleans for 18 years.... Several things happened in my mind right away. The ability to execute the English language properly, quality of the tone of your voice, and most importantly have the ability to counter any and all questions and answers. So... Voice lessons, acting lessons, and a whole closet of clothes which make you look like you stepped out of a page of time as if that historical character is standing there in front of you. Personally I turned into a sponge for information like a librarian and I thoroughly enjoyed talking about any subject. The more you know you become the dynamic and the center of attention.
😂
The problem with politics today (and for quite some time now), is that there is a real lack of charisma and heart coming through that TV or on the radio. Suit and tie politicians who just read off a sheet of paper or a teleprompter..they do not actually mean what they say 75% of the time. Guys like Churchill and Hitler would go up there and wing it and scream, be animated and actually have emotion. This is why Trump got popular in my opinion... whether you agree or do not agree, he said what he felt and was thinking at the time. This is totally foreign in our public relations science atmosphere where everything from clothes, to speeches, to opinions politicians should have are decided by a background committee.
Yes, nowadays most politicians aint do what they say to
Hitler was actually very meticulous in his preparation and how he was viewed.
@@blksheep176 it's true, but on multiple occasions there were recordings of him high as a kite screaming speeches, but in regular convo he was much calmer and laid back, in the recordings of his talking to the Finnish prime Minister he was talking at a normal pace with a deep calming voice and seemed almost as if he hadn't a care in the world, he was talking to finland abt continuing their advance onto the russian territory of the USSR and also telling them he didn't know how large their reserves of men or equipment was or he would've thought twice of trying to invade them, he seemed actually pretty self aware and understanding abt the whole situation in private but in public he couldn't say that so the drugs would help him get pumped and be maniacal to put on a good face for Germany
@@bigtittie7295
Remember that the thing about the drugs may have been a factor during the latter part of the war (and even that is quite unclear and subject to rumours and more or less well founded speculations), but most of the famous speeches were pre-war, and there is little to suggest he was given any drugs during that period. In fact the longer the war continued, the more sparse his public appearances became, so the part of his life with most of the speeches, and the part where he was possibly more and more affected by some drugs were not simultaneous. Therefore I find it less likely that drugs influenced his speech making to any large extent.
Furthermore: Hitlers speeches may have seemed like he almost was high (and the rumours about his drug intake late in the war may get blurred together with that notion), but in fact you usually only see short snippets of them. Many speeches were really long (an hour or more), and the climactic bellowing parts were preceeded by a long, carefully rehearsed and prepared buildup.
@@mateuszmattias Maybe Hitlers speeches were kind of like Jordan Peterson’s books, whose own fans don’t really care or know whats actually in them.
Lex "Sorry to bring up Hitler" Fridman
The more I learn about that guy, the more I don't care for him.
And that Hitler guy was pretty bad too.
@@Jackaroo. I couldn't help but thinking of Norm throughout this conversation. Norm's Hilter stuff was some of his very best. RIP Normy you beautiful chunk of coal.
Lex! You have really changed my view of things with your podcast! Thanks for doing what you do and talking with who you talk with!
agreed. 1000% true!!
We’re lucky now to have a leader that either in front of a group or one-on-on can put everyone to sleep.
Including himself.
Well, better than the one that made everyone else want to vault out of the window
@@shalizzle793 ...and by everyone you mean the elitists.
Are you saying we'd be luckier to have a leader like Hitler
@@philmitchellboxing8661 I think as far as inspiring a nation goes, having a vision for that nation, and being able to go toe-to-toe with other world leaders, then yes.
My pops, was literally the most charismatic guy I ever had the privilege to know, that and his gift for gab was just amazing to watch. He would close jobs, that was for sure meant to go to the larger contractors, more established, more reliable to handle the size of the jobs, not that we wasn’t, we just didn’t look it back then, but my pops would walk out with the same deal or better, guaranteed. My grandfather and great pops all had it, it definitely skipped me and my siblings, but my cousins have it too, quite amazing. But you have to know you have research, but you also have to have something special. I can plan, research learn everything I need to know, but I just didn’t have that gift. Now I let others do that and I focus on what I am good at, logistics, planing etc. you don’t know what you don’t know
If you're an exceptionally good communicator, it doesn't matter if it's on one one, or one on one million, you know how to control people's emotions.
It's fantastic there's someone that spots what's what
You speak from experience, I can’t get enough of your over a million viewed vids myself
I’ve fell victim to this and victimized others like this throughout my life
From the title I thought this video was about basketball
haha! excellent
😂😂
I cant get the image of hitler breaking FDR's ankles out of my mind.
@@ajg5138 That's how he got the wheelchair!
Lmao
One on one, Hitler had a very deep, serious voice, reminiscent of the stevedore philosopher Eric Hoffer. He was quite convincing.
Speaking to an audience is a form of speaking one-on-one. In public speaking you look just above the crowd and see them really as one entity you are having a dialogue with.
your Chanel deserved subscribe and hit the liked button so educational.
Love the topic!
Love the question about Lincoln and his method of influencing the room
Amazing convo
Position, Power, Control, Authority.. when you have all these factors, people (whether it be by choice, or by coercion) would follow you. and it is a natural tendency for subordinates to subdue ego and submit to herd mentality in order not to stand out and be picked on
the real question is... how to put yourself in such position of power.
Its almost as if lex could be the next rogan. not in terms of laughs and things but he's asking the right questions to right people at the right time and seeing him wake up in real time is something magical
How dare you compare lex to that fucking goof lolol. Idc if it was a year ago.
The man is Zen as fuck. Effortlessly present
Hey Lex, Thanks for not being too 'cool' to ask interesting questions that us regular folk can appreciate....and eventually understand📚 😌⏳✌
Best back-handed compliment!
@@imsorrythankyouplease7613 only to someone who IS too cool. Lol ✌
embrace the bald my dude... you will be glad you did it sooner than later.
Hahaha,it's real hard for some it seems.
😆😆😆 yikes
Fuck that. A single hair on your head is better than no hair at all.
Thank goodness they’ll be a cure in the next 10 years!
Yeah, it looks Chernobyl bad.
Storytelling is one of my biggest loves
What was the year Richard Kalergi wrote the “Pan” European Union Plan and Practical Idealism? Was it 1923? Read carefully...in the plan and book are laid out what Hitler reacted to and fought against. Who funded and supported Kalergi and his plans? Why do we not hear more about Kalergi? An acolyte of Kalergi, Barbara Lerner Spectre will explain on TH-cam some of the goals...
Just started his podcasts🤙🤙
I think Lex mentioned it before on another show that Chamberlain met Hitler (and got taken in) but Churchill never did. Then there was Orson Wells, who asked who this Hitler guy was. His friend said to him "you sat next to him at dinner for two hours "when he thought back, he said he could vaguely remember this nothing little man.
I seen that interview and then I seen other interviews with Lady Mosley and she says he was one of the most captivating people she ever met
@@ryanybaz2230 That's Hitler, a guy who didn't do well at school , not recommended for promotion in the war, rejected for an art degree, yet conned some smartest and most powerful people in Europe.
The Welles story is almost certainly untrue.
@@johnbull1568 Orson Welles also said he was nothing without thousands shouting Heil Hitler.
@@pepelemoko01 there weren’t thousands shouting Heil Wells were there?
Lex, if you want to know more about how Hitler was 1 on 1 you should read Hitler's "Table Talk". It's a collection of his private conversations during around a 2 year period.
Only accurate in its original German. English version has liberties taken and things added.
@@ajohnson9630 original German is even disputed, to my knowledge
@@alphaclam Indeed, but far more accurate than the English or French version.
@@ajohnson9630that doesn't make much sense. if it isn't a historical document to begin with, the degrees of "accuracy" are not relevant in relation to understanding what Hitler was like in private. Strictly speaking, it doesn't provide that in any language. The German version isn't any more "accurate," even if the other versions are mistranslations.
@@alphaclam In all fairness, no historian ever has a "perfect source" to work with, but for sure some sources must be dealt with much more carefully, and some for that matter may need to be dismissed altogether. But that being said I think your take on the "Table talks" above is a bit too formalistic; they must be read with a critical eye, but they can still provide very valuable insights. Unless one can determine with a reasnoable degree of certainty that it's all completely made up fiction, it may still be possible, albeit with some difficulty, to filter out valuable parts. Tricky at times, but I have never heard that the "Table talks" have been disputed to that degree, that they are supposed to be complete falsifications (like the Hitler diaries for example), and in that light they may verty well be worth reading.
What book did the guy mention? Max Favor or Vavor or something like that?
Read the Kotkin books on Stalin
The crown actually originates from an ancient Persian belief in and artistic depiction of a certain elegance, perhaps one could say "intangible", or perhaps attractiveness or charisma, brilliance, et cetera, a certain je ne se quois that radiates around the head of a particularly respected religious and or social/political figure, especially a leader. Human traditions even since ancient civilizations have not only grappled with these very ideas and debates but they also even reflect these concepts in their cultures and beliefs and have even reified and brought these concepts into being, oftentimes intentionally, with their rituals and institutions.
Your hedgehog is looking through me.
My dog wants to play with it! 😁
Lex's podcast nonchalantly surpassed JRE in terms of intriguing episodes a long time ago.
The guy talking with Curtis Yarvin would be great
I would love to have Lex as a teacher even though we are damn near the same age.
Well, I'm just incredibly thankful to habe all these tribesmen on podcasts who tell me what to think about ethics and history
Trump, bullying 1 on 1? I’ve worked with him. Twice. The man makes you feel like you’re the most important person in the room. Like you have ALL of his attention. Definitely not bullying. Maybe he is when he disciplines idk but he was EXTREMELY charismatic.
Lex is letting his left-leaning bias show.
Hitler was also a lazy authoritarian. From interviews of diplomats and Germans who saw him, he’d stay up all nights watching cinema, sitting on his legs across wingback chairs and would t wake up until noon or late afternoon.
Based tbh
@@Justin-lk2gt I sleep right through my alarm clock for work all the time
Based poltards on youtube
@@TheHellogs4444 /his/ actually, /pol/ is a silly place
Stalin did the exact same thing actually, Hitler and Stalins associates both actually were forced to reschedule their entire lives basically around Hitler and Stalin staying up till 5 in the morning watching movies, filling out paperwork, and even making battleplans or statesplans, it was very strange how similar they were in day to day life but and even had a lot of the same views like on the Ukranians or how they both thought the son of powerful leaders were always lousy, they even believed pretty similarly abt how to treat the polish problem
Unconscious suffering is like a human machine that can imitate life & totally disconnected from conscious suffering.
I think ambition is the thread that binds all people of power, good or bad. Lincoln and Hitler were equally ambitious, but their ambitions took totally different directions. One became powerful because they wanted to end atrocities, while the other became powerful because of the atrocities they were wiling to inflict.
Many leaders are mostly about themselves. I don’t think Napoleon had that much of an ideological drive; more of a romantic sense of destiny and an all devouring personal ambition.
I actually assume Stalin was a bit the same in a much more ruthless and unrefined way.
In this clip Joe Rogan has Jamie research a story he had heard about Hitler's beligerent, talkative behavior nearly completely prevented anyone else from interrupting as during the meeting he cornered Mussolini to convince him to continue to support the war effort. Hitler was so wired on Eukadol that despite nearly cancelling the meeting due to exhaustion, he became even more confident and aggressive than usually.
th-cam.com/video/Gd92fg1VWyU/w-d-xo.html
“Charisma is exquisite manipulation” - Grian Chatten
This reminds of a time I was watching peeky blinders and Tom shelby was telling a story of the time he shot someone for cowardice and stole their white horse from under them to emphasize the fact to someone that he wasn't going to wait around for his money . See what I did there
Sorry to bring up hitler but it breaks my heart that I dont know him.
FDR would tell a story and never get to your point then get you out the door gore Vidal says it really well and does a funny impression
Check out the documentary Europa the Last Battle to learn more
Hitler was notorious for having a sweet tooth. He would often eat 4 or 5 cream cakes in one sitting. Quite an interesting mental image, him with cream all over his tiny moustache, stuffing down yet another cake in front of a bemused and mildly disgusted Goebbels.
Yeah, like hed get to eat all the cream cakes with goebbels around!
I don't believe that. If you said Goering, I would definitely believe you. But Hitler? Hitler was a slim man.
@@theycallmedoorway9913plenty of slim people eat lots of sweets and stay slim if they’re physically active
There is a recording out there of Hitler talking with his normal voice to Finnish commander Carl Gustav Mannerheim.
Because we all fear an angry parent Hüter in public was an angry man but in private probably very relaxed and congenital therefore anyone who was dreading meeting him were relieved to be presented with a happy parent
Psychopaths and sociopaths are often highly intelligent and charming and that's why they are as successful as they are.
Hitler was neither of those things
Hitler knew how to charm exactly who he needed to and when he needed to BUT by the last 2-3 years of his dictatorship, he had lost that ability.
The one on one with Mussolini was WOOOOOW!!! I would have loved to have been outside of that room shit in the seat Mussolini was in!!! The feelings the REVERBARATION!!!! Ahhhh those speeches??!! The ENERGY!!! Not that I prais Hitler or anything he did but there has never been a more POWEFUL more more PERSUASIVE SPEAKER!!!!
The Australian PM said Clinton was astonishing one on one. And he could give a speech.
Lolita express
Stalin ended what may be the most murderous genocide and movement for the amount of time that it existed
Stalin, or rather the USSR with his leadership, is at least mostly and was nearly single-handedly responsible for defeating the nazis, which were a far more ruthless, powerful, ambitious, and dangerous threat than the confederacy. Why not compare the two? Both have hella clout, but Stalin may have more...
Lex you should also read if you havent already the Albert Speer book--Inside the Third Reich
Hitler is a complicated phenomena. He did not have the charisma to get elected, but he did build and organization strong enough to get him appointed. He did a much more thorough and efficient form of Fascism than the Italians. His understanding of what had to be done for this "new" idea of taking Communism and replacing class with race and concentrating on one group and a mythology of a connection to the land was phenomenal. The development of a new mythology and the raising of "a generation of brutal youth" built on the neo-paganism that had begun in the 1890's. It was very much like the speed with which wokeism has spread through the universities and now the public schools and local government in the US, and they are related. Imagine woke/political correctness with the full force of the government and police behind it, like in Canada.
This is how it happens. It only the time from a child be 8 until 15 or 16 , that's 5 or 6 years, and you can change everything if you control the schools and the public discourse. The same as two terms of a US President. One more Biden term and all the women in power will be replaced by trans-women, as if the 19th Amendment never happened.
This guy watched the Lincoln movie by Spielberg to
I make a comment that people were in awe of AH and while he was a lot of things he was a genius and TH-cam(I hope not this page) deletes the comment. Unreal.
Hitler, Stalin, Ayn Rand, Gangis Khan
Dude can talk a hellava lot about those 4
Trump.... His era isn’t over
They didn't really conclude or analyse anything about Hitler. He said Hitler was different, but then stopped. How was Hitler different? The clip doesn't really answer it's own headline.
gud stuff
All those people who describe Hitler as an unavoidably charismatic Svengali type figure who could hypnotize people with his eyes and his speech are just making excuses and avoiding the shame of them having listened to him, or agreed with him, or doing what he ordered. They were not hypnotized. They were humans. Unless they had a gun held to their heads, they did what they did because they chose too, even when they knew it was wrong. If you were in Germany in the 30s and 40s chances are you would have gone along with everyone else and did the same thing. As evidence, watch film of all the German citizens that were rounded up to help clean up the concentration camps after the Allies liberated them. They all knew exactly what was going on in those camps but they made the choice to live in denial and after it was over their shame absolutely destroyed many people.
They had guns in their head
What went on in the camps
If you can convince 20 thousand people of a thing, then you can convince 1 person in a room of that thing.
Being good at one does NOT mean you are not good at the other, quite the opposite, it means you are more likely to be good at both if you are good at one.
I fail to understand why people think so 2 dimensionally, it's quite disappointing.
Can confirm that Hitler was, indeed, "a little different"
Don’t you know the Mannerheim recording?
Friedman: "Sorry to bring up Hitler"
🙄
Only the most recognizable person of the last 120 years.
this title is WILD
The leader that had the most charisma in both settings was the Dear Holy Apostle ( The Most Honorable Elijah Muhammad).
Trump was very effective one on one with foreign leaders.
a good leader comes from what they have been bestowed with not them personally that is why leaders break out from a moment rather than born that way hitler was a failure most of his life and homeless for a period nothing magical about his perona in those times but all of this time was preparation for his break out and when that happended it was that purpose he found that fueled any success he had this principle applies also to prophets jesus started his ministry at 30 mohammed at around 40 destiny reveals it self the moment we are most prepared
In my opinion, Hitler was not extraordinary one on one. If a small crowd were to coalesce, he would then become magnetic.
Hitler simply formed camaraderie with his old army bros and people with shared interests. They would then use his charisma with crowds to push their political agenda and grow their movement. Stalin on the other hand was a shitty orator. That 1941 speech felt like he was reading a report in a boardroom. One on one, however, he was extremely effective. He was charming, manipulative, deceptive, and completely inscrutable. It was as if there were several Stalins, according to Lazar Kaganovich. He was more like the character of Palpatine in the Star Wars franchise; secretly manipulating others into doing his bidding. That is how he was able to destroy his opponents, like Trotsky, and maneuver to the top of the political hierarchy.
Lincoln also died in a duel. And it changed his approach to ppl. He would write the means letters to ppl until that duel.
He lived through it. And was humbled. And became all the better for it. Life is funny that way. ⚡⚡
he changed his approach to people after he died?
Hitler was actually a speed freak, maybe that’s why the gaze
If didn't meet him how could he know how he was like personally
Listen to Hitlers talk with Mannerheim. He presents a cery different persona.
Then you need to listen to Louis Ferdinand von Hohenzollern, who had met him.
As someone who had a receding hairline at birth, what a hairline.
I think Lex just want to know the vibes.
*Look Who's Back book and movie adaptation nailed the scariest things about this genocidal German dictator*
Apparently herman Goering was very charismatic, according to his American guards after the war
The condition to have charisma is to be totally blind to it , so as to Be 100,% natural and when the viewer is sure that the powerfull feeling or message the charismatic person has is natural that brings it all its strength and persuasion. If you are fake and carry fakness if it even gets a bit detected then you lose respect
I don't know obviously, I agree about what is said. And I think we can speak of "magic" but in a charismatic way if to call it that. Now, these people you speak about is obvious narcissist's. Even psychopaths. I've met my shared part of some of those. I think the ability to appeal to people emotionally without necessary have alot of them or even any plays apart. Those people have some ability to fool people. To read people and to find out what gets them triggered. On a low scale on a one to one basis but on a higher Ewen thousands. The surface traits I think differ from culture to culture, and of course what time in history it is. Whatever those people could play on. What I know (I read alot about Hitler) Hitler was quite a discontent loner to start with, then he started to express his discontent in coffeshops, in a time when the German people really was in a distress. He realized he was an excellent demagogue and it must have excited him rejected as he had been earlier. It was the classical background of a mask Ng if a sociopath as well with an abusive father and an overprotective mother. Not that all people with that upbringing becomes sociopaths but it is a quite common trait. I been thinking alot if he had any "help" if he was "chosen" in an even more evil and cunning way to simply create a political chaos and even finally a war. In the world we live in I don't even find it unreasonable. But not necessary either.
One on one, Hitler was probably very ordinary. Hitler’s power depended on his powerful public speaking skill. Charisma depends on having an audience. Hitler was not especially charming or gracious. He was not a great conversationalist. He didn’t have any real friends. He had no girlfriend or family life. He was a fanatic and his personal life was totally absorbed by his political life.
what do you mean, he had no girlfriend?!
his long time partner was Eva Brown, his former secretary. and they both both married before commiting suicide at the end of WW2.
@@LevisH21 Eva Braun was not his secretary at any time. She only came into Hitler’s life in 1932, and questions remain about the nature of their relationship.
No his power was contingent on telling people the truth
Ye is right
Wow just imagine eating tea and looking for something to watch and thus pops up in recommendations 🤣 gotta love those algorithms. Now I've got to watch full show
I love when that happens while eating tea!
Mussolini thought of hitler as awkward and talkative
Hitlers strength in meetings would have been his psychopathy
Untrue
I’m tryna get a haircut like that
Cult and religious leaders are good at story telling
Only comment about Trump is that he is “physically menacing”? Gee, how neutral and unbiased. Trump is beloved by people one on one. Seeing him interact with individuals changed my mind about him, to the positive. I hate his crowd persona. He’s genuinely nice to individuals.
You've been eating too many Trump steaks, MAGA mouth.
I love how getting what you want has now been collectively called bullying in the societal mind because of the softness of the modern era.
Weak.
Hitler had a superpower. It only worked on Germans. English speakers laughed. But then we didn't think we were the true masters of the world who somehow always lost, the Empire, the naval race, the war. In fact they didn't really lose the war. They never saw a foreign soldier in their country. It must have been a stab in the back.
love the hedgehog
Talking about Hitler, then: "I don't want to bring up controversial figures, but Donald Trump..."
It is the same with Modi in India..
After listening to this entire clip, we still don’t know what Adolf Hitler was like one on one. 🙄🤷🏻♂️🙄
Regardless of what others will say about their political positions, Clinton and Obama were extremely good in public speech and 1-on-1
people always want to look at Hitler as this awful person and wonder how he got these people to follow him. but people fail to look at the state of Germany at the time, after the first War Germany kind f got screwed over by the other nations and the average Germans was not living the greatest life. this made it easy for a guy to come in preaching German Pride and to inspire eager young people to follow and be part of something. ive always thought the real history lesson in WWII wasnt what Hitler did and became, but the mistakes that others made by giving Germany a raw deal which led to somebody like this being able to take control. all people want to do id blame Germany and call Hitler evil and not look at what the "good guys" did that allowed him to happen in the first place. you talk about not learning from history, after WWII people were so hungry and eager to punish Nazis and scold Germans they very well could have set things in motion for it to happen again.
Have you been reading alot about the Jews in Germany in the 30's and their financial behaviour? Nah, didnt think so German history seems to start in about 1939.
How the hell would this guy know?