34:58 this whole sequence is full of cameos. The wise ones are played by the original Broadway Elphaba and Glina (Idina Menzel and Kristen Chenoweth). Then the woman who says 'he can read it he must be a wizard' is Winnie Holzman who wrote the book for the musical and co-wrote the movie. Then finally the guy who says 'the wizard will see you now' is Stephen Schwartz who wrote the music
The red shoes in the film was an easter egg. It was actually silver in the book of the wizard of oz. During the film 1939 they changed it to red since the red popped out more than the silver on the yellow brick road.
And there are patent issues which is why the slippers are silver in the play, like the book. Note how Glinda claps ruby red slippers three times while singing Popular.
The Wizard of Oz is just Dorothy's perspective, her house kills the witch of the east and steals her shoes so is it surprising the witch of the west is pissed? 😂
Part 1 shows how Elphie’s life started with a lot of hurt (her father’s rejection and her mom dying etc.) so it is safe to say Part 2 with all that we seen in the story will continue this. Morrible’s propaganda was basically the end of Elphaba’s dream and the start of her life as The Wicked Witch of the West. Also a lot of people do not realize Elphaba went west not only because of the difficult terrain but because it is secluded place which happens to be the region where Fiyero is from.
If you listen to what Glinda says in the beginning when the little munchkin girl asks her"Why does wickedness happen?" and also look at Glindas face when she sings no one mourns the wicked and you might change your mind about their friendship not being real. The only reason Glinda follows Madame Morrible in the end scene is because both she and Elphie know that she will be killed if she does not. There are a lot of clues
The ruby red slippers was not originally ruby red. In the books by L.Frank Baum they were silver, just like in this movie. The only reason they were ruby red in the 1939 movie was because they used technicolor for the first time and they wanted the shoes to pop out more against the yellow brick road. So actually this movie is more true to the original story but at the,same time they pay tribute to the 1939 movie in more ways than one and the shoes in popular is one.
About the ruby red slippers, apparently in the original book they’re supposed to be silver. They were changed into red slippers for the movie because somebody maybe the director thought that they would stand out more. So this movie is going back to the original color, silver. So it’s Nessarose’s silver slippers that will be taken by Galinda and given to Dorothy. I actually think it’s pretty nasty in the Wizard of Oz that Galinda didn’t wanna give those shoes back to Elphaba , especially when you learned that Elphaba was promised those slippers by her sister. She could’ve told Dorothy to click her heels and go home and given the slippers back to Elphaba , But it seems that she wanted Elphaba to go on this rivalry with Dorothy and eventually get killed, and she was even risking Dorothy‘s life by putting her through all that instead of telling her that all she had to do was click her heels and say “there’s no place like home“.
Glinda felt bad during the beginning. But chose to be part of the system (that's always benefited her) to try and make change from the inside. She doesn't have the same strength as Elphaba to be seen as a villain or "wicked." The friendship was deep. I think one lyric in No One Mourns the Wicked is actually "No, ONE mourns the Wicked" the one being...Glinda😢
Yeah it was a bit frustrating how much they didn't get the dynamics. Even if you don't know how the story turns out...which I don't so no spoilers! Even if what I'm about to say is wrong, but I left the theater thinking that they're probably secretly working together. Again, don't tell me if I'm wrong. However, it was obvious that it was more than just "oh Glinda's actually evil"
Marissa Bode who played Nessarose was the first actress who played her who is actually disabled in real life and who actually uses a wheelchair in real life.. Jon M chu wanted an actual disabled person to play Nessa in this movie...
And I love that. The whole set design was taken into consideration for her, with the hiring of a disability coordinator (who is also a wheelchair user). As well as any costumes and props Marissa would use in the movie. And her chair! It was designed after Marissa’s actual chair, right down to the breaks. They also had an accessible trailer made for her and hired a van to take her to and from places. I’ve never wanted to cry at how much care and consideration was put in for her. The bar was buried in the floor, and they went above and beyond for her.
When I tell you I have been waiting for your reactions to this incredible movie. Wicked is my second favorite musical of all time and I have been waiting for a movie since I saw it on stage in 2010. It's one of the best movie adaptions of a musical I have ever seen. From the sets (that were almost all practical), to the cosutmes, to the music (sung live on set), to the performances (Ariana and Cynthia, along with the rest of the cast, were incredible) it's all perfection. I do need to defend my girl Galinda. If you go back and watch the opening number when she lights the fire you can see in her eyes she is heartbroken, but she has to act happy to keep up appearances. She is spoiled and has everything handed to her and she is mean. But it isn't malicious. She wants to be a good person, but she has never had anyone show her truly what that means. That's why she is so intrigued by Elphaba. Elphie is the first person to not fall for her act, and is the first person to truly be her friend and not someone who just wants to take advantage of her popularity. When it comes to the ending and chosing not to go with Elphaba, it's because she knows she wouldn't survive as public enemy number 2. In her eyes the best way to get the public to go against the wizard is to get them to fall in love with her and listen to what she says. That's why she said to go apologize. Her mind goes straight to taking down the heirarchy from the inside, not head on like Elphie. Part 2 really is going to go deeper into where her mind is, but until that comes out just keep in mind that people aren't just good or bad. They are both. Well after that novel I just have to say this was a fun reaction and I'm glad you guys enjoyed the film.
@fynnthefox9078 I hope so. I may be biased because I have always been a Glinda fan, but I just think lots of people who haven't seen the full show are only seeing Glinda's character on the surface level, not looking deeper.
Wicked was originally a book based on the Oz books, which are in the public domain. Wicked was then adapted into a play and after years of development, we have the movie! About the slippers, they're silver slippers in the original books, the RUBY slippers were an exclusive invention of the MGM movie to show off the technicolor. Disney actually had to pay MGM to use the ruby slippers in Return to Oz. Speaking of which, I'd love to see you three react to Disney's Return to Oz, it's a very loose sequel to the MGM film, but it's great. The tone is much closer to the books.
the stage musical has two acts which they split into two parts for the movie because they wanted to expand it as the show is quite rushed. part 1 is more of the prequel however part 2 takes place alongside the wizard of oz from elphaba and glindas perspective, so part 2 will end with her melting. you will also see the tinman, scarecrow, lion and dorothy. it comes out november this year as they filmed both parts at the same time. also the red shoes that glinda was holding was just a reference, but the SILVER shoes that elphabas sister was wearing are the ruby slippers. in the original book they were silver and were only ruby for the wizard of oz movie so they are copyrighted. in part 2 tho there might be a scene where they turn red for certain reasons 🤫
Imagine if your beloved sister was crushed by a house and someone else gave her special slippers given to her by her mother/father to a stranger tourist and you can’t get them back. How would you feel? How would you act toward the strange tourist?
Loved the reaction! Just as a bit of trivia, the shoes in the original book were silver slippers, but the Wizard of Oz movie made them ruby to stand out in the new technicolor film!
You have to read the book "Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West" by Gregory Maguire. It's so much darker and more detailed, but my god it's so amazing! Elphaba's backstory is so interesting and I absolutely love what the musical did - even though they took out a lot of the darker elements. The book series is just fantastic! 🤩🤩🤩
Wicked is based mostly on the 1939 MGM Wizard of Oz, but because that movie is still under copyright, Wicked could only gingerly tip-toe up to the edge of the MGM movie, but not step over a legal line. So they reached back to the original L. Frank Baum 1900 novel, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, and fill in a whole lot of gaps from their own imagination. The MGM movie presents Oz as Dorothy's dream, with characters created in her imagination from real people she supposedly knows from Kansas. So technically, the only back stories would be, say, why Miss Gulch is so mean, not why the Wicked Witch is mean. A couple of important ways that MGM Oz (and hence Wicked) deviate from the novel (and Baum's 13 sequels). MGM combines the unnamed Good Witch of the North with Glinda, the Good Witch of the South. In the book, Dorothy is greeted by the former, and finally after finding out the Wizard is powerless, has to reach Glinda to send her home. (This makes a lot more sense than Billie Burke not telling Dorothy at the start that she had the power via the ruby slippers to return home at any time.) The novels were heavily illustrated so we can see exactly how Baum envisioned the world he created. The Good Witch of the North looks like a kindly grandmother. Glinda is a strikingly beautiful mature woman, totally different than the gauzy ditzy all-pink bubble-transporting version created by Billie Burke. The Baum's Wicked Witch looks like a sort of gypsy woman who carries an umbrella (you can guess why) instead of a broomstick. This version comes across as really weird to anyone who has seen Margaret Hamilton's iconic version. None of Baum's witches are dressed like a traditional medieval witch, all in black. None have magic broomsticks on which to fly and in fact, no witch flies whatsoever. Most importantly, his WWofTW is NOT green. In Baum's world, there is no life-long discrimination and assumption that a green woman is inherently evil. In Baum's Oz, ALL the animals talk (including Toto in the later sequels) but they only do animal things - they aren't nannies or professors. (The horse of a different color, invented by MGM, would be chatting with his passengers in Baum's world, but definitely not driving the carriage.) And no one is trying to take away their rights, so there is no cause for Elphaba to champion. Baum's fictitious world is filled with the most imaginative creatures (and Elphaba being green but otherwise human would not cause anyone to bat an eye). In Baum's sequel, there is a man constructed of sticks with a Jack-o-lantern head, men that go on all-fours, all on wheels, a windup mechanical man that "does everything that live," a princess who changes her heads instead of her clothes, and a flying living contraption made of two sofas tied together with palm fronds for wings, a broomstick tail, and the head of a gump. (Disney's 1985 Return to Oz is considered by many to be the most faithful to the books. Also, you can type in the name of any character and "Oz" in the search function and see all the ways that person was imagined.) I love the books (and Return to Oz), I also love the MGM movie, and as I am learning about Wicked, also loving that. But trying to blend of any two is, in my opinion, a lost cause. Each should be appreciated on its own merit.
@@QuasarYGO Literally the first book I ever read was Ozma of Oz, my mother's copy with the original period John Neil illustrations. Return so cleverly takes that book, stirs in characters from the Marvelous Land of Oz, and reverses the MGM movie idea, of having the Oz characters bleed through into Kansas. Reactors, though, who only know Oz through the MGM version can get freaked out by seeing Baum's concepts, but for me, that is the charm of the books. Another thing is that Baum wrote these as children's tales, with Dorothy or a similar young lead character, directing the action. Sixteen yo Judy Garland, strapped in to portray Dorothy as a 14 yo, was still half-a-decade too old (and the Wiz movie and the Muppet version both with a mid-20's yo Dorothy are even worse in this regard). Nine yo Fairuza Balk was the perfect Dorothy. I finally realized that because the MGM movie is trying so hard to show us her three companions already had the characteristic trait they though they lacked, they have their scarecrow leading the action. Judy Garland winds up in a sense being a "damsel-in-distress" heroine, not how Baum saw her.
Part 1 is based on Act 1 of the play, but with about an hours worth of extended storyline that you can't really do on stage. Part 2 will be based on Act 2 of the play, so be careful for spoilers (I've seen lots of spoilers for part 2 on other reaction videos)
Would love if you could react to jonathan baileys project before wicked . Called Fellow travelers (2023) for which he won awards and received his first Emmy nomination. He called it his life’s work. It’s just a 8 episode limited series very important emotional and heartbreaking.
Always felt bad that the musical added the love triangle subplot, since it puts G(a)linda through unecessary pain--plus I can sympathize with her wanting her name to be pronounces correctly, even if my name is average.
I’m just going to suggest you rewatch this without reacting. I feel like you missed a lot. For one… Glinda’s entire character. lol Still an enjoyable reaction all the same.
It's interesting how these women cut the VERY emotional parts out of the dance scene. I wonder if that's because they couldn't manage to empathize with the power of it and couldn't even fake it. Same with the scene when Elphaba's younger self flashed when she was falling at the end. Some people just can't relate.
Loved how Elphaba flipping her cape was pretty much her "hair toss." It was a nice touch. 👌
This comment has been recycled so many times lmao
@@stanleylee8581 good it makes me happy everytime i see it lol
34:58 this whole sequence is full of cameos. The wise ones are played by the original Broadway Elphaba and Glina (Idina Menzel and Kristen Chenoweth). Then the woman who says 'he can read it he must be a wizard' is Winnie Holzman who wrote the book for the musical and co-wrote the movie. Then finally the guy who says 'the wizard will see you now' is Stephen Schwartz who wrote the music
Remember history is written by the victors... this musical indicates she wasn't Wicked, it was propaganda.
The red shoes in the film was an easter egg. It was actually silver in the book of the wizard of oz. During the film 1939 they changed it to red since the red popped out more than the silver on the yellow brick road.
And there are patent issues which is why the slippers are silver in the play, like the book. Note how Glinda claps ruby red slippers three times while singing Popular.
The Wizard of Oz is just Dorothy's perspective, her house kills the witch of the east and steals her shoes so is it surprising the witch of the west is pissed? 😂
Lots of your questions are answered in Part 2, which will the end of the wicked story. No part 3 or 4
“It’s not that deep a friendship.” Media literacy really is dead
Part 1 shows how Elphie’s life started with a lot of hurt (her father’s rejection and her mom dying etc.) so it is safe to say Part 2 with all that we seen in the story will continue this. Morrible’s propaganda was basically the end of Elphaba’s dream and the start of her life as The Wicked Witch of the West. Also a lot of people do not realize Elphaba went west not only because of the difficult terrain but because it is secluded place which happens to be the region where Fiyero is from.
I think you missed that the monkeys did not wish for wings . The wizard was lying
If you listen to what Glinda says in the beginning when the little munchkin girl asks her"Why does wickedness happen?" and also look at Glindas face when she sings no one mourns the wicked and you might change your mind about their friendship not being real.
The only reason Glinda follows Madame Morrible in the end scene is because both she and Elphie know that she will be killed if she does not. There are a lot of clues
The ruby red slippers was not originally ruby red. In the books by L.Frank Baum they were silver, just like in this movie. The only reason they were ruby red in the 1939 movie was because they used technicolor for the first time and they wanted the shoes to pop out more against the yellow brick road. So actually this movie is more true to the original story but at the,same time they pay tribute to the 1939 movie in more ways than one and the shoes in popular is one.
In the 2 part you get to see more reasons why Elphaba is changing, but she is never mean it's just the story that make her like that
About the ruby red slippers, apparently in the original book they’re supposed to be silver. They were changed into red slippers for the movie because somebody maybe the director thought that they would stand out more. So this movie is going back to the original color, silver. So it’s Nessarose’s silver slippers that will be taken by Galinda and given to Dorothy. I actually think it’s pretty nasty in the Wizard of Oz that Galinda didn’t wanna give those shoes back to Elphaba , especially when you learned that Elphaba was promised those slippers by her sister. She could’ve told Dorothy to click her heels and go home and given the slippers back to Elphaba , But it seems that she wanted Elphaba to go on this rivalry with Dorothy and eventually get killed, and she was even risking Dorothy‘s life by putting her through all that instead of telling her that all she had to do was click her heels and say “there’s no place like home“.
Do you not know how to not leave spoilers in comments or something
1:04:52 If you think Glinda is “one-dimensional” then you’ve missed a lot of the nuance. Watch it again. But also, Part 2 will show you.
right? the subtle emotions and feelings she showed through out the movie 🤦♀️
Glinda felt bad during the beginning. But chose to be part of the system (that's always benefited her) to try and make change from the inside. She doesn't have the same strength as Elphaba to be seen as a villain or "wicked." The friendship was deep. I think one lyric in No One Mourns the Wicked is actually "No, ONE mourns the Wicked" the one being...Glinda😢
Yeah it was a bit frustrating how much they didn't get the dynamics.
Even if you don't know how the story turns out...which I don't so no spoilers! Even if what I'm about to say is wrong, but I left the theater thinking that they're probably secretly working together.
Again, don't tell me if I'm wrong.
However, it was obvious that it was more than just "oh Glinda's actually evil"
@@sandpiperrit annoys when people make excuses for others behaviors, she is upholding the lie of her supposed friend being evil
@@tjhill8093 All that tells me is that you're a 1 dimensional thinker.
Marissa Bode who played Nessarose was the first actress who played her who is actually disabled in real life and who actually uses a wheelchair in real life.. Jon M chu wanted an actual disabled person to play Nessa in this movie...
And I love that. The whole set design was taken into consideration for her, with the hiring of a disability coordinator (who is also a wheelchair user). As well as any costumes and props Marissa would use in the movie.
And her chair! It was designed after Marissa’s actual chair, right down to the breaks.
They also had an accessible trailer made for her and hired a van to take her to and from places.
I’ve never wanted to cry at how much care and consideration was put in for her. The bar was buried in the floor, and they went above and beyond for her.
Fun fact: Ariana and Cynthia were singing LIVE in this movie
When I tell you I have been waiting for your reactions to this incredible movie. Wicked is my second favorite musical of all time and I have been waiting for a movie since I saw it on stage in 2010. It's one of the best movie adaptions of a musical I have ever seen. From the sets (that were almost all practical), to the cosutmes, to the music (sung live on set), to the performances (Ariana and Cynthia, along with the rest of the cast, were incredible) it's all perfection.
I do need to defend my girl Galinda. If you go back and watch the opening number when she lights the fire you can see in her eyes she is heartbroken, but she has to act happy to keep up appearances. She is spoiled and has everything handed to her and she is mean. But it isn't malicious. She wants to be a good person, but she has never had anyone show her truly what that means. That's why she is so intrigued by Elphaba. Elphie is the first person to not fall for her act, and is the first person to truly be her friend and not someone who just wants to take advantage of her popularity. When it comes to the ending and chosing not to go with Elphaba, it's because she knows she wouldn't survive as public enemy number 2. In her eyes the best way to get the public to go against the wizard is to get them to fall in love with her and listen to what she says. That's why she said to go apologize. Her mind goes straight to taking down the heirarchy from the inside, not head on like Elphie. Part 2 really is going to go deeper into where her mind is, but until that comes out just keep in mind that people aren't just good or bad. They are both.
Well after that novel I just have to say this was a fun reaction and I'm glad you guys enjoyed the film.
Thank You!!! I really hope Storm reads this and gets a better understanding of Glinda. Glinda's not perfect and that's alright.
@fynnthefox9078 I hope so. I may be biased because I have always been a Glinda fan, but I just think lots of people who haven't seen the full show are only seeing Glinda's character on the surface level, not looking deeper.
Basically Wicked is suggesting, What if the wizard of Oz is propaganda. The winner tells the story to support their side .
Wicked was originally a book based on the Oz books, which are in the public domain. Wicked was then adapted into a play and after years of development, we have the movie!
About the slippers, they're silver slippers in the original books, the RUBY slippers were an exclusive invention of the MGM movie to show off the technicolor. Disney actually had to pay MGM to use the ruby slippers in Return to Oz. Speaking of which, I'd love to see you three react to Disney's Return to Oz, it's a very loose sequel to the MGM film, but it's great. The tone is much closer to the books.
the stage musical has two acts which they split into two parts for the movie because they wanted to expand it as the show is quite rushed. part 1 is more of the prequel however part 2 takes place alongside the wizard of oz from elphaba and glindas perspective, so part 2 will end with her melting. you will also see the tinman, scarecrow, lion and dorothy. it comes out november this year as they filmed both parts at the same time. also the red shoes that glinda was holding was just a reference, but the SILVER shoes that elphabas sister was wearing are the ruby slippers. in the original book they were silver and were only ruby for the wizard of oz movie so they are copyrighted. in part 2 tho there might be a scene where they turn red for certain reasons 🤫
The shoes in the book is silver but the production company for the original wanted to give the shoes a pop of color for the movie.
Imagine if your beloved sister was crushed by a house and someone else gave her special slippers given to her by her mother/father to a stranger tourist and you can’t get them back. How would you feel? How would you act toward the strange tourist?
I like the way you guys discuss and analyze things. I subscribed.
Loved the reaction! Just as a bit of trivia, the shoes in the original book were silver slippers, but the Wizard of Oz movie made them ruby to stand out in the new technicolor film!
You have to read the book "Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West" by Gregory Maguire. It's so much darker and more detailed, but my god it's so amazing! Elphaba's backstory is so interesting and I absolutely love what the musical did - even though they took out a lot of the darker elements. The book series is just fantastic! 🤩🤩🤩
Wicked is based mostly on the 1939 MGM Wizard of Oz, but because that movie is still under copyright, Wicked could only gingerly tip-toe up to the edge of the MGM movie, but not step over a legal line. So they reached back to the original L. Frank Baum 1900 novel, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, and fill in a whole lot of gaps from their own imagination.
The MGM movie presents Oz as Dorothy's dream, with characters created in her imagination from real people she supposedly knows from Kansas. So technically, the only back stories would be, say, why Miss Gulch is so mean, not why the Wicked Witch is mean. A couple of important ways that MGM Oz (and hence Wicked) deviate from the novel (and Baum's 13 sequels). MGM combines the unnamed Good Witch of the North with Glinda, the Good Witch of the South. In the book, Dorothy is greeted by the former, and finally after finding out the Wizard is powerless, has to reach Glinda to send her home. (This makes a lot more sense than Billie Burke not telling Dorothy at the start that she had the power via the ruby slippers to return home at any time.)
The novels were heavily illustrated so we can see exactly how Baum envisioned the world he created. The Good Witch of the North looks like a kindly grandmother. Glinda is a strikingly beautiful mature woman, totally different than the gauzy ditzy all-pink bubble-transporting version created by Billie Burke.
The Baum's Wicked Witch looks like a sort of gypsy woman who carries an umbrella (you can guess why) instead of a broomstick. This version comes across as really weird to anyone who has seen Margaret Hamilton's iconic version. None of Baum's witches are dressed like a traditional medieval witch, all in black. None have magic broomsticks on which to fly and in fact, no witch flies whatsoever. Most importantly, his WWofTW is NOT green. In Baum's world, there is no life-long discrimination and assumption that a green woman is inherently evil.
In Baum's Oz, ALL the animals talk (including Toto in the later sequels) but they only do animal things - they aren't nannies or professors. (The horse of a different color, invented by MGM, would be chatting with his passengers in Baum's world, but definitely not driving the carriage.) And no one is trying to take away their rights, so there is no cause for Elphaba to champion. Baum's fictitious world is filled with the most imaginative creatures (and Elphaba being green but otherwise human would not cause anyone to bat an eye).
In Baum's sequel, there is a man constructed of sticks with a Jack-o-lantern head, men that go on all-fours, all on wheels, a windup mechanical man that "does everything that live," a princess who changes her heads instead of her clothes, and a flying living contraption made of two sofas tied together with palm fronds for wings, a broomstick tail, and the head of a gump. (Disney's 1985 Return to Oz is considered by many to be the most faithful to the books. Also, you can type in the name of any character and "Oz" in the search function and see all the ways that person was imagined.)
I love the books (and Return to Oz), I also love the MGM movie, and as I am learning about Wicked, also loving that. But trying to blend of any two is, in my opinion, a lost cause. Each should be appreciated on its own merit.
I'd love to see them react to Return to Oz!
Yup been requesting Return to Oz on Patreon. Glad to hear I’m not the only Return to Oz fan.
@@QuasarYGOReturn to Oz is my second favorite Oz movie.
@@QuasarYGO Literally the first book I ever read was Ozma of Oz, my mother's copy with the original period John Neil illustrations. Return so cleverly takes that book, stirs in characters from the Marvelous Land of Oz, and reverses the MGM movie idea, of having the Oz characters bleed through into Kansas. Reactors, though, who only know Oz through the MGM version can get freaked out by seeing Baum's concepts, but for me, that is the charm of the books.
Another thing is that Baum wrote these as children's tales, with Dorothy or a similar young lead character, directing the action. Sixteen yo Judy Garland, strapped in to portray Dorothy as a 14 yo, was still half-a-decade too old (and the Wiz movie and the Muppet version both with a mid-20's yo Dorothy are even worse in this regard). Nine yo Fairuza Balk was the perfect Dorothy. I finally realized that because the MGM movie is trying so hard to show us her three companions already had the characteristic trait they though they lacked, they have their scarecrow leading the action. Judy Garland winds up in a sense being a "damsel-in-distress" heroine, not how Baum saw her.
Part 1 is based on Act 1 of the play, but with about an hours worth of extended storyline that you can't really do on stage. Part 2 will be based on Act 2 of the play, so be careful for spoilers (I've seen lots of spoilers for part 2 on other reaction videos)
51:35 she didn’t betray elphaba.
Y'all are so cute!! 😭😭
Would love if you could react to jonathan baileys project before wicked . Called Fellow travelers (2023) for which he won awards and received his first Emmy nomination. He called it his life’s work. It’s just a 8 episode limited series very important emotional and heartbreaking.
Hi family ❤ Happy New Year 🎉
You really need to see the play if you want answers to your questions.
Always felt bad that the musical added the love triangle subplot, since it puts G(a)linda through unecessary pain--plus I can sympathize with her wanting her name to be pronounces correctly, even if my name is average.
Love this but there"s no closed captions on this.
I’m just going to suggest you rewatch this without reacting. I feel like you missed a lot. For one… Glinda’s entire character. lol
Still an enjoyable reaction all the same.
It's interesting how these women cut the VERY emotional parts out of the dance scene. I wonder if that's because they couldn't manage to empathize with the power of it and couldn't even fake it. Same with the scene when Elphaba's younger self flashed when she was falling at the end. Some people just can't relate.
They showed the younger self following. But they did cut the tear falling down her cheek.
Hi i'm new here and can you watch that animated feature film no one remembers.
"Eleanor's Secret" (2009)
1939 version much better than 2024
Two completely different stories but go off I guess
Both are great
wicked is not a remake….its two complete different stories…
Well they are different movies and stories. Sooo.
It's literally good and that's about it (1939)