Types Of Watch Glass - Which Is Best? Acrylic vs Mineral vs Sapphire Watch Glass Comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 527

  • @joaschristian757
    @joaschristian757 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1133

    Glass is glass, and scratches at a level 6 with deeper grooves at a level 7

    • @Eray2007
      @Eray2007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Lmao

    • @Tendies7645
      @Tendies7645 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      Perfect I was looking for this comment

    • @alex.hleconte6007
      @alex.hleconte6007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Actuelly sapphire glass scratches at 8

    • @rehakmate
      @rehakmate 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      @@alex.hleconte6007 Sapphire glass (real ones that are used in watches not some phone glass trying to be sapphire) scratches above 9 on the mohs scale.

    • @watchandjewelryloft4713
      @watchandjewelryloft4713 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It's not a linear scale though. Look at this link for a better understanding of the scale. Although diamond is a 10 and sapphire is a 9, diamond is many times harder than sapphire. Being in the watch repair field and having some jewelry repair experience I've been able to observe this as well.
      4cs.gia.edu/en-us/blog/more-than-mohs-scale-gem-durability/

  • @EliMeadAZ
    @EliMeadAZ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +399

    If you impact your watch hard enough to shatter the sapphire you're going to likely have more problems than just a broken crystal anyway.
    Sapphire still remains king for me.

    • @sectumsempera123
      @sectumsempera123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      😂😂😂 True

    • @tezzanewton
      @tezzanewton 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The only crystal I’ve damaged is sapphire. I chipped the corner of a box crystal when working on the brakes on my car.

    • @yourface4248
      @yourface4248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      @@tezzanewton always take off all bracelets and rings when working on machinery. it is the safe thing to do.

    • @tezzanewton
      @tezzanewton 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@yourface4248 I don’t wear bracelets or rings, I didn’t even mention them. I have 35 years experience on the tools as a tradesman so I probably don’t need your silly advice.

    • @yourface4248
      @yourface4248 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      @@tezzanewton a wrist watch is pretty much a bracelet.

  • @Skybusdriver
    @Skybusdriver 4 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    Sapphire is the way to go, I’ve got scratches all over my metal watch band from day to day manual task, but the face of my watch still looking new!

    • @Totemparadox
      @Totemparadox 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Agreed. The only reason to go with anything softer is job requirements like NASA requiring "crystal" that doesn't shatter into billion little pieces. Like another person said, if you crack sapphire then the watch itself is most likely highly damaged as well from the impact.

  • @hugohutten1497
    @hugohutten1497 4 ปีที่แล้ว +448

    It is really hard to shatter glass when it lies flat on a surface. I think the result will differ when there is a space between the glass and a surface. This is also the case with watches

    • @zakofrx
      @zakofrx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      Also hitting it with a large surface will cause little damage while hitting it with a metal punch will break it.
      A fast and hard hit with a small surface area does the job.

    • @starkid24
      @starkid24 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed.

    • @goku445
      @goku445 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@zakofrx Also hitting it on a plywood desk instead of... concrete.

    • @irishRocker1
      @irishRocker1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@zakofrx he used a screwdriver so it wasnt that. It was that it was flat and supported as Hugo mentioned

    • @afoster1621
      @afoster1621 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Read my mind buddy, I was thinking the exact same thing and comment too and yours was #1 comment !

  • @garethhanna9173
    @garethhanna9173 4 ปีที่แล้ว +226

    If the Chinese can use sapphire on £50 watches there is no excuse for Seiko still using 'hardlex' on £300 models. I considered the Seiko Presage until I discovered it had hardlex, unlike its discontinued Japanese Domestic Market predecessor the SARB.

    • @HonestWatchReviewsHWR
      @HonestWatchReviewsHWR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Totally agree. That's why I bought a Seiko Presage homage instead. It's cheaper and comes with sapphire crystal too.

    • @richardc316
      @richardc316 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      I was about to comment exactly the same thing. You've already done it for me. A piece of sapphire really isn't that expensive and should be in all watched over £150.

    • @NathanChisholm041
      @NathanChisholm041 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Seiko will never use it on their lower end watches! That's one of the reasons Seiko blows. My San Martin eats any Seiko in its price range and even the more expensive ones...

    • @garethhanna9173
      @garethhanna9173 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @&Ö& Paneristi Orient are owned by Seiko, which makes it even more unnaceptable.

    • @1701spacecadet
      @1701spacecadet 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I agree 100%

  • @jansavli4049
    @jansavli4049 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    just noticed that at the end of every sentence Ben does this thing with his lips, like he pressess them together. and it's always in the same way!! it doesn't bother me or anything but I just can't unsee it now :D
    anyone else see that?

    • @raiezy
      @raiezy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Noticed it too 🤣

    • @Totemparadox
      @Totemparadox 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Thanks... Can't unsee it now 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @ziksy6460
    @ziksy6460 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I find that I bump my wrist against doors/tables/walls more often than I'd like to admit. So it's nice to know that my sapphire crystal isn't gonna get scratched. These days, even if I'm buying a relatively entry-level watch, a lack of sapphire is a deal-breaker.

    • @goku445
      @goku445 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bumping is impact.

    • @notme756
      @notme756 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@goku445 it can still scratch though when hitting something harder and dragging/scraping slightly.. and like was said in the video- you dont really have to worry too much about impact resistance, unless your expecting to drop it from 4 feet onto concrete or having large objects fall onto you- you would be tough pressed to shatter either mineral or sapphire in most use cases

    • @goku445
      @goku445 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@notme756 true. I bump my gshock all the time. I have it since almost 2 years and it's only got recently a slight scratch barely visible. It is mineral. That's good enough to me.

    • @rapajuoppo7393
      @rapajuoppo7393 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@goku445 impact doesnt do anything to quarz, I abused my candino with 20kg subwoofer magnet and it always worked after demagnetizing

    • @justafanmarvel9669
      @justafanmarvel9669 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly what you just described is what caused my watch with a mineral crystal to chip.. a bump on a door frame.. now I'm wondering if I should replace it with acrylic or Sapphire

  • @-insert-
    @-insert- ปีที่แล้ว +5

    A few years back I was walking down a sidewalk and my wrist hit a light pole, along the bezel perpendicular to the sapphire. I didn't even hit it particularly hard yet crystal shattered. My take away was that sapphire can withstand a hard knock straight on but hit it on the side and it's toast.

  • @aussie8114
    @aussie8114 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    A sapphire crystal can be had for about $15. However the average AR coating can cause an unsightly blue hue so sapphire is not necessarily always a preferred choice. Sapphire with a high quality clear AR is obviously desirable.

    • @marekhudac8390
      @marekhudac8390 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Not always, but often i tend to like the AR blue hue..

  • @karellen00
    @karellen00 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Of all 3 types I prefer acrylic, of all my watches it is the material that looks more transparent, and without even needing a coating, and doesn't show fingerprints. Sapphire looks really close, especially when it has anti reflective coating, but only when you just cleaned it, the fingerprints really pop with that material making it in real world generally less clear. It also weights a lot more, it's pretty noticeable the difference on the wrist! Plain old glass to me seems the worst, it cuts away contrast more than the other two materials, but anyway I have to admit that the thick hardlex crystal seiko uses on their divers looks really good, really close to sapphire in transparency but less susceptible to fingerprints.

  • @carlosbornes
    @carlosbornes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    Great video just a quick comment regarding the shattering of sapphire. The way you tested is not fare. In a watch, the glass is not fully supported as it is when you place it on top of the table. In a watch the glasses are support only at the edges and when you hit it in the middle the sapphire is more prone to shatter because is more rigid so it can not contract to dissipate the energy like the plastic. When you support all the sapphire surface you are not forming any specific area of stress as the energy is dissipated equally to the table.

    • @carlosbornes
      @carlosbornes 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Mother Algorithm so how to you test if it shatters?

  • @StuntpilootStef
    @StuntpilootStef 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    You missed a very important aspect about acrylic. It isn't just a way to cut costs, some expensive watches have it deliberately because it can be shaped any way you like very thin and offers much better visibility of the dial. It's the reason your Junkers Bauhaus and the Max Bill have acrylic. Omega offers the speedmaster with a choice of acrylic and sapphire to this day.

    • @Alex-qb7gt
      @Alex-qb7gt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      even rolex used in past time plexiglass for some models

    • @StuntpilootStef
      @StuntpilootStef 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Alex-qb7gt That's when everyone used plexi, Einstein. They don't anymore. But they still refuse to use AR coating for some reason.

    • @retardinho5048
      @retardinho5048 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@StuntpilootStef They don’t use AR because it makes their watches less blingy and less expensive looking. Wrap your head around that absurd logic.

  • @robertnorth1681
    @robertnorth1681 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I've retired more watches because scratches to the glass affected the appearance of the dial than any other reason. When I started buying better, mechanical watches, sapphire became the choice, and I have not been disappointed.

  • @butre.
    @butre. ปีที่แล้ว +3

    acrylic for me. they're easy to make look new again, and if they get too bad they're easy to replace. not to mention, I could've bought good flat sapphire for the same price as my aggressive double dome acrylic
    and fyi diamond selectors don't test hardness, they test thermal conductivity.

  • @vesselinkrastev
    @vesselinkrastev ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I've never actually managed to scratch any of my mineral crystal watches. I'm an office worker, mind you, so I'm not doing anything crazy with my watches. The cases and bracelets get worn out from general banging against tables and door frames but the crystals look pristine to my eyes. Once I banged an affordable Casio pretty hard against a lamp post. The case received a rather deep groove but the glass was just fine.

  • @soulfulfool
    @soulfulfool 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I got a watch with mineral glass for like 2 years and yes it has 2 miner scratches, but overall its good. It's my daily watch

  • @tetemix
    @tetemix 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Very nice video. Just a slight comment, you can “polish” mineral crystal, it is just not as easy as with acrylic to polish but the result is pretty good when restoring a watch ! no need to change it. This is quite useful for hard to find domed mineral crystal.

    • @m4t7eo
      @m4t7eo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Connor Locklin You'd be shocked to know that the base speedmaster (5k+) has an acrylic crystal.

    • @peteclegg1578
      @peteclegg1578 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can of course polish the scratches out of anything other than diamond - which doesn't scratch. If any watch crystal scratches then those scratches can also be polished out. A Dremel with a buffing wheel and a small tube of diamond paste will make short work of it. Do not be a slave to the scratch.

  • @Feynman981
    @Feynman981 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I like domed crystal watches. So, I prefere Acrylic or domed Saphire. I try to avoid Mineral glass at all because it's usually just flat and you can't remove scratches.

  • @Robozgraggi
    @Robozgraggi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I'm an oddball on this matter. It's either acrylic or sapphire for me. I scratched and smashed several mineral crystals on watches, to me they're the worst of both worlds. However I never managed to smash acrylic and buffing out scratches is a matter of just a few minutes. Perfect for beater watches you don't have to care about.

  • @BushCampingTools
    @BushCampingTools 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Great summary! I would like to add that the transparency of certain mineral glasses can vary greatly depending upon what constitutes the makeup of the glass alloy. For example: the Seiko Hardlex crystals (even the old ones dating back to the 70's-like on the SEIKO Sports series) and the Citizen PROMASTER series of eco drive watches, have very optically transparent "crystals". I don't know about other watch brands. The example you show for sure looks to have a tinge of green, just as you say it looks like ordinary window glass-maybe hardened of course but you could check by examining it under polarized light. Certainly as a diver using a mineral crystal is a better choice as it is tougher than the Sapphire. I guess besides that, wearing a watch diving the watch case itself is going to get banged up for sure-unless you only dive in a bath tub LOL. To help increase shatter resistance and certainly scratch resistance, i installed some custom made (I made them) watch crystal protectors made from high quality tablet screen protectors. i've had two of these installed; one for over a year (on a SEIKO Prospex 200m diver-baby Tuna actually) and one just for the last 3 months on Citizen BN 0176-08E 300m diver, I've accidentally hit the crystal several times and I'm certain the protectors have saved me either breaking the crystal and or definitely preventing scratches. The upshot is, when the protector gets manky you can simply remove it and put another one onto the still brand new watch crystal LOL. I also reviewed these watches and how to install such protectors.

  • @Foxtrot-jr5qu
    @Foxtrot-jr5qu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have Seiko Samurai with hardlex which I own since 2018 (bought it for around 300$) and it's one of my daily watches and so far I haven't scratched it. There's no doubt that sapphire is superior but depending on the model and of course the price it isn't that much of a deal breaker for me (especially if that particular watch model is on a big sale like -30-50% of the retail price) and if I really want to I can always buy a sapphire crystal for around 40$ if that's really necessary. The rest of my watches have sapphire crystals and I also have Vostok Amphibia (that has acrylic crystal), which I recently bought and also wear from time to time with no issues so far. I think it all depends on what are you doing while wearing your watch. A friend of mine is a car mechanic and he's wearing a Victorinox with sapphire and although the crystal looks like new, the rest of the watch looks like hell so there's that to.

    • @gimiked8685
      @gimiked8685 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea I would be wearing either no watch, a gshock, or another cheap durable watch doing work like that. I had a gshock when I was in the military, as work was not easy on gear, or me for that matter. I take off my watch if I'm doing yard work and swap it out for a casio of some type. I usually wear a seiko, citizen, or micro brand. Entry level stuff. But I still don't want to be buying one every year or two. The casio is 20-30 bucks. I can afford to grab a new one every year.

  • @rickjason215
    @rickjason215 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Sapphire. I have old watches with Sapphire and the crystal looks brand new.

  • @lorenzogiancristofaro9721
    @lorenzogiancristofaro9721 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Sapphire crystal is the most resistant to scratches and least resistant to impact, acrylic is the exact opposite. Mineral glass can scratch or crack fairly easily, is relatively expensive to replace and quite difficult to polish. In my experience mineral glass combines the worst aspects of the other 2 options.

    • @m4t7eo
      @m4t7eo 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is kind of an oversemplification, and underestimation of mineral glass. While it is easier to scratch then sapphire, acrylic can get scratched by just looking at it. I have a swatch that gets cloudy by just being worn, due to contact with sleeves.

  • @justme7920
    @justme7920 4 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    BenRigEverything 😀

  • @Dionysor
    @Dionysor 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Cheers for the upload. I did not expect my Casio M170TD to have sapphire glass so its good to know i can go ham with it.

  • @xandercloet7467
    @xandercloet7467 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    i have a watch with a sapphire watch glass.
    i've had it for 7 years now and there is literally no scratch on the watch.

    • @appalachiangunman9589
      @appalachiangunman9589 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      If you’d had a mineral crystal you would have probably gotten the first scratch within a week or two.

    • @GicN
      @GicN 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@appalachiangunman9589 true

    • @goku445
      @goku445 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GicN I've had a gshock for 2 years and zero scratch on it (mineral). I use it daily.

    • @RamxesArcangel
      @RamxesArcangel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@appalachiangunman9589 I have had a mineral crystal watch for 11 years and 0 scratches so far. Ironically, the only crystal on a watch I’ve damaged is sapphire.

  • @IbtsaamChughtai
    @IbtsaamChughtai 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have watch with sapphire glass from the past 7 years and right now it is in my hand like brand new.
    Although I used it all the time.

  • @jimizuri
    @jimizuri 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Clear and concise explanation and great broadcasting! Thank you. Definitely worth considering sapphire.

  • @peterclarke3990
    @peterclarke3990 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great review Ben. Short, simple and to the point. We'll done. Look forward to more informative vids from you.

  • @vBDKv
    @vBDKv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mineral is my prefered. It's relatively cheap but can also withstand a beating. It can look a little "foggy" at certain angles though.

  • @AliasEveWatches
    @AliasEveWatches 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    When you ran the blade on the acrylic glass in the intro i was like 😱😱😱
    That Blue Auto (The 5th) you showed in the sapphire part is beautiful!

    • @NathanChisholm041
      @NathanChisholm041 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Will you be ok😂

    • @AliasEveWatches
      @AliasEveWatches 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nathan Chisholm I’ll recover 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @menandroplan1554
    @menandroplan1554 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I wholeheartedly agree with sapphire on higher end watches except for the Speedmaster. Ive had the sapphire and hesalite version, and the hesalite version, aesthetically, looks sooooo much better on it.

    • @makaela3041
      @makaela3041 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hesalite is acrylic material?

  • @FeralInferno
    @FeralInferno 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sapphire is also a really great shoot 'em up for the PC Engine. Very shiny visuals and difficult to break.

  • @RandyRyanCandy
    @RandyRyanCandy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    1st off I love your videos! I'm kinda perplexed in how underrated you are...

  • @SniperKing029
    @SniperKing029 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yeah, a sapphire watch crystal has never cracked on my wrist. But I have scratched, chipped, and cracked mineral glass. Although, My son shattered my Seamaster’s sapphire crystal on a tile floor 😖

    • @aimanshaikh5406
      @aimanshaikh5406 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      oh u xplained what richness is.. 😀

  •  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You should actually put the glasses into a watch when trying to shatter them, as laying them on a flat surface gives them support. When in a watch, the impact will push against the glass and allow that force to be distributed along the edge through the center. This stress could result in a crack, or breaking of the glass.
    (Edit:) I've just now seen the other guys' comment 😂

  • @GabrielGGabGattringer
    @GabrielGGabGattringer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I've 17 watches in a range of €10 to €400. Wear each of these watches regularly. Havn't achieved to catch any glass on my watches from Casio G-Shock Square (shouldn't scratch at all, right?) to Timex, Junkers, to Seiko. So what's the fuss all about? Hardlex is totally fine IMHO. Sapphire is a bit more expensive.

    • @erregi4946
      @erregi4946 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can find real sapphire at less than 2€ shipped on AliExpress

    • @ivdee
      @ivdee 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@erregi4946 can’t seem to find them for that price

  • @F3z07
    @F3z07 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for the concise, informative video! Which watch are you wearing here? Thanks for your time!

  • @allan2098
    @allan2098 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Not much mention of IR coatings. I have seen several mid-range watches like Omega and
    Tag have the coating on sapphire crystals and although the crystal doesn’t scratch, you can see hairline scratches on the surface where the IR coating has been scratched. Rolex doesn’t have the coating so there are no tiny scratches but their crystal is VERY reflective.

  • @fakiirification
    @fakiirification 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    acrylic crystal has a cool property in that it can be easily polished back to like-new condition with the same sort of sandpaper and rubbing compound you use to restore car headlight lenses. so minor scuffs and scratches from daily beater service can be polished off when they start to interfere with your ability to read it.

  • @cubink6007
    @cubink6007 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have a sapphire Citezen rn, haved it for 8 months now, really good, you can see clearly through it, unlike negative digital watches like that ca53wf, it has plastic screen, so you can't really see through it, thah watch would be much better if it haved sapphire glass. And yes, it has no backlights.

  • @ivosuter6932
    @ivosuter6932 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hesalite is a cell cast cross linked acrylic. It features better chemical resistance than normal acrylic. In the 70s it was state of the art for watch cristals. Today it is not used often anymore. However, some people prefer its warm touch.

  • @rigbyrib100
    @rigbyrib100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I would like to see a guide on lower priced watches that have sapphire crystal.

    • @JJ-kz4zq
      @JJ-kz4zq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, agree; specially non-micro or Chinese brands.

  • @vanwilder1101
    @vanwilder1101 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Most comments here, people dont have much clue. Acrylic can only be used on certain watch cases, they cant be friction fit with plastic gaskets( like sapphire or Mineral) so that alreasy limits what watches they can be fitted on. Mineral or Sapphire ( sapphire being far worse) tend to be very reflective of light, depending on the mineral glass and quality - it's far better than Sapphire. Sapphire must have an AR coating or else it's basically unreadable in the light. Sapphire is extremely expensive to replace or buy, especially if its a domed or boxed glass. Flat sapphire, however, not so expensive to produce. Mineral glass is quite cheap(Domed or flat)and you can get away with not having an AR coating. Acrylic is Super cheap and the glass can be buffered out like new- however as mentioned, only fits certain cases, often with retainer rings. A good mineral glass is cheap with decent transparency- Sapphire is expensive, reflective, but only diamond's will kill it- Acrylic is super transparent, doesn't need any AR and can be buffed out, however modern watch case fitment is limited.

  • @ralfrufus3691
    @ralfrufus3691 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The most informative, most telling part of your video was when you tried to shatter the sapphire glass.
    I also never had any problems with sapphire glass on my watches.

  • @mostirreverent
    @mostirreverent 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Acrylic will let more frequencies of light through than almost any material, more than glass even. The molding process can change some of its light properties, though it can be machined and polished from sheet stock as well. Also, the stock used for non-molding purposes (the ones who held up) are of a better grade than those used for molding.
    I have found some anti-reflective coating on sapphire at some angles can make it look almost cloudy

  • @4godandcountry663
    @4godandcountry663 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not that I’m a a Invicta fan, however after looking into there FlameFusion Crystal it seems to be a nice alternative. I fix watches etc and they seem to have a good glass

  • @G1NZOU
    @G1NZOU 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I personally don't mind mineral glass (Seiko's hardlex I like even more), especially on a dive watch, it's a little better at not shattering if it get's bashed against something than Sapphire is, which in a dive watch is good, better to get your crystal scratched but still intact so you can replace it when it's dry than suffer a shattered crystal at depth and have a much more expensive repair for water damage.

    • @notme756
      @notme756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ya but i mean... do you actually dive with a mechanical/quartz watch? ive never heard of anyone in this day and age doing that, myself and 99% of others use dive computers with more functionality

    • @otsoni03
      @otsoni03 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@notme756 I sometimes do and many others as well. It is good idea to have a diver's watch with a depth meter as a back up: th-cam.com/video/WCAn4c2eTqA/w-d-xo.html

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah because we are all going diving in harsh marine environments with our collections of dive watches lmfao

  • @erizzle67
    @erizzle67 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can buy protectors (like with phones and smart watches). You can buy specific Casio models, plastic or glass.

  • @loydlamberson8942
    @loydlamberson8942 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Video! Now the real question......................what watch are you wearing? I am looking to get a Field Watch and I believe yours is one?

  • @bobaboey
    @bobaboey 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent informative, to the point video. I liked and subscribed. Thx!

  • @CoreyBrass
    @CoreyBrass 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love acrylic crystals on watches. I love the look of them.

  • @EfieldHfield_377
    @EfieldHfield_377 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thx for the video I always wanted to know. For my personal experience I have had a Seiko with Hardex for 7 years and another Seiko with Sappier much older - with Sapphire (I think - its a bit on the shinny side) about 25 years old. Both I wear regular, both no issues, no scratches. I have, dear I say, a preference for the Hardex - does not have the shinny reflective - but I am just a novice.

  • @Brainman_2331
    @Brainman_2331 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Learned something new today. Thanks, it was a very informative video.

  • @Miguel_GM
    @Miguel_GM 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great comparative. Well explained. Thanks.

  • @Kikilang60
    @Kikilang60 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Design matters too. I had a digital watch with plastic crystal, that never scratched, because it had raised edge around the plastic. I had a watch, with bubbled out glass Crystal. The bubbled out glass took a beating, and eventually broke.

  • @jimcrickmore1347
    @jimcrickmore1347 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Ben great stuff basic & too the point easy to follow i now know what i want to order cheers

  • @silvrcel
    @silvrcel 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    What about Gorilla glass?

    • @NathanChisholm041
      @NathanChisholm041 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Gorrilla glass is somewhere in between mineral and sapphire

  • @thistleclockworks1292
    @thistleclockworks1292 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ben, well done on this video. Thanks for the research and detail. One thing I might add. While you’re spot on about selecting watches with sapphire if given the choice, remember it’s so easy to have your mineral crystal replaced. ...or even take your watch hobby to the next level and learn to to do yourself. I had a scratched Hardlex crystal replaced and it made a 90’s watch brand new again. I’m looking forward to your next vid.

  • @stillcovalent
    @stillcovalent ปีที่แล้ว +1

    9:26 So Ben finally managed to smash a sapphire crystal glass.

  • @Nonexistanthuman
    @Nonexistanthuman ปีที่แล้ว

    I was not expecting to see you with hair as a new subscriber, thanks for sharing!!

  • @HonestWatchReviewsHWR
    @HonestWatchReviewsHWR 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    For me a watch having sapphire crystal a pretty important. Unless its on a cheaper watch with a domed crystal. Then I can forgive it not having sapphire, as domed sapphire crystal is more expensive.
    I wont buy Seikos due to the majority of them not having sapphire, as well as hollow end links. Especially when you can get better made homages for less money.

    • @VersedNJ
      @VersedNJ 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Omega sells their Moon Watch with acrylic, both my Junghans are with acrylic.

    • @landerzone2643
      @landerzone2643 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Homages suck. Copying others designs is pretty piss weak dont you think

  • @KathleenMayTSurla-zx9ft
    @KathleenMayTSurla-zx9ft 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank You for making this video at least now when I buy a watch I’ll be more knowledgeable in different types of quality of glass.

  • @Pandorasoul
    @Pandorasoul 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for your video ! I recently bought an used Cartier Santos on sale, its almos 20 years old and the crystal is impecable, looks as translucent and clear like the first day it left the store. If the vendor had told me the crystal was a new replacement Id have believed him. Thanks again for your informative video !

  • @Trex100
    @Trex100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I enjoy your well-researched videos Ben.

  • @jamesdoherty97
    @jamesdoherty97 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant review! Very helpful to me. Thank you.

  • @lkgpuanimho0349
    @lkgpuanimho0349 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Don't try to smash it to measure shatter/impact-resistant, try to drop it from high ground instead

  • @bibidhbangla8091
    @bibidhbangla8091 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I used a watch that used sapphire glass,Japan quartz movement with 316L SS body.I like it.

  • @Wessel1109
    @Wessel1109 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    what about the droid attack on the wookies?

  • @sugarnads
    @sugarnads 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I ordered a cheeeap casio digital and a nice looking casio dress watch coz you reminded me how good the low end digitals are...

  • @shood7043
    @shood7043 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! Once I discovered sapphire I never looked back. All of my sapphires look brand new. My others....not so much

  • @milutinbresjanac7525
    @milutinbresjanac7525 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great advices, information ratio and I guess help! Keep going, very very good chanel!

  • @NuanDaa
    @NuanDaa 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Sapphire forever.

  • @objective7042
    @objective7042 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    One thing I noticed, my vintage Timexes and new Vostoks acrylics never get smudges, while my Seikos and watches with generic mineral crystals get so much smudges that it almost form an OCD.
    I don't own Sapphire so I can't comment.

  • @OffGridInvestor
    @OffGridInvestor 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just so you know, with the plexiglass it is SET domed. And it's INCREDIBLY impact resistant compared to most plastic. They don't cut it domed. It's just injection molded most likely. I have dealt with sheets of it. Has the ability to be bent after heating and then if heated it will go back FLAT (plastic memory but it's really just releasing the inner stresses).

  • @hb9145
    @hb9145 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Acrylic isn't bad. It doesn't reflect light, and it is by far the toughest when it comes to impact resistance. Perfect for divers and other beaters, I think. Smaller scratches can be buffed out with toothpaste.

  • @zino6661
    @zino6661 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have several Hardlex Seiko, couple Casio G-Shock, and Citizen mineral Crystal. They all scratch no matter how I baby them. The mineral Crystal on Casio is so reflective I had to stick a matt protective film on the glass in order to be able to tell the time

  • @amenhotep7704
    @amenhotep7704 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Congrats, you gained yourself a new subscriber.

  • @BrijeshKumar4599
    @BrijeshKumar4599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice video. I always wonder why watch brands do not use corning guerilla glass.

    • @tommymaddox6785
      @tommymaddox6785 ปีที่แล้ว

      Something I always have to chime in on about gorilla glass. It's useless once it's scratched. You've removed the ion impregnation prestress. It's critical to keep a phone screen protector on your phone at all times to retain the impact resistance it is rated for. Once your screen has a scratched all the strength is gone.

  • @1SaG
    @1SaG 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe I just got lucky, but:
    I barely had it for 10 days or so when I put my Steinhart OVM on a NATO. I handled the watch, forgetting that the NATO in question was pretty thin and the second strap wasn't in place to secure the watch-head. It slipped off the strap and fell on a hard, bathroom-tile floor from about belly-height (~ 1.30 meters or so). It landed right on the sapphire crystal (which is lightly domed on the OVM) and I was expecting it to have shattered or cracked. But, after careful inspection with a loupe ... there was no damage to be found and the crystal looked pristine. It still does today, 2 months later.

    • @zakofrx
      @zakofrx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The thing to worry about it is hits on hard fine points..
      Things like the corner of a sharp rock after swinging your arm with force.
      Glass will chip in that case or scratch while Sapphire will shatter.
      Acrylic will just scratch a lot.
      It one of the reasons to not use Sapphire in dive watches etc....
      Look at the tools they make to smash car windows in an emergency..
      You don't want to hit a watch in a similar way, the harder the glass the more likely it will shatter.

  • @nicvallecillo7557
    @nicvallecillo7557 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, I just recently got a Hamilton day date pilot - like in interstellar, and am so worried I’ll scratch it lol. It’s sapphire so I guess I just have to accept it will do it’s job.

  • @JJ-kz4zq
    @JJ-kz4zq 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks so much for doing this video. Great content!

  • @WuxingGaming
    @WuxingGaming 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Longines with sapphire glass looks great

  • @dawidp8048
    @dawidp8048 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazing video! Greetings from Poland :)

  • @antonhelsgaun
    @antonhelsgaun 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very hard and brittle materials like glass usually break from being stretched/bent (tensile strength), not compressed

    • @Chronoholix
      @Chronoholix 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wwg1wga my friend

  • @watchandjewelryloft4713
    @watchandjewelryloft4713 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I repair watches. Ask me about customers watches where they dropped/shattered their sapphire Crystal.
    Spoiler alert: They shatter and usually end up in almost a dust. Meaning, your mechanical watch needs a service since that dust gets under the dial through the date window. And if they let it run for a decent amount of time after the shatter, that dust had migrated pretty much everywhere. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Most suspectable in domed or crystals with magnifiers. Lots of Rolexes have come into my shop shattered due to the magnifier.

    • @aurthordunne
      @aurthordunne 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      So would you suggest mineral then?

    • @CheesusCrustus
      @CheesusCrustus 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aurthordunne mineral is even worse, if you want something shatter proof go for acrylic. I've only had on crystal shatter and that was mineral. Have been wearing sapphire ever since and never had a problem (I work as a mechanic, the whole watch is scratched, the crystal is like new). It's not bulletproof, but if you don't act like it is you won't have a problem

  • @Dave062YT
    @Dave062YT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This watch part is called the crystal regardless of material used .Of acrylic mineral and sapphire only mineral is glass mate but they are all "the crystal "

  • @rainerbuechse6923
    @rainerbuechse6923 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent overview, thanks!

  • @adamjarosz5558
    @adamjarosz5558 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hay Ben. Where have you bought THE:5th?

  • @suegoulding1341
    @suegoulding1341 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    VERY well explained!

  • @youhuizhang1447
    @youhuizhang1447 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello! What is the Chronograph shown at 5:40 of the video (the one on the right)? Thank you very much!

  • @runningwithshemp
    @runningwithshemp 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a newbie to watch thing, last year I bought a discontinued Marathon Nav and well overall it's excellent but I do with it had sapphire over acrylic crystal as with how easily it scratched up. Of course the updated version has a sapphire crystal hence the reason what I got was discontinued.

  • @gregwalker4236
    @gregwalker4236 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice review, subscribed. as you say, it all depends on the watch and intended use.. there are no bad choices here, imo. now, if you drop a watch on a hard surface, you are likely to damage the innards as well as the crystal, so be careful with a watch you care about. my old wind up rolex from the seventies was dropped and put a crack in the crystal and now you cannot set the time--the whole crown can be pulled out of the watch--but if you wait for the time to match what's on the watch, you can wind and wear!

  • @dennisjaros3345
    @dennisjaros3345 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What about flame fusion glass from invicta?

  • @radzijamal9533
    @radzijamal9533 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have seiko diver..use hardlex crystal..

  • @vegasbob0075
    @vegasbob0075 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have a Timex Expedition what would it cost for a sapphire glass to replace the acrylic crystal ?

  • @vincenzodigrande2070
    @vincenzodigrande2070 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The refractive index of sapphire is far worse than acrylic, making it possible to make way crazier domed shapes retaining the readability of the dial. It is also naturally less reflective as untreated sapphire. Since my watch is generally tucked away under my sleeve I much prefer acrylic of the three. I've actually had some watches with sapphire that I was happier with replacing it for acrylic.

    • @thegorn
      @thegorn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't need "way crazier domed shapes". I am perfectly happy with the domed box sapphire crystals used on a lot of my watches and there are no readability issues. AR coating underside is all all I need for my sapphire watches. Rolex famously didn't use *any* AR coating on any of their watches, barring the cyclops, until very recently. With a flat sapphire, AR coating isn't even required. For a boxed sapphire, AR coating underside is enough. I do have one watch with acrylic - a neo vintage 1980's Vostok Komandirskie. The dome comes in over the numerals more than my sapphire watches because it can with the lower refractive index. That doesn't look any better - it's just a different shape. It is also a bit warmer than the neutral color of my sapphire crystals, I assume because the plastic has aged over the 40 or so years.

  • @12joemangarasimanungkalit39
    @12joemangarasimanungkalit39 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your video, very Usefull

  • @Shawncombat
    @Shawncombat 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    1:36 last hammer strike cracked it, good time to cut scene lol

    • @_morax_.
      @_morax_. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its the scratches that he make

  • @TheStoyanbahchevanov
    @TheStoyanbahchevanov 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi, awesome channel. I found you recently, great content, useful and educational. Do you know more about Stuhrling Original brand, can you make please a video. I have a watch from them and I don't know about them. Thanks. Cheers.