When he is in hospital parents has spent amount sister has spent time may be amount too When husband expired she not came she came only for lic amount Here lawyer says justice should be justified to only wife n kid Am fine with settlement completely on kid as legal heir but not his wife
భర్తనీ వదిలేసి, డబ్బు రాగానే బిడ్డని అడ్డం పెట్టుకొని, డబ్బు వచ్చిన తర్వాత బిడ్డని సరిగ్గా చూడకపోతే,ఇంకో పెళ్లి చేసుకోని పోతే,ఇప్పుడు చనిపోయిన వ్యక్తి అమ్మ నాన్నని కూతురు చూసుకోవాలి కదా, వాళ్ళ పరిస్థితి ఏంటి, చనిపోయిన వ్యక్తి భార్య అంత గట్టిగా మాట్లాడుతుంది కదా, ఇన్నాళ్లు ఎందుకు రాలేదు, అంతా అబద్ధం ఆడుతుంది సరైన న్యాయమైన తీర్పు ఇచ్చారు మేడం మీకు ధన్యవాదములు. 🙏
Advocate Venkateswari garu, can you please spell or write the legal case you are citing.? Until we know what you are citing is really applicable to all circumstances we need to believe the internet writeup inserted here: In India, when a life insurance policyholder dies, the insurance proceeds are typically paid to the nominated person, not the legal heirs, meaning the nominee receives the benefits of the policy upon the policyholder's death; however, if there is no nominee or if legal issues arise, the legal heirs may be able to claim the proceeds through court intervention.
The Court referenced the status of a nominee under life insurance policies, suggesting that the nominee acts as a trustee for the legal heirs. It invoked its landmark judgment in Sarbati Devi vs Usha Devi of 1983, which held that nomination under Section 39 of the Insurance Act, 1938, does not establish a line of succession. Instead, any amount paid to a nominee upon the policyholder’s death forms part of the deceased policyholder's estate, to which all his/her heirs are entitled.
Lawyer garu, I couldn't capture the supreme court case you cited - need to review the circumstances and what verdict exactly they gave and whether applicable in this case where the wife or child are not mentioned even as secondary beneficiaries. Even Google currently saying as follows: In India, if a brother names his sister as the sole beneficiary on his life insurance policy, then upon his death, his wife and children would not be able to claim the policy amount unless specifically mentioned as secondary beneficiaries on the policy; the sister would be the only person entitled to receive the death benefit as per the policy terms
What is her contribution to her in-laws and husband would you like to say marriage means stay for few days with husband and doesn't need any service and loot money of others hardship. Sister is genuinely speaking but wife never heard one good word
When he is in hospital parents has spent amount sister has spent time may be amount too When husband expired she not came she came only for lic amount Here lawyer says justice should be justified to only wife n kid Am fine with settlement completely on kid as legal heir but not his wife
చాలా మంచితిర్పునిచారు మేడం ఇరు కుటుంబాలు కలిసిబ్రతికేలా చేశారు మీకు శతకోటి వందనాలు 🙏🙏💐💐💐
Not sure the judgement is really supported by law and let me know if you captured the case she mentioned.
When he is in hospital parents has spent amount sister has spent time may be amount too
When husband expired she not came she came only for lic amount
Here lawyer says justice should be justified to only wife n kid
Am fine with settlement completely on kid as legal heir but not his wife
Very well said advocate madam. Great
Excellent madam
భర్తనీ వదిలేసి, డబ్బు రాగానే బిడ్డని అడ్డం పెట్టుకొని, డబ్బు వచ్చిన తర్వాత బిడ్డని సరిగ్గా చూడకపోతే,ఇంకో పెళ్లి చేసుకోని పోతే,ఇప్పుడు చనిపోయిన వ్యక్తి అమ్మ నాన్నని కూతురు చూసుకోవాలి కదా, వాళ్ళ పరిస్థితి ఏంటి, చనిపోయిన వ్యక్తి భార్య అంత గట్టిగా మాట్లాడుతుంది కదా, ఇన్నాళ్లు ఎందుకు రాలేదు, అంతా అబద్ధం ఆడుతుంది సరైన న్యాయమైన తీర్పు ఇచ్చారు మేడం మీకు ధన్యవాదములు. 🙏
100% ..Money kavali mogudoddu...Husband chanipoyina kuda chuttaniki raani elanti bharyani venakesukostunna e lawyer ...
legalrightsguru AI fixes this. Legal advice episode on COVID.
Supreme court tparents ni adukku tinamani cheppinda lawyer garu...??
మేడం, useful information చెప్పారు 🙏🙏🙏
Advocate Venkateswari garu, can you please spell or write the legal case you are citing.? Until we know what you are citing is really applicable to all circumstances we need to believe the internet writeup inserted here: In India, when a life insurance policyholder dies, the insurance proceeds are typically paid to the nominated person, not the legal heirs, meaning the nominee receives the benefits of the policy upon the policyholder's death; however, if there is no nominee or if legal issues arise, the legal heirs may be able to claim the proceeds through court intervention.
Elaanti judgements vundatam vallane ee negligences ekkuva avutunnayi...
Great jadjiment mam ❤️ 🙏👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
తొక్కేమీ కాదు. డబ్బులు రాగానే గ్యారెంటీగా వేరే వాడితో పోతాది. కూతురు పేరున డిపోసిట్ చేసి దానితోనే వైఫ్ ని బ్రతిగేలా pettali😂😂😂
100% ..Money kavali mogudoddu...chanipoyina kuda no problem...Society daarunamga vundi..Chattalu maaraali
In my own life is same problem gone in my life
The Court referenced the status of a nominee under life insurance policies, suggesting that the nominee acts as a trustee for the legal heirs. It invoked its landmark judgment in Sarbati Devi vs Usha Devi of 1983, which held that nomination under Section 39 of the Insurance Act, 1938, does not establish a line of succession. Instead, any amount paid to a nominee upon the policyholder’s death forms part of the deceased policyholder's estate, to which all his/her heirs are entitled.
Phone matladutunte accident aindi antundi kada.. appudu husband hospital lo unte yenduku vellaledu??? Phone matlade avida hospital ki vellaleda?? 20:33
అమ్మ నీకంటే రమ్య మేడం కళ్యాణ్ చక్రవర్తి ఓల్డ్ ఎంతో బెస్ట్ నువ్వు ఓన్లీ ఇంగ్లీష్ మారతావు తెలుగు మాట్లాడవు
Lawyer garu, I couldn't capture the supreme court case you cited - need to review the circumstances and what verdict exactly they gave and whether applicable in this case where the wife or child are not mentioned even as secondary beneficiaries. Even Google currently saying as follows: In India, if a brother names his sister as the sole beneficiary on his life insurance policy, then upon his death, his wife and children would not be able to claim the policy amount unless specifically mentioned as secondary beneficiaries on the policy; the sister would be the only person entitled to receive the death benefit as per the policy terms
Biased one sided wrong judgement. If so what about old aged parents they deserves half share who will take care of them
What is her contribution to her in-laws and husband would you like to say marriage means stay for few days with husband and doesn't need any service and loot money of others hardship. Sister is genuinely speaking but wife never heard one good word
Sister must give 50 percent share to husband old aged parents
Antha Baga chepperu kani Amma nanna ki kuda oka 5 lakh isthe bagundu money vunte evaru ayina Baga chusukuntaru
Super madam chala baga cheppali👌👍
Jaya garu andamina jeevitam programme rada?close chesara......
Hii madam miru advocate adhrusta rathanam dhagara velayaru
Edva judgements ivvakandi
🙏🙏🙏👍👍👍💐💐
Madam మొగుడు సపద్ భార్య హక్కు లేదు మేడమ్
When he is in hospital parents has spent amount sister has spent time may be amount too
When husband expired she not came she came only for lic amount
Here lawyer says justice should be justified to only wife n kid
Am fine with settlement completely on kid as legal heir but not his wife
MONEY DRAMA SHE WILL GET MARRIED AGAIN
Kaadu madam parents ni chusukuntundi kadaa ameki anyayam kavalsindena
Avunu husband vaddu parents vaddu Kani money kavali
Mari parents ekadiki vellali
Telugu lo Maatladu Medam Manam Telugollam
Super madem 👌👌👌💯💯
Bhagya ann8 abaddale cheptundi, hartha entha karkotakudu aina chanipoyina chuddaaniki raani aadadi chi....dabbu kosam vqchindi.....sravanthi ye correct, bharya dabbu pichi time athanu chelli ni namimee gaa pettinqadu
Lawyer medam, prathi okkariki hakkulu gurtosthayi kani badyatalu gurtundav, this case is exactly the same, mogudu chachipote Rani pellam ippudu vachi dabbulu kavalantadi, chi adokka adadena thu
Husband chanipoyina badha kuda ledu daniki
Johar to the advocate