The Rise and Fall of the Ottoman Empire

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @HistoryScope
    @HistoryScope  2 ปีที่แล้ว +270

    The audio engineer couldn't find good high quality recordings of many of the songs in this video. So they remade 13 of them and we uploaded them on our third channel, Music Scope, so you can listen to them yourselves as well: th-cam.com/channels/kH3AD8-uCAJYW7Q9I0ZJig.html

    • @xylobol
      @xylobol 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      epic

    • @Scwarzkop
      @Scwarzkop 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      what's your second channel?

    • @polyherb4096
      @polyherb4096 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      wow lol. also you have a audio engineer?

    • @HistoryScope
      @HistoryScope  2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      The second channel is called Extra Scope. It doesn't have any content yet, though. You also won't be able to find it if you search for it AFAIK.

    • @gavrielpapas773
      @gavrielpapas773 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@HistoryScope
      I think you watched too much Game of Thrones. Janissaries did undergo circumcision and not castration. Eunuchs won't make up a whole army of strong people unless it's in the GOT fantasy world.
      It's a huge mistake you made, you gotta fix this or no historian will ever take you seriously.

  • @ChrMuslimThor
    @ChrMuslimThor 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1516

    The Janissaries were circumcised, not castrated.

    • @shaunybonny688
      @shaunybonny688 2 ปีที่แล้ว +510

      I was going to say, castrated soldiers, that doesn’t seem like a good idea.

    • @williamdavis9562
      @williamdavis9562 2 ปีที่แล้ว +131

      @@shaunybonny688 Yea it's just terrible research on the part of the guy who made the video.
      Imagine a bunch of castrated soldiers storming a castle? Not going to end well.

    • @HistoryScope
      @HistoryScope  2 ปีที่แล้ว +683

      Yes, I messed that up.

    • @williamdavis9562
      @williamdavis9562 2 ปีที่แล้ว +377

      @@HistoryScope 40 minute video with that few mistakes?
      It's a job well done my man.
      Although I'm still laughing at the idea of a castrated army charging a city 🤣🤣

    • @daylight3325
      @daylight3325 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      What’s the difference. I feel cheated. I hear it’s way more sensitive with the skin. Tf mom.

  • @saurovaki
    @saurovaki 2 ปีที่แล้ว +703

    I've always been interested in the Ottoman Empire but I wasn't sure how to comprehend its history in a linear fashion so thanks so much for this video :)

    • @the-angel-of-light-gardevoir8
      @the-angel-of-light-gardevoir8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Coincidentally enough one of the Ottomans most iconic rivals is Poland which is historically a Jewish stronghold

    • @Berat-mm6pj
      @Berat-mm6pj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@the-angel-of-light-gardevoir8 so was the ottoman empire. Have a good day sir🖐🏼

    • @joeshar.
      @joeshar. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      To understand Ottomans; you should understand Turks and their history starting from Central Asia, a part ended in East Europe way before Ottomans (Huns); then other part Seljuks take over Persia, Middle East and opened the gate to Anatolia. Ottomans have started from that time.
      If Ottomans have influenced the events in European history; Turks in Central Asia have influenced the events in China and India.

    • @the-angel-of-light-gardevoir8
      @the-angel-of-light-gardevoir8 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It is pretty ironic though that the Ottomans historically a very progressive nation Genocided the Armenians in the last years of its life

    • @Berat-mm6pj
      @Berat-mm6pj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@the-angel-of-light-gardevoir8 that's really ironic (even though nobody knows if the government itself ordered more than the deportations). May everyone be punished that caused this misery to the unguilty

  • @kmmmsyr9883
    @kmmmsyr9883 2 ปีที่แล้ว +426

    Some errors:
    - Ottoman Empire didn't exist for 700 years, it existed for 620 or 623 years (its founding date is disputed, either 1299 or 1302. also it's fall is 1922 by Ataturk abolishing monarchy in Turkey)
    - Janissaries were not castrated. Only castrated people employed by Ottoman government were eunuchs in harems or people who rised to higher positions from being an eunuch. Close to being castrated, however, janissaries were forbidden from marrying until their retirement (until the reign of Selim the Grim). In fact, many people who rised to higher positions from being a janissary even married the sisters and daughters of the sultans and had children with them.

    • @oguzhan9424
      @oguzhan9424 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      One of the Turkic empires, we had many of them (at the same time) spanning a timeline over 2000 years.

    • @kmmmsyr9883
      @kmmmsyr9883 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      @@oguzhan9424 I didn't say anything to the contrary?

    • @abdirahmanmohammed4738
      @abdirahmanmohammed4738 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      I was confused when he said the janissaries where castrated and tried to search google and Wikipedia for any articles that indicated so but I couldn't find anything.

    • @Mustafa1998
      @Mustafa1998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@abdirahmanmohammed4738 they were not allowed to marry, however later that changed

    • @no8to8racism
      @no8to8racism 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The castration thing also startled me. I knew they weren't eunuchs.. Thanks for confirming

  • @ondank
    @ondank 2 ปีที่แล้ว +164

    It honestly boggles my mind that the taxation on spices was SO steep that European countries decided that it made more sense to sail around a continent in voyages that took months, then to pay those taxes.

    • @haldir3120
      @haldir3120 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I would argue high prices drives competitors to enter the market.

    • @theCosmicQueen
      @theCosmicQueen ปีที่แล้ว +16

      lol don't imagine for one second it was a bout taxes, it was about warfare and an enemy taking over the former trading partner, the Byzantines. And the entire trade route for shipping.

    • @ondank
      @ondank ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@theCosmicQueen citation needed

    • @adamthemyth
      @adamthemyth ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They were the OG libertarians.

    • @akkadian102
      @akkadian102 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theCosmicQueenYea but a smart empire would still allow trade to pass through their territory. They didn’t have an embargo on the European nations they just had really high tariffs because of the monopoly ground trade routes.

  • @warcrimeswilly
    @warcrimeswilly 2 ปีที่แล้ว +566

    I would love to see a video like this on the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, an important yet overlooked country. There seems to be no in depth video like this on the history of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and I think it would make a very interesting topic.

    • @HistoryScope
      @HistoryScope  2 ปีที่แล้ว +109

      It's going on the list of future topics

    • @eyekombie3638
      @eyekombie3638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Russian Empire would also be an interesting topic, because their fall was both very interesting and complicated. It would be interesting to hear, how imperial government system, army and ideology collapsed, not just "tsar was bad, then 1917 and Soviet Union"

    • @warcrimeswilly
      @warcrimeswilly 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@HistoryScope I'll look out for it

    • @yerma6847
      @yerma6847 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@eyekombie3638 it's not difficult to understand the Russian empire failed to win important battles in major wars starting with the crimean then the first ww plus the lack of understanding of how Europe was advancing a society they stayed as an agrarian empire while the big boys industrialised leaving the Russians as the backward country where as britian and the Germans had parilments and officials outside the royals the Russians had direct rule which left them easy to manipulation ie rasputin (he might or might not have been using the tsar as a puppet for his mysticism) but as the R.E lost touch with its people and basically abused and starved it's people the Germans saw a chance to send a rebel called Lenin to start the bolshavic revolution which is what lead to the down fall even the Americans and the British tried to stop the communists by sending troops to arkangelsk to lead a counter coup bt its basically failed empire lost touch was over thrown after colossal balls up in major wars

    • @brittking3990
      @brittking3990 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I don’t think that would be a good idea…I mean honestly no one gives 2 shits about Poland or Lithuania. But good luck!

  • @lukasnowak9770
    @lukasnowak9770 2 ปีที่แล้ว +122

    I have been watching your videos since the Aztec empire one. Still happy to rewatch most of them once in a while. Keep up the great work! 👍

  • @rawka_7929
    @rawka_7929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    The Empire's rise is impressive really, taking advantage of the weakened powers around them slowly getting larger and more powerful honestly it's intriguing history

    • @majkel1684
      @majkel1684 2 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      That's pretty much how every empire ever created rose to power

    • @rawka_7929
      @rawka_7929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@majkel1684 not saying it ain't, but ig it's more intriguing to me because I'm from around the region they originally rose in, not happy about it but eh

    • @williamdavis9562
      @williamdavis9562 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rawka_7929 Don't see how that affects your life in anyway, shape or form.
      Not happy about what? Events that took place 700 years ago? lol

    • @rawka_7929
      @rawka_7929 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@williamdavis9562 it did majorly shape my life due to sheer butterfly effect alone, if the ottomans didn't exist and let's say I'm still born all these years later shit would be majorly changed

    • @oddshaft4851
      @oddshaft4851 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rawka_7929 well, cope about an event that happened 700 years ago then

  • @grinchgames98
    @grinchgames98 2 ปีที่แล้ว +189

    The Ottoman Empire is an amazingly interesting empire, it’s progression from a rising star with a monopoly on religious tolerance in the Middle Ages to a nationalist, backwards second-rate power it very intriguing.

    • @xp7575
      @xp7575 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      So basically America in slow motion

    • @joemama-yf7gn
      @joemama-yf7gn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@xp7575 B R U H

    • @straw_hat1579
      @straw_hat1579 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@xp7575 B R U H

    • @oguzhan9424
      @oguzhan9424 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A few notes: it was the brightest star mostly and watch out who you call "backwards".

    • @grinchgames98
      @grinchgames98 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@oguzhan9424 it’s not an opinion but an objective fact that by the end of the lifespan of the Ottoman Empire they were backwards. The young turk pashas were extremely incompetent (e.g- desiring a pan-Turkic empire reaching into China at a time when the empire was struggling to maintain its own borders, and upon the failure poorly planned caucus invasion blaming and slaughtering Armenians) and the empire was falling behind technologically and was already far behind the other great powers in terms of ideas of governing. It was only Mustafa Kemal Attaturk who’s liberalisation and modernisation efforts of society as a whole and resistance against foreign powers that saved the Turkish nation as a concept.

  • @joeshar.
    @joeshar. 2 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    In the very beginning; there are also 2 more main events in World history directly or indirectly triggered by The Ottomans.
    1-Fall of Constantinople and Byzantium let scholars migrate to Italy which triggered Renaissance.
    2-Just like the relationship between Ottomans-Balkans-WW1; similar relationship between Ottomans-MiddleEast-Today's conflicts.

  • @MasterMalrubius
    @MasterMalrubius 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Thank you. I really enjoyed that. I knew the basics of the fall of the Ottoman Empire. However, you provided more detail which helps understand how it was steadily defeated and diminished.

  • @SiVlog1989
    @SiVlog1989 2 ปีที่แล้ว +123

    As ever, as expected from Avery's content, this video taught me more about the history of something than I would have thought possible :).
    When I was a kid, specifically being taught about historical events like the Crimean War and the First World War, little to nothing was taught about what made up those power blocks. The Ottoman Empire was no different. When I first started learning about those two significant moments in British military history, we were told about who led France at the time, who led Russia and briefly mentioned why the Crimean War started, but no context was given to what the Ottoman Empire was nor why two predominantly (nominally) Christian nations came to the defence of a predominantly Muslim Empire. Next to the Falklands War, the Crimean War seems (to me anyway) one of the most bizarre conflicts in British Military history

    • @annatamparow4917
      @annatamparow4917 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Not really! Even the current war is a Russian attempt to gain control of the Black Sea! In the Crimean war the French and the English attempted a stopgap measure, the former to safeguard their Indian dominions, the latter to expand their colonies. Remember Tennysonś poem, The Charge of the Light Brigade? By that time everyone had moved forward in artillery except the Ottomans.

  • @iTsGhosty24
    @iTsGhosty24 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    now i can spend 37 minutes of my life listening to something interesting. keep up the work up 👍

  • @Plantrum
    @Plantrum 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Interesting video. I always liked your content. Even at its roughest, its still very informative. The dept that you go to that others don't dare to is extremely helpful. Thank you for what you do.

  • @degox99
    @degox99 2 ปีที่แล้ว +104

    For anyone who wanted more about the ottoman/turkey, the channel kraut has a 4 hour documentary divided in 3 videos that is amazing (and very dense)

    • @bltsevdallarfanclub641
      @bltsevdallarfanclub641 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Kraut's second and third videos are biased.

    • @onuraslanfb07
      @onuraslanfb07 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@bltsevdallarfanclub641 To be honest all of his videos are biased. If you want objective sources where you can interpret your own meanings of them you have to read books

    • @Localmozzy
      @Localmozzy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bltsevdallarfanclub641 how is he biased

    • @bltsevdallarfanclub641
      @bltsevdallarfanclub641 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Localmozzy the US intervention is downplayed. Like he doesn't talk about the whole "Green Generation" project when USA funded religious extremists to support cults etc... Those cults now hold a significant power among the goverment. Just past months 2 cops got attacked by them. And Erdoğan and other ministers doesn't actually know what they are doing. The neo-ottomanism is just public propaganda and larping while we as public try to live in harsh conditions. His videos are overall are better than average but still falls the same mistakes as some other people like thinking "Enver was a Turanist/pan Turkist" or "Ataturk adopted an Ermenian Genocide victim girl". Those stories are fake for example. Enver paşa tried to fight aganist reds after he fucked up as a leader in Ottoman Empire but it wasn't a "Turanist ambition" thing. Returning to Erdo, he openly admitted he was in "middle east project" time to time before. Or his ministers has shown their true colours. For example last month a former AKP(erdo's party) member whislteblowed some conversations. When the first refugee wave came some of AKP members said things like "hopefully our sons/daughters will marry these refugees" because they were pan/islamist scum(I am a muslim but these guys are retarded af) that think making country go to a civil war is okay. There are more examples like how Turkish ministers agreeing on principles that disadventages Turkey no matter where you look at at EU conferances etc...

    • @ludvigholst4767
      @ludvigholst4767 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@bltsevdallarfanclub641 His takes me a lot of sense in those videos and he brings up why he is negative towards a subject when he is. Also hope this isn't an armenian genocide denial thing

  • @ptolemy_1427
    @ptolemy_1427 2 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    Excellent presentation as always, but I feel the need to correct one small mistake:
    The Janissaries were never subject to castration(since they were destined to be elite warriors), that would be the standard eunuchs.

    • @millehugo2879
      @millehugo2879 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I thought that sounded weird because that would probably make them less aggressive.

    • @auror9792
      @auror9792 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Maybe he meant circumcised 😂

    • @chrisk5651
      @chrisk5651 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They were circumcised not castrated. The guards of harem were castrated & thus were eunuchs.

    • @ptolemy_1427
      @ptolemy_1427 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@chrisk5651 Well of course they were circumsized, since they were all converted to Islam.

    • @chrisk5651
      @chrisk5651 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ptolemy_1427 yeah but he had said that they were castrated which wasn’t the case & Auror ‘97 said that “Maybe he meant circumcised” so I chimed in.

  • @thebestcentaur
    @thebestcentaur 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    "What were they gonna do, sail around Africa?"
    Europe: *so anyway, I started sailing*

    • @dougdouglas2112
      @dougdouglas2112 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ...I know, right. lmao😂

  • @Black.Templar_002
    @Black.Templar_002 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    i love the ottoman history! i myself as a german who has never been to turkey or the middle east have always been interested in the region and especially the ottoman empire. great to see that this channel which always goes so nicely into detail and with amazing visualization does a vid about this topic!

    • @anathardayaldar
      @anathardayaldar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      My favorite snack when I was in Berlin were Doner Kebabs

    • @islamicottoman6445
      @islamicottoman6445 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kaiserreich ❤️ Ottoman Empire

    • @yutanarkavich
      @yutanarkavich 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Visit us some day.

    • @SpaceKebab
      @SpaceKebab ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@anathardayaldar AHH MAN i went to visit my family and i miss doner so much :(

    • @Raveded
      @Raveded ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@yutanarkavichman I am broke as hell. Wish I could visit

  • @JanetDaley-solo
    @JanetDaley-solo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    My late Jewish husband was obsessed with the Ottoman Empire---he thought that's where we should be looking for political options, rather than the Roman Empire.
    Thank you for posting this--it clarified WHY he thought that. 🥰

    • @Thiiink
      @Thiiink 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      oy vey

    • @JanetDaley-solo
      @JanetDaley-solo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Thiiink

  • @Ifraneljadida
    @Ifraneljadida ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This is a great video. I focus on Anglo history (I'm an American of English/German descent) so I relate more to it but I wanted to learn more about the Ottoman empire. Specifically when I learned how Spain developed deep water navigation in large part to circumvent the Ottomans in the spice trade. Or the other big one being the Battle Of Vienna where they almost took over Europe. This is great for a newbie such as myself

    • @carpediem1981jfa
      @carpediem1981jfa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Spain due to the Portuguese presence in Africa and the Ottoman Empire are the reasons to go East, without the Ottomans it would have not been Spanish Empire.

  • @furyninja1625
    @furyninja1625 2 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I've always been curious about the Ottomans, I've only heard about their role in WW1 and the collapse but they never taught us about its rise or its society or anything in school

    • @horvatlovren7198
      @horvatlovren7198 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Criminal imperialist empire that terrorised, subjugated and kept the lands they occupied poor. In the Balkans even 100 years after those imperialists were kicked out, we are still suffering from their 500 year occupation.

    • @9delta988
      @9delta988 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Depends where you live. In western europe we are edudated (although not in dept) on the Ottoman empire. You have to remember there is a lot (and I mean a lot) of history in the world, this is why school sticks to the stuff that helps to explain the world you live in today. For example someone from Kenya doesn't need to know about the northern wars and an chilian does not need to know about Shaka Zulu because they had no effect on the society they live in today.

    • @Mrdinomist
      @Mrdinomist ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@9delta988 While in Balkans all they teach us for most part are the ottoman genocides and wars with our nations. So while we don’t have extensive knowledge of Ottoman empire itself we learn a lot about ottoman presence in these regions .

    • @salihgurbuz2344
      @salihgurbuz2344 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Mrdinomist Most of these are lies. The Ottomans did not commit genocide like France, Germany etc. They invested a lot especially in the Balkans, they were tolerant. The French and British empires stayed in the places they occupied for 50-100 years and the people there even forgot their own languages, but the Ottomans ruled most of the Balkans for 400 year but in spite of that for example, Greeks speak Greek, not Turkish.

    • @Mrdinomist
      @Mrdinomist ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@salihgurbuz2344 Oh so you wanna teach me history of my own culutre . They did commit genocide you can read about it. They took children from their families and coverted them to islam, they did many horrible things as empires tend to do.

  • @icecream6256
    @icecream6256 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So complacency and procrastination really adds up and brings you down in the long run, good thing to learn. I'll stop procrastinating after i watch the next documentary video

  • @killer3000ad
    @killer3000ad 2 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    One thing not mentioned in this video but had spurred the practice of secluding the Sultan's sons in the palace was the practice fratricide amongst potential heirs. In a form of social Darwinism, whenever the ruling sultan died, it became a race to the throne amongst his sons to see who could shore up the most support. This sometimes resulted in civil wars but more often than not it led to brothers killing each other. In one event, a newly crowned sultan had all his younger brothers who still children, murdered to prevent any rivals to his thrown. This cruel practice eventually led to the practice of secluding heirs in the palace rather than posting them as administrators outside the capital to gain experience.

    • @Pulkit__7
      @Pulkit__7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seems like the common theme here is: GREED

  • @mariusvarna868
    @mariusvarna868 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Ottoman history explained simply and in a great order, simply a marvelous video.

  • @gurkeschurke6667
    @gurkeschurke6667 2 ปีที่แล้ว +55

    6:16 I hate how it's portrait like the whole army consists of jannisarys. The jannisarys branch was small and its main purpose was to serve as bodyguards, not to win battles. This downplays the achievements of the army and overestimates the importance of jannisarys.
    edit: they where not castrated thats downright stupid to assume.

    • @hangyalambar
      @hangyalambar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Jannisaries was not mostly concentrated into bodyguard duties, but also policemen, and firefighters in peace time. Although it's true that they are indoctrinated imto palace guard duties and bodyguard during battles, they were mostly the majority - if not, the only infantry-oriented unit of the battle. Theres also other types of bodyguard units of the Ottomans such as the Silahdar & Kapikulu Sipahi.
      Sultans usually commited Jannisaries either to lunge attacks or be indoctrinated within a strategy that they created, they are a chip to win battles like Fall of Constantinople, Battle of Mohacs, Siege of Rhodes, Siege of Esterzgom, Battle of Chaldiran and many other.
      But you are right - Cavalry and other factors such as the Celebi Corps are predominantly apart of the Ottoman Army due to their manpower composition, and their unique role that lubricates balances amongst the Army.

    • @HistoryScope
      @HistoryScope  2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      True, but for the sake of military expansion they were mostly important as a military force. Hence why I talked about the military aspect when talking about military expansion.

    • @Sadoyasturadoglu
      @Sadoyasturadoglu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're also confusing devshirme and janissaries, the majority of Janissaries were ethnically Turkic (in the 17th-19th centuries) devshirmes were Christians.

    • @aleksanderzhuli9607
      @aleksanderzhuli9607 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was going to comment as well on the 'castrated' part, which is inaccurate, to say the least. thanks

  • @thomasjohnson2862
    @thomasjohnson2862 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Always get super excited when I see a new History Scope video pop up! Informative as ever

  • @p00bix
    @p00bix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    20:31 There lived a certain man in Russia long ago
    He was big and strong, in his eyes a flaming glow
    Most people looked at him with terror and with fear
    But to Moscow chicks he was such a lovely dear
    He could preach the Bible like a preacher
    Full of ecstasy and fire
    But he also was the kind of teacher
    Women would desire

    • @hydrolifetech7911
      @hydrolifetech7911 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nice catch! Reminded me of the scandal about Rasputin song tune stolen from a Turkish folk song

  • @HierophanticRose
    @HierophanticRose 2 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    One small thing, Conquest of Vienna was also mainly to facilitate entry into Italy not Central Europe alone, as by then Ottomans had lost the naval superiority and given up on aiming for Italy via naval route from the south
    But otherwise great research into industrialization efforts of the late Empire, not many know of it.

  • @justinleemiller
    @justinleemiller 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The Ottoman architecture in Israel and Lebanon is gorgeous. It’s really sad to see it torn down to build modern crap.

    • @sinnyawesome7037
      @sinnyawesome7037 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      is getting rid of an emperor and building democracy bad? you might be the crap!

  • @sheevpalpy
    @sheevpalpy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +74

    One detail you got mixed up: it wasnt the Young Turks who wanted to promote a national Ottoman identity based around Islam (Pan-Islamist), but rather the Young Ottomans. The Young Turks were the ones to depose Sultan Abdulhamid II in 1908, who sought to emphasise a Turkish identity within the empire. Overall other than that great video

    • @thebristolbruiser
      @thebristolbruiser ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Yes, good point. This is why the Young Turks sought to “Turkify” regions of Asia Minor with large minority populations, resulting in the Armenian genocide, the Assyrian genocide, and the Greek genocide.

    • @papazataklaattiranimam
      @papazataklaattiranimam ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@thebristolbruiser and Dinosaur Genocide as well

    • @parsifal40
      @parsifal40 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​​​@@papazataklaattiranimamNever forget the Jewish genocide commited by Adolf "Bozkurt" Hitler Pasha who was actually Turkish (Also the Nazis are Hun so they are Turkish too)

  • @ffarkasm
    @ffarkasm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    6:21 The janissaries were circumcised, not castrated. Big difference. Just imagine if you were forced to chose from the two.

  • @coineineagh
    @coineineagh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Netjes hoor! Nice to have Dutch representation among the history channels. And your humour is very well timed: sometimes less is more. Keep up the good work.

  • @emmanuelflores1557
    @emmanuelflores1557 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    amazing quality as expected keeping working hard!

  • @Lufefe
    @Lufefe 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Just when I was looking for something to listen to while I code, I see the notification for this video. Happy days 😄

  • @codyjoe2442
    @codyjoe2442 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    love your videos keep up the good work 😀😀

  • @PhoenixBeI
    @PhoenixBeI 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Interesting video, thank you. Albeit, the Europeans weren't after spices because their food was bland. It was because their food would go bad due to the lack of refrigeration. They needed to cover up the taste of rot. This is why a good chunk of preserved meat like salami, and other sausage-like products, were (and still are) very spicy.

    • @skylanh4319
      @skylanh4319 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Both are true. Spices have many purposes. But salt is the main preservative and not part of the spice trade. And the space trade started from wealthy Europeans wanting flavor diversity. They did have flavor…. Just not the options India had.

    • @adamb6670
      @adamb6670 ปีที่แล้ว

      The concept of medieval people eating rotten food is a myth. It was all borne out of a misunderstanding made by an author in the 20th century. Rotten food makes people sick. It did then, just as it does now. If medieval people had eaten rotten food all the time, none of us would still be around. And the least likely people to eat rotten food would have been the only people who could afford spices.

  • @ruthkatz1998
    @ruthkatz1998 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thank you for existing, my dude

  • @3-DtimeCosmology
    @3-DtimeCosmology ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That clears things up alot for me, thanks! 😊

  • @irialoceallaigh7665
    @irialoceallaigh7665 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The spices weren't for food as much as they were needed for European healthcare. Spices were seen to cure various ailments at that time.

    • @williamdavis9562
      @williamdavis9562 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting tidbit of info.
      Thanks for sharing.

  • @lionquill
    @lionquill ปีที่แล้ว +18

    what were the europeans going to do about it? sail around africa? HAHAHAHHAHA.... so anyways, the europeans sailed around africa-

  • @Nom_AnorVSJedi
    @Nom_AnorVSJedi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    1299 - 1922 … amazing run. The Ottomans connected Tamerlane and Hitler. And why was it the Sick Man of Europe? Why isn’t the Spanish, Portuguese and Venetians considered the Sick Man of Europe?

    • @Hoaxe72
      @Hoaxe72 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Basically it became so easy to push around the ottomans. British company’s had monopoly’s in Tobbaco etc.

    • @archivey-h8e
      @archivey-h8e ปีที่แล้ว +4

      it's an unfair title really. Ottoman's were at the end of their long run.

    • @lovelylavenderr
      @lovelylavenderr ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably because they were white...

  • @henrikschmidt3964
    @henrikschmidt3964 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    These videos are awesome. I have read a fair bit of history over the years but I cannot say I knew much about the Ottomans.
    I learned something today.

  • @nemanjaradic1055
    @nemanjaradic1055 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Ottoman conquests in Europe be like: I used the christians to destroy the christians

  • @R0dolphus
    @R0dolphus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Never really thought how much The Ottomans shaped my country, and every other.

  • @HighPeakMapping
    @HighPeakMapping 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I've been waiting for a video about the Ottomans from you, great job!

  • @nehirakarsu7709
    @nehirakarsu7709 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    6:20 Janissaries were not castrated. They were circumcised as a tradition that applied to all Muslim boys. They were taken quite young from their families and raised in a Turkish-Muslim household to accustom to the living of the people. They were converted to Islam as well.

    • @sumgyeojin
      @sumgyeojin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      yeah, this vid had a lot of mistakes, it seems like they didnt research with someone whos actually from turkey lol

  • @rickversglaciers
    @rickversglaciers 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Gaaf zeg. Dank je wel voor je tijd en moeite!!!1❤

  • @jcm95
    @jcm95 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My man, what a video! Extremely interesting

  • @AndrewEvenstar
    @AndrewEvenstar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I've traveled the Ottoman Empire throughout Bosnia. I love the people, culture and food. I want to move there. Long live the Slavs!

    • @mertroll1
      @mertroll1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What

    • @williamdavis9562
      @williamdavis9562 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mertroll1 Bosnians are Slavs, they also have an Ottoman past.

    • @emrefifty5281
      @emrefifty5281 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was in Sarajevo and Mostar 2 times now and I loved seeing the Ottoman Past.

  • @CONSTVNTINE
    @CONSTVNTINE 2 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    6:21 Janissaries were not castrated. Just circumcised.

  • @CalCalCal6996
    @CalCalCal6996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    New history scope video??? Omg I know it's snowing here in Montreal for a reason, it must be Christmas!

    • @HistoryScope
      @HistoryScope  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is one of my favourite comments I've ever received.

  • @circuitsandparts
    @circuitsandparts ปีที่แล้ว

    This video was very well done. While many videos cover the demise of the Ottoman Empire, very few even mentions the birth of Turkey. Well done.

  • @Berat-mm6pj
    @Berat-mm6pj 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    18:20 I'm sorry but this part about Egypt is very wrong. The mamluks were the ruling class of Egypt in the name of the sultan since the defeat of the mamluk sultanate in the 16th century. In the time period you're referring to an important man named Mohammed Ali Pascha became governor of Egypt; he massacred the mamluks after a de-facto Civil War with them, modernised Egypt in many ways afterwards and Egypt became arguably even stronger then the Sultan in Constantinople. He even waged war very successfuly against the sultan and conquert the Levante. Then the European powers launched an intervention to prevent that Mohammed Ali depouses the sultan and creates a new powerful Islamic empire. But he remained the de-facto independent ruler of Egypt.
    Except that your video was quite good. Good job👍🏼

  • @nobodyatall1010
    @nobodyatall1010 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent, as always!

  • @elkoikan5993
    @elkoikan5993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ottoman empire is so huge, it is impossible to cover it all in one video. I wished video talked little bit more about all the great things ottomans build, like multiple stone bridges, channel of Pharaoh's, blue Mosque, great Sultania ship and so on

    • @stellaKAU
      @stellaKAU 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nothing great they ever built nor did. In fact they made that whole area fall backwards and it's still struggling behind the whole world.

    • @kingduck6728
      @kingduck6728 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stellaKAU no

  • @dylan380jwz
    @dylan380jwz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good video as always, thanks for making it!

  • @daireg7921
    @daireg7921 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Your videos are some of the best historical information I’ve found on TH-cam, I really look forward to your next video

  • @SB03182
    @SB03182 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! I have enjoyed every single second. I need it history refresher course! Thank you!

  • @Kim-j9m6v
    @Kim-j9m6v ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I found your channel through your video about autism and agreed with it 100%. I am also autistic with a love of history, and chocolate, so I’ve watched a bunch of your videos now. They are very listenable and easy to understand! I listen to podcasts and stuff all day at work and your content has been great to put on and listen to at length. I appreciate all the hard work, thanks so much 🙏

  • @skeptic781
    @skeptic781 ปีที่แล้ว

    This channel is amazing. I watch this guy's videos for entertainment and for studying. There is so much information in this video that I don't need to read my textbooks for my test tomorrow.

  • @mavislenya1110
    @mavislenya1110 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Janisseries didn't become the main part of the army until its later years. That was the Sipahi that was the main part of the army, which were the equavalent version of feudal lords and their levies.

  • @808_rafa
    @808_rafa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Been curious about this topic for a while now

  • @rjhick1
    @rjhick1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    What's funny is that I started playing Europa 4 and started as one of the European countries (Portugal) and literally what you just said was the reason why I started setting up colonies around the world. The Ottoman Empire is just too strong to mess with

    • @kenos911
      @kenos911 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Portugal in eu4 is so much more op than in real life
      Still a fun country

    • @Hoaxe72
      @Hoaxe72 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@kenos911eah well Portugal fell off

  • @kiern1285
    @kiern1285 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hell yeah! A new video!

  • @mlcooks8663
    @mlcooks8663 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Very informative. Best docu on the ottoman empire I've seen

  • @timeisapathwalkingtounderstand
    @timeisapathwalkingtounderstand ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the video. Here in New York City 1:14 a.m. Sunday March 5th watching and learning how the Ottoman empire fell.

  • @whyshouldwecare3267
    @whyshouldwecare3267 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    @6.28 the Janissaries were never castrated. if nothing else this would make them less effective soldiers.

  • @Nulkk
    @Nulkk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I dont usually comment on videos, but this video was just fantastic!

  • @zuniroa
    @zuniroa 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I’m from the same town as Januarius A. MacGahan, who was a journalist who reported atrocities that the Ottomans committed against the Bulgarian people and was key to Bulgarian independence and the alienation of the Ottoman Empire from European powers. He’s often dubbed the Liberator of Bulgaria and has a massive memorial dedicated to him at the town cemetery

    • @YETERKABULET
      @YETERKABULET ปีที่แล้ว

      If we wanted one of you wouldn't stay Christian. Go and see how it is massacre and assimilation. ALGERIA. If it were up to your brothers, you would have been killed and you would have been a Catholic, we prevented this, so now you have a chance for a freer denomination. Even if you don't have a religious preference, it was important to people. The Ottomans withdrew from those lands because they were fighting against so many states, otherwise the buffoons would only be appetizers for the coffee tables.

  • @MirageGSM
    @MirageGSM 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice video. Interesting it came out one day after Megaprojects did one on a similar topic - Railways in the Ottoman Empire.

  • @napolien1310
    @napolien1310 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    18:36
    And then sadly some Turks blame Arabs, and various other races of their downfall, sorry to tell you the truth but your downfall caused by you own system and incompetence.
    You were great once but not anymore.

    • @rosieslater9643
      @rosieslater9643 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      some dumbasses want to bring back the ottoman empire and abolish secularity. i’ve never heard of anyone making the claims you wrote about though.

    • @7ember100
      @7ember100 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      waw why u use the term "race" ?

    • @samwill7259
      @samwill7259 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@7ember100 "Race" "ethnicity" "nationality" these definitions for these things are bit wibbly wobbly.

    • @napolien1310
      @napolien1310 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@samwill7259 exactly

    • @skullsforerlikkhansthrone9306
      @skullsforerlikkhansthrone9306 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      * watches a video full of mistakes and shortcoming info prepared by some uninformed occidental
      * takes it for granted
      * makes historical analysis based on that dimwitty YT video
      typical arab eh?

  • @SarahET
    @SarahET 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing video
    I really cannot say more, well done, I loved every single second

  • @lostShadowLord
    @lostShadowLord 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    One thing I noticed that in regards to how medieval Europe raised it armies. Levies were actually trained and equipped. The idea of a rabble of poorly trained mobs armed with farming equipment was something from the Humanism who basically believed that the 'Dark age' was horrible time compared to the Roman and Greek.

    • @HierophanticRose
      @HierophanticRose 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes they werent random, in fact levy obligation often came with lower taxes - most people dont realize Medieval contractship didnt stop at nobles, it threaded the entire fabric of society from full time soldier to part time levy to peasant to artisan to freemen to anything else.
      This meant rules and customs were actually less top-down arbitrary than people originally think of middle ages, but it also brought in a very rigid class system except certain exceptions
      But one thing he mentioned is relevant, levies were often region based, and would bring with it regionalities - ie higher levy obligation means higher priviligies, sometimes unwillingness to leave home country etc. As a result, often caused decentralized states and loose unions. Whereas large professional armies often are signs that a country is collecting more central power over a span of time.

  • @allroadsleadtospaghetti888
    @allroadsleadtospaghetti888 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video!

  • @andreweden9405
    @andreweden9405 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Many of these formerly Ottoman-occupied countries surrounding Turkey weren't taking territory away from the Ottoman Empire, they were taking it BACK! You seem to conveniently leave that out.

  • @ioan_jivan
    @ioan_jivan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome video

  • @grosiradu
    @grosiradu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    As a Romanian I am glad the Ottoman empire collapsed.

    • @grosiradu
      @grosiradu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@HnH2.0 Of course it did, Romania is a weak country and it won't change in the near and medium future.
      In the present I am impressed by Turkey, has a great army, I visited only Istanbul, but want to see more and learn more about it history to help myself.

    • @kingduck6728
      @kingduck6728 ปีที่แล้ว

      Turkiyeeeeeee clap vampireeeeee

    • @kingduck6728
      @kingduck6728 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷

  • @parkerbell5826
    @parkerbell5826 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish you had made this longer, it is a lot of history to discuss and was shorter than your previous videos regarding such meaty topics. Other videos are good; would have loved to have gotten more from you in this though.

    • @HistoryScope
      @HistoryScope  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too. I had written 9 pages, as usual. But only found out afterwards that the letters were larger, so there was less content. I have fixed it for the video that comes after this, I think.

  • @TheJadenVideos
    @TheJadenVideos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    14:38 ahh yes my favorite kingdom of the renaissance era, the Soviet Union lol (great video btw)

    • @HistoryScope
      @HistoryScope  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      None of the instances mentioned there were from the renaissance. The French with napoleon and loui 14 (not sure if that's the right number) , the Germans during world wars, and the soviet Union during the col war.

    • @TheJadenVideos
      @TheJadenVideos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@HistoryScope Ahhh I just assumed that the renaissance period was the timeframe when the European powers were finally on par with the ottomans, I just found it kinda funny when you accidentally said the Soviet Union instead of The Russian Empire at 14:38 (although with Soviet Union being one way or another involved with the topics of your past few videos, I can understand how it might have slipped through the cracks)

    • @canyou7670
      @canyou7670 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheJadenVideos You still did not get it. There was no timeframe and it was not just about Europeans being equal to the Ottomans. He was talking about Europeans stopping other Europeans from getting powerful and dominating the rest of Europe
      "From France to Germany, to the Soviet Union"

    • @TheJadenVideos
      @TheJadenVideos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@canyou7670 wasn't the Soviet Union formed around the same time as Turkey?

  • @brianlynnthomas9881
    @brianlynnthomas9881 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good stuff, thanks

  • @HOPEfullBoi01
    @HOPEfullBoi01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Just to add to the beginning: The Mongolian invasion led to the collapse of the Seljuk (Salçuklu) Empire, the Oghuz (Oğuz) Turkic dynasty that expanded into Anatolia. After their collapse numerous, not just Turkic but specifically Turkish as they didn't relate much to the rest of the Turkic world anymore, tribal dynasties formed and Osman's dynasty Osmanlı (known as Ottoman in English for no good reason) was one of them. It fought and devoured its neighboring brother dynasties on its way to becoming the empire we all know about.

  • @ariannaarie5232
    @ariannaarie5232 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You are in a big historical error: Romania was never part of the Ottoman Empire, it was never a pasalach. The three principalities - Wallachia/Tara Romaneasca, Moldova and Transylvania that make up Romania today were vassal principalities of the Ottoman Empire - a totally different thing. They had their own rulers and were at war with the Ottomans. 11:24

  • @sionsmedia8249
    @sionsmedia8249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    35:31 "defeating the Greek and Armenian occupation forces". Is that what you call committing genocide? Did "the NAZIs defeat the Polish occupation forces"?

    • @botisbo4546
      @botisbo4546 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Although the occupation and the genocide are two different,though connected things,it is absurd there is no mention about the genocide of the Christians of the ottoman empire.
      It's like talking about the history of the German Reich(all 3 ofnthem) and not mentioning the Holocaust.

    • @efecetin3048
      @efecetin3048 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Armenians and Greeks Invaded mostly turkish provinces. Greeks committed mass genocides in Western Anatolia. My Grandmother is from İzmir and she told me a story that when Greek occupation forces stuff people to a local mosque and then burning the mosque. My Grand-Grandmother is one of 5 people who manage to survive that massacre

    • @williamdavis9562
      @williamdavis9562 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Sion Media, What you say applies to the Armenians but certainly doesn't apply to the Greeks.
      In your equation if you had to make an analogy the Greeks were the Nazis and the people in Anatolia were the Poles. Not a very good analogy but if one had to be made that would be it.

  • @prouddegenerates9056
    @prouddegenerates9056 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Educational, appreciate you chief

  • @skullsforerlikkhansthrone9306
    @skullsforerlikkhansthrone9306 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    janissaries were not castrated. However they were not allowed to marry (most often than not even prohibited from visiting bordelos or having concobines of their own) until the retirement age of 40. Please correct this misinformation.
    Also, Young Turks didn't want to consolidate the empire around a "shared islamic identity". This is a blatant, if not downright childish mistake, a giveaway of outlook of the typical "occidental" view on the "others" which they dont have the actual info about, but mere stereotypes. It seems that you didnt study your subject well. I really just can't comprehend why EVERY single western "info video" about the Ottoman Empire has to have such minor yet important mistakes here and there.

  • @dougdouglas2112
    @dougdouglas2112 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video (as always). Very entertaining and informative.

  • @nikolasvenetidis9608
    @nikolasvenetidis9608 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    As a Pontic Greek, I’d like to note I don’t hate Turks and I think the modern day of Greeks and Turks hate each other has no connection to the Ottoman Empire.
    The only issues I see prevalent are the genocide of my people and forced population exchange agreement.
    I actually take pride in the Ottoman Empire. I think the only issue I have historically with it is that Greece could not prosper like other European nations and was more of a back water nation within the empire that really held it back from what could be.
    Anyways love to Turkey 🇹🇷 and Greece 🇬🇷 hoping to move back to my ancestral city of Trabzon soon :)

    • @Aethelhald
      @Aethelhald ปีที่แล้ว

      Pride in the Ottoman empire? Why? It created nothing, it did nothing spectacular, carried out multiple genocides and caused WW1 (which caused WW2). There's basically nothing good to say about it.

  • @jlpack62
    @jlpack62 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awesome video! thanks.

  • @yervandmatevosian2706
    @yervandmatevosian2706 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Hey bro I absolutely love all your content and have seen every one of your videos. What bugged me about this video though was how there was no mention of the Armenian/Greek genocides.

    • @Sadoyasturadoglu
      @Sadoyasturadoglu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because best joke.

    • @Nocontextturkishboi
      @Nocontextturkishboi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      During WW1, ottomans have lost %20 of its population(1915-1919)
      I couldn’t find the percentage but independence war (1919-1923) and everlasting minor/major wars in 1900-1915 was threatining the existence of empire and causing immense casualties&losses. Each country & nation was extremely brutal

    • @yervandmatevosian2706
      @yervandmatevosian2706 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Nocontextturkishboi If that is so, what do you have to say about the Hamidian Massacres of 1894?

    • @Nocontextturkishboi
      @Nocontextturkishboi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@yervandmatevosian2706 i don’t even care what happened in my past life. All armenian’s obsession with the past is really unhealthy!! All armenian people need reality check.

    • @yervandmatevosian2706
      @yervandmatevosian2706 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Nocontextturkishboi When previous wrongdoings go unchecked, there is a great chance it will happen again. Just like if a shoplifter is never punished, they will continue to do so. The pressing concern with Armenians is not to even punish Turks, but simply recognition for the wrongdoings of the past.

  • @Yacovo
    @Yacovo 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the video

    • @King_66525
      @King_66525 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's alright video but full with mistakes

  • @tayfundikmen6392
    @tayfundikmen6392 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Too many fundemantal errors in the beginning. Harem almost do not have any role in ruling the common people especially before the collapsing period, there were viziers for that. Jannisaries were definetely not casttated. Jannisaries were the core elite of the army but there was also a system similar to feudalism called as Timar system providing soldiers from landlords as well. Not only the taxation was too much but there were many change of hands too. India to persia or arabia, from there to ottomans and from thefe to europe. İt was increasing the prices and piracy was so common in mediterranian which also were controlled by ottoman controlled muslim pirates. These are the majors but many little ones as well. But the reasons of the fall is quite correct.

  • @thiennguyen-vc8zn
    @thiennguyen-vc8zn ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very very impressive, thank you so much.

  • @colincbatch
    @colincbatch 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why go into so much detail if you don't bother to tell us what anything was called??? The tax for non-muslims was called the "jizyah", the class of kidnapped slave-soldier-administrators were called "Janissaries".... If you don't tell things by their names we'll never even know what it is you think you have taught us!

  • @pvm0212
    @pvm0212 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Art has greatly improved lately, keep it up

  • @BroadwayRonMexico
    @BroadwayRonMexico 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The janissaries weren't castrated, that's a common misconception. They were forbidden to marry, but they had their "equipment". Janissaries taking wives and siring children (who would often get privileged positions in the government) under the table was a big problem in the later years of the Ottoman Empire. These janissary "dynasties" ended up undermining the sultan's authority

  • @erezofer8267
    @erezofer8267 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just love your videos

  • @Mosfer_aldoseri
    @Mosfer_aldoseri 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Turkish government afterwards still have that superiority complex towards most of their neighbors and how they are involved ask a 3rd party in Syria shows that

  • @juancedillo4040
    @juancedillo4040 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing video like always 👏

  • @georgios_5342
    @georgios_5342 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    20:37 Greece started the revolution in 1821, becoming officially independent in 1830, not with the help of European empires but because the European great powers like Russia, England and France decided to wage wars to gain colonies, seeing how weak the Ottomans had become. Only France sent a battalion in Greece, to save its tarnished image on the European theatre after Napoleon.

  • @sa4555
    @sa4555 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliantly done summary of a long and complex history of Ottomans. The phrase by the researcher "Lot of Wars". yeah that is pretty much the perfect phrase to talk about all those conflicts.