Call me insensitive, but I don't think what Prof Karlan said was out of line at all. As one commenter wrote, Karlan was making the point that monarchy is anathema to our government. She could just as easily used Eric if court jester was a royal title!
@Tytyx2 All this hoopla certainly proves your point that it's a bad idea. I just wonder if she had said president can name a son Earl but can't make the son an earl, would all the mothers of kids named Earl be freaking out like this?
She never needed to apologize, it wasn't a joke. I have so much respect for all of these people who have had to take the high road while enduring the ass backward questioning from the gop..
I think the point was Baron Trump has nothing to do with his Father's corruption and in doing so, it reflects negatively on a child. And given he was named "Baron", before Trump had any real power, more akins her statement to a "pun", rather than a "point".
Angela Prince Yeah. I understand what she was trying to convey. But why that? He hates the media, lies to civilians, stomps on the poor and minorities, believes in taxation w/o representation, etc. THE LIST GOES ON... Bringing a child into the televised proceeding, to make your PUN, was uncalled for. And as I said, it would only truly make sense if the child was named "Baron", while Trump actually had power.
I totally agree with you, however I take issue with the joke because she was gave the republicans needless headlines. She is getting lost in the woods, and jeopardizing the mission because the republicans are being snowflakes.
The professor didn't drag Trump's son into anything. She was making a point. And using the name Baron to make that point. She didn't disparage that kid at all.
@@helenamirian908 Ahhhahahahhahahahhah! Great Point! My God, this is such insanity I hope I do not end up in the asylum before this is all over. The right are really quite quackers at this point. Kremlin Quackers.
She kind of got passionate and heated during that. One's true self comes out when passion erupts. I personally think she is biased against Trump from the get-go and I am for impeachment. She also wrote some article awhile back that, depending on your viewpoint, can be seen as conservative-bashing. They used that against her. The other two pro-impeachment professors handled themselves better. They are probably also anti-Trump before the whole Ukraine scandal, but are smart. And the fourth professor was against impeachment.
Enrique Betancourt 🤷🏻♂️ dunno. It is sort of like how a judge is anti-criminal obviously, he/she tries to perform the duty by the letter regardless. If a judge hints that he finds the defendant guilty before the evidence is presented and even before the jury ...
@@mannynoneya7143 she was making a point, not attacking the child. Having the name of 'Barron' made the comparison to the title of 'Baron' a perfect comparison.
That remark would be a very good and concise point... in a one-to-one conversation. In a public speech, however, invoking names of minors is at least ethically questionable. At worst - strategic mistake, what we've got here.
Bears repeating: "Can we just agree? That people in power SHOULD NEVER BE ASKING PEOPLE WHO THEY VOTED FOR?" Man, I hope we can agree on that. I really do.
"Not raising our hands is not an indication of an answer, sir." Perfect response. The Representative was trying to paint them as "anti-trump" to easily dismiss any testimony, and tried to make a non-response be equally as damning. They refused to play that game.
No it is a Good question to ask, who ever you are. The thing is you don't have to answer if you DO NOT WANT TO!!!!!! D only dumb question asked is one that is NOT asked. .. YOU 'LL think this is so bad. Ya right
I'm still shook by the fact that the man had the nerve to ask them who they voted for as a way to discredit them in some way. I'm sure even if they did vote for Trump they'd still abstain from answering because that's in direct violation of their privacy! There is a reason why their are curtains on ballot booths!
I agree. She was using what was available to make the point that trump is not king and can't give out titles or be immune from prosecution for his crimes.
@@morgannedarcourt5956 The guy was shittalking a gold Star family like they hadn't lost their son in the service of the country but Melania "I don't care do you" Trump wants to cry now lol this is just like her anti-cyber bullying thing, she's trying to see if she can get away with it. Its a classic Donnie tactic.
To be fair the Democrats called all 3 of those law professors, meanwhile the Republicans called Turley. Also it's funny that Trevor completely ignored Turley, who wasn't pro-Trump, but anti-impeachment. Just goes to show u it's easy to sell a half-baked story.
@@Sodaextreme1 The thing with Turley's testimony is that his main argument is that the current evidence is thin. It would then be easy to turn to the fact that the White House is actively blocking a lot of the primary evidence. Heck, the supposed "transcript" isn't even an actual transcript (See page 1 of it). Following that logic, that censorship in itself would constitute obstruction of justice, another impeachable offense.
How could you take these scholars seriously when making jokes about trump not having a Barron as a son. This shit is serious and they're popping jokes. Fuck that. Fuck witty, this shit will set people off if you don't impeach him for proper reasons and people have fucking doubts... Why you might ask? Cuz Biden's clearly corrupt and Hunter had no business having a job there and it deserves to be questions. Everyone had no direct knowledge of a quid pro quo and in fact heard Trump say he didn't want a quid pro quo. Go on with this bullshit.
That was a corny joke, and it may well have been the wrong time to crack jokes. But c'mon, that didn't even come close to "dragging him into politics." The joke clearly wasn't disparaging to Barron, hell it wasn't even disparaging to Trump really, it was just a play on words. Really demonstrates what a fever pitch level of hysteria some people are at that they would even make an issue out of that.
👍 Exactly! djt is idiot enough to think if he repeats "baron" enough, his son will eventually become one - thus why he named him that most likely. You're totally right, she was trying to point out his idiotic philosophy (of repeating lies until they become true), not take a swipe at the kid. Only moronic GOP would try and twist it around to make the Professor look bad.
Obvious question. He's not asking you. He asks witnesses because it is important to know whether they are biased or not. And if you start to get scared, you've obviously been raised a sissy.
@@AlexanderBrusilovsky Just another Trumpanzee troll... Sad. BTW if you care at all about not looking like a careless fuckstick, you should know that the phrase is "couldn't care less." Stop being a reason Trump loves the uneducated. It may be time to get a job and move out of your Mommy's basement.
@@AlexanderBrusilovsky boy, these snowflakes know some dirty words! They feel so emboldened! It sure as hell wasn't CNN or their racist representatives that stifled antifa. As soon as the cops stopped protecting that filth they received those well deserved punches! more coming!.
no, absolutely not. there's at least 123 other idiots right there with you, the Maxine Waters fans, or maybe Hank, who still doesn't know what planet he's on.
I'm actually way more offended by brown-noser Matt Gaetz's fake outrage. The guy is so eager to suck up to Trump for every opportunity he can get, it's utterly disgusting to watch.
Trevor, she SHOULD NOT have apologized after that faux outrage over simply saying Baron. How easily triggered can they be? They have been doing Russia's work for them, and *that* is their line?
Every Democrat has Putin under his bed. He climbs out at night and spoils the food in the fridge. Comrade, if Putin wanted to harm the United States, he would first of all incite the people against the President.
Satura Stokes they don’t have to answer but not answering played right into their point proving there ideological bias that undermined their interpretation.
@@wisetrollman True, but it was a political misstep to not find someone Republican who thinks that Trump has broken constitutional law. It would have played out so much better if they had been asked that, refused to answer and then on being asked a second time rattled off a list of Republican credentials followed by the comment that they are still Republican but the president MUST be held accountable to the law. It shouldn't be required, but the Democrats keep making the mistake of not assuming that the Republicans ARE shameless traitors and then acting surprised when they act like shameless traitors.
Politicians are literally the lowest form of educated person in American right now. We let the lowest levels of educated humans decide our laws and how our tax money is spent. "Career Politician" should not be a job title. Think about that.
@Ngawati marupohill Yeah, way to put black people down by ignoring the record low numbers of African American Unemployment in recorded American history. Bigot.
@ngawati marupohill I am a black and a Cameroonian. Ask your self why these demons hate this president so much? Its not politics. Trump built the wall to Americans. I passed through Mexico and bro its terrible there. The border is a gateway for all crimes. You should be preparing for this presidents. All these demons are tied to Iran, Mexican cartels,China and paedophiles. God bless America and president Trump.
That joke wasn’t a big deal at all. She didn’t even attack the poor kid. They’ve make way more cruel jokes about former presidents’ kids than this. Honestly she didn’t even need to apologize to those jerks.
@@pietrojenkins6901 key words. Bumbling idiot. Hes not gonna resign, Trumps too stupid. I'm calling it now, Trump will be synonymous with bumbling idiot within 5 years
What i don't understand is why everyone think she was attacking his son ... really it had nothing to do with him , just his name which is an Title of nobility, in which she explained that it can't be passed down because we have no royalty & no king ... it's simple really..
@@Jay-om8gr What constitutes hard evidence for you ? I feel when a lot of your associates and aids are getting indicted there might and I mean there just might maybe a small probability that you may be a crook yourself.
Now wrong (in their opinion) conversations between people is the same as bloody murders. In what world do these very stupid people live? Unicorns? Butterflies?
And it's not like she gave him a nickname. His parents chose a name that implies nobility, so she connected that to the prohibition against titles. It wasn't a brilliant stroke of wit or reasoning, but it was valid. Not a cutting remark at all, but too hot for the Snowflake Police, it seems.
@Respect/Walk gtfo. First off, the crap being spewed out about Obama's kids were directed at them. Just like the crap with Greta. Baron is a title of nobility. The professor said nothing about the kid, made no insinuations about the kid. Simply used the meaning of the kids name as a point about presidential power. Personally, I don't think she did anything wrong. Yes, if she had attacked a child then I would be against that, regardless of who the child's parents are. That isn't what is happening here though and you damn well know it.
As a general rule I believe those who choose to put themselves in the political spotlight are open for criticism. Greta chose to do that by talking to world leaders and such. People like Obama's kids and Baron puts themselves out of that spotlight.
she wasn't trying to make a joke... she was making a point..." trump can name his son baron, but trump can't make him a Baron. Trump, though he want's to be.... he [trump] is not a king
Agreed. And yet despite daily hypocrisy from the right, one small slip up on the left and Fox puts up 8 videos looking appalled as the ultimate martyrs and victims. Oh the irony.
Republicans' outrage at the Baron joke is so transparent. Like they haven't gone after democrats' family members, and they were probably more vicious about it
No they won't. Literally every Republican that was involved in the Clinton impeachment is now speaking a different tone. You could literally fight every Republican with their own words and it won't make a difference. The only thing that will make a difference is if you take their money. Then they'll do whatever you say!!!
@@peacefreedom4930 Agree to disagree. I won't be taking any of their money, unfortunately but that seems to be the only thing that sways them. Case in point, years of repeal and replace and they didn't do it. But tax cuts, oh yeah that def happened.
Marc Ryder You aren’t doing a good job of making your point. I don’t know what you’re trying to say. We all know that most people respond to being hit in their pockets. However, in this particular situation we are not witnessing an offense that rises to the level of financial liability. So, I’m not sure why you’re bringing that up as a solution. We are witnessing a manipulation tactic. The Republican Representative started controversy to 1. Give them the appearance of higher moral ground 2. Diminish the witnesses credibility 3. Shut down the argument This appears to be a tactic the Republicans use regularly and quite effectively. Unfortunately, I don’t see them being called on it immediately and consistently. People use tactics that work for them. When they don’t work they stop using them. I simply stated their opponents need to address this. How many times should you allow someone to get over on you with the same tactic?
well im from sweden so fuck greta, she is a disgrace to our land. her mother and father are using her for book deals and tv shows. i guess libtards dont give a fuck about sick kids nowdays
Courage Karnga Welp several millions of people both old and young, rich and poor, beautiful and ugly, educated and the poorly educated must really scare you. 😂
Obvious question. He's not asking you. He asks them because it is important to know whether they are biased or not. And if you start to get scared, you've obviously been raised a sissy.
@Stella H no it doenst violate the statute as it says "to vote and to be elected in genuine periodic elections" that means during the period of election and he asked him who he voted for outside of the period of election. Also witness intimidation means "Interfering with a witness's testimony or cooperation in a criminal case is a criminal act that can be misdemeanor or a felony. Intimidating or tampering with a witness involves trying to get a witness to lie, alter or destroy evidence, or not testify or cooperate with authorities at all." And asking questions or rephrasing questions is not intimidation and they have the right to refuse yo answer the question.
Right because Trump is operating like a king? If that was the case, the wall would be fully operational, his trade deal would be signed, and the dems wouldn’t hold the house... so clearly that was a dumb ass thing to say
The "who'd you vote for" question was so irrelevant. It should have been stated as such. They were educators specializing in The Constitution and laws therein. They were schooling the ignorant on what is and what isn't deemed "breaking the law" set forth by our forefathers. I don't care who they voted for, as long as they dictate/inform constitutional law competently as it was written. Have a nice day.
They could ask who they supported. It's quite evident, the whole room was anti-Trump lmao. That is the most biased room of individuals inclined against Trump. Not democratic if you ask me.
@@xblceriyvolk It goes against everything the US stands for to try and disqualify someone's opinion because of their political views. It's also plenty democratic to be against someone who has broken the law, and pardons war criminals.
No...They're PRO-DEMOCRACY, PRO-CONSTITUTION & PRO-THE RULE OF LAW! Only Biased towards What is ETHICALLY RIGHT & DECENT? Sorry if these traits seem ANTI YOUR CONMAN CRIMINAL OVERLORD!!!!!
@@xblceriyvolk excuse me? No where in the definition does it say u need to be "for" someone in order to be democratic. Democracy is about law, order and justice. It's about facts and governing based on fairness, not based on who u support.
Not a bad point for someone who dropped out of High school, and got his diploma 3 years later through night school while attending a trade school during the day.
narumango22 of course you would say there is nothing wrong with referencing Baron. If the tables were turned, Dems would be singing a different tune. Dems have demonstrated complete hypocrisy.
@@henrymartyn oooh, so, we're just ignoring how republicans these days know no greater joy than to slam and drag Greta Thunberg and the survivors of school shootings? Got it, thanks man, I was one step away from being a hypocrite.
@@henrymartyn I don't know you, I don't know if you have dragged Greta or not, but you really haven't seen Republicans do that exact same thing? Kids separated from their parents, school shooting survivors? Are you guys so divided you can't even agree not to use kids in your vile game? The world is watching, try to behave.
@@ilarious5729 I don't often see people being reprimanded in such a respectful way, especially not on the internet, just wanted to acknowledge that and say thank you.
@@henrymartyn I am sure I can find a clip of a Republican saying the names of Obama's kids in a respectful manner while stating a fact like the scholar did in this clip. No outrage..
I think the next time someone brings up the Barron story to me.I am going to ask them to close their eyes and pretend that they are walking up the steps to the house with two grocery bags. On the left, you have a bag that contains the pain from the inadvise use of Barron's name as an example On the right, you have a bag filled with the pain of dead children at the border, the pain of children who have wrongfully lost their parents to ICE raids, and the pain of children who may never see their parents again. Once, they try that exercise, then they can ask me why I am not outraged about a scholar using his name in an example.
Olive Papyrus Understand that that is a go-to ploy of most bullies. By making someone else apologize you get to retain an air of superiority and righteousness.
your an idiot - why bring up a child anyway - that smug ass ugly troll professor needs to be left in the projects in the Bronx for a reality check ,, and you can join her
@@gabrielestamp1195 and you must be a socialist liberal "everything free" supporter .. you liberals crack me up with you're Hippocratic words - you are so open minded until someone disagrees with you .. ill wait for it,,,when you'll call me a racist next - dumb ass millennial
I wonder from what Ivy League college that guy, and other Republicans in office, graduated? What a terrible message sent to our kids. Lucky enough to receive a higher education at a prestigious law school? Don't bother Americans! All it will do is give you an unbiased understanding of the Constitutional laws that govern our country and cause you to become a critical thinker. Not in America you don't! Oh no! We prefer our constituents to be uneducated plebes.
If it was a conservative expert making a comment about al-Obama’s girls you know damn well the media would have circled the wagons and claimed racism somehow. Don’t give me that...
Trevor, you never cease to amaze with your spot on accents and mannerisms. As a Southerner and a fan of Jonathan Van Ness/QE, you knocked this one absolutely out of the park. Thanks for all your efforts and usage of your phenomenal talents, education and brilliance to help make us all a better people---no matter who, where, or what we are!
There are Trump fans who believe all forms of higher education feed kids liberal propaganda. They go as far as not permitting their kids to obtain any form of schooling after high school/getting their GED. It's no joke.
I must be dense for I did not recognize the reference of Barron's name as a joke but a teaching point to aid in understanding the president is NOT a monarch.
That he asks tells us how weak the (R)s case against impeachment is. He implies that their legal opinions are invalid b/c their votes reveal fatal biases. If he voted for Trump in 2016, would he then refrain from voting against the articles of impeachment on grounds of demonstrated bias? Not likely!
Lesson of the day: Get educated. Question everything. Be critical. This applies to everyone. Polticians thrive on the uneducated, disinterested, and uninformed. No one elses opinion should influence yours. Make up your own mind. You really have to question why someone doesn't want your children to become more educated. Perhaps it is because those who are are not so easily manipulated.
Good point, very good point, I would say, essential, but... easier said than done. It takes enourmous resources of time, effort, psychological maturity and strength to question everything. Especially your own values. Say, Mueller's report. I'm now imagining a single mother, who has to take care of two children, having to go through 400+ pages of legalese on her spare time to get a clear picture what was said in it. Very few people have aforementioned resources in this grotesquely unequal society to do that. So, they relly on journalists.... in a perfect world. In a real world, journalism just broke into two factions, analogous to two political parties, which can present completely opposite picture of events. Who to believe in ? Well, the natural reaction is to choose the source which aligns the most with the values one already has. There is an experiment where people were divided into two groups, for and against capital punishment. Then they were presented with equal amounts of arguments for and against it. And what do you think happened ? They did not begin to question their own opinions, no, their opinions in fact hardened... CGP Grey here on youtube has a video, how First Past the Post voting system, which is used in USA, eventually converges just to two parties, which leads to extreme polarization we see today. Apparently, that's a fact in political science, i.e., this voting system is inherently bad. I wouldn't know it, too, if not for my politically savvy friend.
No they are laughting at your government, trying to take a president out illegally, all these people who tried to ruine Donald Trumps presidency better have a criminal investigation launched into them and locked up for fraud and drunkard Peloci must be 1st.
Lie's Exposed TRUTH Restored so it’s “somehow” a conspiracy of the democratic side of the government who coerced him into holding funds and commit the most infamous quid pro quo in history? Transcripts and many of his own right hand guys admitting to it? How’s that work?
She shouldn't have apologised. She made a valid point. Only an idiot would take what she said as a joke. It was NOT a joke. My cousin named he kids Queen & King, we know the rest...
Andrew Cai these places have become bias liberal safe havens. These institutions are losing their credibility because professors like the ones who testified clearly show no objectivity
Fashizy It’s actually the other way around. It’s literally written in law exactly what Trump did (whether ya’ll like it or not it’s still illegal) and republicans are just going “Its not a big deal so what.” You guys are brainwashed.
dave perron and what exactly did trump do that you have eveidence for. That is what this come down to. There is no evidence of the crimes the democrats are accusing trump of. So it is irrelevant to say there is a law because trump didn’t break the law. The democrats need to come up with the evidence. We don’t prove ourselves innocent in this country
Christopher Santos Jesus Christ you guys are fucking dense. You know exactly what he’s accused of doing, you just don’t think it’s worthy of being law which thank god isn’t up to you cult like imbeciles. Shit, if the “perfect call” not verbatim transcript wasn’t enough he did it again on live television. God damn republicans are fucking stupid and have become such an eyesore of the country.
@@christophersantos1823 so eyewitnesses don't count as evidence now? Last I checked, witnesses count as credible evidence. Not to mention that trump is blocking certain key witnesses from testifying. If he were so innocent why do that? And 2ndly the evidence is in the transcript. "I want u to do us a favor though", whilst the aid was being held up. Multiple people say that they got orders that came from the office of the president to hold the funds. Then trump is literally recorded over the phone having said that. He is NOT supposed to ask a foreign country to investigate into American citizens. There r proper avenues to go thru in order to do that. That aren't his private lawyer. Why didnt he tell the FBI and the CIA? What guiliani, who's a private citizen and not even a White House official. U Republicans will defend ur orange idiot til the end.
Call me insensitive, but I don't think what Prof Karlan said was out of line at all. As one commenter wrote, Karlan was making the point that monarchy is anathema to our government. She could just as easily used Eric if court jester was a royal title!
I'd leave the kid out of it, he didn't choose for his father to nut in his mother...he's probably Yang Gang as well
@Tytyx2 All this hoopla certainly proves your point that it's a bad idea. I just wonder if she had said president can name a son Earl but can't make the son an earl, would all the mothers of kids named Earl be freaking out like this?
@Emma XTC Yes, although I don't use Twitter much, the commenter I mentioned was writing on Twitter.
Context of the joke isnt even about the kid.
@@dcloud Agreed. All Melania accomplished was to make it about her son & bring a sh*tload of attention on him.
“Mommas, if you love this country, don’t let your babies have an education”
Yeah, that kinda sums up America’s problems.
Hey! He actually said that!
Yep. Villainization of education, stay ignorant and vote for me! - Wannabe dictators everywhere
To help the crazy monsters like trump get elected
@Kim Jong-un muh sjw reeeee
She never needed to apologize, it wasn't a joke. I have so much respect for all of these people who have had to take the high road while enduring the ass backward questioning from the gop..
She wasn't making a Joke! She was making "A POINT"!!!
Yes she was
Sharon Sirvio Nor was she saying anything negative.
I think the point was Baron Trump has nothing to do with his Father's corruption and in doing so, it reflects negatively on a child. And given he was named "Baron", before Trump had any real power, more akins her statement to a "pun", rather than a "point".
She was describing a very important difference between a king’s powers and a president’s
Angela Prince Yeah. I understand what she was trying to convey. But why that? He hates the media, lies to civilians, stomps on the poor and minorities, believes in taxation w/o representation, etc. THE LIST GOES ON... Bringing a child into the televised proceeding, to make your PUN, was uncalled for. And as I said, it would only truly make sense if the child was named "Baron", while Trump actually had power.
People in power should never be asking anyone who they voted for. *Serious face*
EXACTLY!
She shouldn’t have apologized. Why do you think he named him that.
She didn’t even insult barron she was making a legitimate point, give me a break.
It was a joke that she practice and went wrong
They probably didn't know that baron is a landed gentry title... cause you know, education.
I totally agree with you, however I take issue with the joke because she was gave the republicans needless headlines. She is getting lost in the woods, and jeopardizing the mission because the republicans are being snowflakes.
Lydia, though you are correct.
Yep
this republican “fake outrage” over mentioning Baron is eyeroll inducing
Everything these committee Republicans have said in the last few weeks is eyeroll inducing!!!!
Chris E.
true
Gaetz is now #1 in the Most Punchable Face contest, finally supplanting Shkreli after a years-long run at the head of the pack!
@@rickc2102 The 3 Stooges Nunes, Gaetz and Jordan .........Ever Trumpers
Comrades across the Cosmos u guys outrage when ppl use microagressions relax
The professor didn't drag Trump's son into anything. She was making a point. And using the name Baron to make that point. She didn't disparage that kid at all.
The point they ought to bring up is when tRump was pretending to be his own employee, what was his fake name? (John?) Barron?
@@helenamirian908 Ahhhahahahhahahahhah! Great Point! My God, this is such insanity I hope I do not end up in the asylum before this is all over. The right are really quite quackers at this point. Kremlin Quackers.
She kind of got passionate and heated during that. One's true self comes out when passion erupts. I personally think she is biased against Trump from the get-go and I am for impeachment. She also wrote some article awhile back that, depending on your viewpoint, can be seen as conservative-bashing. They used that against her.
The other two pro-impeachment professors handled themselves better. They are probably also anti-Trump before the whole Ukraine scandal, but are smart. And the fourth professor was against impeachment.
@@FakeAssHandsomeMcGee_ so if you're anti Trump, you're screwed, if you're pro Trump you're screwed... Who could we go to for an unbiased opinion?
Enrique Betancourt 🤷🏻♂️ dunno. It is sort of like how a judge is anti-criminal obviously, he/she tries to perform the duty by the letter regardless. If a judge hints that he finds the defendant guilty before the evidence is presented and even before the jury ...
she was not making a joke, she was making an important point about nepotism
Liz C I saw it the same way
He’s a kid; I understand he wasn’t the point of her comment. At the same time, Baron trump is not Donald trump.
@@mannynoneya7143 she was making a point, not attacking the child. Having the name of 'Barron' made the comparison to the title of 'Baron' a perfect comparison.
@@beverly719
I agree with you.
That remark would be a very good and concise point... in a one-to-one conversation. In a public speech, however, invoking names of minors is at least ethically questionable. At worst - strategic mistake, what we've got here.
Bears repeating:
"Can we just agree? That people in power SHOULD NEVER BE ASKING PEOPLE WHO THEY VOTED FOR?"
Man, I hope we can agree on that. I really do.
Exactly
"Not raising our hands is not an indication of an answer, sir."
Perfect response. The Representative was trying to paint them as "anti-trump" to easily dismiss any testimony, and tried to make a non-response be equally as damning. They refused to play that game.
Indeed.
Not doing so is an easy road towards purging dissent.
@@ElectroNeutrino "is *not* an indication of an answer". Just wanted to point it out, might muddle your point a bit.
No it is a Good question to ask, who ever you are. The thing is you don't have to answer if you DO NOT WANT TO!!!!!! D only dumb question asked is one that is NOT asked. .. YOU 'LL think this is so bad. Ya right
The question about who voted for Trump was so so low. Dictatorship low...
I'm still shook by the fact that the man had the nerve to ask them who they voted for as a way to discredit them in some way. I'm sure even if they did vote for Trump they'd still abstain from answering because that's in direct violation of their privacy! There is a reason why their are curtains on ballot booths!
“It makes you look mean?” She said nothing wrong.
He sounds like a little kid who got he's feelings hurt
Republikans are snowflakes through and through
I agree. She was using what was available to make the point that trump is not king and can't give out titles or be immune from prosecution for his crimes.
Eileen Farrar right. He’s basically telling her to be a good little girls. Good girls are not mean girls.
"It makes you look mean" This is supposed to be a legislature, right?
Utkarsh Singh RIGHT?!?!
fucking TRUERS!
Well yes in Donald s World. It s just like following the white rabbit in the burrow, everything is upside down.
@@morgannedarcourt5956 The guy was shittalking a gold Star family like they hadn't lost their son in the service of the country but Melania "I don't care do you" Trump wants to cry now lol this is just like her anti-cyber bullying thing, she's trying to see if she can get away with it. Its a classic Donnie tactic.
God, no kidding. They are up there as legal scholars and there questions were, who are you loyal too? It’s shameless
To be fair the Democrats called all 3 of those law professors, meanwhile the Republicans called Turley. Also it's funny that Trevor completely ignored Turley, who wasn't pro-Trump, but anti-impeachment. Just goes to show u it's easy to sell a half-baked story.
Mccarthism at it's finest
That's just to gauge their mindset and its protocol for anybody who passed law school
@@Sodaextreme1 The thing with Turley's testimony is that his main argument is that the current evidence is thin. It would then be easy to turn to the fact that the White House is actively blocking a lot of the primary evidence. Heck, the supposed "transcript" isn't even an actual transcript (See page 1 of it). Following that logic, that censorship in itself would constitute obstruction of justice, another impeachable offense.
How could you take these scholars seriously when making jokes about trump not having a Barron as a son. This shit is serious and they're popping jokes. Fuck that. Fuck witty, this shit will set people off if you don't impeach him for proper reasons and people have fucking doubts... Why you might ask? Cuz Biden's clearly corrupt and Hunter had no business having a job there and it deserves to be questions. Everyone had no direct knowledge of a quid pro quo and in fact heard Trump say he didn't want a quid pro quo. Go on with this bullshit.
That was a corny joke, and it may well have been the wrong time to crack jokes. But c'mon, that didn't even come close to "dragging him into politics." The joke clearly wasn't disparaging to Barron, hell it wasn't even disparaging to Trump really, it was just a play on words. Really demonstrates what a fever pitch level of hysteria some people are at that they would even make an issue out of that.
Just go through this comment section and others on late night shows nowadays everyone is in a Hysteria cause no one knows how to talk anymore
Time and place, I suppose.
😳 asking a person who they voted for is an offence! How can someone say that right IN the middle of a political investigation!?
She wasn't even making fun of Barron or his name, just making a simple play on words.
👍 Exactly! djt is idiot enough to think if he repeats "baron" enough, his son will eventually become one - thus why he named him that most likely. You're totally right, she was trying to point out his idiotic philosophy (of repeating lies until they become true), not take a swipe at the kid. Only moronic GOP would try and twist it around to make the Professor look bad.
Republicans love name calling unless its about them. they love calling people snowflakes when they are the biggest snowflakes
Sarah Exactly!!!
She was making fun of the President by invoking his 13 yo son. She is there as a legal "scholar". Even Trevor didn't defend her!
Then why apologize? An old fanatical lesbian doesn't know what children are.
People in power should not be asking who you voted for.
Gerald Shields That loud guy should have apologized.
Wow wow. I barely make that bracket.
How much will it take to calm you do sir and or madam. 🧐
People who ask who you vote for should not be in power.
Seriously I mean these adults are like children!
Obvious question. He's not asking you. He asks witnesses because it is important to know whether they are biased or not. And if you start to get scared, you've obviously been raised a sissy.
Am I the only one who gets sick Matt Gaetz's fake outrage?
Hell no.
I'm just sick of his stupid, punched-in block-face in general.
Nope. He's nauseating.
@@AlexanderBrusilovsky Just another Trumpanzee troll... Sad.
BTW if you care at all about not looking like a careless fuckstick, you should know that the phrase is "couldn't care less."
Stop being a reason Trump loves the uneducated.
It may be time to get a job and move out of your Mommy's basement.
@@AlexanderBrusilovsky boy, these snowflakes know some dirty words! They feel so emboldened! It sure as hell wasn't CNN or their racist representatives that stifled antifa. As soon as the cops stopped protecting that filth they received those well deserved punches! more coming!.
no, absolutely not. there's at least 123 other idiots right there with you, the Maxine Waters fans, or maybe Hank, who still doesn't know what planet he's on.
I _was_ aiming for UCLA Law, but now I'm thinking that Harvard or Stanford, instead, might be a better idea.
Grammy nominee Trevor Noah spitting facts.
He's one of the best!
Matt Gaetz is the last person qualified to accuse anyone of looking mean
Damn who is actually upset about that joke? It's a play on words he wasn't the butt of the joke.
It was actually pretty clever, probably why she is a professor a Harvard.
Exactly....I understood what she was getting at and didn't take it as a joke.
I'm actually way more offended by brown-noser Matt Gaetz's fake outrage. The guy is so eager to suck up to Trump for every opportunity he can get, it's utterly disgusting to watch.
@@toadjiang7626 Yeah Seems the republicans are the real snowflakes here!
@@BornLightWolf exactly!
Trevor, she SHOULD NOT have apologized after that faux outrage over simply saying Baron. How easily triggered can they be? They have been doing Russia's work for them, and *that* is their line?
She was right. That’s why they named him that. It’s not even a joke. She just apologized to be PC.
If those reps who were pissed at Obama, started making jokes about his daughters, would you have said the same shit?
@@lennellwaltonboxer He was named after Barron Hilton. The title is spelled Baron.
Every Democrat has Putin under his bed. He climbs out at night and spoils the food in the fridge. Comrade, if Putin wanted to harm the United States, he would first of all incite the people against the President.
Ortum Union why did you say “he” maybe you should add both genders because there is a such thing as democrat females.
They should never ask who someone voted for in an election....
Satura Stokes they don’t have to answer but not answering played right into their point proving there ideological bias that undermined their interpretation.
Thescot619 “proving” it only proved that republicans are shameless traitors.
@@wisetrollman True, but it was a political misstep to not find someone Republican who thinks that Trump has broken constitutional law. It would have played out so much better if they had been asked that, refused to answer and then on being asked a second time rattled off a list of Republican credentials followed by the comment that they are still Republican but the president MUST be held accountable to the law.
It shouldn't be required, but the Democrats keep making the mistake of not assuming that the Republicans ARE shameless traitors and then acting surprised when they act like shameless traitors.
“Annie Get Your Degree” tickets sold here 🤪
Miggy Rodri can i have one?
I'd like two for the matinee. Can I get a senior citizen discount price?
Why are you so buff?
Two please before they run out
Politicians are literally the lowest form of educated person in American right now. We let the lowest levels of educated humans decide our laws and how our tax money is spent. "Career Politician" should not be a job title. Think about that.
I love how Trever points out the truth in a humerous way. So funny 😂
The truth is never read on paper or on the prompter. Trevor is far from a free man, he omits uncomfortable things in his videos.
What truth? Just so you know Trump is the best president for America. I will be here laughing when all this is done.
@Ngawati marupohill Yeah, way to put black people down by ignoring the record low numbers of African American Unemployment in recorded American history. Bigot.
@ngawati marupohill I am a black and a Cameroonian. Ask your self why these demons hate this president so much? Its not politics. Trump built the wall to Americans. I passed through Mexico and bro its terrible there. The border is a gateway for all crimes. You should be preparing for this presidents. All these demons are tied to Iran, Mexican cartels,China and paedophiles. God bless America and president Trump.
That joke wasn’t a big deal at all. She didn’t even attack the poor kid. They’ve make way more cruel jokes about former presidents’ kids than this. Honestly she didn’t even need to apologize to those jerks.
Christmas came early. The gift of impeachment.
Merry Impeachmas!
@Respect/Walk Follow your own advice. Have some respect and walk away.
we gonna get stuck with Cotton Hill (Pence) tho lol
Just subbed!!!😉
Oh, poor kid won't get his gift from Santa. What a great sadness (no).
Happiest moments of my life;
When my sons where born.
Divorcing my ex wife.
And hearing Nancy say we are filling articles of impeachment
Don donny yep-only 3 years after I knew it was going happen!
Okay but when is the bumbling idiot resigning?
Don donny divorcing your exwife 😳
@@pietrojenkins6901 key words. Bumbling idiot.
Hes not gonna resign, Trumps too stupid.
I'm calling it now, Trump will be synonymous with bumbling idiot within 5 years
Right...
What i don't understand is why everyone think she was attacking his son ... really it had nothing to do with him , just his name which is an Title of nobility, in which she explained that it can't be passed down because we have no royalty & no king ... it's simple really..
If the defense of Charles Manson was that the witnesses hated him, would that have freed him?
Docktor Jim did they have hard evidence against him? Horrible analogy
@@Jay-om8gr What constitutes hard evidence for you ? I feel when a lot of your associates and aids are getting indicted there might and I mean there just might maybe a small probability that you may be a crook yourself.
Now wrong (in their opinion) conversations between people is the same as bloody murders. In what world do these very stupid people live? Unicorns? Butterflies?
Yes, if the GOP were his lawyers.
Nope. both cases have hard evidence so what’s your point?
Miss Nancy
Thank you
I honestly don’t see the issue here... like she didn’t say anything about the child other than the fact that his name was... baron?
And it's not like she gave him a nickname. His parents chose a name that implies nobility, so she connected that to the prohibition against titles. It wasn't a brilliant stroke of wit or reasoning, but it was valid. Not a cutting remark at all, but too hot for the Snowflake Police, it seems.
Welcome back home Donnie, you're gonna get impeached
🙏
I love how the same people who are all like how dare she mention his son, are the ones making ten or a hundred times worse jokes about Greta Thunberg.
Kade Williams good point!
@Respect/Walk wtf are you talking about. Take your adhd pills, Obama isn't in the picture any more.
@Respect/Walk gtfo. First off, the crap being spewed out about Obama's kids were directed at them. Just like the crap with Greta. Baron is a title of nobility. The professor said nothing about the kid, made no insinuations about the kid. Simply used the meaning of the kids name as a point about presidential power. Personally, I don't think she did anything wrong. Yes, if she had attacked a child then I would be against that, regardless of who the child's parents are. That isn't what is happening here though and you damn well know it.
As a general rule I believe those who choose to put themselves in the political spotlight are open for criticism. Greta chose to do that by talking to world leaders and such. People like Obama's kids and Baron puts themselves out of that spotlight.
some of those jokes are just disgusting...
I don't see anything wrong about her statement about son Baron. She was trying make a point. Trump is not a king.
she wasn't trying to make a joke... she was making a point..." trump can name his son baron, but trump can't make him a Baron. Trump, though he want's to be.... he [trump] is not a king
Exactly. You can tell when someone is trying to tell a joke. She was seriously just trying to make a point, no joke!
I can't understand how anyone still supports this idiot!
These are the same people who cover for every stupid ass thing that comes out of their “King’s” mouth by saying “his majesty was just joking” 🤯
And republicans call us snowflakes. It wasn't mean, it wasn't even a joke at the kid's expense, and they go off the rails crying. Pathetic.
Agreed. And yet despite daily hypocrisy from the right, one small slip up on the left and Fox puts up 8 videos looking appalled as the ultimate martyrs and victims. Oh the irony.
Republicans' outrage at the Baron joke is so transparent. Like they haven't gone after democrats' family members, and they were probably more vicious about it
For instance they way they still talk about Michelle Obama and her girls.
I just can't understand this shit!
Didnt they call Chelsea the white house dog?
The Obamas have more than a few memories of that. Not to mention poor Chelsea Clinton.
They aren't transparent, they're thick.
The joke wasn’t offensive. It doesn’t say anything bad about the boy just trumps actions. Y’all annoying.
Karlan shouldn`t have apologized for the Baron/Barron comment.
It wasn`t a joke, she just made a point.
In a system that is free - there are NO DICTATORS. There are no reasons to complain of choosing names. Every one got the right to live and co-exists.
I’m so over selective outrage. Start calling hypocrites out and they’ll stop pulling that bs!
No they won't. Literally every Republican that was involved in the Clinton impeachment is now speaking a different tone. You could literally fight every Republican with their own words and it won't make a difference. The only thing that will make a difference is if you take their money. Then they'll do whatever you say!!!
Marc Ryder
We can agree to disagree. On what grounds are you planning to “ take their money “?
@@peacefreedom4930 Agree to disagree. I won't be taking any of their money, unfortunately but that seems to be the only thing that sways them. Case in point, years of repeal and replace and they didn't do it. But tax cuts, oh yeah that def happened.
Marc Ryder
You aren’t doing a good job of making your point. I don’t know what you’re trying to say.
We all know that most people respond to being hit in their pockets. However, in this particular situation we are not witnessing an offense that rises to the level of financial liability. So, I’m not sure why you’re bringing that up as a solution. We are witnessing a manipulation tactic. The Republican Representative started controversy to 1. Give them the appearance of higher moral ground
2. Diminish the witnesses credibility
3. Shut down the argument
This appears to be a tactic the Republicans use regularly and quite effectively. Unfortunately, I don’t see them being called on it immediately and consistently. People use tactics that work for them. When they don’t work they stop using them. I simply stated their opponents need to address this. How many times should you allow someone to get over on you with the same tactic?
When you invoke his son's name? Lmao is he a Sumerian demon??
That would actually explain a lot😬
"I invoke.......Ted!"
@@markfoster1520 I invoke Eric-oh never mind,big mistake 😨
Where were these people defending Baron when Greta Thunberg got attacked by the President and other politicians?
They were attacking Greta Thunberg, mostly.
Bunch of hypocrites!
They were playing in hypocrisy land.
@DoubleYou3D lol you do know Trump's been claiming he's one of the "elites" right? Lol
well im from sweden so fuck greta, she is a disgrace to our land. her mother and father are using her for book deals and tv shows. i guess libtards dont give a fuck about sick kids nowdays
Who did you vote for? Could be construed as voter intimidation.
and some people ask you who you are voting for, and try to bully you into voting for their choice..its annoying imo
Well, the only thing that scares me is the fact that anyone voted for this orange buffoon!
Courage Karnga
Welp several millions of people both old and young, rich and poor, beautiful and ugly, educated and the poorly educated must really scare you. 😂
@@couragekarnga8735 facts
Obvious question. He's not asking you. He asks them because it is important to know whether they are biased or not. And if you start to get scared, you've obviously been raised a sissy.
I can't accept asking testimonies who they voted for isn't some kind of crime... This is outrageous!!
He asked who they supported not who they voted for
Ethan Cleland this shouldn’t still be a political thing this should now be a legal thing
@@JohnTheboy-jq4po why? It's like we want to get rid of the people in government at any chance we can stop being bitches and vote that's what matters.
@Stella H yes but its not a crime just impolite
@Stella H no it doenst violate the statute as it says "to vote and to be elected in genuine periodic elections" that means during the period of election and he asked him who he voted for outside of the period of election.
Also witness intimidation means "Interfering with a witness's testimony or cooperation in a criminal case is a criminal act that can be misdemeanor or a felony. Intimidating or tampering with a witness involves trying to get a witness to lie, alter or destroy evidence, or not testify or cooperate with authorities at all." And asking questions or rephrasing questions is not intimidation and they have the right to refuse yo answer the question.
She made a good point about baron. Never should have apologized. Makes her seem less credible. You should always stand by what you sag
What you sag will somehow always get behind you.
Right because Trump is operating like a king? If that was the case, the wall would be fully operational, his trade deal would be signed, and the dems wouldn’t hold the house... so clearly that was a dumb ass thing to say
Trump needs to apologize for sticking the kid with that name.
She wasn't credible to begin with
Sun Shine a kid born in riches? He’ll be fine
These Republicans have fallen so low, they can only go lower.
Yeah yeah they can.
They have become so pathetic it's just so ridiculous.
*Hold my shovel*
They're digging even deeper than needed at this point...it's like a competition to see who can be worst
The "who'd you vote for" question was so irrelevant. It should have been stated as such. They were educators specializing in The Constitution and laws therein. They were schooling the ignorant on what is and what isn't deemed "breaking the law" set forth by our forefathers. I don't care who they voted for, as long as they dictate/inform constitutional law competently as it was written. Have a nice day.
I hope Congress propose a legislation that requires every Republican in the House to get a CAT scan.
😂😂😂
Yes people in power should never asked who they voted for.
They could ask who they supported. It's quite evident, the whole room was anti-Trump lmao. That is the most biased room of individuals inclined against Trump. Not democratic if you ask me.
@@xblceriyvolk It goes against everything the US stands for to try and disqualify someone's opinion because of their political views. It's also plenty democratic to be against someone who has broken the law, and pardons war criminals.
No...They're PRO-DEMOCRACY, PRO-CONSTITUTION & PRO-THE RULE OF LAW! Only Biased towards What is ETHICALLY RIGHT & DECENT? Sorry if these traits seem ANTI YOUR CONMAN CRIMINAL OVERLORD!!!!!
@@xblceriyvolk excuse me? No where in the definition does it say u need to be "for" someone in order to be democratic. Democracy is about law, order and justice. It's about facts and governing based on fairness, not based on who u support.
@@notoyaarthur1990 It doesn't but when the whole room is a circlejerk democrat room, the intention is pretty obvious. You're excused
Trevor is Perfect.
NEVER disappointed.
Thank you Sir.
Pretty proud of you.
💚💜💙😊💚💜💙
It wasn't a joke, it was an example in order to illuminate the situation.
Not a bad point for someone who dropped out of High school, and got his diploma 3 years later through night school while attending a trade school during the day.
“How dare you upset your mama like this” 😂
I’m so disappointed. It is extremely rude to talk about those two like that.
Don’t compare Cellino & Barnes to the Trump brothers!
Trevor you're killing it man! Love you!
There was nothing wrong with what she said about Baron. She was making a point not a joke.
narumango22 of course you would say there is nothing wrong with referencing Baron. If the tables were turned, Dems would be singing a different tune. Dems have demonstrated complete hypocrisy.
@@henrymartyn oooh, so, we're just ignoring how republicans these days know no greater joy than to slam and drag Greta Thunberg and the survivors of school shootings?
Got it, thanks man, I was one step away from being a hypocrite.
@@henrymartyn I don't know you, I don't know if you have dragged Greta or not, but you really haven't seen Republicans do that exact same thing? Kids separated from their parents, school shooting survivors? Are you guys so divided you can't even agree not to use kids in your vile game? The world is watching, try to behave.
@@ilarious5729 I don't often see people being reprimanded in such a respectful way, especially not on the internet, just wanted to acknowledge that and say thank you.
@@henrymartyn I am sure I can find a clip of a Republican saying the names of Obama's kids in a respectful manner while stating a fact like the scholar did in this clip. No outrage..
Jeezus ...she wasn't picking on Baron, just pointing out that trump gave him that name...
I think the next time someone brings up the Barron story to me.I am going to ask them to close their eyes and pretend that they are walking up the steps to the house with two grocery bags. On the left, you have a bag that contains the pain from the inadvise use of Barron's name as an example
On the right, you have a bag filled with the pain of dead children at the border, the pain of children who have wrongfully lost their parents to ICE raids, and the pain of children who may never see their parents again. Once, they try that exercise, then they can ask me why I am not outraged about a scholar using his name in an example.
Not going to lie, that scene of Trevor imitating a southern accent was really funny and well acted haha
Trevor's really good at accents. My favorite are his South African accents 😁
How the hell does he do all these accents?
She shouldn't have apologised. She wasn't disparaging the kid, she was making a valid point about Trump.
Olive Papyrus Understand that that is a go-to ploy of most bullies. By making someone else apologize you get to retain an air of superiority and righteousness.
your an idiot - why bring up a child anyway - that smug ass ugly troll professor needs to be left in the projects in the Bronx for a reality check ,, and you can join her
Central Avenue those remarks from you are totally uncalled for but not surprising! You must be a Trump supporter !
@@gabrielestamp1195 and you must be a socialist liberal "everything free" supporter .. you liberals crack me up with you're Hippocratic words - you are so open minded until someone disagrees with you .. ill wait for it,,,when you'll call me a racist next - dumb ass millennial
Central Avenue, Hippocrates is the man who wrote the oath that doctors take. You mean, "hypocritical", I think?
Its a debate trick and she fell for it, act outraged over a part of the argument when losing so the other person starts doubting
That's really good stuff...High School, is it?
She wasn't joking, she was making a point.
"Mama Don't Let Your Babies Grow Up to be Cowboys" is a Willie Nelson song, which that senator from Texas woefully botched as a joke.
Long trip off a short pier.
Gaetz yelling "you're mean!" & He looks like spit is about to come out if his mouth
OMGOSH Trevor.....your impressions are so hilarious. Loved this.
Love from Republic of Trinidad and Tobago Trevor!! ❤🇹🇹🇹🇹🇹🇹
Can't wait to see "Annie Get Your Degree" be a real show.
My reaction was the same as trevor’s when that guy is really recommending not to go to law studies. Who does that
Right???
I wonder from what Ivy League college that guy, and other Republicans in office, graduated? What a terrible message sent to our kids. Lucky enough to receive a higher education at a prestigious law school? Don't bother Americans! All it will do is give you an unbiased understanding of the Constitutional laws that govern our country and cause you to become a critical thinker. Not in America you don't! Oh no! We prefer our constituents to be uneducated plebes.
Max M Please congressmen Louie Gohmert send your grandkids to Trump university .
He must be afraid of losing his "career politician" job...he wants less competition; so less people going to higher education benefits him.
I don’t even think she said anything wrong. She was just making a point not a joke.
Agreed
Agreed...smh I thought it was gonna be way worse.
If it was a conservative expert making a comment about al-Obama’s girls you know damn well the media would have circled the wagons and claimed racism somehow. Don’t give me that...
It opened up a talking point republicans can use to derail the hearing.
@@MajorHenryL. give an example of what could have been said to the Obama's similar to what was said about the Trump's given the circumstances.
Trevor, you never cease to amaze with your spot on accents and mannerisms. As a Southerner and a fan of Jonathan Van Ness/QE, you knocked this one absolutely out of the park. Thanks for all your efforts and usage of your phenomenal talents, education and brilliance to help make us all a better people---no matter who, where, or what we are!
Trevor is so adorbs he needs to be a Build A Bear option.
Hahaha yesssss
I want that bear!!!
“sober lucille bluth” HOLY SHIT YES
If only l knew who that was...
Arrested Development was a great show. Unfortunately it was too intelligently written for a lot of people and was cancelled...
Look at the past 3 years and what happened. Then someone mentions trump son. OMFGGGGGOOOD
6:27 You´re wrong, Trevor: That wasn´t a mere joke, it was a valid juristical point she made and schouldn´t apologize for.
Pretty sure she could’ve pick her words better and this wouldn’t even be a thing.
@@tonyandrys8872 Pretty sure that than id would be an other fake outrage. It is nothing more than this.
Who wouldn't want their kids to go to Stanford or Harvard Law
republicans apparently, since people from Harvard knows too much and the rep only wants the stupid so they can rule easier
There are Trump fans who believe all forms of higher education feed kids liberal propaganda. They go as far as not permitting their kids to obtain any form of schooling after high school/getting their GED. It's no joke.
Did you watch the scene? The southerners lol
@Respect/Walk I think you spelled a word incorrectly
@Respect/Walk Indoctrinated. Speaking of lack of education...
Thank you to Trevor and the Daily Show team that I can sit through these news without being bored to death
I must be dense for I did not recognize the reference of Barron's name as a joke but a teaching point to aid in understanding the president is NOT a monarch.
Let's go Pelosi!
Impeach Them All
God his accents are fantastic 🤣
Not only is asking them who they voted for wrong, it's just plain irrelevant.
That he asks tells us how weak the (R)s case against impeachment is. He implies that their legal opinions are invalid b/c their votes reveal fatal biases. If he voted for Trump in 2016, would he then refrain from voting against the articles of impeachment on grounds of demonstrated bias? Not likely!
The professor had no reason to apologize.
Question: Didn't he bring Biden's son into Politics? If kids are off limit there's no age limit!
I wonder if Trump let's Baron drive the short bus to school?
Hunter Biden is not a kid. The Parkland kids or Greta would be better examples
Minors are and should be protected, putting a child on blast is pretty messed up no matter how much you disagree with the father
It's a pretty well known unsaid truth that Baron Trump has some developmental problems. Probably on the spectrum. Just saying.
@Terry Hawkins couldn't have said it better
omg Trevor's play "Annie get your degree" was hilarious
Lesson of the day: Get educated. Question everything. Be critical.
This applies to everyone. Polticians thrive on the uneducated, disinterested, and uninformed. No one elses opinion should influence yours. Make up your own mind.
You really have to question why someone doesn't want your children to become more educated. Perhaps it is because those who are are not so easily manipulated.
Good point, very good point, I would say, essential, but... easier said than done. It takes enourmous resources of time, effort, psychological maturity and strength to question everything. Especially your own values.
Say, Mueller's report. I'm now imagining a single mother, who has to take care of two children, having to go through 400+ pages of legalese on her spare time to get a clear picture what was said in it. Very few people have aforementioned resources in this grotesquely unequal society to do that. So, they relly on journalists.... in a perfect world. In a real world, journalism just broke into two factions, analogous to two political parties, which can present completely opposite picture of events. Who to believe in ? Well, the natural reaction is to choose the source which aligns the most with the values one already has. There is an experiment where people were divided into two groups, for and against capital punishment. Then they were presented with equal amounts of arguments for and against it. And what do you think happened ? They did not begin to question their own opinions, no, their opinions in fact hardened...
CGP Grey here on youtube has a video, how First Past the Post voting system, which is used in USA, eventually converges just to two parties, which leads to extreme polarization we see today. Apparently, that's a fact in political science, i.e., this voting system is inherently bad. I wouldn't know it, too, if not for my politically savvy friend.
"Annie, get your degree" will win a Tony, next year
I used to not like Trevor Noah much, but man he's been killing it the past year or two
isn't there something like "the right to vote in secret"?
Humour's vital❣ Thanks so very much💝
"The whole world is laughing at us, they are laughing at the stupidity of our president." - Donald Trump
For once I agree with him.
No they are laughting at your government, trying to take a president out illegally, all these people who tried to ruine Donald Trumps presidency better have a criminal investigation launched into them and locked up for fraud and drunkard Peloci must be 1st.
Lie's Exposed TRUTH Restored so it’s “somehow” a conspiracy of the democratic side of the government who coerced him into holding funds and commit the most infamous quid pro quo in history? Transcripts and many of his own right hand guys admitting to it? How’s that work?
@@LiesExposedTR drink much? Locked up? If you don't have any sensical remarks to make, stay off the internet....
She shouldn't have apologised. She made a valid point. Only an idiot would take what she said as a joke. It was NOT a joke.
My cousin named he kids Queen & King, we know the rest...
Frankly it wasn't a comment about the child but about parents who are so insensitive the name their son Barron
@@123Fanan EXACTLY!! Thank you!
Watching from Botswana
I would really like to know how the students and faculty of Harvard and Stanford reacted to that statement.
The desperation by Republicans is hilarious, also “mamas don’t let your babies grow up to go to Harvard or Stanford”? Makes sense 😂
Andrew Cai these places have become bias liberal safe havens. These institutions are losing their credibility because professors like the ones who testified clearly show no objectivity
Fashizy It’s actually the other way around. It’s literally written in law exactly what Trump did (whether ya’ll like it or not it’s still illegal) and republicans are just going “Its not a big deal so what.” You guys are brainwashed.
dave perron and what exactly did trump do that you have eveidence for. That is what this come down to. There is no evidence of the crimes the democrats are accusing trump of. So it is irrelevant to say there is a law because trump didn’t break the law. The democrats need to come up with the evidence. We don’t prove ourselves innocent in this country
Christopher Santos Jesus Christ you guys are fucking dense. You know exactly what he’s accused of doing, you just don’t think it’s worthy of being law which thank god isn’t up to you cult like imbeciles. Shit, if the “perfect call” not verbatim transcript wasn’t enough he did it again on live television. God damn republicans are fucking stupid and have become such an eyesore of the country.
@@christophersantos1823 so eyewitnesses don't count as evidence now? Last I checked, witnesses count as credible evidence. Not to mention that trump is blocking certain key witnesses from testifying. If he were so innocent why do that?
And 2ndly the evidence is in the transcript. "I want u to do us a favor though", whilst the aid was being held up. Multiple people say that they got orders that came from the office of the president to hold the funds. Then trump is literally recorded over the phone having said that. He is NOT supposed to ask a foreign country to investigate into American citizens. There r proper avenues to go thru in order to do that. That aren't his private lawyer. Why didnt he tell the FBI and the CIA? What guiliani, who's a private citizen and not even a White House official. U Republicans will defend ur orange idiot til the end.
It wasn’t even a joke She was making a point.
Remember, moms: Liberty and Bob Jones destroy brains.
prager u...also sad
Trump never studied constitutional law?
Who knew.
That course wasn't offered at Trump University.
@Respect/Walk spoken like a true red deplorable.
@Respect/Walk look at what good it did lol. Just Be thankful i didnt call you a stupid piece of shit lol.
We will soon find out who has studied the Constitution better. I think it will come as a surprise to you. As in the case of Mrs. Shill.
Oh Lort, how dare you mention their son, when they have children in cages, without basic services and with many dying? GET SOME PERSPECTIVE!!
I get it why republicans were upset about the little joke:
Their little joke is in the white house. #micdrop
Aba Dab Oblongata lmao I can’t 🤣
Aba Dab Oblongata and in their pants
And I oop 🤭
I thought it was a fat joke.
What country are you from? The wouldn’t pass for a joke here in the US