I have to say this as well. This is a real life example of the "Emperor has no clothes" story. None of these people have any clue what Howard is saying because it can't be understood. None of it makes any sense, yet they're still saying how profound he is and how much of a genius he is, just like in the original story where someone tricked the king into walking around naked. The huckster said he had the most beautiful fabric in the entire world but only wise people can see it. The king wanted people to think he was wise so he lied and said he could see the cloth and he wanted clothing made from it. His subjects were also told that only wise people could see the cloth his clothes were made of so even though they saw the king naked they lied and told him how beautiful his clothes were because if they said they couldn't see the cloth it would reveal them to be unwise. Howard is the king and the idiots supporting him are the subjects.
Homeschool just got more complicated. Child: what does 1 * 1 equal? Parent: public School systems will tell you it's 1, but we all know it equals 2. Child: ......ummm....... Parent: to put it into perspective if you multiply yourself one time how many would you be? Child: 2 Parent: Correct!! So proud of you sweetie!
This whole thing is the most bewildering modern phenomenon. We are certainly living in a very special period of time. To be blessed with intellect like that possessed by those like Howard and Carson is just breathtaking. 😂😂😂😂
1. No one ever said nor disprove that genius and psychosis are mutually exclusive 2. Howard’s theories need and should be tested. NDT was right to question but not attack his treatise. NDT (who should never be apart of any scientific findings or discussion) like a most researchers are scared to objectively question the new.
To be genius is to be misunderstood but to be misunderstood is not to be a genius. What testing is there to be done? Your reasoning is fundamentally flawed. Here's an example. 1 butterfly times by 1 butterfly is a nonsensical statement. 1 butterfly times by 1 is a sensible statement. 1x1 (one multiplied by 1) =1. You cannot multiply something by butterfly. You can multiply something by a number. The fact that this is hard for you to understand and the fact that you felt the need to comment in defense of Terrence shows how intellectually deficient and unwilling to admit when you are wrong you are.
@@0pct-Zscrop2-bcue7im9a.4space I give a rip about the math not mathing. the desire to test a statement or theory is never flawed just the procedure of how it’s carried out. I’m talking about everything else Howard said. You think he was the first to question why one is the answer to this multiplication question? Hours and hours of this guy on Rogan, at Oxford and other institutions of learning and this is the question that ruffles feathers? Your priorities suck. Let’s say he is some how right. Is down now up and we float into space? No. Do all of his other postulates mean they are all correct too? No. So Test them.
This s*** is asinine! If this is the type of crap that we are teaching in schools than we are completely lost! Over complicating such a simple aspect just to get it wrong is completely ridiculous
1+1 is different than 1x1. It’s understandable that a child may be confused by this at first but once it’s understood, most people will grasp the concept that this is not a flawed system. One existing just one single time, is indeed ONE. Get over it.
Math is crazy and makes my head hurt, 1 * 2 = 1 + 1 = 2, so if multiplication is repeated addition, this would mean the multiplicand (1) is added to itself *ONE* time but the multiplier is 2?, 2 * 2 = 2 + 2 = 4. If the definition that multiplication is repeated addition is always true and that numbers represent quantity and again that the multiplier in the operation tells you how many times to repeat addition then 1 * 1 should mean 1 is added to itself one time, i.e 1 + 1 = 2. i am losing my train of thought trying to explain this but i hope i am making sense. I think the only mathematical operations that existed naturally are addition and subtraction then multiplication and division were invented when it became tedious to add repeatedly or subtract. It doesn't make sense😫
Multiplication is an operation, the multiplicand is whatever you want to multiply (make more of the same thing or increase in quantity) and the multiplier is how may times to repeat addition. So multiplicand * multiplier = product. We all know numbers represent quantity, 0 means you have nothing and 1 means you have something. If you have one cow and you want to increase the quantity of cows you have then you would add another cow (1 + 1) = (1 * 1) = 2. Is multiplication *CLONING* ? WTF is going on?
No silly, multiplication starts by defining how many of something you have. 1 x 1 = 1 because if you have 1 thing 1 time, you have in total had that 1 thing 1 time. If you had 2 things, 2 times, you would have had that thing a total of 4 times. If you had 1 thing, 2 times, you would have had that thing a total of 2 times. Why is this confusing?
Check out Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Podcast, episode Prophets of Doom, I think. He talks about the spread of variations all kinds of religious cults across Europe after the invention of the printing press. He argues that during that time people didnt really understand what was going on and we are living in a parallel period in history today after the invention of the internet.
Literally everything Terrance said has been debunked by actual experts. Nobody worth their salt will give any of his nonsense the time of day. I really hope this video was intended to be satirical, but it’s hard to be sure. 🤣
@@Sirpass.Skateboards lmao. Oh you're narrating? With no insulting subtext? So maybe you can give me the non insulting context that you were going for.. I'll wait..
He is, but so are many others and this doesn't equate to -"Every bold claim he makes is true" 2 is absolutely not the square root of 2. Hard to have complete faith in other topics he talks about when basic math is failed. His flower life idea is absolute brilliance though. Terrence did embellish NGT reaction, NGT is correct when he discussed it 2 days ago and usually i find NGT to be arrogant and pompous. I dont believe the "i was doing math as a fetus" fantasy details that can never be vetted. To even state that was WEIRD lol
![⭐️( ลอยกระทง 2024 ) Ver. แดนซ์ Remix BY [ ดีเจกิต รีมิกซ์ ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/rMWOLhgXUHc/mqdefault.jpg)
I have to say this as well. This is a real life example of the "Emperor has no clothes" story. None of these people have any clue what Howard is saying because it can't be understood. None of it makes any sense, yet they're still saying how profound he is and how much of a genius he is, just like in the original story where someone tricked the king into walking around naked. The huckster said he had the most beautiful fabric in the entire world but only wise people can see it. The king wanted people to think he was wise so he lied and said he could see the cloth and he wanted clothing made from it. His subjects were also told that only wise people could see the cloth his clothes were made of so even though they saw the king naked they lied and told him how beautiful his clothes were because if they said they couldn't see the cloth it would reveal them to be unwise. Howard is the king and the idiots supporting him are the subjects.
One of the best comments I’ve ever read.
Well said
Who tricked the king ?
@@AureliusMax according to the story nobody special. Just two con men posing as weavers after they heard the king was obsessed with clothing.
just google the Dunning-Kruger effect
One of the most commonly used human psychological exploits
I heard it's just a picture of Terrance Howard's smug face now.
Homeschool just got more complicated.
Child: what does 1 * 1 equal?
Parent: public School systems will tell you it's 1, but we all know it equals 2.
Child: ......ummm.......
Parent: to put it into perspective if you multiply yourself one time how many would you be?
Child: 2
Parent: Correct!! So proud of you sweetie!
That is bad parenting. Addition is the new multiplication? That it? One existing only once, is ONE.
This whole thing is the most bewildering modern phenomenon.
We are certainly living in a very special period of time.
To be blessed with intellect like that possessed by those like Howard and Carson is just breathtaking.
😂😂😂😂
Do you just read reddit comments in all your videos?
By this logic, if 1 x 1 = 2 (a simple redefinition of the times-symbol as a plus-symbol), then 2 x 1 = 3. It’s not.
these people vote, drive, and believe they are the main character of their lives
Yep! LMAO it's horrifying
1. No one ever said nor disprove that genius and psychosis are mutually exclusive 2. Howard’s theories need and should be tested. NDT was right to question but not attack his treatise. NDT (who should never be apart of any scientific findings or discussion) like a most researchers are scared to objectively question the new.
To be genius is to be misunderstood but to be misunderstood is not to be a genius. What testing is there to be done? Your reasoning is fundamentally flawed. Here's an example. 1 butterfly times by 1 butterfly is a nonsensical statement. 1 butterfly times by 1 is a sensible statement. 1x1 (one multiplied by 1) =1. You cannot multiply something by butterfly. You can multiply something by a number. The fact that this is hard for you to understand and the fact that you felt the need to comment in defense of Terrence shows how intellectually deficient and unwilling to admit when you are wrong you are.
@@0pct-Zscrop2-bcue7im9a.4space I give a rip about the math not mathing. the desire to test a statement or theory is never flawed just the procedure of how it’s carried out. I’m talking about everything else Howard said. You think he was the first to question why one is the answer to this multiplication question? Hours and hours of this guy on Rogan, at Oxford and other institutions of learning and this is the question that ruffles feathers? Your priorities suck. Let’s say he is some how right. Is down now up and we float into space? No. Do all of his other postulates mean they are all correct too? No. So Test them.
This s*** is asinine! If this is the type of crap that we are teaching in schools than we are completely lost! Over complicating such a simple aspect just to get it wrong is completely ridiculous
1+1 is different than 1x1. It’s understandable that a child may be confused by this at first but once it’s understood, most people will grasp the concept that this is not a flawed system. One existing just one single time, is indeed ONE. Get over it.
1 time 1 equals 2? My 12 year old just laughed at me 😢
He seems to be the current king of pseudo profundity.
Nah imma trust guys like Edward Witten over iron man's friend
awesome channel. hope you lean into this topic and blowup.
Thank you so much!
What a joke
The ability to watch a video clip and comment on it on your phone is proof that 1 x 1 = 1
Math is crazy and makes my head hurt, 1 * 2 = 1 + 1 = 2, so if multiplication is repeated addition, this would mean the multiplicand (1) is added to itself *ONE* time but the multiplier is 2?, 2 * 2 = 2 + 2 = 4. If the definition that multiplication is repeated addition is always true and that numbers represent quantity and again that the multiplier in the operation tells you how many times to repeat addition then 1 * 1 should mean 1 is added to itself one time, i.e 1 + 1 = 2. i am losing my train of thought trying to explain this but i hope i am making sense. I think the only mathematical operations that existed naturally are addition and subtraction then multiplication and division were invented when it became tedious to add repeatedly or subtract. It doesn't make sense😫
Multiplication is an operation, the multiplicand is whatever you want to multiply (make more of the same thing or increase in quantity) and the multiplier is how may times to repeat addition. So multiplicand * multiplier = product. We all know numbers represent quantity, 0 means you have nothing and 1 means you have something. If you have one cow and you want to increase the quantity of cows you have then you would add another cow (1 + 1) = (1 * 1) = 2. Is multiplication *CLONING* ? WTF is going on?
No silly, multiplication starts by defining how many of something you have. 1 x 1 = 1 because if you have 1 thing 1 time, you have in total had that 1 thing 1 time. If you had 2 things, 2 times, you would have had that thing a total of 4 times. If you had 1 thing, 2 times, you would have had that thing a total of 2 times. Why is this confusing?
keep up the work and never give up man!
Thank you. I'll do my best to keep this going!
Check out Dan Carlin's Hardcore History Podcast, episode Prophets of Doom, I think. He talks about the spread of variations all kinds of religious cults across Europe after the invention of the printing press. He argues that during that time people didnt really understand what was going on and we are living in a parallel period in history today after the invention of the internet.
the general public is so gullible, they will believe and follow just about anything.
Literally everything Terrance said has been debunked by actual experts. Nobody worth their salt will give any of his nonsense the time of day. I really hope this video was intended to be satirical, but it’s hard to be sure. 🤣
Why would a self absorbed, self centered narcissist like Terrance offer anyone
Anything of value and free too?
The guy is far from a genius. Hes lying about his education and having a phd. He is not metally well, he thinks hes iron man.
Says the guy named noise420.
@Sirpass.Skateboards are you narrating?
@@Sirpass.Skateboardstrying to Discount someone's argument by making fun of their name. Speaks volumes
@@deadpuddle86 I was narrating, not making fun of him.
@@Sirpass.Skateboards lmao. Oh you're narrating? With no insulting subtext? So maybe you can give me the non insulting context that you were going for.. I'll wait..
He is, but so are many others and this doesn't equate to -"Every bold claim he makes is true" 2 is absolutely not the square root of 2. Hard to have complete faith in other topics he talks about when basic math is failed. His flower life idea is absolute brilliance though. Terrence did embellish NGT reaction, NGT is correct when he discussed it 2 days ago and usually i find NGT to be arrogant and pompous. I dont believe the "i was doing math as a fetus" fantasy details that can never be vetted. To even state that was WEIRD lol
He is a charlatan. 1x1=5