25:20 "Unlike perhaps in politics". Why? It seems that the battlecry should be the same, for the same reasons. Pluralism is required for progress, as well as for intellectual well-being. But credit should definitely be given for the insertion of that "perhaps".
![เป็นไปได้ไหม - WanMai [Teaser] | 05-12-24](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/P5Uto6e453w/mqdefault.jpg)
Wow! Oh well, I got what I asked for and more;-Feyerabend takes on Khun's saccount of the history of science. That's filled up my weekend!
25:20 "Unlike perhaps in politics". Why? It seems that the battlecry should be the same, for the same reasons. Pluralism is required for progress, as well as for intellectual well-being. But credit should definitely be given for the insertion of that "perhaps".
So he's saying that Microphysics can't be determined by relying on a foundation of Classical Science?
He should have mentined Copernicus
the work for which he is best known, “Against Method”, makes a central argument based on Copernicus
Like why philosophers want to be seen like bad boys, they are nerds, except for Plato who was buff and still a fan fic boi