I remember the one time Daihatsu tried getting into the US market, they simply made a LHD version of one of their Kei cars, and it sold horribly, with the i3 being so unbalanced that most people assumed they were broken off the lot. I even seen one for sale a few years ago in great condition, but the dude was selling it cheap cause "the engine runs rough don't know why"
Thank you for uploading. I could already read from your description that the Wake's NA 52PS engine lacks behind the N-Box 58PS engine in terms of acceleration. I had the impression that the sound insulation is quite good in this car, what were your first hand impressions? And how about interior space in comparision with the N-Box?
Soon I started driving, I felt this car is way too heavy for the 52PS NA engine. If I bought one, I would never buy without turbo charger. Except that, The exterior looks good , and interior is not bad. Like you mentioned, the sound insulation is decent. And this car has plenty of room especially above my head (even you I guess. the inside height is 55mm higher than N-box.)
Sugoi! Thank you. I'm interested in tall-wagon kei car, which i can probably also drive with my height (2.00m). I'm wondering about the long term durability and reliability of turbo charged 0.66L three cylinder engines still. Did drivers in Japan have any concerns or problems with Daihatsu/Honda/Suzuki turbocharged kei car engines, or are they running just same as the naturally aspirated kei car engines?
Generally speaking, if you own a kei car with a turbo charger, you need to change oil frequently like every 3,000km. Surely a turbo charger engine have more parts than a NA one so the chances of causing any trouble is little bit higher. but at the same time you can drive a turbo charged car at lower rpm compare to NA. So I think ....it's OK.
Probably not. For obscure reasons, key cars aren't a thing that sells well outside Japan. They are rationnal, reliable, costless in their fees. Whatever, peoples, actually, prefere Kia Sportage and whatever monstrous Mazda throw on the market. Daihatsu actually left my home market years ago. With that, the only Kei Car alternative left the market.
![[Live] : ONE FIGHT NIGHT 24 “จาร์เร็ด vs กุสตาโว”](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ENNA-fsT67c/mqdefault.jpg)
Cool rentals car awesome for the city driving..
Did you fix the mirrors ☺
今まで色々な車載動画を観たけど、全部の道を知っている動画は初めてでした。
船橋近辺だけかと思ったら、近所まで来てくれるとはｗ
私は八柱霊園の回り以外全部の道知りませんでしたのでドキドキでした。
I love this car. I wish we got them in the US.
水戸街道の岩瀬交差点を右折した当たりから、見慣れた景色なので親近感がわきました。かなりアクセルを踏み込んでいる感じですね。どちらかと言えば、荷物をたくさん積んで活用するのが一番ですね。
Cat
Good city car!
This is so cool mini band
僕も偶然ウェイク動画を探していたらジモピー動画だった。
今は遠く中国地方に住み懐かしい道順だった^ ^
Nice car
Great👏👏
I remember the one time Daihatsu tried getting into the US market, they simply made a LHD version of one of their Kei cars, and it sold horribly, with the i3 being so unbalanced that most people assumed they were broken off the lot. I even seen one for sale a few years ago in great condition, but the dude was selling it cheap cause "the engine runs rough don't know why"
I want a Daihatsu Wake, even though I live in California.
Me encantan los autos que usan en Japon, pero mas me gustan los trenes que tienen =)
最近の軽自動車は静かなんですなあ
実家のダイハツエッセはそらもう、エンジン音半端なかったからよ。
Looks like all kei cars are made by one manufacturer and just rebranded. They are all almost identical.
That's because the regulations for them are so strict, there's only so much you can do, hence the similar styles.
Thank you for uploading.
I could already read from your description that the Wake's NA 52PS engine lacks behind the N-Box 58PS engine in terms of acceleration. I had the impression that the sound insulation is quite good in this car, what were your first hand impressions? And how about interior space in comparision with the N-Box?
Soon I started driving, I felt this car is way too heavy for the 52PS NA engine. If I bought one, I would never buy without turbo charger. Except that, The exterior looks good , and interior is not bad. Like you mentioned, the sound insulation is decent. And this car has plenty of room especially above my head (even you I guess. the inside height is 55mm higher than N-box.)
Sugoi! Thank you. I'm interested in tall-wagon kei car, which i can probably also drive with my height (2.00m).
I'm wondering about the long term durability and reliability of turbo charged 0.66L three cylinder engines still. Did drivers in Japan have any concerns or problems with Daihatsu/Honda/Suzuki turbocharged kei car engines, or are they running just same as the naturally aspirated kei car engines?
Generally speaking, if you own a kei car with a turbo charger, you need to change oil frequently like every 3,000km. Surely a turbo charger engine have more parts than a NA one so the chances of causing any trouble is little bit higher. but at the same time you can drive a turbo charged car at lower rpm compare to NA. So I think ....it's OK.
Awesome, thanks again :)
can it go up to a very uphill road?
I want this car, but I don't know if this car will come to my country
Probably not. For obscure reasons, key cars aren't a thing that sells well outside Japan. They are rationnal, reliable, costless in their fees. Whatever, peoples, actually, prefere Kia Sportage and whatever monstrous Mazda throw on the market.
Daihatsu actually left my home market years ago. With that, the only Kei Car alternative left the market.
"They are rationnal, ..." Since when is a car a rational entity? :D
I think the closest thing you can buy to a kei car is a Suzuki Ignis
What country are you in? You may be able to import them
@@cpufreak101 there is a company in Japan that imports to the UK
ターボ無しと、ターボアリでなんか変わるのですか？
車のことよくわからないので
もしターボがないまま100キロ走るとどうなりますか？
ターボが無いとパワーがその分少なくなるので、特にこの車のように軽自動車の割に重くて空気抵抗が大きい車だと、高速道路への合流でもたついたり、100キロ巡行でエンジンの回転数が高くなり、色々余裕がなくなると思います。おそらく100km/hの平地で走行する分には問題ないと思いますが、自分の車でないのと、シェアカーでも少ししかない車種なので、あまり無理な走行はさせたくないなというのが本音のところです。
+Driver視点Japan なるほどそういうことでしたか
分かりました
ターボ付きなら登坂車線の有る道でも、120キロは出る。ただし、6000回転まで回るし、燃費も物凄く悪くなる。ターボ無しとは別の車と思った方が良い。
エンジンが爆発します。
Mileage is only 500 km, have you recently bought a car?
Which country is this?
japan
あれ、パワースライドドアのスイッチ付いてるのに、主さんがドアをあけたとき、なんでイージーしか機能してないんですか？
電動スライドドアのスイッチをOFFにしてたからだと思いますよ。
このグレードは両側電動スライドなので
パワースライドドアってオンオフスイッチがあるんですね！教えていただきありがとうございます‼
If I could buy it in Canada, I'd already have my licence.
Gabriel Gingras you don't want this car in Canada. Believe me.
@Cooker Cook in Canada you only have to wait 15 years
Import
Супер, хорошее авто
ウェイク出たんですか。時間あったら乗ってみたいですね
話のネタになりそうな車なので一回乗ってみるのはお勧めです。
次回 ウェイクで高速道路走って下さい‼︎
ターボ無しのウェイクで100キロ出すのはちょっと怖いです。
Driver視点Japan 大丈夫だ怖くない
No one's gonna talk about the r32 gt-r in 9:00?
夏ですな。
カッコいい、
どっかの兄ちゃんがただ乗ってるだけの動画
ハンドルはインドネシアのアギアの車とまったく同じです
タントの上⤴️⤴️を行くからウェイクと言う名前になったらしい⁉️👸🚘
Anchan.
Japanese ,chinese C A R S
Is too crazy i travel to tokyo is too big city and little cars
annchan???
XD
سياره
.. سياره
حط
@@RevolutionYap زراعه العدسات
That is daihatsu Nbox
역시 경차 장점도많고 경제성도좋고
この車で長距離走る人はターボ必須だからな！NAは現行国産車の中で最も加速が悪いから…
デイズルークス「呼んだ？」
Hello
uh im from kansas usa
connor kern ,my condolences.
良いビデオのレビュー、ありがとうございました。
Condolences???
NY here, no clue how I got here either.
فضحة
需要があんまりないんだろうな 高すぎて。背が。 タントでも正直高すぎるくらいだもん。 ムーヴキャンバスが俺にはちょうどいい。
morel se ljudino pola japana kolima obic
the noise is unbearable in this car. Its quieter to take the bus than drive in this.
What noise? Things quieter than our Ford Escape
Doesn't sound unbearable to me here.
It's a mini Luxio
発進時の加速が鈍いですね〜
これだと回転数だけ上がってしまうので燃費も悪そうですね。
山本龍平 うう
。バモス 決めつけっていうけど発進時にあれだけエンジンの音がしてるんだからパワー不足があるのは事実
それに人によって意見が違うのは当たり前。それを決めつけとか求めすぎとか言うな
軽になにを求めてるかって、そんなもん車種によって変わるでしょ？コペンやS660に積載性能を求める人やタントやN－BOXにサーキット走行を求める人なんていますか？
わざわざタントと比較してくれてありがとうねー
性能は10年前の車と比べていいに決まってるでしょwww
アホでもわかるわい
ただ、動力性能に関してはウェイクのが重たいからタントより不利なのは事実
一人乗車でこの加速だから荷物を載せたりフル乗車をすればこれより加速が悪くなるのはわかるよね？
僕は積載性能を重視してる車だからフルに荷物を載せた時の事も考えて言ってるだけですが…
そもそもなんで人の意見に対してわざわざ腹を立てるかね？ウェイクの動力性能は悪くないですよ。って言わないと気が済まないのか？
別に全ての事に返信する気なんてないけど燃費の事は触れてないとかどーこーいうけど燃費なんて条件によって異なりますからね。エアコンの使用や乗車人数や積載やアクセルの踏み具合、ゴーストップの多い街中や信号が少ない田舎とかで燃費は変わってくる。
実燃費はｅ燃費でこの車のノンターボは13~18くらいらしいけどそこまでいいとは思わないなぁ
あのボディサイズを考えたら悪くは無いとは思うけどね
だけどこの車は燃費がいいよ！って言える程ではないと思う
最後じゃなかったんかよw
なるほどw
すまんがね矛盾してるかもしれはいが文字に書くのはムズイんだよw
何がしたいのやら？
逸楽。。コースの運転が静かだな！
No rear camera. But inner space's awesome. Front vision is bad , side angle views aren't clear. hindered by double A-pillar. Fail design.
Well It's japan only and road accidents don't happen alot there normally...
うーん、、、外観はカッコイイけど、中はショボいね…
加速悪いです
リッター20 いかないだろな
藤野勝巳 現行型のってますが16か17くらいです。
Apple信者 それは酷いな