🧐🧐yep not Vietnam not Iraq not Afghan not Syria even Russia is there but Russia is not going to fight somebody else war for them on full potential they only got there few ships and few jets and few SAM just to back up Assad when his Army needed and asked and protect its own Russian base and that's it
it seems that russian engineers perform better then the westerners. engineering students shld consider russian university as an option for advance education
Of course, all so called western university is the best in the world, isn't true at all, Russia always has best mathematics, fysics, very highly educated peoples
Iskander missiles are hypersonic traveling at mach 7 while patriot missiles are supersonic traveling less than mach 5. That's the main reason patriot systems can't cope with iskander missile interception.
The funny thing is, the ukrainians cant intercept the iskander with the patriot but they're claiming it knocked out kinzhal and other hypersonic missiles lmfaoo
Can guarantee its skill of operator/command failure. Not sure if the systems are being operated by Ukr or US users, and the politics no doubt weakens command responses.
if its one or two Patriots, such conclusions can be accepted. But non Iskander missiles have been shot down by the Patriots. That is the equipment failure to perform.
Admitting failiure with wrong parameters = deception. Neither is the Iskander the biggest problem, there is a variety of faster multiple entry vehicles equipped as well as air and/or see launched systems the makes the system not strungle but impotent. Further to blame the crew is a joke and the drones and slower cruise missiles serve mostly to exhaust the system, means, once the real stuff is incoming there the batteries are often depleted etc. etc.
Most weapons are built in the 80's and upgraded over time😉 however the Iskander is newer, made in 2004, which is considered modern in military terms, its very difficult to intercept
because it's real war against someone that can defend itself, not a video game, not a defenseless foe...
🧐🧐yep not Vietnam not Iraq not Afghan not Syria even Russia is there but Russia is not going to fight somebody else war for them on full potential they only got there few ships and few jets and few SAM just to back up Assad when his Army needed and asked and protect its own Russian base and that's it
They no longer fighting sandmen in the desert with Ak-47's, a gun from the 40's
True 🎉
US force only works in countries with no modern air defense. It's like playing soccer with no goalkeeper.
The patriot is great in theory only, not good enough in battle conditions
The limited 120 degree radar is a blind spot for the system
Are you saying its Ukrainians that are operating the patriot missiles? NATO forces are operating it on behalf of Ukraine, so skill is not the issue
Yup good point
US is facing a real.army not a primitive foot soldier in afghanistan😂
US is not even at war...
@@lordmac-b6v 😂😂😂😂
@@lordmac-b6vUS and NATO will not dare take on Russia.
How quick were they to invade Libya! Why are they not directly helping the depleting Ukraine?
But even the foot soldier won in the end.
But even the foot soldier won in the end.
it seems that russian engineers perform better then the westerners. engineering students shld consider russian university as an option for advance education
Lol? Patriot has been way more successful than the s400.
@@lordmac-b6v Nope.
I wish I applied to a physics PhD in Russia.
@@lordmac-b6vIn doing what?
On paper, yes. Practically, No.
Of course, all so called western university is the best in the world, isn't true at all, Russia always has best mathematics, fysics, very highly educated peoples
After WWII I don't remember the US facing an equal opponent. Banana republics and third world countries.
World War II was not an adversary for the Americans. They fought on two fronts stupid!
US weapons win war in Hollywood movies 😂😂😂
Iskander missiles are hypersonic traveling at mach 7 while patriot missiles are supersonic traveling less than mach 5. That's the main reason patriot systems can't cope with iskander missile interception.
Because Russian technologies are far ahead to US technologies. It's the simple truth.
especially those washing machine ships the media told us about
Love the iskander system a milestone in Russia' s defense capabilities
It's only great in Hollywood 🤣
It's because Chuck Norris, Vandam, Steven Segal and such other captain American is not using them😅
But Hollywood...
Us shovels
because russian staff officers job includes SEAD
The iskanders descend at 80°.in ine incident it evaded four patriots before it rammed into the launcher, something no missile has ever achieved
An nit missile system that can’t defend itself from missile?
Просто у петриот есть ряд недостатков и ракетчики этим пользуются, типа мёртвая воронка сверху, ещё у пусковых установках ограничен сектор обстрела.
That's only excuses
The funny thing is, the ukrainians cant intercept the iskander with the patriot but they're claiming it knocked out kinzhal and other hypersonic missiles lmfaoo
Can guarantee its skill of operator/command failure. Not sure if the systems are being operated by Ukr or US users, and the politics no doubt weakens command responses.
Correct, it always comes down to command error
if its one or two Patriots, such conclusions can be accepted. But non Iskander missiles have been shot down by the Patriots. That is the equipment failure to perform.
Ukraine doesn’t have anyone trained to use the system so it’s nato personnel operating them just like the ATACMS
Admitting failiure with wrong parameters = deception. Neither is the Iskander the biggest problem, there is a variety of faster multiple entry vehicles equipped as well as air and/or see launched systems the makes the system not strungle but impotent.
Further to blame the crew is a joke and the drones and slower cruise missiles serve mostly to exhaust the system, means, once the real stuff is incoming there the batteries are often depleted etc. etc.
why you blame human error in instead of the system incapability but when it comes to S400 you think the system is incapable
Because their opponent is their level😂
And how many s400 system have destroyed by himas ??? Useless propaganda
Junk
Simple. They aren't
We all know who operate that sam,So only reason why it doesnt work, patriot is obsolete
Yeah first punch against the Us
Made in America means junk. Most items are 40 to 60 year's old.
Most weapons are built in the 80's and upgraded over time😉 however the Iskander is newer, made in 2004, which is considered modern in military terms, its very difficult to intercept
As usual trying to find excuses for it failure
if the patriot is getting beat why cant the russians take ukraine?
Did the usa take weak Afghanistan, Ukraine is for more stronger than the goat herders that the us lost to in Afghanistan
...Russia records everything.
Propaganda!