I watched a programme the other night about the inevitable existence of multiple universes. Assuming there is a Roger Federer in every one of them we should feel privileged we are in the one with the best! God bless you the GOAT. Have a happy retirement ❤️
Great compilation of Roger’s genius. How does he make even digs look graceful? I love how the commentators are all like that is ridiculous because that’s how I feel too. I could watch him play his beautiful and genius game for hours and not get bored.
read my comment, such skills are not acquire but a gift, like lang lan playing fastest piano, pavatoti 's vocal, lin dans deceptive shots & farah 's squash drop & lobs....a gift that is refined with their own abilities
Why see a player like him when there could be one better? Years will pass and people will develop a better sense of knowledge on the court. More and more generations will adapt and grow with practice and skills/knowledge passed on from player to player. I agree that no one will be like him but I also believe players are going to grow to be even better in skill and make tennis look even more effortless. But thats just my opinion.
The 3rd there is the 3rd there was and the 3rd we will ever see. At this moment he got almost no record. 3rd Grandslams, 2nd weeks as world number one...
@@Spacevet consecutive weeks n1 is a more important record than overall. most wimbledon, most us open, most finals are a few of the records he still holds. even if he had none, you just have to watch him play to know who the goat is. people in 100 years will see videos of him playing and know who the goat is. there will never be someone like him.
@@Spacevet The fact that you guys are so obsessed with saying that he’s 3rd, going so far as to troll comments on Federer compilations, proves that he’s higher than 3rd
@@rogerigez21 It proves nothing. You and many other Fed fans are so obsessed with saying "trolls" so fast anyone state that Fed not number1. Just look on the fact. He will have the record "consecutive weeks n1" that do not mean much, but not much more when they all retired.
What made him the greatest was his talent. He got some shots on pure instinct that no one ever will be able to hit even after practice. That was the genius of Federer he didn't need long drawn out raliies to break his opponents down. He would just think of a shot and hit it on the spot.
If defying science means "hitting a slice forehand or backhand" I suppose that would be true, but this is just a testament to how great Federer's drop shot slice really were
I think Roger just understands science better than the rest of us. He instinctively knows the angle his racquet head must be to pull off certain shots. It happens so fast and at different angles and positions on the court, you can only call it genius. He also has wonderful anticipation and deception. All of his opponents have hit a million balls, only Roger consistently pulls off these types of shots.
@@DrMrPersonGuy That's a garbage "reason", not to be taken seriously. And a Federer fan like you to call the era Djokovic and Nadal played in as "weak" is hilarious. Federer's era, where he racked up so many of his titles, was the true weak era. Everyone knows it. There's a reason he stopped winning titles on a consistent basis when Nadal and Novak came into their primes and it wasn't the age. Nadal and Novak are in their mid going to late 30s and still dominating the sport. So you can toss that bullshit excuse right out.
The 40th video title exaggerating Roger's gifts. Defying science did not happen; you are seeking either to connect with or capitalize on people's emotions due to his goodbye. I loved to see him play. And he may be the GOAT as so many people think he is. But it is steadfastness, vulnerability and maturity that is commendable to me; not the idea someone has put aside laws of physics. Is he more praiseworthy than anyone else who put in the same amount of effort but was unable to score so much?
Yes, fucking obviously. Genius, performance, and achievement matter too. Lots of artists put in much more effort than Picasso or Da Vinci have done. Steadfastness and effort are great, but to ignore genius, talent, achievement, etc is silly. Michael Jordan golfed and gambled and ran businesses and played baseball. There are many basketball players who put in more singular effort at their craft than he did. But they never accomplished his heights.
These pitches that claim athletic moves by well trained athletes are magic or violate physics are so lame, pushing the idea that training yourself is useless, and only some kind of wizard can do these. So, best anyone can do is go play video games. In particular, screw the Brit commentator channel used by most of these, with his “can’t teach” BS.
@@Huskymaster12345 I played for years, amateur competitive. It’s not magic, and it can be taught. It takes work, training, focused time w a coach, and some talent highest levels.
Stupid title - tennis exists because of physics - scientific laws explain the dynamics of tennis technique - Federer's shots are based on science (physics) - nothing defies science (except the stupidity of the guy who makes up nonsensical titles for his YT channel)
What dumb triggered nonsense. Ok, he doesn’t defy physics, he defies the probabilities. He routinely makes shots that most others couldn’t land if given a thousand attempts at it. Happy?
Federer makes you feel grateful to have eyes.
Well put!!! There is no dancer, not even Baryshnikov, who equals Federer in grace and flow.
I watched a programme the other night about the inevitable existence of multiple universes. Assuming there is a Roger Federer in every one of them we should feel privileged we are in the one with the best!
God bless you the GOAT.
Have a happy retirement ❤️
Great compilation of Roger’s genius. How does he make even digs look graceful? I love how the commentators are all like that is ridiculous because that’s how I feel too. I could watch him play his beautiful and genius game for hours and not get bored.
He takes balls so early and makes it look effortless. It’s such a hard skill to acquire
read my comment, such skills are not acquire but a gift, like lang lan playing fastest piano, pavatoti 's vocal, lin dans deceptive shots & farah 's squash drop & lobs....a gift that is refined with their own abilities
We're never gonna see a player like him ever again
Probably not, because anyone who is close will have too much pressure to fill his shoes.
Why see a player like him when there could be one better? Years will pass and people will develop a better sense of knowledge on the court. More and more generations will adapt and grow with practice and skills/knowledge passed on from player to player. I agree that no one will be like him but I also believe players are going to grow to be even better in skill and make tennis look even more effortless. But thats just my opinion.
The best there is the best there was and the best we will ever see
The 3rd there is the 3rd there was and the 3rd we will ever see. At this moment he got almost no record. 3rd Grandslams, 2nd weeks as world number one...
@@Spacevet consecutive weeks n1 is a more important record than overall. most wimbledon, most us open, most finals are a few of the records he still holds.
even if he had none, you just have to watch him play to know who the goat is. people in 100 years will see videos of him playing and know who the goat is. there will never be someone like him.
@@Spacevet The fact that you guys are so obsessed with saying that he’s 3rd, going so far as to troll comments on Federer compilations, proves that he’s higher than 3rd
@@rogerigez21 It proves nothing. You and many other Fed fans are so obsessed with saying "trolls" so fast anyone state that Fed not number1. Just look on the fact. He will have the record "consecutive weeks n1" that do not mean much, but not much more when they all retired.
@@Spacevet why are you watching pure federer magic videos and even commenting?! wait...my question has already been answered.
What made him the greatest was his talent. He got some shots on pure instinct that no one ever will be able to hit even after practice. That was the genius of Federer he didn't need long drawn out raliies to break his opponents down. He would just think of a shot and hit it on the spot.
9:17 *Federer destroys everyone. His adversaries, me, and even YOU.*
Roddick’s frustration at the end.. throwing his racket..😅..didn’t know at that time what he was up against
If defying science means "hitting a slice forehand or backhand" I suppose that would be true, but this is just a testament to how great Federer's drop shot slice really were
I think Roger just understands science better than the rest of us. He instinctively knows the angle his racquet head must be to pull off certain shots. It happens so fast and at different angles and positions on the court, you can only call it genius. He also has wonderful anticipation and deception. All of his opponents have hit a million balls, only Roger consistently pulls off these types of shots.
1:10 *i remember that day when Federer launched that amazing dropshot during an earthquake*
GOAT
3rd best of his generation.
@@sj4632 nah he's the best, the other 2 got lucky that they were younger during this weakest ever era.
@@DrMrPersonGuy No, just.......no. Stop. The other two are better, just accept it.
@@sj4632 Wrong, and I gave one reason why, there's many others.
@@DrMrPersonGuy That's a garbage "reason", not to be taken seriously. And a Federer fan like you to call the era Djokovic and Nadal played in as "weak" is hilarious. Federer's era, where he racked up so many of his titles, was the true weak era. Everyone knows it. There's a reason he stopped winning titles on a consistent basis when Nadal and Novak came into their primes and it wasn't the age. Nadal and Novak are in their mid going to late 30s and still dominating the sport. So you can toss that bullshit excuse right out.
What a match it was.........
11:31 *"Oahh, what a dick!!"*
“The last time we saw one of those, God was a boy” - bloody brilliant
W😮W!!!!
❤Roger❤
Is it reaction time that made him better? Amazing talent
he gathered quite a couple of sick shots there in dubai
08:19 andre agassi
🐐
Scientists hate him
This guy is good, can he join my 4.0 team?
Nazir Bacar
Bacarnazir
The 40th video title exaggerating Roger's gifts. Defying science did not happen; you are seeking either to connect with or capitalize on people's emotions due to his goodbye.
I loved to see him play. And he may be the GOAT as so many people think he is. But it is steadfastness, vulnerability and maturity that is commendable to me; not the idea someone has put aside laws of physics.
Is he more praiseworthy than anyone else who put in the same amount of effort but was unable to score so much?
Yes, fucking obviously.
Genius, performance, and achievement matter too. Lots of artists put in much more effort than Picasso or Da Vinci have done. Steadfastness and effort are great, but to ignore genius, talent, achievement, etc is silly.
Michael Jordan golfed and gambled and ran businesses and played baseball. There are many basketball players who put in more singular effort at their craft than he did. But they never accomplished his heights.
These pitches that claim athletic moves by well trained athletes are magic or violate physics are so lame, pushing the idea that training yourself is useless, and only some kind of wizard can do these. So, best anyone can do is go play video games.
In particular, screw the Brit commentator channel used by most of these, with his “can’t teach” BS.
You’ve clearly never played tennis
@@Huskymaster12345 I played for years, amateur competitive. It’s not magic, and it can be taught. It takes work, training, focused time w a coach, and some talent highest levels.
The commentator I think you’re talking about is Robbie Koenig, but he’s not British he’s South African. Reached the US Open semi finals in doubles.
Stupid title - tennis exists because of physics - scientific laws explain the dynamics of tennis technique - Federer's shots are based on science (physics) - nothing defies science (except the stupidity of the guy who makes up nonsensical titles for his YT channel)
What dumb triggered nonsense. Ok, he doesn’t defy physics, he defies the probabilities. He routinely makes shots that most others couldn’t land if given a thousand attempts at it.
Happy?
It’s to back he screwed all of us with his retirement! He should have had a farewell year so every tournament could have said goodbyes