Thanks for solving For puzzle #2, so he!ed because it was my second fog puzzle. My first fog puzzle used a barely visible diagonal line, so it was not the best for submitting. I'm not surprised it got lost, as it had a problem with the fog when I submitted it. My resubmission was kind of casual. I'll try to be tighter with my rules in the future, although we have a few differing ideas about the best way to present them 😊. Don't worry about how you solve any of my puzzles. I miss the most obvious things while testing. I realized that many of my puzzles submitted to you are whispers based. I ought to diversify and avoid the whole 3 next to 8 business. Again, something I have done with my own puzzles. Actually, whispers into the fog are a bit more difficult than clear whispers. Once again, I appreciate the very nice things you have said about my puzzles (and about me).
Even with explaining what you were doing, you solved this puzzle a lot faster than I did. You shouldn't let people who do it faster than you get you down. Did you ever claim to be the best in the world? No! So quit worrying about how fast someone else does it and just enjoy the beauty of the puzzles.
Whoa! What a nice fog puzzle!!! It is ok to miss things, I missed them all the time, but the thing is: when I miss something I can use your video to help me, but you can't use any video to help when you are kinda lost. Super fun german whispers. Have a nice day!! 🐝
Bremster - it doesn’t matter if you miss what is seemingly obvious! You solve the puzzle eventually, you’re doing it on camera which the majority will never do and your videos are highly enjoyable!
That happened to me countless time, after an hard deduction I get lost on the simple ones. But that's part of the solve experience too! Splendid puzzle and great solve!
It would have been a loss to not see this puzzle at all. So, just fine with all the struggles and missing the obvious. One step to break in I made was thinking whether the 34s in r1c4 and r4c1 were a pair or the same digit, and thinking deeply about them reveals none of them can be 4, so my greatest pleasure was putting in two 3s in these cells at the same time, removing lots of fog. In detail it's all about how a 49 pair can (or can't) be in box1, if you make any of the 34 cells in the neighbor boxes a 4. Also in conjunction with the white dot in box 2.
Don't be too hard on yourself, BremSter, you did a fine solve, especially doing it live! Even with my solve, I still missed some things for a while and wasn't sure I'd make it through, but did and was able to complete it in 23:01. Very cool puzzle from EPH, many thanks for showing it here to BremSter!
Liked this puzzle; a sorta tricky break-in, but otherwise fairly straight forward logic. I like how the fog-of-war constraint sorta "guides" the solve.
I got the 3 in box 4 reasonably quickly, then stared at it for ages like a burke. Clever puzzle, but easier than my final time would have you believe..
This felt like it was a puzzle where you were very unlucky. You seemed to spot all the hard logic relatively easily but missed some of the easier things like some german whisper constraints. And I should stress that this isn't a criticism of your solving, we all miss things, its meant to be a compliment on you hitting all the harder stuff well. And regarding your comment on finding puzzles relaxing when ill - I suspect they probably would be more relaxing if you weren't recording! It was a very fun puzzle though, I hope you still enjoyed it at the end of the day and the little mistakes didn't detract from that!
solved in 33:04. it would've been faster but I was too hasty with the final steps and I made a mistake I had to backtrack on. the first half of clearing fog felt very simple thanks to how the properties of german whisper lines mix with your pencil marks to eliminate certain permutations of low and high digits. then the second half slowed down a bit, and took a bit more insight to spot those same kinds of tricks going on in the puzzle.
My previous comments were made using a damaged tablet, so it should say "Fog Puzzle #2, so named ..." I did edit the comment, but the bad Wi-Fi at worked seems to have scuttled that. By the way, I would love a video about cosmetic setting.
Thanks for solving For puzzle #2, so he!ed because it was my second fog puzzle. My first fog puzzle used a barely visible diagonal line, so it was not the best for submitting.
I'm not surprised it got lost, as it had a problem with the fog when I submitted it. My resubmission was kind of casual.
I'll try to be tighter with my rules in the future, although we have a few differing ideas about the best way to present them 😊.
Don't worry about how you solve any of my puzzles. I miss the most obvious things while testing.
I realized that many of my puzzles submitted to you are whispers based. I ought to diversify and avoid the whole 3 next to 8 business. Again, something I have done with my own puzzles. Actually, whispers into the fog are a bit more difficult than clear whispers.
Once again, I appreciate the very nice things you have said about my puzzles (and about me).
Even with explaining what you were doing, you solved this puzzle a lot faster than I did. You shouldn't let people who do it faster than you get you down.
Did you ever claim to be the best in the world?
No!
So quit worrying about how fast someone else does it and just enjoy the beauty of the puzzles.
Whoa! What a nice fog puzzle!!!
It is ok to miss things, I missed them all the time, but the thing is: when I miss something I can use your video to help me, but you can't use any video to help when you are kinda lost.
Super fun german whispers. Have a nice day!! 🐝
Bremster - it doesn’t matter if you miss what is seemingly obvious! You solve the puzzle eventually, you’re doing it on camera which the majority will never do and your videos are highly enjoyable!
Loads of this puzzle wasn't at all obvious
Thanks for being fallible to the point that I feel normal when I watch your channel and make my own mistakes too.
That happened to me countless time, after an hard deduction I get lost on the simple ones. But that's part of the solve experience too! Splendid puzzle and great solve!
Awesome puzzle! Fog and whispers are two of my favorite variants and this one was a pleasure to solve.
I do enjoy fog puzzles and I especially enjoyed this one. It was just the right amount of difficulty for me. Thank you!
It would have been a loss to not see this puzzle at all. So, just fine with all the struggles and missing the obvious.
One step to break in I made was thinking whether the 34s in r1c4 and r4c1 were a pair or the same digit, and thinking deeply about them reveals none of them can be 4, so my greatest pleasure was putting in two 3s in these cells at the same time, removing lots of fog.
In detail it's all about how a 49 pair can (or can't) be in box1, if you make any of the 34 cells in the neighbor boxes a 4. Also in conjunction with the white dot in box 2.
Very nice fog puzzle, they probably are my favourite variant.
Don't be too hard on yourself, BremSter, you did a fine solve, especially doing it live! Even with my solve, I still missed some things for a while and wasn't sure I'd make it through, but did and was able to complete it in 23:01. Very cool puzzle from EPH, many thanks for showing it here to BremSter!
Liked this puzzle; a sorta tricky break-in, but otherwise fairly straight forward logic. I like how the fog-of-war constraint sorta "guides" the solve.
This was a very nice puzzle. My favorite part was realizing that the low digit repeated 3 times on the line in b689, then seeing it had to be 1.
I got the 3 in box 4 reasonably quickly, then stared at it for ages like a burke. Clever puzzle, but easier than my final time would have you believe..
This felt like it was a puzzle where you were very unlucky. You seemed to spot all the hard logic relatively easily but missed some of the easier things like some german whisper constraints. And I should stress that this isn't a criticism of your solving, we all miss things, its meant to be a compliment on you hitting all the harder stuff well. And regarding your comment on finding puzzles relaxing when ill - I suspect they probably would be more relaxing if you weren't recording! It was a very fun puzzle though, I hope you still enjoyed it at the end of the day and the little mistakes didn't detract from that!
Excellent puzzle - solved in 21:21 time to watch Bremster solve!
49:14 for me. That was really enjoyable; thanks for sharing.
That took me the same time to solve as to bake a loaf of bread!
Nice puzzle. The beginning is a bit tricky, but after that it flows really nicely. Solved it in 22:57.
24:11, thank you!
solved in 33:04. it would've been faster but I was too hasty with the final steps and I made a mistake I had to backtrack on.
the first half of clearing fog felt very simple thanks to how the properties of german whisper lines mix with your pencil marks to eliminate certain permutations of low and high digits. then the second half slowed down a bit, and took a bit more insight to spot those same kinds of tricks going on in the puzzle.
Nice puzzle... done in 25 mins...
My previous comments were made using a damaged tablet, so it should say "Fog Puzzle #2, so named ..." I did edit the comment, but the bad Wi-Fi at worked seems to have scuttled that.
By the way, I would love a video about cosmetic setting.
at ~ @20:00
How did you miss the obvious thing and what was it ?
😀
I found this tough
33:26 for me
nice puzzle
24:45 ... not too hard once I got going and a very fun solve.
That was hard. Very narrow solve path. Not much fun.
AGWM34 - 2