The King James Version: Translating the World's Most Popular Book.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 เม.ย. 2020
  • The Holy Bible is the most read, and one of the most influential, books in world history. But the choice of what to include, and translating ancient words into modern languages, created many pitfalls, and even included a "wicked bible." The History Guy recalls the convoluted path from Galilee to English translations of the world's most popular book.
    This is original content based on research by The History Guy. Images in the Public Domain are carefully selected and provide illustration. As very few images of the actual event are available in the Public Domain, images of similar objects and events are used for illustration.
    You can purchase the Splattered Gingham bow tie worn in this episode at The Tie Bar:
    www.thetiebar.com/?...
    All events are portrayed in historical context and for educational purposes. No images or content are primarily intended to shock and disgust. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Non censuram.
    Find The History Guy at:
    Facebook: / thehistoryguyyt
    Patreon: / thehistoryguy
    Join the History Guy for history trivia at www.quizando.com/TheHistoryGuy
    The History Guy: History Deserves to Be Remembered is the place to find short snippets of forgotten history from five to fifteen minutes long. If you like history too, this is the channel for you.
    Subscribe for more forgotten history: / @thehistoryguychannel .
    Awesome The History Guy merchandise is available at:
    teespring.com/stores/the-hist...
    Script by HCW and RAC
    #history #thehistoryguy #bible

ความคิดเห็น • 3K

  • @NotThatBob
    @NotThatBob 4 ปีที่แล้ว +268

    When I saw the title, I thought you had walked into a hornet's nest of 'Biblical proportions'! Hahaha. But you handled this with a master's touch. Great job sir. Great job.

    • @paintedwings74
      @paintedwings74 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      He sure did--the difference between an approach to history based on evidence and the scientific method, versus "history" based on dogma and "faith." The history of the Christian religion, and the Jewish religion before it, is fascinating, and it's just as much of a mess as every other bunch of history.

    • @benjaminbrewer2569
      @benjaminbrewer2569 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That would be a locusts next. Thank you very much.

    • @NotThatBob
      @NotThatBob 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@joesguiltyguitar Nice song friend. Thanks for sharing.

    • @joesguiltyguitar
      @joesguiltyguitar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@NotThatBob thanks ...

  • @sortedsortof3474
    @sortedsortof3474 4 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    Martin Luther's translation had another effect and that was to standardize the many variations of the German language spoken in the different regions.

    • @joshduthie3401
      @joshduthie3401 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes. The King James has changed English too.

    • @TheDeepening718
      @TheDeepening718 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      "YOU TOO are the Son of God." -Jesus

    • @rsr789
      @rsr789 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another effect Martin Luther had, was that his book 'On the Jews and Their Lies' (Von den Jüden und iren Lügen) was the primary guide used by the Nazis for the Holocaust.

  • @Visitor2Earth
    @Visitor2Earth 4 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    Some years ago, I was visiting folks in a local nursing home as a volunteer Chaplain. One day a very sweet older lady saw my (Amplified Bible) I was carrying, and asked me what it was. I told her it was a newer translation that combines the different shades of meaning (of words) from the original languages. She then became quite upset, and very loudly and forcefully said "I use the King James Bible, and if it was good enough for Jesus to use when He was on Earth, then it's certainly good enough for ME"! Hey...it's a true story, and, I just agreed with the old Saint and went on my way. No need to upset her even more!

    • @Akula114
      @Akula114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      So funny! I related the same story elsewhere in this thread. You reacted in exactly the way Jesus would have... why argue and muddle up the peace and serenity she found in the KJV? Thanks for relating this story!

    • @SimonASNG
      @SimonASNG 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I have heard that statement also, but I can tell when someone is kidding.

    • @ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681
      @ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sadly, I have come across the same argument too. Except this woman was not dying at the moment, and could quite forcefully argue that god wrote the kjb originally, even the new testament, before the time of Jesus. In original english, which did not exist at the time and was then translated to greek. By the english, who didnt exist at the time.
      I have great respect fo people who help others, and just as great for people who do not forget common sense, and it is not many who can put their own sense of what helps others aside, and listen to their needs instead. I cant thats for certain. I can listen, but I cannot hurt myself in order to help.
      Anyway, Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?
      We can hope that god watches the watchmen, and thats good if they choose to listen.
      But since some wont, we cannot rely in their conscience. And same goes up the chain of command no matter how long we build it. So the answer has to be:
      "I do."
      We all have to take responsibility of the people around us.
      Though I believe the original meaning was: If watchmen break the law, the government is ultimatetely responsible for their actions.

    • @SimonASNG
      @SimonASNG 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681 you just didn't understand her argument. It was probably something like God is omniscient, omnipresent, outside of time, etc. If you believe in a God like that and believe that God inspired the original writers, then it would be logical to assume that he also inspired the translators and planned for all of that before the creation of the planet. You were in an argument where you either didn't agree on the underlying assumptions or didn't understand the semantics.

    • @ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681
      @ribbitgoesthedoglastnamehe4681 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SimonASNG
      Yes, it works because of power of delusion. I see it now.
      I found a good, reasonable, wise person who I found I could respect, and then you need to remind me all of you are just a bunch of psychos in disguise who cant handle that some of you are more idiots than others.
      Just fuck off, will you?

  • @NewTestamentDoc
    @NewTestamentDoc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    From a guy with a Ministerial Doctorate and great knowledge of Koine Greek, you did a great job on this historical piece . Love your channel for many other reasons as well.

    • @chrisfuller1268
      @chrisfuller1268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You studied Catholic propaganda, not the truth. Check out "Did the Catholic Church Give us the Bible" and its Bibliography for a starting point into the actual history of the Bible.

    • @shaneofnj
      @shaneofnj ปีที่แล้ว

      My latin and romance language skills are average. Is Koine Greek approachable to self teach?

    • @NewTestamentDoc
      @NewTestamentDoc ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shaneofnj yes, you can learn the alphabet and pronunciations in a couple of hours. Always easier with a classroom and professor . but in a class we could begin to decipher New Testament texts in 10-15 hrs.

    • @sharkydiver3900
      @sharkydiver3900 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Shane DeWitt Check out Mathew Black's text. It is what I would recommend if you are considering self learning. Also, A Readers' Greek New Testament is a must-have. Whatever you choose, get reading as soon as possible. The nuances will come with practice.

    • @rscott2247
      @rscott2247 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I gotta wonder how many times its been edited & reorganized by the church before and after King James ?

  • @Cadwaladr
    @Cadwaladr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +188

    I have a Geneva bible that was printed in 1608 (my grandma's cousin bought it in England back in the 50s for £7/10/-), so a lot of times when I want to look up a passage I look in that one first, then the KJV to see what the difference is. They are very similar.
    I actually have a whole collection of bibles, so if you ever need to swear on a stack of them, I have quite a stack.

    • @cavscout6b
      @cavscout6b 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That would be amazing.

    • @SisterShirley
      @SisterShirley 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cadwaladr-do you have a personal favorite?

    • @SisterShirley
      @SisterShirley 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Cadwaladr-Ever thought of doing your own TH-cam video showing and explaining the differences of your stack of bibles?
      I would not want to miss that

    • @cascorick8253
      @cascorick8253 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Cadwaladr what religion are you?

    • @Cadwaladr
      @Cadwaladr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@cascorick8253 none

  • @KManwarren
    @KManwarren 4 ปีที่แล้ว +843

    Whether people agree or not with everything here, I HOPE they at least recognize that you kept to your usual way and allowed the history to speak rather than your opinion. Well done.

    • @Call-me-Al
      @Call-me-Al 4 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      I mean, there isn't anything to agree/disagree about, is there? He just presented the facts as well as we know it. No? I'm an atheist, and I enjoyed this. I never felt he presented the KJV as the one true scripture, just explained its origins and use

    • @KManwarren
      @KManwarren 4 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      @@Call-me-Al I agree. He just let history speak. Sometimes people find videos on Christianity and the Bible as a way to sound off about their other disagreements.

    • @scotleoqueen704
      @scotleoqueen704 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @K Manwarren Well said, and ditto 😁

    • @glennso47
      @glennso47 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @A HA Sounds fair to me. It's interesting to see how things originated even though you don't agree with a given thing. I don't agree with progressivism but it's interesting to see how it works and how it started. Example: I was looking at a video from Hillsdale College about the beginning of Progressivism in the early 20th century and how it really got a foothold during the presidencies of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. I disagree with progressive thought but it was interesting to see how it started.

    • @bobhawkins2997
      @bobhawkins2997 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      K Manwarren - you are right. His presentation was quite fair and objective although I think he missed a few details. His description of the propagation of the scrolls was lightweight.

  • @alcoholfree6381
    @alcoholfree6381 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Spectacular episode! I’m a Christian and love anything about the Holy Bible! This is both educational and entertaining, thanks HG.

  • @bradbell3744
    @bradbell3744 4 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Very scholarly presentation. Quality!

  • @charliejohnson1937
    @charliejohnson1937 4 ปีที่แล้ว +132

    John Wycliffe's name lives on in the name of Wycliffe Bible Translators, an organization who''s goal is to translate the Bible into every language.

    • @mapleleaf0
      @mapleleaf0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      As does the name Tyndale in Tyndale House Publishers.

    • @Ggdivhjkjl
      @Ggdivhjkjl 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Both of which are pronounced with the "y" making a short "i" sound.

    • @mapleleaf0
      @mapleleaf0 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Ggdivhjkjl Agreed

    • @jimclark6256
      @jimclark6256 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wycliffe was burned to death. His bible was used to start the fire.

    • @joeschmoe1711
      @joeschmoe1711 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jimclark6256 I thought he was beheaded.

  • @leehaseley2164
    @leehaseley2164 4 ปีที่แล้ว +338

    This was a sensitive topic to talk about and I can only say that you did it with extreme impartiality and professionalism. Well done indeed History Guy.

    • @zeldabloom3582
      @zeldabloom3582 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Lee Haseley how sad a commentary that speaking of the Bible is a "sensitive topic" in our culture now. America was founded on Judeo-Christian morals & ancient republican ideals. BOTH are now out of fashion in our "progressive" society. We're living with the consequences, & they're not pretty.

    • @leehaseley2164
      @leehaseley2164 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@zeldabloom3582 although I am not an American, allow me to say that you put that point superbly well.

    • @ryanvictoria6206
      @ryanvictoria6206 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I miss the America of the Andy Griffith Show. From Mayberry to Sodom and Gommorah in just 50 yrs.😪

    • @strangelee4400
      @strangelee4400 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@zeldabloom3582
      What are they? These 'Judean Christian morals'? No one ever says what they actually are.

    • @davidm5707
      @davidm5707 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@strangelee4400 They usually wind up to be their version of Christianity.
      They throw in "Judeo" so as not to offend the Jews, but don't really care about their tradition.

  • @ixobelledotcom
    @ixobelledotcom 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is such an awesome channel. Not religious myself, but can appreciate this from a historical perspective. As I sit here int he morning, drinking my coffee, I wonder if "The History of Coffee" is worth remembering? :) It's something I take for granted (like recent entries on TP and Soap), cant imagine a world where it isn't the first thing I reach for, and take for granted that it's 'just there'. Love the channel, thanks for all the hard work you put into these!

  • @InGratiaDei
    @InGratiaDei 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A favorite Tyndale quote: “Euangelio (that we cal gospel) is a greke word, and signifyth good, mery, glad and joyful tydings, that maketh a mannes hert glad, and maketh hym synge, daunce and leepe for joye.”

    • @scorpion19142001
      @scorpion19142001 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Speak real English. Can't read trash!!

    • @InGratiaDei
      @InGratiaDei 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@scorpion19142001 It's anything but trash and it's made all the more delightful in its older spelling.

    • @scorpion19142001
      @scorpion19142001 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@InGratiaDei Delightful to you! I live with Modern English I don't understand the scripture of "Old" English!!!!

    • @InGratiaDei
      @InGratiaDei 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@scorpion19142001 I've read most of the major English translations of the Bible, and I come back to the KJV. There are some minor issues with the translation, but no other quite captures the majesty of Scripture like it does.

    • @blessedamerican3541
      @blessedamerican3541 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@scorpion19142001 get educated

  • @donphillips5957
    @donphillips5957 4 ปีที่แล้ว +131

    To add perspective, ownership of Mao's LRB was almost mandatory in China during his reign

    • @rooster1012
      @rooster1012 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Same for the Bible at most Churches, with many requiring you to buy "Their Bible" and forbidding you to bring another into "Their Church" and as a child from a poor family it was a burden along with them wanting money handed to them in a basket 3 times and shaming you if you had no more to give.

    • @hiramlawson2824
      @hiramlawson2824 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      He forgot Euclid's geometry... Which is cut up and put inside of math books under other author's names.

    • @craigcrawford6595
      @craigcrawford6595 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Don Philips, you ever read Mao's poems? His poems are completely antithetical to how he lived, kind of ironic...

    • @tobybartels8426
      @tobybartels8426 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@hiramlawson2824 : If you're going to count books based on the Bible, that cut up and rearrange the ideas in it, then the Bible's numbers go up as well. Mathematics obviously owes a lot to Euclid, but modern books take a different approach.

    • @stephenvince9994
      @stephenvince9994 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Another perspective of course is that the LRB directly contributed to the death of about 12 million Chinese. As with most communist regimes, if you didnt agree with the idea you were not required. Thinking about it, that certainly is history which deserves to be remembered.

  • @johntaylor-lo8qx
    @johntaylor-lo8qx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Love how your videos are getting a little longer, allowing much more facts, and just a great channel. Ty history guy, and wife 🙂

    • @PurpleObscuration
      @PurpleObscuration 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is only one Christian religion, Catholicism but there more than 40K denominations.

    • @gilbertbrewer269
      @gilbertbrewer269 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Buck ey eee isn’t that good one day

    • @prepperjonpnw6482
      @prepperjonpnw6482 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Buck ey that’s 40k “protestant” denominations. And you are correct that Catholicism is the true Church started by Christ on the “rock” which is Peter the first Pope.
      Cheers

  • @envitech02
    @envitech02 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I remember the KJV Bible had a lot of Thou and Thee, that a teenager I was downright confused. Later I had the NIV and that was more contemporary and much easier to understand.

  • @LindysEpiphany
    @LindysEpiphany 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    That was a wonderful history lesson. Thank you History Guy!

  • @IamMe10-4
    @IamMe10-4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    William Tyndale was an amazing man. He was the first to seek to translate from the original languages to english. He was successful and smuggled bibles into England. He wanted the people to be able to read and not just the church. He was captured and imprisoned for doing so, he was strangled then burned. 30,000 copies of his translated bible were available around his time of death.

    • @avislussier1111
      @avislussier1111 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tyndale was murdered for doing what God told him to do, the 54 scholars finished his God inspired work. KJV is not copyrighted, ALL other versions are. ie: For money.

    • @TorianTammas
      @TorianTammas 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The original koine Greek version is free.

    • @TorianTammas
      @TorianTammas 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@avislussier1111 King James Bible was produced for King James as the name says. It is quite far away from the koine Greek original.

    • @lawrencek1900
      @lawrencek1900 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      KJV is copyrighted, held by Cambridge University, Wycliffe did some translating but from the Vulgate

  • @Zombeegun
    @Zombeegun 4 ปีที่แล้ว +186

    I like how he had to stifle a laugh when he said the 3rd most read book is the Harry Potter series! lol

    • @Bronco541
      @Bronco541 4 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Theres more and better moral lessons in Harry Potter than the bible...

    • @greatdaneacdc
      @greatdaneacdc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Zombeegun Yeah ! Like with all of them I thought Most read ? I don’t think so ! Most purchase or giving away ....Yes!

    • @bitsaurus
      @bitsaurus 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      @@Bronco541 like you've read either of them...

    • @allankoivu3263
      @allankoivu3263 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Also more factual truth in the Harry Potter books....

    • @alexandercarder2281
      @alexandercarder2281 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      CallMeBronco There are some great moral lessons in Harry Potter series and I love fantasy more than any other genre. But Harry Potter series doesn’t deal with the problem that all humanity faces and that is the problem of Sin. The bible has in its 66 books the answer for every problem we face as men and woman who are made in God’s image and likeness.

  • @stevenjp7155
    @stevenjp7155 4 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    At the risk of showing my age, I enjoy this series as it brings to mind Paul Harvey, The Rest of the Story. Very well written and presented succinctly, The History Guy elucidates snapshots of history which are very interesting.

    • @fauxhound5061
      @fauxhound5061 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are an elder. Something that , at the least, demand respect

  • @gerrye114
    @gerrye114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You did a fantastic job of keeping to the facts of what we know about the text without straying into beliefs. A rare treat these days

    • @toosiyabrandt8676
      @toosiyabrandt8676 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      HI
      That, is what I would call ' Fence sitting'. Non committal. THE fact, that the Bible brings to the fore, [and which is the reason of it's proliferation into many languages,] is that Jesus of Nazareth was the One promised in the Old Testament to be our scapegoat , commissioned from the Beginning to reinstate us after the Fall in the Garden. If you think talking about this 'Fact' without 'Straying into beliefs' is some kind of achievement, then the Bible might as well be a laundry list, for all the good it has done you! Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua.

    • @gerrye114
      @gerrye114 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@toosiyabrandt8676 don't mistake my praise for the translation of a book for fence sitting on the truth of the claims within the book.
      Most of the prophecies about the Jesus character come from Matthew. Most of those are taken out of the context of the Tora, were obvious retcons, or were even prophecies based on a passage translated in the wrong language.
      Do I think that there was a first century rabbi who founded an apocalyptic death cult? Yes.
      Do I think that the gospels accurately describe that guy's life? About as well as Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter does.

  • @awizardalso
    @awizardalso 4 ปีที่แล้ว +230

    I did find that one of the 10 Commandments was improperly translated. In my KJV it reads "Thou shall not kill'.
    In biblical Hebrew, as in English, killing (harag) and murder (ratzah) are two different words with two very different moral connotations, and the commandment uses the Hebrew word ratzah, which means that the proper translation of the commandment from Hebrew into English is, "Thou shalt not murder."

    • @rickintexas1584
      @rickintexas1584 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      awizardalso - that is an important distinction.

    • @jeffreywj7773
      @jeffreywj7773 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I am going to look into that. That would indeed be a significant translation difference from how the Ten Commandments were presented to be me in my youth. Thank you.

    • @mrsaturdaynightspecial3055
      @mrsaturdaynightspecial3055 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      It's not a transaction error.
      It was done to keep the peasants from rebelling.

    • @jafinch78
      @jafinch78 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seems obvious you'd think for survival since pathogens, plants and wild or domesticated animals specifically bred for survival to be harvested ethically are in fact killed. Furthermore, self defense of the herd typically allows for killing in self defense of invasive nuisances and imminent threats... though instead of deductive or inductive reasoning to determine... I guess secular laws needed to clarify since some of the clarification might not be obvious to those that do not read or comprehend well what they've read... or I guess the desperate false pretense few who intentionally rebel to justify their crimes.

    • @GaveMeGrace1
      @GaveMeGrace1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      “Concurred,” says the former wizard...

  • @martinstent5339
    @martinstent5339 4 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    History guy, there are more people who deserve to be remembered: The Lollards.
    John Wycliffe’s bible did not exist in a vacuum, it had to be copied and distributed throughout the land. There was a small army of helpers who copied his bible in secret and were often martyred as a result. The Lollards walked the land (England) preaching in English from Wycliffe’s bible. If it weren’t for the Lollards, Wycliffe’s bible would not have survived.

    • @sharonshookup
      @sharonshookup 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      There is still an organization today called Wycliffe Bible translators, whose goal it has been to translate the Bible into every language and dialect.

    • @martinstent5339
      @martinstent5339 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      If you look at the 12 conclusions of the Lollards (from 1392), they still look pretty modern. The catholic church would do well to go back and consider their validity.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelve_Conclusions_of_the_Lollards
      The first conclusion asserts that the English Church has become too involved in affairs of temporal power, led by the bad example of the Church of Rome.
      The second conclusion asserts that the ceremonies used for the ordination of priests and bishops are without scriptural basis or precedent.
      The third conclusion asserts that the practice of clerical celibacy has encouraged sodomy among the clergy.
      The fourth conclusion asserts that the doctrine of transubstantiation leads to idolatrous worship of everyday objects (the communion wafers).
      The fifth conclusion asserts that the exorcisms and hallowings carried out by priests are a sort of witchcraft and are incompatible with Christian theology.
      The sixth conclusion asserts that it is inappropriate for men who hold high office in the Church to simultaneously hold positions of great temporal power.
      The seventh conclusion asserts that prayers for the souls of specific individual deceased persons is uncharitable, since it implicitly excludes all the other blessed dead who are not being prayed for, and that the practice of requesting prayers for the dead by making financial contributions is a sort of bribery that corrupts the Church.
      The eighth conclusion asserts that the practices of pilgrimage and the veneration of relics at best are ineffectual for spiritual merit and at worst approach idolatry in their worship of created objects.
      The ninth conclusion asserts that the practice of confession for the absolution of sins is blasphemous, because only God has the power to forgive sins, and because if priests did have that power it would be cruel and uncharitable of them to withhold that forgiveness from anyone in the world, even if they refused to confess.
      The tenth conclusion asserts that Christians should refrain from warfare, and in particular that wars given religious justifications, such as crusades, are blasphemous because Christ taught men to love and forgive their enemies.
      The eleventh conclusion asserts that women in the Church who have made vows of celibacy are having sex, becoming pregnant, and then seeking abortions to conceal the fact that they have broken their vows, a practice which the text strongly condemns.
      The twelfth conclusion asserts that Christians are devoting too much of their energy and attention to the making of beautiful objects of art and craft, and that people should simplify their lives and renew their devotion to godliness by refraining from unnecessary endeavors.

    • @rooster1012
      @rooster1012 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      There are millions of people that deserve to be remembered in history, the man has 10 minutes to give us a brief snippet of the past.

    • @k.c1126
      @k.c1126 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@rooster1012 Hopefully he has years to come to make many more of these 10 minute videos ....

    • @WildWestGal
      @WildWestGal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Martin Stent Maybe you didn't notice? The title of the video is The King James Version: Translating the World's Most Popular Book. The Lollards didn't translate anything. They used Wycliffe's work. There's only so much that can be presented in 10 minutes, assuming THG is going to stay on topic.

  • @davidlewis6464
    @davidlewis6464 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m seriously impressed that you picked up on the existence and importance of ‘Yr Beibl Cymreig’ to the survival (and now thriving) of my second language and my mother’s first language.

  • @billd.iniowa2263
    @billd.iniowa2263 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thank you History Guy. You handled this subject with your usual tact and unbiased approach.

  • @thomasvansant6246
    @thomasvansant6246 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    Exceptional Essay on what even today is a controversial subject. Once again my hats off to the History Guy!

  • @jakedee4117
    @jakedee4117 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    That's good stuff History Guy, there aren't many people bold enough to take on a subject as tricky as The Bible. Kudos.

    • @losttribe3001
      @losttribe3001 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bart Erhman, Milwaukee Atheist, Richard Carrier come to mind and are more academic. They are out there.

    • @laurenceelisha689
      @laurenceelisha689 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      A Lost One Q? What makes you ‘ A LostOne?? Being raised basically an academic I would trust far less those with an academic point of view. I was noticeably changed at 21 years and have struggled to not try to find answers thru an academic approach. It has to be spiritually imparted. It really is the only way. At 57 I am still challenged in this area. Is. 57:10/Dan 9:13/Hos.10:13/Amos 4:6 are my personal chain reference about reliance on what I know and perceive over Jesus’ word(s).

  • @djolley61
    @djolley61 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    I grew up reading the King James version and love the sound of the language. I can't imagine reading the Christmas story from Luke from any other version.

    • @malleusdei1520
      @malleusdei1520 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Douay-Rheims is better, tho

    • @toughguyno.1599
      @toughguyno.1599 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah, I've always liked the King James Version.

    • @RalphReagan
      @RalphReagan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Indeed

    • @nimrodquimbus912
      @nimrodquimbus912 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @djolley61 Do You know why that is? Joh 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
      Joh 10:28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.

    • @AndrewEddie
      @AndrewEddie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The problem is the English, unlike Latin, is still a living and fluid language. Another problem is that, for example in the Greek parts of the New Testament, there sometimes aren't 1-to-1 mappings from the Greek to English (or Hebrew, or Aramaic for that matter). You'll also got figure of speeches that a first century Jew or Roman would have just "picked up", but have long since been lost to us in the 21st century.
      The KJV falls into the family of literal translations. That is, it tries to translate the text word-for-word, and do it's best to arrange those words in English as best it can. And the problem there is it's using a version of English that is well over 500 years old. English has moved on a lot in the mean time.
      In contrast, something like the New Living Translation is a dynamic equivalent. It's trying to translate the text thought-for-though so that the modern reader is able to more easily pick up on the the spirit of what, for example, Paul might been writing.
      Then you have another type of translation called the paraphrase, like The Message. I like referring to it "sometimes" just to help get a better perspective on how the original authors might have written the letters in a more contemporary setting. You wouldn't, however, base your theology on a paraphrase. For that you really need to study Greek and Hebrew :)

  • @diandoxlee7346
    @diandoxlee7346 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This history guy will always be remembered by me.🤓 My favourite subject in school was history. And this channel actually show stories that are important but not remembered because it wasn't famous or notorious. Or let's say, only the victors write their history.. More knowledge, more power!

  • @Worthrhetime
    @Worthrhetime 4 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    Another presentation of ... Biblical proportions.

    • @Taistelukalkkuna
      @Taistelukalkkuna 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wasn´t complete Hebrew to me.

    • @THE-HammerMan
      @THE-HammerMan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Verily verily I say to you that was quite good!

    • @Whitpusmc
      @Whitpusmc 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ouch.....

    • @Cujo2447
      @Cujo2447 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're preaching to the choir on that one.

    • @Saint_nobody
      @Saint_nobody 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      (Facepalm) your pun was God awful.

  • @thgenral
    @thgenral 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent! Thank you for this discussion, very enlightening.

  • @casey8899
    @casey8899 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love The History Guy! Some of your topics I am in to, others moderately but its ALWAYS interesting and I just love it! Thank you for posting this video. I graduated from a Bible College and church history was one of my favorite things to study and love your historical approach to and your history on the King James Bible! Sometimes people talk about this stuff with a selfish preachy purpose but you were thoroughly, accurately, and educationally Historical without coming across like you were trying to preach to us. Everything lined up with what I have studied and I just think this is a great video anyone from any faith or belief, believer or not, can watch and listen to and just learn about the history of the King James Bible. Thanks!

  • @jgibson7321
    @jgibson7321 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “Raise challenges,” you nailed it. Thank you for eloquently stringing this together.

  • @samwilliams8327
    @samwilliams8327 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Love these videos. Thanks for helping the lockdown be less boring. I want to know about the octagonal Pewter plate behind you

  • @Call-me-Al
    @Call-me-Al 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This was great, but much shorter than I had expected. Thank you!

    • @d.e.b.b5788
      @d.e.b.b5788 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      It's the readers digest condensed version!

    • @Call-me-Al
      @Call-me-Al 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@d.e.b.b5788 good comparison!

  • @jostallworth3087
    @jostallworth3087 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now that was quite a superior & timely episode. Many thanks!

  • @raycruickshank4928
    @raycruickshank4928 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you, Lance! Very enjoyable episode.

  • @danielhayton9438
    @danielhayton9438 4 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    The Grandfather of a friend who came from the Icelandic community in Winnipeg learnt his English from the King James Bible!

    • @natewatl9423
      @natewatl9423 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Use of the Bible as a learning tool four new languages has been often used because familiarity with the context aids the learner.

    • @ErikNilsen1337
      @ErikNilsen1337 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That's fascinating! Did his English develop a 17th century flavor?

    • @k.c1126
      @k.c1126 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Billions of English speakers have learned to read from the Bible over the centuries. It's one of the reasons it continues to have influence even in modern English - so many allusions are embedded in our everyday speech, to the point where we don't even recognize they ARE allusions ....

    • @rabbi120348
      @rabbi120348 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @K. C -- You're right -- we have the illusion that they're modern figures of speech.

    • @Simonsvids
      @Simonsvids 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Verily I sayeth unto you, that doth be very interesting!

  • @malicant123
    @malicant123 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Minor point of interest. If you're ever in Dublin, you can visit Marsh's Library and see the first copy of the Bible translated into Irish.

  • @deetrvl4life875
    @deetrvl4life875 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is a binge day for me on your channel. Well done on this one!

  • @jeffhoward553
    @jeffhoward553 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much, I try to watch your videos all the time, don’t know how I miss this, thank you for time and videos

  • @larryperez5761
    @larryperez5761 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Well done sir.

  • @darthcat6337
    @darthcat6337 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    While many wish to discuss the content of their beliefs it seems due respect must be given to The History Guy And Gal for the tremendous research and Love that went into this one episode.
    A dangerous tightrope act they took to present this so that we the listener would be enriched, rather than alarmed over a sacrilegious comment.
    Well done, for this too is History That Deserves To Be Remembered.
    When out in southern California next time visit The Huntington Library for a look at Gutenberg Bible.

  • @jeffreysouthflorida7008
    @jeffreysouthflorida7008 4 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Left out of this history is the immeasurable contribution of St. Jerome, a doctor of the Catholic Church. Without St. Jerome’s monumental work, the religious scholars of King James would likely have had very little text to translate.

    • @SpectatorAlius
      @SpectatorAlius 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      St. Jerome was not completely left out. Considering that the topic of this video is translation into English, I think he got quite good enough exposure in it.

    • @peterfichera2027
      @peterfichera2027 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmmm....not really--the main sources were Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek--though they probably did study St. J's remarkable work....

    • @jeffreysouthflorida7008
      @jeffreysouthflorida7008 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Peter Fichera St. Jerome’s translation of the Old Testament and at least the four Gospels of the New Testament was used for over 1,000 years. Council of Trent recognized the Vulgate’s significance at least 40 years before the King James Bible was completed. Protesters of the Catholic Church (Calvin, for example) freely quoted the Vulgate. To say St. Jerome’s work was not a main source for King James’ religious scholars during the late 16th and early 17th centuries is to misread history.

    • @peterfichera2027
      @peterfichera2027 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@jeffreysouthflorida7008But the council of Tret was Catholic, and, at that point, England hadn't been, for quite a while. Calvin was Swiss, not English. There had already been about 2 1/2 translation into English--Tyndale was killed before he could complete his, at that time, and the KJV EXPLICITLY states that it was translated from the original tongues. They also acknowledge that they consulted previous translations, but that may only really reference Tyndale/Wycliffe e.g., Tyndale's translation of the first line of Genesis: ""In the Beginning God created Heaven and Earth." The KJV merely inserts a couple of articles which aren't there in the Hebrew, since, as is the case for Latin, Hebrew has no articles.That's why those words are italicized in the KJV.
      Now, don't get me wrong, the Vulgate is a monumental and impressive achievement, but translating from Greek to Latin adds a lot of noise; Greek is a terribly exact and precise language, like German on steroids, Latin, not so much; many words can be ambiguous; probably where we get the idea that Eve got into trouble for eating an apple--the word for 'evil' is spelled the same way. Worse, the Old Testament he worked from was, itself, a translation, from Hebrew, which is even worse than Latin--just as an example, 'YoM", which KJV always seems to translate as 'day'--and the Vulgate and Septuagint do the equivalent--actually an mean ANY fixed period of time; hence: "A day unto the Lord is as a thousand years" (Or, for that matter, 2 billion).(or, almost as long as some of my posts seem to get to).
      On the other hand, maybe they /should/ have paid more attention to the Vulgate at times--Whereas the KJV says the heavenly host sang "Glory to God in the highest, andpeace on Earth, God will towards men", the Vulgates "Gloria in exchelcis Deo, et in Terra pax hominibus bone voluntatis"--'Glory to God in the Highest, and on Earth peace to men of good will" seems a better rendering of the Greek, which I shall not even attempt to render in Latin characters....

    • @peterfichera2027
      @peterfichera2027 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jeffreysouthflorida7008 Exact numbers I don't know, but there must have been quite a few; Tyndall, for one, had a copy, and he was a comparatively low-level cleric. If they'd been that rare, only the archbishops & such would have had one--even if they couldn't read them; status symbols, don't you know.And let's face it, the KJV folks would only have needed one--unlike NT manuscripts, the Hebrew OT manuscripts are remarkably consistent.

  • @jorgenskyt
    @jorgenskyt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is really an astonishing video with a humongous amount of details and references. I have to see this a number of times and spread it among my friends in the protestant church. Very interesting! Thank you!

  • @hellavadeal
    @hellavadeal 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    You cannot understand a book like that without the cultural context it was written in.

    • @martymcmannis9121
      @martymcmannis9121 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The holy spirit interpretation is all I need.

    • @crossconnectsitservices894
      @crossconnectsitservices894 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You can have some understanding, but to have the best understanding, context is key.
      For example, I Peter talks about the relationship between husband and wife. It is often derided as putting the husband above the wife in importance, but the context was Roman law that did that, and Peter wrote that she is a fellow heir of the grace of life.

    • @g.alistar7798
      @g.alistar7798 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      To the natural man (unbeliever) the Word of God is foolishness, but to those with faith, it is the power of God!

    • @wlewisiii
      @wlewisiii 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@martymcmannis9121 That heresy has ratfucked many people and places over the centuries.

    • @amercyreceived
      @amercyreceived 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wlewisiii obviously your a idiot

  • @davidcarter1942
    @davidcarter1942 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    As a Christian, I appreciate your objective approach on such a charged subject.

    • @petersack5074
      @petersack5074 ปีที่แล้ว

      QUOTE, FOR US, JOHN 3:13........you don't believe this one, either !

    • @jarrettesselman8144
      @jarrettesselman8144 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@petersack5074 no one has gone into heaven, except for the one that came down from heaven, the son of man.

  • @sidvich
    @sidvich 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Episode, keep'em comming

  • @nonnonbutlove1642
    @nonnonbutlove1642 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative thanks for sharing.

  • @lesahenderson7365
    @lesahenderson7365 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    WOW❗️Thank you so very much!!!

  • @4fanintexas
    @4fanintexas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    History Guy, for a 12-minute video this is exceptionally well done, as usual. I was a little leery when I saw the topic but just had to watch. I am a seminary-educated Christian, a former pastor, and current military and civilian chaplain. I am a history nut and have studied this topic thoroughly. I appreciate your emphasis on historical facts and the way you avoid getting into the weeds of theological debate. So many people have very strong feelings and opinions on this topic and you navigated it with professionalism and class. Well done sir. May God continue to bless your efforts as you educate the masses about "history that deserves to be remembered."

  • @ronriesinger7755
    @ronriesinger7755 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A fair summary of the history of English Bible translation. The shear variety of your subjects continues to impress!

  • @jpwilliams6926
    @jpwilliams6926 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was an excellent (!) summary of such a complex story. Well done indeed.

  • @valgalloway6914
    @valgalloway6914 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The KJV includes some of the most beautiful phrases in the English language - and they are mostly taken from William Tyndale's version. He is greatly underrated as a contributor to the richness of our literary heritage.

  • @deandupont5503
    @deandupont5503 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    "The meek shall inherit the earth."
    The meek are contesting the will.

    • @rodneyspider9452
      @rodneyspider9452 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Meek is misunderstood today. Better word is steadfast

    • @BoopShooBee
      @BoopShooBee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I understand "the meek" to mean the humble. Some understand it as shy.
      Whatever, being humble or shy doesn't mean you aren't strong.

    • @renaissanceman4054
      @renaissanceman4054 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/SIexc-_q1s0/w-d-xo.html

    • @erichodge567
      @erichodge567 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      "The meek shall inherit the Earth, but not the mineral rights." - J. Paul Getty, oil millionaire.

    • @rodneyspider9452
      @rodneyspider9452 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@erichodge567 Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition

  • @cedricgist7614
    @cedricgist7614 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks! I've been following you for years and enjoying your research, content, and presentation - and your passion for all the stories you share. Over the years, I've desired to say, "Thanks," in a more substantive way. This is just a token of my appreciation.

  • @TheAmazingAdventuresOfMiles
    @TheAmazingAdventuresOfMiles 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Superb research and presentation as always, you are consistently brilliant. I actually live just around the corner from where the Bible was translated into Welsh, it's a lovely old farm house.

  • @GaveMeGrace1
    @GaveMeGrace1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you- as I understand it, one of the reasons that Doctor Martin Luther had access to all those Greek manuscripts in Germany, includes the many Byzantine brides (royal & noble) who married into noble German households; that brought their own Greek Bibles with them.
    Citation: class notes (from memory)
    Jay Thompson, PhD.
    Professor of History Faith Evangelical Seminary & College (now University)
    Author of “A Tale of Five Cities.”

    • @fantasia55
      @fantasia55 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hamlet Fortinbras That’s interesting.

    • @danieldoherty5034
      @danieldoherty5034 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope. He used the Greek version of Erasmus.

  • @TheEulerID
    @TheEulerID 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Quite apart from matters of accuracy, the King James version is a supreme work of English literature. The language, and the phraseology is from a time when English reached its aesthetic peak. This was, after all, the time of Shakespeare and has left us with phrases that have rung through the centuries. The vividness of the language is a contrast with the plodding prose of more recent, earnest and literal modern versions.
    Of course, the King James version was a collective effort, but it was not the work of bureaucrats. It was the work of people with poetry in their soul, albeit owing so much to William Tyndale who was condemned and killed as a heretic.

  • @markpaul8178
    @markpaul8178 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    HISTORY GUY,you are the best in history scholars because you cover everything in history, while every edition is superb.

  • @NavigatEric
    @NavigatEric ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Well done Sir, on a very delicate topic...

  • @vespelian5274
    @vespelian5274 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I was in an old bookshop in Dartmouth, Devon in the UK in 1978. I was young and used to atract the sort of intresting people who are all dead now. The proprietor came up and started tralking of his adventures in the RAF in Egypt before the Second World War. How they flew out to St Katherine's monastry and the monks showed them their ancient library, flicking through the priceless tomes as though they were paperbacks. A real Boys-Own tale. I never forgot it.
    Later in the same year I took up drinking in the pubs and met a man who'd served in the Royal Tank Regiment in the ealry 1920s. There was a man called Ross, whom everybody knew by sight, and they knew his real name was T.E Lawrence, famous as Lawrence of Arabia.

    • @laurenceelisha689
      @laurenceelisha689 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Vespelian -Wow great tale!!

    • @Simonsvids
      @Simonsvids 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A very very tall tale considering Lawrence died in 1935. You must have a nose like Pinocchio!

    • @laurenceelisha689
      @laurenceelisha689 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Simon Jones Hmmm I reread the story. He didn’t say HE met TE Lawrence; he said he talked with a man that had.

    • @Simonsvids
      @Simonsvids 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@laurenceelisha689 Ah yes. Thanks for pointing that out. Interesting story then.

    • @vespelian5274
      @vespelian5274 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Simonsvids Before making comments it's always best to read the post properly before hand.

  • @peterkizer6163
    @peterkizer6163 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As a devout Roman Catholic, I greatly appreciate your (very short) history of the Bible. Again, well done.

    • @fireballxl-5748
      @fireballxl-5748 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      As a foolish man, believing in the traditions of men rather than the word of God, you have a problem. Most of what you believe is are lies.

  • @user-vm5ud4xw6n
    @user-vm5ud4xw6n 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very enjoyable lesson. My appreciation for history has increased as it always does when I listen in!

  • @seanklay1388
    @seanklay1388 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well presented as always.

  • @justnotg00d
    @justnotg00d 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    And from the original King James Version, Exodus 6:3, Psalm 83:18 and others have the name of God as Jehovah. Coins minted for the Crusades have the Latin version of Jehovah spelled with an I, as there is no J in Latin. In the back of the King James Version that I have, it is explained that the name of God, Jehovah, was "substituted" with the title God and Lord. Yes, history does deserve to be remembered, as does the real name of God, Jehovah.

  • @JohnToddTheOriginal
    @JohnToddTheOriginal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Heard them mention you on AFR yesterday. They loved this video and recommended people come to your channel and watch this video and subscribe!

    • @nicholasdalli6303
      @nicholasdalli6303 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      American Family Radio? Is that the AFR you speak of? Because from the list of AFR institutions I found on Wikipedia that is the only one I could see him being mentioned on.

  • @BigPete7407
    @BigPete7407 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well done sir, as always. Thank you.

  • @TheOdieD3
    @TheOdieD3 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man! That was great! It feeds in to the youth group lesson I have coming up. Thanks for a grand resource!

  • @SaykhelRachmones-um1no
    @SaykhelRachmones-um1no 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Every bible translation is an interpretation. Reading and understanding in the original tongue is vitally important to understanding the bible personally; otherwise, one must rely on others.

    • @marbleman52
      @marbleman52 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Saykhel Rachmones....I agree, and this is why every Christian and any other student of the Christian Bible should have a concordance handy and do their own word studies. The KJV scholars did a good job with the translations, but not a 'perfect' job. For example: The KJV says in Psalm 8:5, in regard to Man: " For You have made him a little lower than the angels...". When you look up the word 'angels' in the concordance ( I use the Strong's Exhaustive Concordance), it is a Hebrew word ( # 430 in the Hebrew part of the concordance ), which is 'Elohim', which is the plural form of God...Gods. I think that the scholars may have thought it almost blasphemous to put Man on such a close level with God, so they changed the translated word to say 'angels'. It is only when one starts digging into the Hebrew and Aramaic words for the Old Testament , and Greek for the New testament ( primarily Greek, but remember that many scriptures from the Old Testament are spoken about in the N.T. ), that a much richer and deeper understanding of the scriptures can be had.

  • @Oxnate
    @Oxnate 4 ปีที่แล้ว +87

    "Thou shalt commit adultery." Well okay then.

    • @TheHistoryGuyChannel
      @TheHistoryGuyChannel  4 ปีที่แล้ว +61

      WICKED!!!!

    • @richd5476
      @richd5476 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Commonplace nowadays....

    • @bigblue6917
      @bigblue6917 4 ปีที่แล้ว +32

      Well ar least he was not coveting his neighbours ox.

    • @BHuang92
      @BHuang92 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@TheHistoryGuyChannel
      There is a copy of the Wicked Bible that is up for sale as of 2020 for the price of $99,500.

    • @rubberneck2855
      @rubberneck2855 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Of all the things to get wrong. Funny though.

  • @dhession64
    @dhession64 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent installment, sir.

  • @dave-in-nj9393
    @dave-in-nj9393 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice approach and nicely done.

  • @robbicu
    @robbicu 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Really good deep dive! It was my understanding, and you did touch on it briefly, that the KJ version was to promote the authority of the King, while rather suppressing an opposing viewpoint.

  • @richardmcleod5967
    @richardmcleod5967 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The King's James Bible so well known to all of us is the one that I prefer, primarily because it is the Bible I first used and memorized as a child. I can't say you and your, but prefer Thee and Thou simply because it sounds more reverential than the common language used in say "Good News for Modern Man". I can't say the others are wrong, just that this is the version I prefer.

  • @joesguiltyguitar
    @joesguiltyguitar 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    the way you tell this is well spoken...tell it as is , well done history guy... bless you

  • @davidsradioroom9678
    @davidsradioroom9678 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for a most informative video.

  • @scheimong
    @scheimong 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Second place was Quotations of Chairman Mao. Haha, didn't see that coming

    • @TheMotorick
      @TheMotorick 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Sold to the people at the point of a rifle.

    • @bradkay4794
      @bradkay4794 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@TheMotorick I suppose that is somewhat different than selling the Bible under threats of eternal damnation in hell. It also seems the Inquisition was quite effective.

    • @cavscout888
      @cavscout888 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Probably required reading in China, who has a lot of people. Also... could be fake numbers generated by the Chinese Communist Party, since you can never trust them.

    • @Paul020253
      @Paul020253 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      During the 6os it was given away by the Chinese Embassy in London. All you had to do was ask!!!

    • @bradkay4794
      @bradkay4794 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@cavscout888 like you can trust the current u.s. government?

  • @bigblue6917
    @bigblue6917 4 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    One of the interesting things about King Alfred and the bible is that because he was having difficulty learning Latin he had made notes in old English. The interesting part is that he wrote using runes which had previously been thought to have been only used for inscriptions and not everyday use.

    • @welshpete12
      @welshpete12 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Are you sure ? I would very much like to see your references ! If this is so it is of great importance .

    • @welshpete12
      @welshpete12 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just spoke to my old Professor on the phone, he says this is not so !

    • @TorianTammas
      @TorianTammas 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why should some 16th century Scottish King write in runes?

  • @skyfacer9626
    @skyfacer9626 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is really a pleasure to listen to. The History Guy 'spells' out the subject very clearly.

  • @TermiteUSA
    @TermiteUSA 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    H.G., thanks for another good one.
    Hope you and yours are safe and well.

  • @mttrnx
    @mttrnx 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love how he laughs when he is mentioning the Harry Potter series.

  • @laurenceelisha689
    @laurenceelisha689 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Brave and courageous History Guy. I bet you are fun at family gatherings! Lol. I have to commend you for presenting a truly controversial subject, (although not to me, I’m convinced ). My eyes bugged out that you tackled it. I was tracing through my memory about what I had previously read or heard to compare and even contradict if necessary. I think concerning the KJV more time could have been spent on William Tyndale and his enormous contribution to this version as the KJV team of “Secretaries “ used much of his work in the final version. And some time on this team of ‘Secretaries’ that devoted their lives at the time to complete it. Maybe separate histories to explore later. A very challenging topic. I do appreciate your zeal and style and presentation. Thank you also for ramping up your output during these challenging times.

  • @laurakuhn8743
    @laurakuhn8743 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I remember an assignment in theology about how words change over time. mr. History guy I am putting this out after 20 seconds of your video. My professor pointed out that the term "meek" in the first century AD, was a term often used to describe the best Chariot horses, and that back then it ment " quickly responsive to a Master's direction, or in horse terms they were quickly responsive to the reigns". It was a great lesson

  • @michaelhalbert9264
    @michaelhalbert9264 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was very well done, I enjoyed it a lot

  • @davedoyle6835
    @davedoyle6835 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you

  • @interwebtubes
    @interwebtubes 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow!, very nice piece,
    Many thanks for your time and effort,
    And as a friendly reminder,
    Everyone please remember to keep your hands washed up at all times in order to help prevent the spread of germs,
    Peace out everyone ✌🏿

  • @weaver270
    @weaver270 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Such a challenging topic. You did well.

  • @worthgoldmusic
    @worthgoldmusic 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliantly researched from the very beginnings of biblical texts and translations! Wonderfully illustrated and very informative. /Carol Worthey

  • @crazysteve9390
    @crazysteve9390 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Everyone should read through it at least once in their life. What you do with that no other person can control but you certainly ought to read it and be aware of it. Magnificent book.

    • @glennso47
      @glennso47 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Findlay Robertson U R not a Christian.

  • @lindseyhinck6298
    @lindseyhinck6298 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    What an incredibly well spoken non judgmental and insightful history lesson into a subject fraught with danger in this time of correctness. Well done Sir well done. May you and Mrs history guy stay safe.(And history kitty

  • @SuperFredAZ
    @SuperFredAZ ปีที่แล้ว

    great coverage.

  • @vmbrister3278
    @vmbrister3278 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a Protestant Christian I applaud you, HG. Very well done! A side note, the King James Bible is also the Only Bible that was Not copywrited, so Anyone can print a KJV Bible Without permission

  • @jmeyer3rn
    @jmeyer3rn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You know you need to make a part II! Saint Jerome, the Book of Kells, and Douay Rheims did not make it into this great video. Thank you Mr History Guy. Every at bat is at least one RBI or an inside the park homer. Keep up the batting practice.

  • @nadanada5698
    @nadanada5698 4 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    A MILLION THANKS HISTORY GUY ! ! ! ! - YOU WILL BE REMEMBERED AS THE ICONIC HISTORY GO TO GUY ! ! ! ! Edit ; if i could give you more thumbs up 👍 than TH-cam allows i would,so this is my way of doing so 👍 👍 👍

  • @freddywarren69
    @freddywarren69 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of your best. Thank you.

  • @michaelwhittaker4246
    @michaelwhittaker4246 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wearmouth monastery (St. Peters) is in modern day Sunderland. Jarrow’s monastery (St. Paul’s) is about 10 miles further north. They are separate places but they worked closely together.

  • @mikezweber4433
    @mikezweber4433 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Psalms are beautiful in the KJV.

    • @jackyflap
      @jackyflap 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Psalm 27 KJV, all the Psalms are wonderful...this is one of my dearest and most loved... The LORD is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear? The LORD is the strength of my life; of whom shall I be afraid?

  • @marcomalo02
    @marcomalo02 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I was raised as a Southern Baptist on the KJV and in spite of the more modern versions and even the condemnation by many later scholars, there is a poetic beauty in the work that will never be matched. The core message is the same, or at least should be, regardless of the translation.

    • @georgebennett3197
      @georgebennett3197 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi marcomaloo - I am now an atheist but used to be a choir boy and got a lot of solace from the church in my youth. - I loved the KJV - as you say there is a poetic beauty in the book.

    • @georgebennett3197
      @georgebennett3197 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@seanwebb605 well as I thought I made clear - I was talking about the language and poetry - not necessarily the content. I may now be an atheist but I try not to be aggressive towards people who have different views to me. As you point out there are some very questionable things in the Bible but that shouldn't blind you to the beautiful things. ... and I don't mean that you were being aggressive.

  • @kc135rpilot
    @kc135rpilot ปีที่แล้ว

    LOL at 11:00 time stamp, oh so on board with the admission of the "not' word!🤣