How to Analyze 4th Amendment Searches and Seizures of Evidence on a Criminal Procedure Essay

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 52

  • @balwantpawar5068
    @balwantpawar5068 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    This guy is simply awesome! He is one of those rare tutors that can make law and it’s many technicalities understandable. You finish watching and can say wow I finally get it now!

  • @carlesiabibbins8070
    @carlesiabibbins8070 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Very beneficial...I love the visual and the break down of the information! I am consuming this .21 minute video better than the number of class periods it took to go over this. Thumbs up!

    • @studicata
      @studicata  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome. Glad this helped! 👍

  • @gabrielasaint-louis4249
    @gabrielasaint-louis4249 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I love this, thank you! I have my exam tomorrow and I've been freaking out all day, but this video put me at ease!

  • @AntiMasonic93
    @AntiMasonic93 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    My understanding is before going into details with respect to government action, standing needs to be discussed. So, whether the defendant has standing to bring a 4th amendment challenge is discussed first then a discussion on government action is next. Also, the exclusionary rule is always discussed to see if the motion to suppress will be granted.

  • @michellestockman5751
    @michellestockman5751 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm not a law student, but due to the fact that my court appointed attorney is not defending me to the best of his ability, I have been researching heavily since March in hopes to successfully get my charges dismissed. Do you have anything about the scope of a warrant, what to do when a judge denies your motion to discovery, specifically denies you the warrant that led to an arrest and the application that got this warrant? What would I look for in here? You've absolutely got my attention and you explain things perfectly. I am forever grateful for all the things you've taught me thus far.

    • @AntiMasonic93
      @AntiMasonic93 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You can move the court to appoint new counsel to you due to ineffective assistance of counsel from your previous attorney.

    • @General8675
      @General8675 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How'd that work out for you?

    • @princessruth9155
      @princessruth9155 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ooh thats happening to one of our clients rt now and im stumped and exhausted but we will figure it out. our client is in fed no bail in AZ. and the warrant is not for him! its unforgivable. best of everything, keep studying get a jd or be an asst. not everyone says im gonna go learn n do it alone. by me for me, great self motivation skill. lawyers r no longer zealous or passionate nor r they "practicing" esp in the criminal courts. and it all seems like the adverse party and our lawyer AND my neighbor KAREN knew what would go down i allege collusion. 😂🤣😂🤣 imma polynesian chick. white women dont understand me. imma find what i need.

    • @49metal
      @49metal 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This case will answer all your questions:
      www.iowacourts.gov/courtcases/14305/embed/CourtAppealsOpinion

    • @chilldragon4752
      @chilldragon4752 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@princessruth9155 What?

  • @ditzybangochik
    @ditzybangochik 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thank you thank you thank you! I am studying for the CA Bar and Bar Essays did a terrible job at explaining the difference between Evidentiary Search and Seizure and 4th Amend. Search & Seizure. Thank you for doing this and giving us free access to it.

    • @studicata
      @studicata  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Of course, happy to help! Sending good vibes your way for the CA Bar 👍

    • @HadiMufid
      @HadiMufid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what bar prep material did you use? Hope you passed!

  • @AntiMasonic93
    @AntiMasonic93 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nice video. It would have been nice to elaborate on the Katz v United States case. This case expanded the 4th amendment to public places.

  • @studicata
    @studicata  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🚨 SPECIAL OFFER: Want to crush law school finals, rack up scholarship $$$, pass the bar exam, and practice law like a BOSS? Take the LEAP. Get started today for free at: www.studicata.com/leap

  • @WearethebestB
    @WearethebestB 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very helpful thank you! Do you have videos for Florida bar as well? thank you

  • @bigmelty
    @bigmelty 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    You are a life saver

  • @latejanaurbana1589
    @latejanaurbana1589 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    11:55 - 4th at issue ---------------
    Warrant requirement
    Scope of warrant

  • @jessecastro4921
    @jessecastro4921 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi i'm jessie do you know if this a good enough answer for my response; Furthermore the plaintiffs Fourth Amendment search and seizure rights were broken because there was a physical intrusion of eviction proceedings performed by the government into a constitutionally protected area which was subsidized housing where there was a reasonable expectation of privacy and warrants necessary to proceed in an eviction proceeding of unlawful detainer.

  • @jenniferrivera6344
    @jenniferrivera6344 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    better than my professor

  • @latejanaurbana1589
    @latejanaurbana1589 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seizure performed by government. Yes.

  • @jessecastro4921
    @jessecastro4921 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey i have a question, how would a search and seizure rights be broken if eviction proceedings are instituted against someone for due process violations.

    • @AntiMasonic93
      @AntiMasonic93 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You do not have 4th amendment protection if the eviction proceedings are conducted by a non-government actor.

    • @jessecastro4921
      @jessecastro4921 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think the residents where I live at is government-sponsored economic assistance aimed towards alleviating housing costs and expenses for impoverished people with low to moderate-incomes. The eviction proceedings were caused by a government entity DHHS which were a Human Services Agency. I wrote this The Human Services Agency broke the search and seizure Clause because they caused oppressive restrictions in my liberty within my society and community that constituted a seizure of obstruction of my freedom.

    • @jessecastro4921
      @jessecastro4921 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey thanks for educating me on that topic. Do you know anybody who can help me amend a complaint and create a monell claim for violation of the Fourteenth Amendment due process under color of law?

  • @jimvazquez5203
    @jimvazquez5203 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Did he cover “open fields”?

  • @coryupton669
    @coryupton669 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what if the government is looking from federal airspace? say like from an airplane, which is technically owned by the FAA, and they used this to search your backyard or private property.

    • @latejanaurbana1589
      @latejanaurbana1589 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      HHOL, at 9:15

    • @AntiMasonic93
      @AntiMasonic93 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No reasonable expectation of privacy in aerial views with respect to airplanes or helicopters flying over your house.

  • @jonathanlindsey7623
    @jonathanlindsey7623 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let's say my dad has it on Fuson and I. Let's say the fusion center denied me. Let's say if you deny me in front of men, because calls are recorded for monitoring, that I'll deny you in front of my father. Let's say I have to trust that home because you expect to use that power for emergency purposes. How do you?

  • @A.WhiteCompany
    @A.WhiteCompany 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    JESUS FUCKING CHRIST! thank you for everything you do. These videos are incredible.

  • @cecigowin2347
    @cecigowin2347 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about your vehicle? Is that not protected?

  • @latejanaurbana1589
    @latejanaurbana1589 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Evidentiary search and seizure

  • @navycorpsman9291
    @navycorpsman9291 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    In this day and age such devices are available to public. Police aren’t happy bout this either.

  • @anthonythompson8519
    @anthonythompson8519 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Roooual area" hahaa . . . Great video tho!

    • @latejanaurbana1589
      @latejanaurbana1589 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why is that? Lol. Learning is so much richer when's it is presenter in analysis.

  • @latejanaurbana1589
    @latejanaurbana1589 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Governments conduct!!!!!!

  • @Ruger22cal
    @Ruger22cal 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    greatttt video! glad to be first to comment:) Godspeed.

  • @jonathanlindsey7623
    @jonathanlindsey7623 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Satan doesn't have a right to prey

  • @latejanaurbana1589
    @latejanaurbana1589 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does the magistrate have to be a lawyer,

  • @jonathanlindsey7623
    @jonathanlindsey7623 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Stand up stand up for Jesus. This strife will not belong. Stand in His strength alone. Hold high His royal banner. Ye dare not trust your own.

  • @jonathanlindsey7623
    @jonathanlindsey7623 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let's say God's wrath comes upon us and even one of us can understand that and know for that not to be an unwarrantable search and seizure of a governmental asset that there must then be less of us afterward and be more compliant with the reasons his wrath was struck upon us in the first place. Is it also an active prohibit of the free exercise of religion? All hail the power of Jesus name let angel's prostrate fall. No tongue can bid ME this - depart.

  • @JRBROOKS42
    @JRBROOKS42 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    THEY CANT TEACH THIS TO HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES !!! 😡😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬🤬😳😳😳😳😳😳🎥🎥🎥🎥🎥💵💵💸💸💸💰💰💰😎😎😎😎😎