Hi! This summary has been so fantastic! I've watched all your other evidence videos and they've been so helpful!! Totally cleared up my understanding. I wanted to follow-up and ask whether you've had a chance to make the flowchart for character evidence?
Im willing to be an attorney in California as a foreign lawyer. The general principles of law is all same . Like jurisdictions, evidence rules , torts .... only the type of regulations are different. Im following your videos its very helpful to give me a vision on CA state Law
You have one of the best legal channels on the net man. You should pay someone to advertise you a little bit, you make it right back in advertising revenue and grow your channel
If I asked a witness on cross how they knew it was blue ink for the contract and they said, “because it was raining that day”, I would just say no further questions and sit down.
To clarify, you said for your mnemonic device “MIMIC” (sorry, I butchered the spelling of it, love the device nonetheless) - “preponderance of the evidence” to get some evidence in under FRE 404(b) Character Evidence; however, isn’t 404(b) for criminal cases only, therefore the standard of proof being beyond a reasonable doubt instead of preponderance? Why is it preponderance of the evidence for the weight of that evidence to get it admitted?
In the Casey Antony trial, an expert witness, Dr. Rodriguez, failed to enter into his report that he couldn't make an opinion on where was the placement of the duct tape, despite the lawyer, Mr. Baez, previously had been given a court order to tell witnesses to enter all opinions into their reports. Rodriquez claimed he wasn't aware of that court order, and he wasn't conformable making the opinion since he had none. I guess this goes to show that evidence, even documentation that there is no opinion and the basis for that opinion, needs to be entered. The old adage, "if you didn't document it, you didn't do/consider it."
![Evidence Bar Review: Most Tested Areas of Law on the Bar Exam [BAR BLITZ PREVIEW]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/y7kYRrclwZ0/mqdefault.jpg)
Hi! This summary has been so fantastic! I've watched all your other evidence videos and they've been so helpful!! Totally cleared up my understanding. I wanted to follow-up and ask whether you've had a chance to make the flowchart for character evidence?
Im willing to be an attorney in California as a foreign lawyer. The general principles of law is all same . Like jurisdictions, evidence rules , torts .... only the type of regulations are different. Im following your videos its very helpful to give me a vision on CA state Law
Omg. Taking February 2020 bar and love your videos. Seriously considering enrolling
VK were the results a shock? ;/
thanks for the great video! could you include the flowchart you refer to?
I was just thinking the same!
You have one of the best legal channels on the net man. You should pay someone to advertise you a little bit, you make it right back in advertising revenue and grow your channel
Thank you for your support!
If I asked a witness on cross how they knew it was blue ink for the contract and they said, “because it was raining that day”, I would just say no further questions and sit down.
Amazing! Thanks!
Love all your videos, thank you so much!
This is great! I do not see the link to an evidence tree chart as stated in the video. Did you ever make it?
God bless the day i found studicata!!!!
Can you post the link to the flow chart you mentioned you would in this video?
Great explanation of this rule I've heard thus far...great....it can get complicated but great job...
Very helpful thank you!
i cannot find the tree please
This is a great video and very clear.
Thank you!
How to bring the trust forward subrogation
Awesome explanations.
Thank you!
To clarify, you said for your mnemonic device “MIMIC” (sorry, I butchered the spelling of it, love the device nonetheless) - “preponderance of the evidence” to get some evidence in under FRE 404(b) Character Evidence; however, isn’t 404(b) for criminal cases only, therefore the standard of proof being beyond a reasonable doubt instead of preponderance? Why is it preponderance of the evidence for the weight of that evidence to get it admitted?
Thank you!!
God bless you. And your tall hair!
In the Casey Antony trial, an expert witness, Dr. Rodriguez, failed to enter into his report that he couldn't make an opinion on where was the placement of the duct tape, despite the lawyer, Mr. Baez, previously had been given a court order to tell witnesses to enter all opinions into their reports. Rodriquez claimed he wasn't aware of that court order, and he wasn't conformable making the opinion since he had none. I guess this goes to show that evidence, even documentation that there is no opinion and the basis for that opinion, needs to be entered. The old adage, "if you didn't document it, you didn't do/consider it."
thank you
Helpful
Is there any fullstop between your two Sentences? Please follow palki Sarma's presentation in gravitas.
Hello, Im preparing for the bar exam. What is your rate for coaching or do you have a program?
Hi there!
You can find all our info at: www.studicata.com/
Thank you!
Since this pertains to the California Bar, it would be nice to go over the California specific laws pertaining to evidence, such as prop. 8 and 352.
Give him a thumbs up!
👍