The Peasants' Revolt of 1381 Explained: England's Turning Point

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ม.ค. 2024
  • By the late 14th century, England was in decline. Already weakened by the Hundred Years’ War, both Edward III and his son, the Black Prince, had died, leaving the country in a perilous state. Richard II, the new king, was only a child. With the poor facing increasingly harsh poll taxes, and distrust of the nobility growing among them, an uprising broke out in southern England in 1381. It was led for the first time by peasants, a class of person invisible on the historical stage up to this point. The Peasants’ Revolt would prove to be one of the most iconic events of English history, altering not only England’s society and the fate of her monarchy, but also generating a new kind of grassroots radicalism.
    Join Tom and Dominic as they discuss the outbreak of this landmark moment in the history of English socialism, building up to the climactic moment when Richard II and his men find themselves besieged in London by the rebel army surrounding her walls, under the leadership of the elusive Wat Tyler…
    The Rest Is History LIVE in 2024
    Tom and Dominic are back onstage this summer, at Hampton Court Palace in London!
    Buy your tickets here: therestishistory.com
    Twitter:
    @TheRestHistory
    @holland_tom
    @dcsandbrook
    ✅ Subscribe Here: / @restishistor. .
    ---
    🎙️ Listen To The Podcast: linktr.ee/restishistory
    ---
    📱 Follow Us On Socials:
    Facebook: profile.php?...
    Instagram: / theresthist. .
    TikTok: / theresthistory
    Twitter: / theresthistory

ความคิดเห็น • 63

  • @Elitist20
    @Elitist20 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    The Pedants' Revolt:
    'I had expected there would be less of you...'
    'FEWER!'

    • @x0rn312
      @x0rn312 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      This is very clever

    • @dankcaesar4760
      @dankcaesar4760 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Stannis the mannis

  • @PatrickRivers-cy2dh
    @PatrickRivers-cy2dh หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Bravo! Je ne connaissais pas cet épisode pourtant crucial de l'histoire britannique. Vous deux êtes de brillants raconteurs. Merci.

  • @TheAnadromist
    @TheAnadromist 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I am reminded that when the king was told that the peasants were revolting, he simply shook his head a moaned 'Why don't you tell me something I don't know?'
    Great stuff gents.

  • @spectatorwv1054
    @spectatorwv1054 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Just to learn about Bill Payable was worth a listen.

  • @tomchiles9282
    @tomchiles9282 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Banger of an episode! Keep it up! Live from 🇺🇸

    • @rat_king-
      @rat_king- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      how did that woodstock go?

  • @Lumsdenaa
    @Lumsdenaa 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    About time , been waiting years for this

  • @drew9351
    @drew9351 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Did not know i could watch these ! Been listening the last few months

  • @johnhaynes9910
    @johnhaynes9910 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Brilliant as ever ! A silly memory to share with regard to names and jobs. Many years ago I lived in the London Borough of Hillingdon and at the time the Borough Treasurer who signed the Rate (Council Tax) demand was a certain Mr B Quick :)

    • @faeembrugh
      @faeembrugh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My sister had a Chinese dentist called...Mr Ow.

    • @thomasdonovan3580
      @thomasdonovan3580 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My Japanese exwife’s name was Sosuumi

    • @thermionic1234567
      @thermionic1234567 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Too bad Stanley Kubrick is dead as that would be a great name for a character. I’m thinking “Clockwork” or “Strangelove.”

    • @thermionic1234567
      @thermionic1234567 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thomasdonovan3580I hope the divorce didn’t break you financially and otherwise.

  • @andrewpeake1712
    @andrewpeake1712 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    After all these years, the book, missing out on tickets when you were in Sydney! You do not look how I imagined. Thank you for the fantastic podcast. (Loved the series on countries from the World Cup)

  • @mastermason552
    @mastermason552 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Ahh, an episode I've been waiting for, presented by my history chums across the pond. This one is well timed considering the current attitude between us peasants and the ruling class.
    Will enjoy this as i eat my porridge and gruel, before a day in the salt mines serving my masters😮

  • @SithFam
    @SithFam 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lovely work gents

  • @The123rasputin
    @The123rasputin 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nothing short of Brilliant; the man is a model Historian.

  • @spankflaps1365
    @spankflaps1365 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Destroying financial records buildings, six centuries before Fight Club.

  • @johncarroll772
    @johncarroll772 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant podcast

  • @neilgadsby3924
    @neilgadsby3924 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Looking forward to how this cliff hanger works out - not looking good for Richard II...

  • @thomasdonovan3580
    @thomasdonovan3580 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    “Well I didn’t vote for you!”
    “If I told you that I was king because some moisten tart threw a simitar at me *They’d put me away!”*

  • @divyarajkathait4417
    @divyarajkathait4417 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have been looking for any reference on William Payable, could you provide me with?

  • @jonhelmer8591
    @jonhelmer8591 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So, the storm clouds finally broke sinking the ship of the desert?

  • @Zifferony
    @Zifferony 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Tom Holland is using the words Peasants and Serfs interchangeably in this video time code 20:20. Are they at this period in English history the same by definition? By how he describes their rights and obligations I would say he's talking about serfs whereas peasants tended to have a stronger position in society and their local lords couldn't control them the same way.
    I know that in Scandinavia the peasant class were immensely strong by comparison to the peasant class on the European continent who tended to be serfs.

  • @petersuson7958
    @petersuson7958 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Where does the influence of John Wycliffe comes into the picture?

  • @itfc1959
    @itfc1959 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Would like a podcast on Kett's Rebellion, please. Now that one really was close. The monarchy only saved the day by bringing in Italian Mercenaries. Nearly got 'em! One day....

  • @dustyfairview9062
    @dustyfairview9062 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you put out a blacked out version? Would be nice. Just a title card? Maybe some source material?

    • @teacherlee3102
      @teacherlee3102 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There is a podcast you can listen to instead.

  • @firefox5926
    @firefox5926 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    9:41 ah ... maggie would be proud lol

  • @robertgerrity878
    @robertgerrity878 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Start change by renaming it The Common People's Revolt. Go Judith Barker!!!

  • @benjaminblakemore9704
    @benjaminblakemore9704 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But how? How can they intimidate the poor when they have the upper hand? Why does wage freeze work. Surly they can just rise up?

  • @corinth492
    @corinth492 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The word peasant had a different meaning in the middle ages, many peasants were land owners, skilled artisans and business owners, many were educated and relatively wealthy.

  • @Camcolito
    @Camcolito 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was nothing compared to the Pheasant's Revolt of 1831.

  • @ianmedford4855
    @ianmedford4855 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Its super weird that NOBODY has done anything on the Border Reivers and Wardens of The March....
    Just sayin'

  • @tropics8407
    @tropics8407 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow ! 😳 Tax ! Who would have thought 🤔 and the government wasting our taxes to pay for and benefit themselves. Just like today. 🤷‍♂️ outstanding !🤩

  • @fastpublish
    @fastpublish 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Was that all the lawyers? - Practicing Lawyer

  • @jonathangammond3019
    @jonathangammond3019 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Studied it at school in the late 1980s for A level and we called it the Great Uprising rather than the Peasants' Revolt.

    • @davidvasey5065
      @davidvasey5065 หลายเดือนก่อน

      think the peasants revolt is more cutting

  • @philipbrooks402
    @philipbrooks402 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dominic suggests that the manifesto of the rebels could also be viewed as a precursor to Protestantism. Although Tom has shown that the story of John Ball could not have happened as it was portrayed, it does not alter the fact that he was a radical. Where did he acquire his radicalism? Could there be a link between Ball and John Wycliffe, leader of the Lollards, who was also attacking the wealth of the Church and calling for the translation of the Bible into the vernacular? All at about this time.

    • @yankeegonesouth4973
      @yankeegonesouth4973 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think that chronology is a little off. If I remember correctly, Wycliffe becomes notorious a few years later, after Ball has, er, left the scene.
      Also, if memory serves, that unpopular John of Gaunt fellow was actually Wycliffe's patron (which is important for Wycliffe's story - that his patron was not the king or the church hierarchy).

  • @user-hj4nm7ms2g
    @user-hj4nm7ms2g หลายเดือนก่อน

    I´m not paying up

  • @geoffreynhill2833
    @geoffreynhill2833 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm with Tom. (Dominic's wondering who Billy Bragg is.) 🤔(Green Fire UK) 🌈🦉

  • @R08Tam
    @R08Tam 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Vive la révolution, vive la République

  • @user-nx8ii4ef7f
    @user-nx8ii4ef7f 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Essex is still suffering for its part in this!

  • @gbickell
    @gbickell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No cliché is off the table

  • @user-oy4bn7bi1j
    @user-oy4bn7bi1j 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As an American viewer, I appreciate your diligence in providing clarification on minor points. ie. “They (The Commons) we’re made up of JPs”. I immediately thought, “like JP Morgan?” Would not have landed on Justices of the Peace. Next your gonna tell me MP stands for Member of Parliament and not Military Police.
    🎉Cultural differences!🎉

    • @Tconcept
      @Tconcept 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It stands for both, we have military policemen too you know 👍

  • @amandahudson2038
    @amandahudson2038 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nothing Chang’s does it?

  • @curtistim
    @curtistim 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The kindling spark of the capitalist nouveau riche, i would say. Nothing really to do with the poor.

  • @garytaf
    @garytaf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe incarnation is real

  • @Terinije
    @Terinije 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The peasantry being upset at their feudal overlords was assuredly the norm, not the exception. Things didn't go suddenly bad for peasants, things went worse which elicited the revolt.
    And there was violence inherent in the revolt because they were revolting against violence that was inherent in the system.

  • @benjaminblakemore9704
    @benjaminblakemore9704 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    💯 better when I can see you speak 😂

  • @ropeburnsrussell
    @ropeburnsrussell 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im with Dom, if servants are tiresome, serfs must be unbearable.

  • @matthewnewberry7275
    @matthewnewberry7275 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The rest is Tory history. That's what so important isn't it? aspirational zeal in the blood.

  • @Horwitz86
    @Horwitz86 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Romanov the Windsors