250. Alfred the Great: Fury of the Vikings

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 29

  • @carolspeaks733
    @carolspeaks733 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thank you for your most entertaining account of British history. I look forward to hearing more, cheers from deep in the heart of Texas.

  • @toneydavis9802
    @toneydavis9802 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I feel priveledged to have access to your knowledge and wit. I thoroughly enjoy these podcast.I have purchased the children's book as a Christmas present for my Grandson of 11. When he visits at Christmas he and I will read together.

  • @howwwwwyyyyy
    @howwwwwyyyyy หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Bernard Cornwell series with Alfred is a great series of books, can be a bit repetitive but does a great job of bringing history to life.

  • @Fernandoenf2
    @Fernandoenf2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great discovery, love the podcast
    I'm Spanish living in Portsmouth from almost 10 years and I always felt attracted to the figure of Alfred when I first visited Winchester

  • @watcherofthewest8597
    @watcherofthewest8597 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Great show you guys have! this should be in the top 5 of history podcasts! Keep at it! I wish I were in an Oxford study with a pipe or a pub listening to this!

    • @Time_Is_Left
      @Time_Is_Left 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What are your other 4? Would be curious to take a look if I haven’t

    • @watcherofthewest8597
      @watcherofthewest8597 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Time_Is_Left the only one I'd put above this one is Dan Carlin. I said top 5 just because there are so many I haven't heard. But these guys are great, so let's say 2nd best!

    • @Jacob-sb3su
      @Jacob-sb3su 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Time_Is_Left Dan Carlin is king, Daliel Bolelli History on Fire is also good, theres a good series (albeit old) by Mike Duncan,
      For more relaxed stuff: OverSimplified history, crash course world history(and all the crash course series on history really, its highschool lvl but its good to start and funny). Overly Sarcastic Productions is also good!
      For military leaning: Kings and Generals, and the best of the bunch when it comes to military history and ancient warfare Historia Civillis

    • @Johnconno
      @Johnconno 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You smoke the Kif?

  • @nomorephones
    @nomorephones 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you lads. Absolutely love your show. Cheers from Israel.

  • @tehonlyFreeman
    @tehonlyFreeman 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This was so good, gonna have to listen to the other episodes you've done

  • @michaelk19thcfan10
    @michaelk19thcfan10 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Perhaps Thomas Hardy referring to the area where his most famous novels take place by the ancient name of Wessex adds to the deep roots of the location.

  • @noahholland1795
    @noahholland1795 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What happened to episode #249?

  • @Rwthless1
    @Rwthless1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe Ivar the boneless was double jointed and seemed to be extremely and inhumanly flexible. Like a snake.

  • @darrelgustafson2507
    @darrelgustafson2507 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The vikings got a bad rap.
    They were really just a bunch of rowdy tourists who occasionally roughed up the locals.

  • @TimLeandro
    @TimLeandro 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Eggbutt is one of the funniest names ever.

    • @IanCross-xj2gj
      @IanCross-xj2gj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ecgberht .... or Egburt ... Wessex King

    • @nozrep
      @nozrep หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@IanCross-xj2gjyes but to some ears, such as American English ears, possibly others, we hear him saying eggbutt. It is simply them saying it in standard British accent which is totally fine, good great grand. But if you have more knowledge on how accents are heard from various perspectives or from different geographies around the world, you may quickly understand why hearing the name Egbert seemingly pronounced like eggbutt quickly becomes a humorous sort of pun, or something. Not really a pun but maybe a homophone I suppose. The British do not pronounce the ‘r’ sound in Egbert. So it sounds like eggbutt instead of Egbert, as it is spelled. And we Americans usually pronounce every hard ‘r’ sound in most words, as it taught in American schools.

  • @DennisDithmar
    @DennisDithmar 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another great show, with a bunch of brilliant points. TIP: If you want to understand "Vikings" a bit better, stop using the term "Viking" (which basically just means soldiers/raiders) as a people, and look a bit back at the real peoples who went looking abroad and why they did it. The Danes, the Angles, the Cimbers, the Jutes, the Teutons - all ppls from Jutland. There are an equal amount of Norse tribes in Norway to look at. And then the Swedes of course. One of their main tribes called Goths. They didn't go Viking, but went Rus. What they acomplished are truely amazing, moving down thru Europe splitting into Visigoths and Ostrogoths. All these scandic tribes are not just Vikings. And please stop using the term "socalled Danes". It is much more logical to talk about "socalled Brits" than doing it with Danes.

    • @Dude0000
      @Dude0000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It’s from the point of view of the Anglo-Saxons and Alfred, so Viking is the correct term, isn’t it? And I always understood Viking to mean pirate.

    • @DennisDithmar
      @DennisDithmar 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Dude0000 Fair enuff. That's what we were taught in school. But in every other episode, the TRIH-team digs a bit deeper than that. Ie in episodes about the Persian rulers - the Persians are called Persians and not socalled Persians. Dane and Norse vikings raided - then settled, then ruled. Then they were kicked out by Anglo-Saxons. Angles originating from Jutland and Saxons originating from upperwest corner of todays Germany. The Anglo-Saxons were then defeated by the Normans. Originally DK/NO-vikings who raided, settled and then ruled Normandy.
      It is quite OK with me, that vikings are portrayed as raiders if you wish. They did indeed raid, pillage, rape and plunder. But then they settled and ruled. So at least rise above calling them "socalled Danes". When the ships arrived on the socalled British Isles, the locals weren't screaming "Vikings!!!" They were screaming "The Danes are coming." They had the proper respect for a tribe, just a tad earlier being a united kingdom, than the UK (pun intended). With a (later) flag just a tiny-bit older than the Union Jack. And they were never ruled by Romans.

    • @Dude0000
      @Dude0000 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DennisDithmar ‘Viking’ is just a modern term to differentiate them from others, like, as you said, the Normans who were of very similar origins. Mycenaeans, for example is a term we use for late Bronze Age Greece, which was certainly not used by them nor their contemporaries. It’s just for modern day people to identify different cultures over, not only geographical location, but time, too.

    • @DennisDithmar
      @DennisDithmar 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dude0000 You keep missing my point. Call them Vikings all you want. That's what they are to most people. But can't you see it feels wrong to me, that Danes are called "socalled Danes"? Imagine coming from the UK, hearing an episode about The Black Prince, and the hosts calling him "socalled English"?
      The suggestion looking at them as Danes or Norse is merely an option to learn a bit more about them, than just "rape and plunder".

    • @RabidBogling
      @RabidBogling 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@DennisDithmar They say "so called" Danes because the Anglo-Saxon chronicle and other sources refer to all Scandinavians as Danes. They didn't make a distinction, yet there may have been Norwegians and Swedes within the Great Heathen Army. They aren't saying it to diminish the Danes as a people or to be snobbish in some way.

  • @Johnconno
    @Johnconno 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Vikings weren't black or blonde bearded, they were just in their own league of Filthy.