YOU, sir, are the only person I have found on the NET, not just TH-cam (after hours and hours), who had COMMON SENSE enough to say what you would THINK anyone "teaching" convolution would say: something somewhere along the lines of overlap patterns and the y(t) intervals changing when the overlap pattern changes. Seriously I heard that, watched this video up to like 13 mins, and stopped and finally understood what I was doing. Thank you for teaching and not "teaching."
6 years later and same here, at exactly the 13 minute mark I started to actually understand... maybe I should have payed more attention during the lecture that day haha.
My dear sir, you may not even see this comment after all these years but you literally made me understand convolution just in 5 minutes. I owe you my respect if you come across my words.
Very good teaching. Thank you. While I feel I fully understand the first example, I wish the second example could have been run through in the same detail as the first.
This is the exact same thing I was wondering. It WOULD make sense for the lower limit to be -1, because that is where the upper function changes value from 0 to 2.
you would have covered that region when you first started shifting x(t-lambda) and also if you move t-4 all the way to -1 then the t would no longer be greater than 3 ( i think)
YOU, sir, are the only person I have found on the NET, not just TH-cam (after hours and hours), who had COMMON SENSE enough to say what you would THINK anyone "teaching" convolution would say: something somewhere along the lines of overlap patterns and the y(t) intervals changing when the overlap pattern changes. Seriously I heard that, watched this video up to like 13 mins, and stopped and finally understood what I was doing. Thank you for teaching and not "teaching."
6 years later and same here, at exactly the 13 minute mark I started to actually understand... maybe I should have payed more attention during the lecture that day haha.
My dear sir, you may not even see this comment after all these years but you literally made me understand convolution just in 5 minutes. I owe you my respect if you come across my words.
This is great. Like others have stated, it has been hard to find this information. I watched at 2x speed, and it was totally clear.
I just went from near permanent confusion to full understanding. thank you!
It seems you are the only one to define the limits and intervals perfectly
Saved my quiz. EXCELLENT WORK SIR !!!!
Excellent Example ... Thanks for posting
Saved my life...
Thank you so much, I did not understand the intervals until I saw this :)
A very clear example, thank you.
Great work
Very good explanation. Thank you!!
OMG this is good ! i struggled with the concept for a moment and now i understand :)!
Thanks a lot ! This really cleared up my doubts. Amazing!!!
Thank you very much, very good explanation.
Very good teaching. Thank you. While I feel I fully understand the first example, I wish the second example could have been run through in the same detail as the first.
just what i was looking thanks
Excellent explanation 👋🏻thank u boss
THANKSSS ALOOOOT !!!!!!
At 32:42 it is stated 0 < t-4 < 3.
I expected -1 < t-4 < 3, can someone explain why the lower limit is not -1?
This is the exact same thing I was wondering. It WOULD make sense for the lower limit to be -1, because that is where the upper function changes value from 0 to 2.
you would have covered that region when you first started shifting x(t-lambda) and also if you move t-4 all the way to -1 then the t would no longer be greater than 3 ( i think)
thank you!! :)
thank you
wow!
Jesus Fuck this guy explains convolution like a god !
i dont get it
I wish i could give 2 thumbs up !
This would be a great video if you weren't punching and slapping the mic. The audio spikes are really hard to overcome.