Honestly the new naming scheme they are taking on just makes me feel like they're accepting defeat and conforming to Nvidia. I liked their naming scheme besides "XTX" Just felt like too many X's lol
They have to hit the 7900xt with it, there's just no way they fail that hard again after getting practically nothing from the die shrink from 6k to 7k, and going back to a mono die after they knew that was the problem with rdna3. Matching a 4070s is just the increased core count over the 7800xt. If that's the case there isn't even a justification to make the thing.
Finally we're talking about it. Thank you!
Honestly the new naming scheme they are taking on just makes me feel like they're accepting defeat and conforming to Nvidia. I liked their naming scheme besides "XTX" Just felt like too many X's lol
Yes, I agree with the naming scheme and don't understand why they didn't do 8700xt for the name of the card
I run a 7900xtx. I don't plan on upgrading in 2025.
Ya I run a 7900xt and I don't see a reason to change out either
They have to hit the 7900xt with it, there's just no way they fail that hard again after getting practically nothing from the die shrink from 6k to 7k, and going back to a mono die after they knew that was the problem with rdna3. Matching a 4070s is just the increased core count over the 7800xt. If that's the case there isn't even a justification to make the thing.
@rotm4447 If they can match the 7900xt in performance with way way better raytracing, it will be a very nice card
What's the difference between GDDR7 and GDDR6 ?
Just bigger bandwidth memory up to 40% faster
@SilverbeardGaming so for the same amount of gb it's up to 40% faster?
@kador7182 from what I am gathering on techpowerup but that might no be right
@@SilverbeardGaming ok thank you for the information
Looks like it's going to be the same memory as the 7800xt and the same speed at 624GBps