Firebase vs AWS Amplify

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 8 ส.ค. 2024
  • How does 🔥 Firebase compare to ⚡Amplify? Review Google Cloud Platform and Amazon Web Services in terms of pricing, features, and the developer experience 🤔. fireship.io
    - Firebase firebase.google.com/
    - Amplify aws-amplify.github.io/
    - Source Code github.com/fireship-io/188-fi...
    #firebase #aws #amplify
    Get the Fireship Quiz App 🤓
    iOS itunes.apple.com/us/app/fires...
    Android play.google.com/store/apps/de...
    Upgrade to Fireship PRO at fireship.io/pro
    Use code lORhwXd2 for 25% off your first payment.
    Tools I use...
    Editor: VS Code with Atom One Dark + VS Code Icons
    Video: Adobe Premiere + AfterEffects
    Design: Figma
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 281

  • @RodrigoDiasS
    @RodrigoDiasS 3 ปีที่แล้ว +179

    I think it's worth updating this video, given the latest updates on both platforms.

  • @NitishKumarSingh
    @NitishKumarSingh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +333

    I find Amplify complicated, it is kind of difficult to get started with it. AWS UI is shit but services are outstanding.
    Google makes things easier with the help of nice UI where Amazon doesn't focus more on UI.

    • @shailynortiz
      @shailynortiz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Worry no more, aws now make a new console for amplify only

    • @migueldomingos4570
      @migueldomingos4570 4 ปีที่แล้ว +64

      Amazon never gives a fuck about the ui even in their main site!

    • @franciscoandressierramunoz3095
      @franciscoandressierramunoz3095 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      True

    • @maloxi1472
      @maloxi1472 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @@migueldomingos4570 They wanna get you emotionally invested in that shitty UI 😄
      Soon, you'll realize that you're hooked to the cortisol and keep coming back for more 😂

    • @sumanth3036
      @sumanth3036 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      TBH, I hate Google's UI in their consoles.

  • @patrickmullot73
    @patrickmullot73 5 ปีที่แล้ว +84

    It's great that we have more alternative now on RT databases That will put pressure on the firebase team to release more awesome stuff for their platform if they want to stay at the top!!
    Thanks, Jeff to bring the info to us in such an exhaustive way and not just reading the specs

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Healthy competition makes these products better for us. I think we can count of Firebase to keep pushing the limits.

  • @Alexldev
    @Alexldev 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Would be cool to see you update this seeing both services have changed quite a bit
    As always a great video :)

  • @dependersethi1345
    @dependersethi1345 5 ปีที่แล้ว +156

    ✨You provide the best informative videos out there

    • @aihabgmati8425
      @aihabgmati8425 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I agree with you, he has provided very good information in this video

  • @CodeCowboy64
    @CodeCowboy64 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    One thing not covered, that I would really like to see covered is cold-start differences. My understanding is that cold starts take a lot longer on Firebase than Lambdas/Amplify functions

    • @abpdev
      @abpdev ปีที่แล้ว

      Please elaborate on this.

  • @leonelmateus
    @leonelmateus 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I appreciate your coverage on this subject!

  • @JakeWoken
    @JakeWoken 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hugeee props for using Svelte! And awesome video overall. Thanks a lot!

  • @26waga
    @26waga 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Love the simplicity of auth in AWS. Love also the Graphql schema api generation. However I prefer Firebase.

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Yeah, I'd really like MFA and more customization for Firebase auth.

  • @-_-unseen-_-
    @-_-unseen-_- 5 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Firebase is definitely more friendly to developers but it's the limitations in Firestore queries compared to DynamoDB that kills it.

    • @Euquila
      @Euquila 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      it's optimized for reads..

    • @lucascolepichette5970
      @lucascolepichette5970 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Euquila Optimization shouldn't result in limitations, just imo

  • @earljohn3ric
    @earljohn3ric 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    great video, very informative :) Honestly, i thought you're going to be biased about this, but i'm wrong, very professional :)

  • @PL4YR
    @PL4YR 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Top video. I have some heavy experience with amplify. I am not a fan of the cli. The SDK is brilliant. But the cli bootstraps infrastructure and code together.
    Like for example. Setting up auth the quick way in the cli enforces sms codes? To get rid of that you have to destroy it and rebuild. Theres also a massive risk in editing their generated infrastructure (cloudformation).
    In terms of appsync to dynamo. I have just removed appsync all together. I just use aws document client to connect to dynamo with the auth credentials from amplify/cognito.
    To tldr it. We use amplifies sdk. Dynamo and lambda. The analytics are great too and quick to implement.
    Its interesting on push notifications to. I actually have firebase launching them instead of aws. But i store the push notification acceptance code in dynamo.
    I would rate the sdk much better than the cli. The cli i would say provides more minimum flexibility.
    It gets the resources up there. But all those manual changes after? Not stored anywhere so your disaster recover becomes a bit more tedious
    Catch me on slack if you want more info ;)

    • @lardosian
      @lardosian 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey, I'm building a PWA with Amplify and Appsync, I'm fairly new to all this stuff, some tips would be great. I was directed to an example survey pwa on AWS so I cloned the repo and followed all the steps and got it set up. So I'm wondering now should I strip it down and build up my own app using it as a base or start from scratch with a new amplify project, thank you!

  • @gcyalbert
    @gcyalbert 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Amplify is more difficult to start with but once you get used to it, you will love the flexibility.

  • @ben34256
    @ben34256 5 ปีที่แล้ว +137

    AWS requires card to set up though :(

    • @mightylinsomniak3464
      @mightylinsomniak3464 5 ปีที่แล้ว +81

      this comment should be pinned. Firebase will not ask ANYTHING even if you blow up your free quota. AWS charges you without notice

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว +53

      Good call, forgot about that as I've had a paid AWS acct for a long time.

    • @ben34256
      @ben34256 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Yeah, it's not a big deal as if you are seriously looking for a platform it's not a bad requirement. But for me and probably a lot of viewers of this channel who are hobbyists who just want to try it out, it's not a platform to make offhand concepts.

    • @DiegoRFGonz88
      @DiegoRFGonz88 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You get all those solutions and you want for free really, bet if I ask you for some classes you'll charge me

    • @dusscode
      @dusscode 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Mighty L'Insomniak no lmao

  • @grow-nannyinc1444
    @grow-nannyinc1444 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video! I build IoT solutions hosted on S3 with a serverless backend. Although accessing data may be more expensive in terms of adding big data it feels like the ease of use with Kinesis Analytics was the selling point for me. I feel like I needed to learn GraphQL anyway.. My vote goes to Amplify.

  • @ProgramWithErik
    @ProgramWithErik 5 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Very interesting! I've been working a lot in AWS lately, but I like Firebase, it was neat seeing a comparison of the too. Another thought on the to-do demo is instead of using the GraphQL API, you could use the REST API and setup a todos end point. At that point you would have to write a lambda for the end point, to GET and POST the data to the dynamoDB (that's the easy part). The tricky part would be the real time aspect. My first thoughts is to use web sockets and have the svelte client connect to another API end point to do that. The nice thing about DynamoDB is you could have the DynamoDB stream connect directly to a lambda. So every update to the DB will trigger the lambda that can emit a broadcast to all the connected clients.
    Would that be simpler then GraphQL? I dunno, but it's another way to do it if you don't like the complexity of GraphQL and subscriptions. If you don't have the requirement of real time then it's way easy.

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      That is an interesting thought. A websockets implementation could def get the job done, but the Apollo client is nice because it can also handle optimistic updates and caching easily.

    • @PL4YR
      @PL4YR 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Top in this. Ive done sockets in serverless using dynamos downstream service. This replicates the effect. But each open stream costs more on the socket gateway. It can accrue over time very quickly. For the realtime data update apollo is far more superior.

    • @PL4YR
      @PL4YR 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You also have to manage user channels potentially too. It becomes logistical nightmare

    • @sots_music
      @sots_music 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What I ended up doing in one of my projects is use the best of both worlds. Firebase is really good for interacting with the user interface so created read model that uses firestore and users can only ever perform reads from the Firebase backend. Then in AWS I implemented lambda functions for the API that is secured by cognito authentication. The main reason as to why I picked AWS was due to fact that I was suppose to implement a data pipeline whereby multiple lambda functions will communicate with one another via message queues (SQS) and update data in DyanmoDB. Since AWS has a good feature called DynamoDB streams I was able to attach lambda functions that listen to record updates in the database and update the read model which is essentially updating firebases firestore. With this done I was able to use realtime functionality of firebase but with a data processing backend in AWS. This basically was inspired by the CQRS pattern martinfowler.com/bliki/CQRS.html. No Appolo was used in this by the way. Other thing you will need to consider is using authentication user token in firebase in order order to integrate cognito and firebase auth users

  • @YanickSteinbeck
    @YanickSteinbeck 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredibly concise but still super clear and informative. Thanks!!!

  • @pragyavashishtha2409
    @pragyavashishtha2409 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a ton! Very helpful for my upcoming project. I love the dev community on the internet

  • @vincentdufour613
    @vincentdufour613 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You have to add the API-gateway (bridge between the client http call, websocket...) cost if you create a serverless API with AWS. So the cost per function is much more : 0.2 per million for lambda call + other lambda function cost + 1.2$ per million call (slightly more or less depending on the AWS region).

  • @randymotluck1503
    @randymotluck1503 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man I love your videos. I especially like all the movie cuts for humor. I watched most of them on first release. It makes watching programming stuff (which is dry by nature - no pun).. much much better. You've been to the rodeo and I appreciate your content and your rationale based on experience. Thank you!

  • @ComisarioLobo
    @ComisarioLobo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey, it would be great if you could create an up to date video, also showing other capabilities of each platform :)

  • @gcavicchioli93
    @gcavicchioli93 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Really nice video. Congrats 👏🏼👏🏼

  • @hdorodev
    @hdorodev 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks so much for the video, Jeff 💜

  • @RahulGolwalkar
    @RahulGolwalkar 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perfect video - thanks!!!
    This helps a lot in me deciding my path !!!

  • @MapMavericks
    @MapMavericks ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparison. Are you considering making a course on amplify? I'd love to see that. I personally use firebase, but we're implementing Amplify in our project at work.

  • @eddiejaoude
    @eddiejaoude 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great comparison 👍. I used to use aws but have recently switched to Firebase and everything is much simpler 🤓

  • @yogenp
    @yogenp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the movie snippets. Haha. Awesome research. I had dabbled with both and favored Firebase more of the time because its easier to set up.

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Awesome, thanks for the feedback 👍

  • @Gorlokki
    @Gorlokki ปีที่แล้ว

    For some weird reason, I can't stand other tech videos, but I love watching yours. Great work!

  • @willyosorto
    @willyosorto 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Such a good comparison about those giant platform that provide a service for a common problem that developers face. Thanks!

  • @elie2222
    @elie2222 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How easy is local development? If you have a bad internet connection or are on a plane without internet is it possible to develop?

  • @MohammedNoureldin
    @MohammedNoureldin 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparison for the basics, thanks a lot!

  • @architectsofthecloud6218
    @architectsofthecloud6218 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's super extensive research and comparison. Wow just wow!

  • @GrumpyPapaJim
    @GrumpyPapaJim 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    oh fs. I use firebase with vuex and have buttons to refresh the store. Didn't know I could create a livelink :( Would love a video on what firebase classes as reads while setup as a live link.

  • @scootndute579
    @scootndute579 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amplify pros:
    - super easy user authentication out of the box
    - good documentation for all platforms (web, vue, react, ios, etc)
    Amplify cons:
    - DynamoDB was built for massive quantities of data so the relational model is proprietary and confusing
    - You can't get away with only using "Amplify".. you'll have to use other AWS services
    I dropped Amplify on my latest project and am so much happier back with Firebase. What Firebase does better than Amplify is its ability to totally abstract itself from the mothership (aka Google Cloud, and AWS for Amplify). You can go start to finish without leaving Firebase on your project. If you use Amplify, chances are you're going to need to branch into the overwhelming AWS-land.

  • @ArthurSilva-kt2bx
    @ArthurSilva-kt2bx 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video!
    despite people from comments are arguing AWS is hard to use, I think AWS amplify cool. Docs are really well explained, and I agree that UI is not that friendly.
    do you recommend me any getting started video or course of firebase ? I'm struggling a lot with their docs.
    cheers mate!

  • @vinayakgosale8470
    @vinayakgosale8470 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Request a video on AWS Amplify, specifically the Data store GraphQL API and Security rules. I've tried Firebase, it's definitely more developer-friendly than AWS Amplify. But for complex fin-saas applications, AWS Amplify takes the cake thanks to its relational data modelling and flexibility.

  • @JohnoScott
    @JohnoScott 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks so much. Excellent pace, detail, demo and opinion.

  • @abpdev
    @abpdev ปีที่แล้ว

    Just finished a firebase project, did well. Now off to build one with amplify.

  • @jantube358
    @jantube358 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice to see you use Svelte! Helpful comparison.

  • @mayankkataria7080
    @mayankkataria7080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have 2 questions:
    1. How you plan your content?
    2. How you remember multiple platforms code?

  • @hoanbui7003
    @hoanbui7003 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’ve learn a lot! Keep making more videos like this.

  • @DenisTRUFFAUT
    @DenisTRUFFAUT 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pricing comparison is interesting, thanks.

  • @manunoly
    @manunoly 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    thanks jeff, is a great topic to share

  • @DK-ox7ze
    @DK-ox7ze 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What if we have some big custom logic/algorithm that needs to be run on the backend? How will we do that in Firebase or AWS Amplify?

  • @OleksiiSidorov
    @OleksiiSidorov 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very neat and clear explanation, good job.

  • @mariol8831
    @mariol8831 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please we need an updated video with this comparison, thanks.

  • @kyawzinlatt3712
    @kyawzinlatt3712 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a very specific and explicit explanation ever!!!

  • @TelosMediaOrgOfficial
    @TelosMediaOrgOfficial 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I believe Amplify also provides a way to listen for the user's auth status.

  • @ruben45210
    @ruben45210 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Finally compettition, google will have to improve firebase to not lose for amazon.

  • @SergioArroyoSailing
    @SergioArroyoSailing 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    super awesome video! which is better for REACT Native ? could you do a follow-up video on that? :D

  • @ani2595
    @ani2595 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just out of curiosity, what is Microsoft's version of Firebase/Amplify? Do they have a platform on Azure for this?

  • @t.j.prescott1960
    @t.j.prescott1960 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you please make a video comparing Amplify to Laravel Vapor both using AWS? Great comparison. Thankyou!

  • @bitsurfer0101
    @bitsurfer0101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Which one seems easier to use?

  • @benmarcus2577
    @benmarcus2577 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi
    can someone explain..
    do we not need graphql with firestore?
    is there a use case to use graphql with firebase/firestore?
    or only with AWS amplify?
    thank you so much!!

  • @alexrafter
    @alexrafter 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparison, thanks 👍

  • @nimayndolo
    @nimayndolo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    God I wish Firebase allowed for a relational db 😞

  • @SampathLokuge
    @SampathLokuge 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do we have something like this on Microsoft Azure?

  • @trackbuddy2013
    @trackbuddy2013 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video, fire-base best to use for flutter apps, and conducting A/B testing. Please do a video on aggregated document on firestore when developing with flutter. If you already have such video please share link.

  • @basdfgwe
    @basdfgwe 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I looked at amplify recently but I got lost in the docs, I feel that the docs for firebase to be pretty much straightforward.

  • @konopaku913
    @konopaku913 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the nice video!
    In terms of pricing, Firebase is $0.6 read/ $1.8 write per one million query ?
    It seems that pricing of Firebase is based on 100,000.

  • @braydenwilson4484
    @braydenwilson4484 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it smart to build on Amplify and then migrate to custom Auth Modules(Instead of Cognito or App Sync) and Custom Dynamo DB interaction?
    That way we can mitigate the disadvantage of AWS Amplify and stay for long after scale!

  • @shafu_xyz
    @shafu_xyz ปีที่แล้ว

    Can we use Firebase/AWS amplify exclusive on server? without shipping any of these to browsers for say a web project? Does this has any limitaions?

  • @BlueDragon022
    @BlueDragon022 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Overall, how limiting do you think Firestore is compared to GraphQL/dynamo db. Do you think the limitations of Firestore do not affect the majority of apps and only a few percentage of applications will need the flexibility found in GraphQL? Thanks

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Firestore is actually more flexible then DynamoDB for data modeling imo, but GraphQL can use ANY data source. If you hit the limitations of NoSQL, you can drop in a graph database or full-text search engine and still use the same realtime SDK.

    • @BlueDragon022
      @BlueDragon022 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Fireship Ah I see thank you!

  • @sdprashanth2874
    @sdprashanth2874 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for the detailed explanation

  • @greenspeed3619
    @greenspeed3619 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice content...and the arnold references are hilarious.

  • @omar_benaidy
    @omar_benaidy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    i likedd the video as soon as i saw svelte 3

  • @AlanJudson
    @AlanJudson 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you have to use Graphql with Amplify to get realtime?

  • @RageBasterd
    @RageBasterd 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    havent used amplify yet, but competition is always welcomed. whats the 3rd best option?

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would probably say MongoDB Stitch www.mongodb.com/cloud/stitch

  • @socks5proxy
    @socks5proxy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would you be interested in comparing Firebase to GunDB?

  • @blessingschishimbakalambai8574
    @blessingschishimbakalambai8574 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    You read your messages!!! thanks!

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yes, I do. That's the main way I figure out what to create.

  • @yaboirairai
    @yaboirairai 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Currently weighing these two options up against each other. How do you read my mind with your video topics!??????

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Community feedback & suggestions are what drive the content on this channel :)

    • @yaboirairai
      @yaboirairai 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fireship the coincidence this time was honestly uncanny though. You are on the ball. Keep it up!
      Personal request: a deep dive into some tips/tricks to improve performance and reduce costs on Firebase or Amplify.
      I know you’ve touched these topics before but would be awesome to see you revisit this topic as many of your viewers are building apps on these services on a tight budget

  • @teC5
    @teC5 ปีที่แล้ว

    its time for a refresh on this video! I bet amplify matured, and firebase has new features as well.

  • @rickfarina9835
    @rickfarina9835 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Friggin awesome and great job. Thank you!!

  • @1mindset1
    @1mindset1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is really good content thanks!

  • @alexjflopes
    @alexjflopes 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does GraphQL require a "rigid" schema, that is, If I want to retrieve documents with some variations in the attributes in the same collection, can I read/write them with GraphQL, even when they don't match completely the schema in graphQL file?

  • @tha_gaffa
    @tha_gaffa 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    what font is the titles in like "Features"??

  • @basdfgwe
    @basdfgwe 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's good for us that amplify is available, good set of options and competition is good for everyone.

  • @scottpuckett5403
    @scottpuckett5403 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do an update on this? Trying to decide on Firestore or amplify with graphql.

  • @luchinazo
    @luchinazo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use both, depends on the app and the customer, Firebase has improved a lot these days tho

  • @tanzeelhassan2934
    @tanzeelhassan2934 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great. Thanks so much!

  • @bongisiphomntambo9026
    @bongisiphomntambo9026 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you have to get a copyright license to use footage and snapshots from movies like "the terminator"
    If so, how did you?
    I need this info for a project that I am doing.

  • @CarlosJuarez-dl3nn
    @CarlosJuarez-dl3nn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    Do more AWS content! :D
    Pretty please?

  • @Muzly
    @Muzly 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love the Arnie clips.

  • @ct5816
    @ct5816 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Is there any equivalent to these from Azure?

  • @ankushjain358
    @ankushjain358 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use Amplify the reverse way. I first create the backend resources in AWS, then configure the Amplify SDK in the app to use the existing backend. This way I feel more confident.

  • @scifiroel
    @scifiroel 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Random question: would you say that using wordpress as an app backend infrastructure is a good idea (since it has a REST-api now)?

  • @imrannazir6931
    @imrannazir6931 ปีที่แล้ว

    AWS now have Lambda URLs. So they have the 'callable functions' base covered.

  • @dk0r51
    @dk0r51 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    13:29 "Now I probably wouldn't build an app like this in the real world..."
    ...because? 🤔

    • @anonwithamnesia
      @anonwithamnesia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Anthony because it gets very complicated

  • @holidayexplanation4505
    @holidayexplanation4505 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much. Awesome video.

  • @ighsight
    @ighsight 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love AWS, but Amplify & Cognito are not your best choice if you are looking to avoid the complexities of setting up user authorization. Which seems to be the point of using solutions like Amplify or Firebase in the first place. I lost hours and hours of developer time trying to get it to work. The difference in speed & complexity for setup are confirmed by this video, Firebase seems so much easier to get going compared to the Amplify/GraphQL steps showed during comparison near end of video.

  • @omar_benaidy
    @omar_benaidy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is svelte native / native script available in any of the platforms ?

    • @basdfgwe
      @basdfgwe 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Didn't know anyone uses nativescript.

  • @VictorAdad
    @VictorAdad 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, keep it up!

  • @mrgreen5903
    @mrgreen5903 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Still glad that react is everywhere 😌

  • @mattiaesposito5525
    @mattiaesposito5525 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    arnold schwarzenegger in the video rocks

  • @tylergabb2632
    @tylergabb2632 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Firebase lets you attach a snapshot to a filtered collection, for example
    .firestore()
    .collection("collection")
    .where("user", "==", user.email)
    .onSnapshot(...)
    What would the equivalent be on amplify? As far as I can tell, your graphql subscription listens for all todo's, what if you wanted to only listen to those owned by a specific user?

    • @Liquidian
      @Liquidian 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You would specify which todos you want in the query, then subscribe to that.

  • @scottcooper9089
    @scottcooper9089 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Waiting on that updated video

  • @MikeNugget
    @MikeNugget 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    U forgot one meme: "Not bad, not bad, now you.." xD

    • @anonwithamnesia
      @anonwithamnesia 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Haha this would be good

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not a bad idea for a future video

  • @ectoplazmgmailcom
    @ectoplazmgmailcom 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    FaunaDB also is a good option

  • @roberthall9452
    @roberthall9452 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Long time Svelte user here. I'm curious about your difficulty w/ Svelte and Rollup. Rollup is all I use w/ Svelte.

    • @Fireship
      @Fireship  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Its an issue with the way aws is packaged, nothing to do with svelte. Try buliding amplify in a vanilla svelte project to see what I mean.

    • @jpbash
      @jpbash 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Fireship dev.to/swyx/making-aws-amplify-work-with-rollup-2d9m