One more note about Inglorious Basterds: when Shosanna kills Frederick it is the gunshots in the film playing that cover her real gunshots. Cinema helps her out and the Nazis are too stuck in their own film to realize they're in danger.
But cinema kills her: she sees a moving scene with Frederick being somewhat shellshocked on top of the belltower. She then watches him, walks to him and gets gunned down...
Vector Sigma lmao call him what you want but while you’re complaining about a director on the internet, he’s in his nice big penthouse with his millions. Who’s the lowlife again?
This is why I loved Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. The film so often takes little moments to address how Tarantino's belief in and admiration for the innocence of Hollywood and the innocence of American culture is failing, whether that's in Dalton's self-doubt about himself and his career, the suspense scenes involving the seemingly inevitable horrors surrounding the Manson cult, or the bits where Tate naively watches herself in the theater, oblivious to the tragedy we know would befall her in real life. In a sense, it's like he's realizing that these moments of taking delight in the power of cinema are fading slowly, in the same way that I'd argue he was somewhat hinting at towards the end of Basterds with the idea of destroying the theater (though, like the video said, not without following it up with a moment of indulgence by Tarantino through blowing up Hitler and the Nazi machine with it). But in the final act of OUaTiH, you pretty much feel him take a deep breath and go, "Yeah, my belief in the movie system may be a dated one, but you know what? I'm gonna keep believing in it, long after it's gone," culminating in yet another Tarantino revisionist moment, a defiant middle finger to the industry which has slowly suffocated the art form for years now. Or it could be about feet. Yeah, it's probably about feet.
"Experian has lobbied in support of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, legislation currently being considered in the Senate that would broaden its immunity were it to share its stores of information with the Department of Homeland Security (which in turn would be compelled to share it with law enforcement and the NSA). " Dunno man. I might be a little more wary about whose sponsorship you accept, speaking of double-edged swords.
to be fair, it's alternate history...I see it more as a what if instead of the solution, and Tarantino is an eccentric anyway, so not everyone will agree with his interpretations/ suggestions xD
I think the problem is more that he feels the need to hammer home that idea. Like damn nigga we're taught this from the time we're 4 we get it. Most of the people saying that are 30-50 year old conservatives.
The thing that remained fixed in my mind was how calm and matter of fact Shosanna and Marcel were as they lived their last hours and enacted their plan and how clear but understated their love for each other was as they did so, then Shosanna laughing as the screen melts and then her laughing image projected on the smoke. The first time I saw that I was like...Wow. Now that's a scene
Really disappointing to see Wisecrack taking sponsors from a megacorp like Experian. I thought you guys were worried about our upcoming cyberpunk technoligarchy.
I was shown an ad by youtube before the video started, another ad by the video creator himself at the start and FOUR more ads during the first ten minutes of the video at which point i stopped watching. Great job TH-cam.
Boo hoo you have five-second interruptions in your free content every couple of minutes. This is how they make their money. If you don't like it, go pay for cable, so they can force you to watch ten unskippable ads in a row every ten minutes.
I have watched inglorious basterds like 10 times, and I never tire of watching it, it's simply the best movie I have ever seen, and believe me I have seen quite a lot. I once watched it 2 times in a row without a break. My favourite scene is the one in the tavern btw
I mean ok, but at some point I felt it is over simplifying to say the rise of neonazism is because of the fall of the glory of cinema. There are like a million reasons this has happened and cinema is probably not the big part
It's also grossly overstated, especially in the US. There is no new white nationalist movement on the rise in the US, it's just that liberals keep on calling anyone who disagrees with them a white supremacist. I say that as a liberal. It needs to stop.
Lodatz there’s literally neo-nazi groups that proudly parade themselves around as neo-nazis and there’s the most there have ever been in the world since the early 20th century and probably the most in America ever
The sad part about that is that we live more and more in a post-truth world where facts can be dismissed as 'fake news' and 'mainstream media lies' which shows how much the mass media and in general society has messed up when it comes to selling facts and truth for biases and spectacle.
That sounds good but isn’t true. Knowledge and truth is not a cure to ignorance or arrogance. So it won’t be able to change someone’s ideology alone. Life experience cannot be taught just like how breaking ideologies cannot merely be taught. Some are even stubborn to death and war. Those who started it may die, but it can live on into new groups that share the same belief.
@@bartonbella3131 the USA invented the klashnikov and Soviet tanks isn't that right, Americans literally traveled to the ussr and joined the red army to liberate Berlin ? Seriously tho, the ingenuity of Soviet engineering literally halted the nazis in their tracks. they came up with a strategy that could actually stop and push back against the blitzkrieg, so thing the brits and French all failed at
That same Experian who never noticed they had been breached for nine months by their San Diego office 2013 and had 250,000 credit reports stolen? Forget about it.
“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.” ― Frank Herbert, Dune “It is necessary to take what is common as our guide; however, though this logic is universal, the many live as if each individual has his own private wisdom.” ― Heraclitus
this movie is a movie within the tarantinoverse that characters in pulp fiction/reservoir dogs would have seen at the theater, it tells the story of that universes version of ww2
I love this channel and love that y'all get sponsorships but I wish you wouldn't have done Experian. Since they had every adult in America's data hacked and nothing bad happened to them. Love this channel but that company isn't good. Edit: I just did a little more research and saw that I had Experian and Equifax mixed up. Equifax is the one with the awful hack, TransUnion and Experian are the other companies. I apologize about spreading misinformation on that, but don't apologize for loving the channel. Keep it up Jared!
Considering that Tarantino himself was supposed to portray Aldo Raine instead of Brad Pitt, the last line of the movie is even more obvious as it should have been the director himself talking straight in the eyes of the audience saying "This might be my masterpiece"
Just a quick note: there hasn’t actually been an increase in hate crimes. Reports of hate crimes have increased over the last few years because more departments have just started reporting them.
Also, you've got neo-progressives in power who expand the definition of hate crime to include things no sane person would consider to be such. Maybe not so much in the US but definitely in some places in Europe such as the UK.
@@mr.peanutbutter6969 this is hilarious. “Almost all hate crimes are faked-unless it’s the right getting hate crimed, in which case it’s totally real you guys.”
Ew, please don't take sponsorship deals from experian. I know you gotta make money somehow, but can't you be a little more selective about where it comes from?
This is late obviously but I always thought it was more of a momentous to the PTSD a soldier can face and it broke away from the facade of militarism and shit like that
Yeah, except American capitalism makes it look stupid and flawed, like a bunch of yanks. Extreme nationalists want the majority to look good, unrealistic and glorified. But... AS has some war-tune prop in it.
Your pronounciation of Goebbels is adorable. It sounds like a German trying to pronounce the word gerbils. And failing. Love your stuff. Greetings from Germany!
Two things I realised recently 1) Landa almost never kills anyone directly. He is just a detective. She avoids shooting Shoshanna in the beginning. The only person he kills is von Hammersmark 2)When they meet again he orders milk. He definitely knows who she is
I don't think the ending is that simple. I've always thought that the bigger statement in the burning down of the theater that leads to the death of Hitler is that if you destroy cinema, you destroy history. I think Tarantino has been very aware from the start that this is going to happen. And in all of his movies, in both his universes cinema is the thing that keeps everything together. And he has always modified history in his films as far back as True Romance. He has also stated this numerous times in interviews. Throughout his films you'll find embellishments to history as we know it and those aren't just bad writing. Tarantino needs to have his stories driven by cinema away from historical accuracy. The purpose for this is beyond me, to be honest, but it's so obvious to any Tarantino fan that this is one of the most self-aware things he does in his movies. I hope by the 10th film there is a hint of why this is so, but knowing his work so far, I think it will remain a puzzle. Like why the hell did he decide to name his first film "RESERVOIR" dogs. In his words it just sounds cool. And that's another thing Tarantino does a lot... he just improvises.
I don't think Tarantino necessarily got the message of Inglorious Basterds wrong or that it's no longer relevant. I think the movie is merely about the power of cinema and that can be applied in numerous manners. It could just refer to how films can impact us and resonate with us, and in that sense it really hasn't lost relevance as its message is something that'll last until cinema itself is gone. As long as movies are being made and can resonate with people, his message here stands.
@@NostalgiNorden It's in English because it's about Ukrainians speaking Ukrainian and Russian to each other. They wouldn't notice or think about speaking Ukrainian to each other, they'd just see it as talking. If it's in English, a western audience would perceive it as a Russian would in the actual situation. It makes a lot of sense
Nothing like a dramatized hit piece on nuclear energy with some sketchy ties to the Oil Industry. Such a drama they dramatized the physics of how the physics work.
Hi, love your videos, but the music on this one really didn't work for me. It's very dramatic and distracting, and it's keeps from really following your arguments.
I still think the message of Inglorious Basterds kind of works. After all, not all the Nazis died at the end of the film. Hans Landa lived on and presumably went on to live in America. So I don’t believe Inglorious Basterds is arguing that film killed the Nazis, but that film, and the ruling center it can represent, can damage and minimise the harm done by these toxic ideals those that the Nazis promoted and continue to promote posthumously.
How long after a movie comes out do you usually do a SMTM podcast on it??? I just watched Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood and I cannot waiittttttt to hear what y’all have to say about it I needddd now!!
"robotism" really is a derogatory word that means big shot tv executive not having the control of culture under their thumb Even if that only lead to worse outcome, I would prefer "robotism" to the alternative on ideological grounds alone I don't know much about McLuhan, beside of how popular he apparently was and I would like if you talked more about his ideas. But, either you didn't explain his idea clearly or I just don't like his idea of "robotism" Robotism is a media mogul's complaint that he can't be Goebbels anymore and that he's going to lose control of the nation's culture. I don't think anyone should be in control of the nation's culture. Sure, it might be sad that we are no longer united by a common culture (calling in a monoculture, feels icky to me btw) but that's just the price of freedom ? And really doesn't that mostly lead to design by comitty, watered down lowest common denominator pop culture (like the avengers)
shodanxx I agree. I enjoy robotism much moreso than centralism, but I think it’s more of an interesting reality than a positive one. Propaganda has shifted to accommodate robotism. Look at Britannica USA’s targeted advertising. Propaganda made for the robotism era. I’m interested in how robotism will effect they changing America.
Well for someone who don't know much about an author's ideas, you seem to sounds like expert tbh... that's your interpretation mate. Robotism isn't a media mogul complain. It's a philosophical concept that simply means society lack a central culture. Shrinking it down to media is very reductive. Religion, science, education etc are ALL affected by a central culture, or lack thereof. I'm also very much shocked that you state "that's just the price of freedom" while simultaneously contradicting yourself by mentioning that "it's sad" because we now mostly end up with films created by " a design comity". Isn't that everything but creative freedom? He also never said that someone in particular should be ruling a nation's culture. This idea that an individual or a company rule culture is actually a product of robotism, which as you said IS a derogative term because it literally means corporations (or religious cult, or political organizations) playing on the de-centralization of culture to appeal individualism. Ironically enough, those corporations are very hypocrite and in fact, reveal that robotism control your "freedom" of choice by restricting content based on your IP address for example. Of course a "monoculture" isn't a good either but we all need to at least find a group of people who share the same interest than ours. This is a perfectly natural and healthy human behavior. There is nothing wrong in being proud of your culture. That doesn't mean that you think it's "superior" to others' culture - at all! You have all the rights in the world to be proud of your culture. Why wouldn't you?! It's your heritage to *share with the world*. It *defines you as a human being*. You have all the right in the world to take your distances or even reject your culture if you don't like it, and choose another one. But at the end of the day, we're all part of a culture. Being in London isn't the same as being in Hong Kong. The unwritten rules and ways of life are completely different, and it we weren't agreeing on some set of common behavioral archetype, the world would be in constant chaos (which it is already close to).
The fact that the guy telling you “your thoughts should be in line with the rest of society” is the one calling actual free diverse thinking “Robotism” tells you all you need to know about how full of shit this “‘media theorist” is. Incredible how no one else is acknowledging this.
@@mariojose1993 The central idea that morality is dependent upon pop culture for its dissemination and acceptance by the masses, that it can be weakened simply by the multiplicity of voices online. Many of which are the same cultural arguments we've been having for decades transported to a new medium, hence why topical shows like The Simpsons at its best are still insightful now.
@Scott Johnstone watch the actual video dude. Wisecrack doesn't talk shit about the movie, they just explain why its message wouldn't work in the world nowadays.
I just saw the movie yesterday and I am in awe! As an Austrian citizen everything to do with WW2 (and 1 for that matter....uuupsiii) hits close to home. Being able to understand English and German makes this movie 100 times better too. Oh I wish I spoke French. That experience must be grandious. Needless to say I love this movie, Tarantino in general.
that feeling when finish ur concluding paragraph with reflecting on the glorification of the past and the vast dependancy on it existing as an idealization in order to maintain hope in an 'ever fracturing world' and it gives everyone whiplash from the tonal shift of that truth bomb to upbeat advertisement. Lol im mclovin it my dudes! This is enough logic to mull over till halloween!! Thank you as always I love the depth and hardwork yall put into covering these topics.
8:24 cherry picking information from bias, far-left sources like NPR, Harvard Opinion, The Nation, Independent, Vice, etc... that drastically overplay the numerically small rise of far right extremism is a horrible way to make a point. I'm not saying there hasn't been a rise in far right extremism, but the extent of this "issue" is minuscule in the grand scheme of things, and is more so a response to (IMO) naive far left policies like positive discrimination and open boarders. Also, those sources are guilty of lumping-in normal people with conservative views into the "far-right"camp.
I agree. The dreaded so-called "rise of the far right" isnt as big and scary as the sensationalist media outlets portray. They're overblowing the actual significance (or lack thereof) of this vocal minority/small subsection of society. If an unsuspecting reader got all of their talking points and political viewpoints from media headlines they'd think skinheads and kkk were marching down our streets daily.
I particularly loved the part where he committed several fallacies and his argument fell flat on his face but because people are sheep he will keep getting money.
Given that a huge proportion of the men serving in the German army by 1944-1945 are unwilling conscripts, many of them teenagers, it's almost certain that the Basterds victims were teenage boys pressed into being a soldier against their will.
If you define Nazis to include Neo-Nazis and other white supremacists, then you could say that cinema failed to destroy the Nazis. That's a pretty broad definition that sets the bar very high for cinema. In order to clear that bar, film would have had to fundamentally change human nature instead of just helping to end a facist political movement in the 1930s.
One thing I hated about IB is the lack of security they have at the movie premiere. You have Hitler, Goebbles, Goering there. You have a bunch of wealthy high society of Germany there. You even have foreign dignitaries there. What you don't have is the kind of guards & security that type of audience would demand. Also take in account you have a group of maniacs going around killing every Nazi they come across. There would be every kind of security, secret service, sniper & soldier imaginable at that place. They would have spent hours going around the cinema searching inside and out for anything suspicious like, you know, a bunch of flammable film sitting in a big pile. They would have vetted everyone that was attending well before the event took place. If they didn't know you, you weren't getting in. You were probably getting arrested so you could be questioned. There would have been 2x as many men on the outside of the cinema who would have broken down doors to get Hitler and the rest out of there. Yeah, yeah I know. Suspension of disbelief. It's an alternate history. Landa helped the Basterds win, blah, blah blah. Still this bothered me when I saw the film years ago.
Okay...but several of the attempts on Hitler's life, including Stauffenberg's, show that Nazi security procedures were actually surprisingly lax at times.
This robotism could've been helpful towards undermining Fascist Germany, which depended on there being a common society which had gotten its values from their state. Saying film defeated the Nazis is like saying guns defeated the Nazis - if true, then its Technically correct. but its power isn't necessarily Anti-Nazi.
Films have kept the Nazis down. Film propaganda has been incredibly efficient at cementing the image of nazis has evil incarnate. Just look at how differently communists and the USSR are treated in daily life. Does society has the same visceral reaction when they see someone carrying a USSR flag to one carrying a nazi flag? No. The reaction isn't even close despite being both equally abhorrent. That's because of the power of Hollywood's propaganda.
Oh ffs theres always one This is a dumb idea because araki explores a lot of dio's intentions in part 6 which is still just a manga. Wisecrack does philosophy on film and tv.
StrangerX9 DIO isn’t a morally or psychologically complex villain. He’s just an insanely charismatic, flamboyant, and frankly terrifying villain. If you want one of these videos on _any_ JoJo villain, I would use Yoshikage Kira. Maybe Pucci, because at least then Wisecrack can cover morality from the perspective of attaining Heaven.
In my humble opinion, Tarantino is a genius, I own all of his films in Blu-ray, have seen each several times even with subtitles on so I do not miss anything. The way he scripts his movies, it's like watching a Shakespearean play, fantastic long dialogues and dramatic endings, no one can deny Quentin is unique.
I think a reason for the rise of right thinking is how globalization and wars have made people mitigate everywhere. Mostly into places that are well off, safe and stable. That leads to a scenario where the original residents go outside and don't see the kind of people they are familiar with. They see different cultures, hear different languages, see different faces. And none of them "fit" into the environment they are used to. This doesn't get helped by how many migrating people are either unwilling to adapt to the customs of their new environment or aren't getting the necessary support to do so. So they stand out in public but stay among their own privately, leaving them as the foreigners for at least two generations. This gaping chasm between "us" and "them" drives people into the perceived safety of a tighter, more conservative and territorial mindset. Not to mention the last decade got many people quite disillusioned and dissatisfied with left leadership. Their failings have strengthened the position of the opposing side.
if by left you mean the sappy "liberal" "feel your pain" crowd that do nothing to help the working people, I would agree 100% with you. which is why even in the USA in paralel with far right you see workers movements
Totally agree with the ritualistic nature of watching a movie. Even though I watch most movies on my laptop these days, I have to mentally prepare days ahead when If I really want the movie to have an impact on my and to properly grasp it. If I just decide on a random movie 5 minutes before I watch it on Netflix or Prime, it rarely if ever gives me the proper feeling of watching a movie, most of the time it just makes it feel like Tv, or a TH-cam video.
Sorry I'm afraid to watch this video bc I don't want to see some millennial know it all bash some movie by Tarantino who is wholly accomplished in his craft and most possibly created his best masterpiece in this film.
The hidden philosophical plot of GTA San Andreas: Conspiracy and Control. How the authority and ambition for power can drive civilians to social clashes in the context of the 90s.
12:43 And that is where you are wrong. Your conclusion implies that there is something as wrong think. That's exactly the reason that leads people to that kind of thinking. You have to analyse why people flock to Nazism. The answer according to me is simply: Lack of worthwhile opportunities.
This movie is excellent. Very entertaining. However two things really stand out for me. Firstly, the intro sequence with Landa playing around with the French dairy farmer and the second one is Michael Fassbender sequence in the bunker. Great writing and great execution.
@@Pantano63 yeah, that's what i mean, that's the normal speling. if it had been a literal translation it would have been "Basteardos sin glouria" or something like that
@@Pantano63 not all latin america tho, here in Brazil it's "Bastardos Inglórios", also without the E. The change from "inglorious" to "without glory" is weird tho
When my dad wanted to go to the cinema, he had to pay the equivalent of €2, when I want to go to the cinema, I have to pay €12 just to see the film, and a bottle of water can cost €5. I really love the cinema, but it's just too expensive to go watch every film I want to see there. Especially if the film is potentially really bad, and I can watch it for free two months later.
This whole "going to cinema as ritual" shit is intellectual garbage.. I have seen the best films on my laptop and I don't feel like they influenced me less because of that Honestly some of the things spewed in this video has no basis or actual research behind them at all, movies have become shit, interacting with people is becoming shittier, and people are starting to lose faith in common sense facts like "nazism is bad" because of a whole bunch of reasons and one of which is that media corps are no longer trust worthy, and not one of them is that netflix is killing the effing "ritual"
Plus you don't have to deal with smelly fat/tall people that cough any time they're not talking or checking their phone that they forgot to put on silent while they eat crispy snacks from the most crinkly bag ever invented. And you get to drink alcohol, decide your own pee breaks, and hang out with people you like when watching the movie at home. The superior experience is clear to me.
That is very spot on. in contrast to the past when we shared centralized ideas, nowadays we are isolated in our own bubble and consume content exclusively to our personal liking, cementing and reinforcing only narrow set of ideas.
@@paulcharles2457 depends on how you count it I think. Specifically, do you have to see the body on screen for it to count? Or does a movie about a particular battle get to count everyone who died in that battle irl? If the former the actual war still has the upper hand I think. But if the latter, most of the major battles have had multiple movies about them made. It might be enough to make the fictional nazi body count outnumber the irl count. And some of those Nazis have died quite a few times.
A bunch of people say they've lost all their credit because of Experian. If you're going to shill that's fine, but at least make sure the companies you advertise aren't scamming people.
Long shot here but can we please get a philosophy of Mass Effect video? Y'all have referenced it before and it's a goddamn goldmine of philosophy and cultural comentary! Yeah it's not super relevant right now but that doesn't mean the fanbase isn't still rabid for new content! Besides a series as excellent as ME could always use some more exposure
This was not the video I thought it was going to be. It was really good and insightful. Thanks for sharing this. With that said don't ever again say anything bad about Inglourious Basterds!!!!!!
I'm pretty sure this movie is 100% historically accurate.
Same bro
Yeah it's true I was there.
@Nigerian Prince Holy shit! No time long see
Michael Roper no it suck
Nope, bro, German high command was killed by a lone dude called Blazkowitz.
0:15 I thought he’s gonna say *”It’s his profound love for feet.”*
🤨
Well, that too was referenced in one scene
I thought that too lol
Foot massage
Based
One more note about Inglorious Basterds: when Shosanna kills Frederick it is the gunshots in the film playing that cover her real gunshots. Cinema helps her out and the Nazis are too stuck in their own film to realize they're in danger.
Yes there’s a reason she quickly looks out the projector window to make sure no one noticed
That's pretty explicit in the movie.
Pretty sure everybody knows it
But cinema kills her: she sees a moving scene with Frederick being somewhat shellshocked on top of the belltower. She then watches him, walks to him and gets gunned down...
@@MrGougui Very well noted actually! Both sides of the coin, I guess.
" this may just be my masterpiece "
Yes quentin I think it is
Very pretentious.
It’s brave of you to assume that’s not pulp fiction 😂
Tardis crew inglorious basterds is amazing but pulp fiction is his masterpiece (at least in my opinion)
It's garbage. Absolute garbage. Like the low life that made it.
Vector Sigma lmao call him what you want but while you’re complaining about a director on the internet, he’s in his nice big penthouse with his millions. Who’s the lowlife again?
This is why I loved Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. The film so often takes little moments to address how Tarantino's belief in and admiration for the innocence of Hollywood and the innocence of American culture is failing, whether that's in Dalton's self-doubt about himself and his career, the suspense scenes involving the seemingly inevitable horrors surrounding the Manson cult, or the bits where Tate naively watches herself in the theater, oblivious to the tragedy we know would befall her in real life. In a sense, it's like he's realizing that these moments of taking delight in the power of cinema are fading slowly, in the same way that I'd argue he was somewhat hinting at towards the end of Basterds with the idea of destroying the theater (though, like the video said, not without following it up with a moment of indulgence by Tarantino through blowing up Hitler and the Nazi machine with it). But in the final act of OUaTiH, you pretty much feel him take a deep breath and go, "Yeah, my belief in the movie system may be a dated one, but you know what? I'm gonna keep believing in it, long after it's gone," culminating in yet another Tarantino revisionist moment, a defiant middle finger to the industry which has slowly suffocated the art form for years now.
Or it could be about feet.
Yeah, it's probably about feet.
This is my fave Tarantino comment ever 🙏🏽⚡️🤓😎
Loved this interpretation
"Experian has lobbied in support of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act, legislation currently being considered in the Senate that would broaden its immunity were it to share its stores of information with the Department of Homeland Security (which in turn would be compelled to share it with law enforcement and the NSA). "
Dunno man. I might be a little more wary about whose sponsorship you accept, speaking of double-edged swords.
He doesn't care
Hopefully this doesn't end up like the Candid debacle.
Welcome to Crapitalism, Comrade
Couldn't agree more
There are no ethical consumables under capitalism ;)
to be fair, it's alternate history...I see it more as a what if instead of the solution, and Tarantino is an eccentric anyway, so not everyone will agree with his interpretations/ suggestions xD
It is a fake propaganda,just that it is for the other side...
درع ماس that's what I'm saying ...
@@17-MASY a movie? fake? really?
@@fatboicarti8735 his name is dumbass written in Urdu, what do you expect
wait, are you telling me it's not acutally "that's a bingo"???
You just say Bingo
how fun!
That’s a bigooo
@@CloggedFob3 damn it, I knew I wouldn't be the first to crack that one!
th-cam.com/video/4JpDQT7dMZ4/w-d-xo.html
Jared: Nazis are bad.
Totally-not-nazis: Actually, this makes you a nazi and nazis don't exist!
I think the problem is more that he feels the need to hammer home that idea. Like damn nigga we're taught this from the time we're 4 we get it.
Most of the people saying that are 30-50 year old conservatives.
@@wisemankugelmemicus1701
>White guy saying the n word
>Complains that "Nazis bad" is being hammered too hard
🤔
et Han of Astora hahaha
@@RaylaEclipse I watched one of his videos, and uh yikes.
@@justacat.1428 Nazism is an ideology. They definitely do still exist.
The thing that remained fixed in my mind was how calm and matter of fact Shosanna and Marcel were as they lived their last hours and enacted their plan and how clear but understated their love for each other was as they did so, then Shosanna laughing as the screen melts and then her laughing image projected on the smoke. The first time I saw that I was like...Wow. Now that's a scene
Really disappointing to see Wisecrack taking sponsors from a megacorp like Experian. I thought you guys were worried about our upcoming cyberpunk technoligarchy.
Especially ones that lost millions of people data via hack
@@regularstan6212 Equifax* sadly, there's only 3 major credit scoring companies. Unless you want to nationalize the credit scoring industry.
If you can't beat the system...
Man's gotta eat
I have no idea what the fuck you guys are even talking about...
I was shown an ad by youtube before the video started, another ad by the video creator himself at the start and FOUR more ads during the first ten minutes of the video at which point i stopped watching. Great job TH-cam.
the creator put the ads in there....
fuck youtube with there overbearing ads and the users adding too many ads. it's so annoying
But you took the time to write this way to long comment
Boo hoo you have five-second interruptions in your free content every couple of minutes. This is how they make their money. If you don't like it, go pay for cable, so they can force you to watch ten unskippable ads in a row every ten minutes.
@@harmevers2661 and you took the time to read it.
hol up. theres a sylvester stallone soccer movie?
.football
@@NostalgiNorden "fútbol"
With PELÉ
Escape to victory. He.plays golie for the allied pow team against the german national team.
Classic film
I have watched inglorious basterds like 10 times, and I never tire of watching it, it's simply the best movie I have ever seen, and believe me I have seen quite a lot. I once watched it 2 times in a row without a break.
My favourite scene is the one in the tavern btw
I mean ok, but at some point I felt it is over simplifying to say the rise of neonazism is because of the fall of the glory of cinema. There are like a million reasons this has happened and cinema is probably not the big part
It's also grossly overstated, especially in the US. There is no new white nationalist movement on the rise in the US, it's just that liberals keep on calling anyone who disagrees with them a white supremacist. I say that as a liberal. It needs to stop.
Lodatz there’s literally neo-nazi groups that proudly parade themselves around as neo-nazis and there’s the most there have ever been in the world since the early 20th century and probably the most in America ever
Dean Keepers the FUCKING southerners.
Lodatz that is a complete lie.
@Michael Freed dude, exactly
This one and Overlord will be the closest thing we will ever get to a Wolfenstein movie.
Crazy Bastard man in high castle?
@@fakegmale4648TV series, not a movie.
Dude. I was thinking same thing, but as a game about this movie.
yes, it's *atmospheric(both political power and geographically)*
- and colors that pop are green and muddy
The most important thing about cinematography is eating beans at the theater
Bush’s baked beans, the only acceptable option
But only when Cars 2 is showing
@@obama9076 Roll that beautiful bean footage.
I like to flick my bean at the theater
I feel like the background music on this video is a bit loud and distracting. Anyone else feel the same?
Yep.
Well, I do now
I came here to say this. It's terrible.
I like it
I don't find that annoying, but I find it anyone that they have push their political beliefs down everyone's through every video.
You can't destroy an ideology with violence or lies. You can only destroy it with the truth.
The sad part about that is that we live more and more in a post-truth world where facts can be dismissed as 'fake news' and 'mainstream media lies' which shows how much the mass media and in general society has messed up when it comes to selling facts and truth for biases and spectacle.
This isn't even remotely true lmfao.
Um, no. You can only destroy something with the oldest wrecking ball of all time: violence/power.
@Jordan Myles Evans what the fuck…
That sounds good but isn’t true. Knowledge and truth is not a cure to ignorance or arrogance. So it won’t be able to change someone’s ideology alone. Life experience cannot be taught just like how breaking ideologies cannot merely be taught. Some are even stubborn to death and war. Those who started it may die, but it can live on into new groups that share the same belief.
Yeah, sure, the cinema completely destroyed the nazis.
Well, that and, you know, the overwhelming tide of angry communists.
José Rafael "Tota" de Souza and those communist using the materials given to them by the angry capitalists
@@bartonbella3131 so angry people who got little bit teed off ended the Nazis
Who taught u history bud your as accurate as this movie
@@bartonbella3131 - uhm - I think you need to go back to your history class....
@@bartonbella3131 the USA invented the klashnikov and Soviet tanks isn't that right, Americans literally traveled to the ussr and joined the red army to liberate Berlin ?
Seriously tho, the ingenuity of Soviet engineering literally halted the nazis in their tracks. they came up with a strategy that could actually stop and push back against the blitzkrieg, so thing the brits and French all failed at
That same Experian who never noticed they had been breached for nine months by their San Diego office 2013 and had 250,000 credit reports stolen? Forget about it.
No, wrong company. You're thinking of Equifax
No, he really is talking about Experian.
Am I the only one super bothered by the background music? I can't focus on the voice!!
Made my heart race
Its called A.D.D.
Yeah somethings wrong w u lmao
@TwinTurbo Ray I think it's time for a psychiatrist evaluation 😅
"Robotism" is a terrible name :/
Not if you intend to use it outside of the context it was coined in to add colour to a narrative.
It sounds like worshiping our robot overlords
Reminds me of robo-tripping....good lord I was so retarded in high school lol 🤦🏽♂️
“Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.”
― Frank Herbert, Dune
“It is necessary to take what is common as our guide; however, though this logic is universal, the many live as if each individual has his own private wisdom.”
― Heraclitus
this movie is a movie within the tarantinoverse that characters in pulp fiction/reservoir dogs would have seen at the theater, it tells the story of that universes version of ww2
I love this channel and love that y'all get sponsorships but I wish you wouldn't have done Experian. Since they had every adult in America's data hacked and nothing bad happened to them. Love this channel but that company isn't good.
Edit: I just did a little more research and saw that I had Experian and Equifax mixed up. Equifax is the one with the awful hack, TransUnion and Experian are the other companies. I apologize about spreading misinformation on that, but don't apologize for loving the channel. Keep it up Jared!
Wait I thought that was Equifax, or are they all kinda the same thing?
AspLode different company same field.
Like universal studios and warner bris.
@@AspLode Different credit rating agencies but Equifax is the one that got hacked.
AspLode same shit, different pile
"Since they had every adult in America's data hacked " well, kids don't have any valuable data to hack!
Considering that Tarantino himself was supposed to portray Aldo Raine instead of Brad Pitt, the last line of the movie is even more obvious as it should have been the director himself talking straight in the eyes of the audience saying "This might be my masterpiece"
Just a quick note: there hasn’t actually been an increase in hate crimes. Reports of hate crimes have increased over the last few years because more departments have just started reporting them.
Also, you've got neo-progressives in power who expand the definition of hate crime to include things no sane person would consider to be such. Maybe not so much in the US but definitely in some places in Europe such as the UK.
Also most "hate crimes" are all faked.
Or people on the right are the ones being hate crimed
@@mr.peanutbutter6969 this is hilarious. “Almost all hate crimes are faked-unless it’s the right getting hate crimed, in which case it’s totally real you guys.”
@@mr.peanutbutter6969 you are so wrong
Ew, please don't take sponsorship deals from experian. I know you gotta make money somehow, but can't you be a little more selective about where it comes from?
Agreed. Reminds me of the sh*t they do in china.
I expected a video about Tarantino. Instead got one of the most interesting analysis of modern society I've seen in a while.
"That's just like... your opinion, man." (LEBOWSKI, Jeff "The Dude")
best tarantino film
Maurício Rodrigues you did not need to define that quote I think. The Coen Bros are so much better than Tarentino imho
@@batgurrl take it from a guy that can't spell...
IAMPEDRO 101 the dude abides lol
batgurrl lmfao. You couldn’t be more wrong. Lmao
Am i the only one who looks at "A nations pride" and is reminded of American sniper?
Literally everyone left of bill o riely has made that point bc it’s paper thin militaristic propaganda
David L ehhhh the film is still very much a propaganda film.
damn! it is!
This is late obviously but I always thought it was more of a momentous to the PTSD a soldier can face and it broke away from the facade of militarism and shit like that
Yeah, except American capitalism makes it look stupid and flawed, like a bunch of yanks. Extreme nationalists want the majority to look good, unrealistic and glorified. But... AS has some war-tune prop in it.
Your pronounciation of Goebbels is adorable. It sounds like a German trying to pronounce the word gerbils. And failing.
Love your stuff. Greetings from Germany!
he says it like 'gerbils'
Is it gay-bles? Like Matt Groening?
@Conor Koritor theres no r in the pronunciation
@DXSP X What do you mean?
The „oe“ in goebbels is pronounced like the „u“ in turtle.
And the „e“ is pronounced like the „a“ in „thanks“
Two things I realised recently
1) Landa almost never kills anyone directly. He is just a detective. She avoids shooting Shoshanna in the beginning. The only person he kills is von Hammersmark
2)When they meet again he orders milk. He definitely knows who she is
Your milky observation skills get a like.
I don't think the ending is that simple. I've always thought that the bigger statement in the burning down of the theater that leads to the death of Hitler is that if you destroy cinema, you destroy history.
I think Tarantino has been very aware from the start that this is going to happen. And in all of his movies, in both his universes cinema is the thing that keeps everything together. And he has always modified history in his films as far back as True Romance. He has also stated this numerous times in interviews. Throughout his films you'll find embellishments to history as we know it and those aren't just bad writing. Tarantino needs to have his stories driven by cinema away from historical accuracy. The purpose for this is beyond me, to be honest, but it's so obvious to any Tarantino fan that this is one of the most self-aware things he does in his movies. I hope by the 10th film there is a hint of why this is so, but knowing his work so far, I think it will remain a puzzle. Like why the hell did he decide to name his first film "RESERVOIR" dogs. In his words it just sounds cool.
And that's another thing Tarantino does a lot... he just improvises.
Your sponsor... like I'll ever trust Experian with anything of mine after their BS.
that was equifax my dude
@@Warchief1521 It's happened to both
WTF is going on in wisecrack? They have been advertising unethical companies like better help and now experian.
@@danchase7454 alot of creators are recently
So you have no credit card, loans, etc.?
As someone who works in the financial world this add hurts me.
As someone who can write in English this hurts me. JK I just thought this was a funny response in my head, I now realize I should just s
I expected a 5 seconds video saying "nothing"
I don't think Tarantino necessarily got the message of Inglorious Basterds wrong or that it's no longer relevant. I think the movie is merely about the power of cinema and that can be applied in numerous manners. It could just refer to how films can impact us and resonate with us, and in that sense it really hasn't lost relevance as its message is something that'll last until cinema itself is gone. As long as movies are being made and can resonate with people, his message here stands.
Dude, stop saying Gerbels.
Excuse him, it’s of course *REICHSPROPAGANDAMINISTER GÖBBELS*
That's how they say it in the film. Well, "gairbels", but close enough
It's not like the man deserves having his name pronounced correctly.
Just call him Gerbils.
@@무군 I laughed thank you.
“Send for Goebbels.”
“Send for Goebbels.”
“Send for Goebbels.”
“Send for Goebbels!”
I just think there wasn’t enough Christoph Waltz
@Doctor Spaceman ya just say bingo
I’d love a video analysis on HBO’s Chernobyl
It's in english. It's stupid.
Oh hellyea.
@@NostalgiNorden It's in English because it's about Ukrainians speaking Ukrainian and Russian to each other. They wouldn't notice or think about speaking Ukrainian to each other, they'd just see it as talking. If it's in English, a western audience would perceive it as a Russian would in the actual situation. It makes a lot of sense
Nothing like a dramatized hit piece on nuclear energy with some sketchy ties to the Oil Industry. Such a drama they dramatized the physics of how the physics work.
@@MrMrchatcity it's not a hit piece on nuclear energy but a critique on the Soviet government instead
Hi, love your videos, but the music on this one really didn't work for me. It's very dramatic and distracting, and it's keeps from really following your arguments.
I still think the message of Inglorious Basterds kind of works. After all, not all the Nazis died at the end of the film. Hans Landa lived on and presumably went on to live in America. So I don’t believe Inglorious Basterds is arguing that film killed the Nazis, but that film, and the ruling center it can represent, can damage and minimise the harm done by these toxic ideals those that the Nazis promoted and continue to promote posthumously.
How long after a movie comes out do you usually do a SMTM podcast on it??? I just watched Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood and I cannot waiittttttt to hear what y’all have to say about it I needddd now!!
mikayla mast fuckin same. Came back to comment this
"robotism" really is a derogatory word that means big shot tv executive not having the control of culture under their thumb
Even if that only lead to worse outcome, I would prefer "robotism" to the alternative on ideological grounds alone
I don't know much about McLuhan, beside of how popular he apparently was and I would like if you talked more about his ideas.
But, either you didn't explain his idea clearly or I just don't like his idea of "robotism"
Robotism is a media mogul's complaint that he can't be Goebbels anymore and that he's going to lose control of the nation's culture.
I don't think anyone should be in control of the nation's culture.
Sure, it might be sad that we are no longer united by a common culture (calling in a monoculture, feels icky to me btw) but that's just the price of freedom ? And really doesn't that mostly lead to design by comitty, watered down lowest common denominator pop culture (like the avengers)
shodanxx I agree. I enjoy robotism much moreso than centralism, but I think it’s more of an interesting reality than a positive one. Propaganda has shifted to accommodate robotism. Look at Britannica USA’s targeted advertising. Propaganda made for the robotism era. I’m interested in how robotism will effect they changing America.
You had me until your comment about the avengers (unless you're referring to the one from the 90s)
Well for someone who don't know much about an author's ideas, you seem to sounds like expert tbh... that's your interpretation mate.
Robotism isn't a media mogul complain. It's a philosophical concept that simply means society lack a central culture. Shrinking it down to media is very reductive. Religion, science, education etc are ALL affected by a central culture, or lack thereof.
I'm also very much shocked that you state "that's just the price of freedom" while simultaneously contradicting yourself by mentioning that "it's sad" because we now mostly end up with films created by " a design comity". Isn't that everything but creative freedom?
He also never said that someone in particular should be ruling a nation's culture. This idea that an individual or a company rule culture is actually a product of robotism, which as you said IS a derogative term because it literally means corporations (or religious cult, or political organizations) playing on the de-centralization of culture to appeal individualism.
Ironically enough, those corporations are very hypocrite and in fact, reveal that robotism control your "freedom" of choice by restricting content based on your IP address for example.
Of course a "monoculture" isn't a good either but we all need to at least find a group of people who share the same interest than ours. This is a perfectly natural and healthy human behavior. There is nothing wrong in being proud of your culture. That doesn't mean that you think it's "superior" to others' culture - at all! You have all the rights in the world to be proud of your culture. Why wouldn't you?! It's your heritage to *share with the world*.
It *defines you as a human being*. You have all the right in the world to take your distances or even reject your culture if you don't like it, and choose another one.
But at the end of the day, we're all part of a culture. Being in London isn't the same as being in Hong Kong. The unwritten rules and ways of life are completely different, and it we weren't agreeing on some set of common behavioral archetype, the world would be in constant chaos (which it is already close to).
The fact that the guy telling you “your thoughts should be in line with the rest of society” is the one calling actual free diverse thinking “Robotism” tells you all you need to know about how full of shit this “‘media theorist” is.
Incredible how no one else is acknowledging this.
Disagree with many of your suggestions, but it's interestingly argued.
Found the nazi supporter
@@TreyDZd Idiotic.
What a thorny argument, for even if you try to dispute it, in a way, you prove it.
What are the main arguments of the video that you disagree with?
@@mariojose1993 The central idea that morality is dependent upon pop culture for its dissemination and acceptance by the masses, that it can be weakened simply by the multiplicity of voices online. Many of which are the same cultural arguments we've been having for decades transported to a new medium, hence why topical shows like The Simpsons at its best are still insightful now.
Ok i love this channel, but i gotta say, even before watching the video, that movie is amazing.
Nik Manolov amazing moves.
@Scott Johnstone watch the actual video dude. Wisecrack doesn't talk shit about the movie, they just explain why its message wouldn't work in the world nowadays.
I loathe this movie. So violent, yet so boring. Total fantasy bullshit.
@@Clay3613 yep not a fan of fan fiction.
I just saw the movie yesterday and I am in awe! As an Austrian citizen everything to do with WW2 (and 1 for that matter....uuupsiii) hits close to home. Being able to understand English and German makes this movie 100 times better too. Oh I wish I spoke French. That experience must be grandious. Needless to say I love this movie, Tarantino in general.
world war starting bastards
EDIT: Joke.....am from slovenia
@@serugolino7867 well at least we done anything interesting.. :D
@@hiphop4ever66 how dare u mock our non existent history
that feeling when finish ur concluding paragraph with reflecting on the glorification of the past and the vast dependancy on it existing as an idealization in order to maintain hope in an 'ever fracturing world' and it gives everyone whiplash from the tonal shift of that truth bomb to upbeat advertisement. Lol im mclovin it my dudes! This is enough logic to mull over till halloween!! Thank you as always I love the depth and hardwork yall put into covering these topics.
8:24 cherry picking information from bias, far-left sources like NPR, Harvard Opinion, The Nation, Independent, Vice, etc... that drastically overplay the numerically small rise of far right extremism is a horrible way to make a point.
I'm not saying there hasn't been a rise in far right extremism, but the extent of this "issue" is minuscule in the grand scheme of things, and is more so a response to (IMO) naive far left policies like positive discrimination and open boarders. Also, those sources are guilty of lumping-in normal people with conservative views into the "far-right"camp.
I agree. The dreaded so-called "rise of the far right" isnt as big and scary as the sensationalist media outlets portray. They're overblowing the actual significance (or lack thereof) of this vocal minority/small subsection of society.
If an unsuspecting reader got all of their talking points and political viewpoints from media headlines they'd think skinheads and kkk were marching down our streets daily.
Please talk about Netflix's "Love, Death and Robots"!
That series was amazing
Mostly dumb, the deep bits were adaptations already
Every day the theory that the Internet was a mistake makes more sense.
What do you mean?
Dunno if it's just me, but these videos just seem to be getting better and better
This isn't Wisecracks strongest upload.. hopefully they upload new material soon.
The analysis here was phenomenal, but that background music drove me crazy!
I particularly loved the part where he committed several fallacies and his argument fell flat on his face but because people are sheep he will keep getting money.
Phenomenally bad
*Cm’on!* The video starts explaining the title at 9:00
I’m ok with a brief synopsis but it can’t long half timing
The second part is really interesting. You did a particular analysis of the metaphorical meaning of Basterds.
“I say to you: *Bravo* 👏🏻 “ ( Landa)
Can someone tell me what the name of the piece of classical music playing in the background is called? I love the sound of this piece
Given that a huge proportion of the men serving in the German army by 1944-1945 are unwilling conscripts, many of them teenagers, it's almost certain that the Basterds victims were teenage boys pressed into being a soldier against their will.
If you define Nazis to include Neo-Nazis and other white supremacists, then you could say that cinema failed to destroy the Nazis. That's a pretty broad definition that sets the bar very high for cinema. In order to clear that bar, film would have had to fundamentally change human nature instead of just helping to end a facist political movement in the 1930s.
Chad I mean American History X is a great film
The monoculture is dead, long live the monoculture.
Pretty much
One thing I hated about IB is the lack of security they have at the movie premiere. You have Hitler, Goebbles, Goering there. You have a bunch of wealthy high society of Germany there. You even have foreign dignitaries there. What you don't have is the kind of guards & security that type of audience would demand. Also take in account you have a group of maniacs going around killing every Nazi they come across. There would be every kind of security, secret service, sniper & soldier imaginable at that place. They would have spent hours going around the cinema searching inside and out for anything suspicious like, you know, a bunch of flammable film sitting in a big pile. They would have vetted everyone that was attending well before the event took place. If they didn't know you, you weren't getting in. You were probably getting arrested so you could be questioned. There would have been 2x as many men on the outside of the cinema who would have broken down doors to get Hitler and the rest out of there.
Yeah, yeah I know. Suspension of disbelief. It's an alternate history. Landa helped the Basterds win, blah, blah blah.
Still this bothered me when I saw the film years ago.
Okay...but several of the attempts on Hitler's life, including Stauffenberg's, show that Nazi security procedures were actually surprisingly lax at times.
This robotism could've been helpful towards undermining Fascist Germany, which depended on there being a common society which had gotten its values from their state.
Saying film defeated the Nazis is like saying guns defeated the Nazis - if true, then its Technically correct. but its power isn't necessarily Anti-Nazi.
Films have kept the Nazis down. Film propaganda has been incredibly efficient at cementing the image of nazis has evil incarnate. Just look at how differently communists and the USSR are treated in daily life. Does society has the same visceral reaction when they see someone carrying a USSR flag to one carrying a nazi flag? No. The reaction isn't even close despite being both equally abhorrent. That's because of the power of Hollywood's propaganda.
Absolutely brilliant video. Thank you :)
When a movie is ten years old, spoiler alerts should not be needed anymore.
And it’s also free on youtube. So if you didn’t watch it at that point, it’s kind of stupid to complain about spoilers.
Isn't Alternative for Germany pro-Israel? Seems a bit weird to use it as an example of neo-nazism
@@ailithtwinning6806 Ah yes, all those Jewish Nazis
Do the psychology of Dio from JoJo's bizarre adventure!
2 words: Daddy Issues
That's been overdone
Forget psychology of DIO make philosophy of JoJo as a series.
Oh ffs theres always one
This is a dumb idea because araki explores a lot of dio's intentions in part 6 which is still just a manga.
Wisecrack does philosophy on film and tv.
StrangerX9 DIO isn’t a morally or psychologically complex villain. He’s just an insanely charismatic, flamboyant, and frankly terrifying villain. If you want one of these videos on _any_ JoJo villain, I would use Yoshikage Kira. Maybe Pucci, because at least then Wisecrack can cover morality from the perspective of attaining Heaven.
Uhh..usually agree but their were some blantant inaccuracies on this one.
William Blackfyre - For example?
*there, also which ones?
@@MPLS623 8:24
In my humble opinion, Tarantino is a genius, I own all of his films in Blu-ray, have seen each several times even with subtitles on so I do not miss anything.
The way he scripts his movies, it's like watching a Shakespearean play, fantastic long dialogues and dramatic endings, no one can deny Quentin is unique.
Seeing films in the theater is still the best way to see one... I love The Alamo Draft house.
I think a reason for the rise of right thinking is how globalization and wars have made people mitigate everywhere. Mostly into places that are well off, safe and stable. That leads to a scenario where the original residents go outside and don't see the kind of people they are familiar with. They see different cultures, hear different languages, see different faces. And none of them "fit" into the environment they are used to.
This doesn't get helped by how many migrating people are either unwilling to adapt to the customs of their new environment or aren't getting the necessary support to do so. So they stand out in public but stay among their own privately, leaving them as the foreigners for at least two generations. This gaping chasm between "us" and "them" drives people into the perceived safety of a tighter, more conservative and territorial mindset.
Not to mention the last decade got many people quite disillusioned and dissatisfied with left leadership. Their failings have strengthened the position of the opposing side.
Wow someone on the internet with a brain... so so rare
if by left you mean the sappy "liberal" "feel your pain" crowd that do nothing to help the working people, I would agree 100% with you. which is why even in the USA in paralel with far right you see workers movements
Totally agree with the ritualistic nature of watching a movie. Even though I watch most movies on my laptop these days, I have to mentally prepare days ahead when If I really want the movie to have an impact on my and to properly grasp it. If I just decide on a random movie 5 minutes before I watch it on Netflix or Prime, it rarely if ever gives me the proper feeling of watching a movie, most of the time it just makes it feel like Tv, or a TH-cam video.
I'd love to see a Philosophy of Malcolm in the Middle.
The future is now old man
Loved the analysis and the background music
Sorry I'm afraid to watch this video bc I don't want to see some millennial know it all bash some movie by Tarantino who is wholly accomplished in his craft and most possibly created his best masterpiece in this film.
It’s nothing. He literally went on a rant about how this has to do with cinema killing the nazi’s, and comparing nazi’s, to the right wing in the US.
We need an episode about Malcolm in the middle
Everyone is forced to use Experian because they're one of the 3 major credit scoring agencies.
Your journalistic analysis is so damn good it makes everything so cohesive and comprehensive. Thank you
Hey guys love everything your making on the channel! You should do a timeline/breakdown of the World War 2 Cinematic Universes
this is your best video imo
The hidden philosophical plot of GTA San Andreas: Conspiracy and Control. How the authority and ambition for power can drive civilians to social clashes in the context of the 90s.
12:43 And that is where you are wrong. Your conclusion implies that there is something as wrong think. That's exactly the reason that leads people to that kind of thinking.
You have to analyse why people flock to Nazism. The answer according to me is simply: Lack of worthwhile opportunities.
The background music is giving me hypertension...
What's the piece played in the background?
This movie is excellent. Very entertaining. However two things really stand out for me. Firstly, the intro sequence with Landa playing around with the French dairy farmer and the second one is Michael Fassbender sequence in the bunker. Great writing and great execution.
In Argentina the title was translated as Bastards, so i didn't know about the actual name for a couple of years
I though it was called Bastardos sin gloria ("Bastards without glory") in all of Hispanic America. That's certainly the case for my country, Mexico.
@@Pantano63
yeah, that's what i mean, that's the normal speling. if it had been a literal translation it would have been "Basteardos sin glouria" or something like that
@@Pantano63 not all latin america tho, here in Brazil it's "Bastardos Inglórios", also without the E. The change from "inglorious" to "without glory" is weird tho
When my dad wanted to go to the cinema, he had to pay the equivalent of €2, when I want to go to the cinema, I have to pay €12 just to see the film, and a bottle of water can cost €5.
I really love the cinema, but it's just too expensive to go watch every film I want to see there.
Especially if the film is potentially really bad, and I can watch it for free two months later.
This whole "going to cinema as ritual" shit is intellectual garbage.. I have seen the best films on my laptop and I don't feel like they influenced me less because of that
Honestly some of the things spewed in this video has no basis or actual research behind them at all, movies have become shit, interacting with people is becoming shittier, and people are starting to lose faith in common sense facts like "nazism is bad" because of a whole bunch of reasons and one of which is that media corps are no longer trust worthy, and not one of them is that netflix is killing the effing "ritual"
@@losersclass I agree.
Plus you don't have to deal with smelly fat/tall people that cough any time they're not talking or checking their phone that they forgot to put on silent while they eat crispy snacks from the most crinkly bag ever invented.
And you get to drink alcohol, decide your own pee breaks, and hang out with people you like when watching the movie at home.
The superior experience is clear to me.
@@Lilliathi I'm more annoyed by kids screaming during the movie and loudly explaining everything to their guardian, who knows nothing about the film.
"Can't stay neutral on a moving train." -- Earth wind and fire
tarantino had 1 good movie i dont know why people hold him to so much
That is very spot on. in contrast to the past when we shared centralized ideas, nowadays we are isolated in our own bubble and consume content exclusively to our personal liking, cementing and reinforcing only narrow set of ideas.
Were more Nazis killed on the battlefield or on the silver screen?
Great question but I'm gonna say in real life like 4.5 million died
@@paulcharles2457 depends on how you count it I think. Specifically, do you have to see the body on screen for it to count? Or does a movie about a particular battle get to count everyone who died in that battle irl?
If the former the actual war still has the upper hand I think. But if the latter, most of the major battles have had multiple movies about them made. It might be enough to make the fictional nazi body count outnumber the irl count. And some of those Nazis have died quite a few times.
Depends what you count as Nazis. Actual Nazi politicians/officers or common German soldiers?
definitly battlefield V
Where are the subtitles ? I can't hear you when I'm chewing
*Garax Wormuloid has left the chat*
@@sirsplintfastthepungent1373 lol
I was thinking I needed a dose of wisecrack, and here you are
A bunch of people say they've lost all their credit because of Experian. If you're going to shill that's fine, but at least make sure the companies you advertise aren't scamming people.
Long shot here but can we please get a philosophy of Mass Effect video? Y'all have referenced it before and it's a goddamn goldmine of philosophy and cultural comentary! Yeah it's not super relevant right now but that doesn't mean the fanbase isn't still rabid for new content! Besides a series as excellent as ME could always use some more exposure
How ‘bout my knife
Also, Shoshana, you have to double tap!
@ 8:25
Narrator goes political and chooses to speak on topics and stats he knows nothing about.
Shut up Nate.
Mcluhan's view on hemispheric thought has no basis in neuroscience.
-- He mentions that a little after, but it's still a weak argument.
What's the "something awful" at 13:52?
This was not the video I thought it was going to be. It was really good and insightful. Thanks for sharing this. With that said don't ever again say anything bad about Inglourious Basterds!!!!!!