Electrical Power, Conductors, & Your Dream Home: Crash Course Engineering #21

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 ต.ค. 2018
  • Today, we'll explore the materials electrical engineers work with. We'll look at high-conductors, insulators, and how low-conductivity conductors can be used to generate light and heat.
    Crash Course Engineering is produced in association with PBS Digital Studios: • All PBS Digital Studio...
    PBS Space Time: / @pbsspacetime
    ***
    RESOURCES:
    indianapublicmedia.org/amomen...
    www-spof.gsfc.nasa.gov/Educat...
    www.electrical4u.com/high-res...
    www.performancewire.com/insul...
    sciencing.com/printed-circuit...
    www.livescience.com/38997-fac...
    www.celticgold.eu/en/gold-uni...
    megaanswers.com/why-does-the-f...
    www.radiologymasterclass.co.u...
    ***
    Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at / crashcourse
    Thanks to the following Patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever:
    Mark Brouwer, Kenneth F Penttinen, Trevin Beattie, Satya Ridhima Parvathaneni, Erika & Alexa Saur, Glenn Elliott, Justin Zingsheim, Jessica Wode, Eric Prestemon, Kathrin Benoit, Tom Trval, Jason Saslow, Nathan Taylor, Brian Thomas Gossett, Khaled El Shalakany, Indika Siriwardena, SR Foxley, Sam Ferguson, Yasenia Cruz, Eric Koslow, Caleb Weeks, D.A. Noe, Shawn Arnold, Malcolm Callis, Advait Shinde, William McGraw, Andrei Krishkevich, Rachel Bright, Mayumi Maeda, Kathy & Tim Philip, Jirat, Ian Dundore
    --
    Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet?
    Facebook - / youtubecrashcourse
    Twitter - / thecrashcourse
    Tumblr - / thecrashcourse
    Support Crash Course on Patreon: / crashcourse
    CC Kids: / crashcoursekids

ความคิดเห็น • 106

  • @HannahHinze
    @HannahHinze 5 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I could listen to this woman talk all day.

  • @bovinespongiformflu
    @bovinespongiformflu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +105

    ElectroBOOM!!!!

    • @unom9515
      @unom9515 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      FULL BRIDGE REKTIFIER!!!!

  • @Danilego
    @Danilego 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    1:20 Wow, that visualization is so good it should be used in schools

  • @cjwrench07
    @cjwrench07 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thank you for this. This it more than perfect timing.
    My girlfriend is taking an introduction to electronics course, this is exactly where she is right now, and she’s been having a very hard time visualizing the concepts.

  • @Beryllahawk
    @Beryllahawk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I love that there was a Kodama figure on the shelf in the house

  • @Someone-cr8cj
    @Someone-cr8cj 5 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    5:26 electroboom Easter egg

    • @SaberusTerras
      @SaberusTerras 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Intro electroBOOM as well.

  • @pialljungberg6963
    @pialljungberg6963 5 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    The swedish name for tungsten is wolfram. So i'm confused.

  • @kainesweet
    @kainesweet 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    5:26 FULL BRIDGE RECTIFIER

  • @kesor6
    @kesor6 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    ElectroBOOM makes a guest appearance on TV at 5:30! And Picard Borg appearing at 6:50. Awesome :)

  • @brunomeral7885
    @brunomeral7885 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    06:49 "resistance is futile..."
    oh! A borg ;)
    .
    .
    nice Star Trek reference.

  • @brxnv_
    @brxnv_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I just love everything about this channel... the quality is on point..

  • @JustinAlexanderBell
    @JustinAlexanderBell 5 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Electroboom on the TV!

  • @hiramanchaudhari6379
    @hiramanchaudhari6379 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    5:28 ELECTROBOOM ROCKS

  • @zhamoodi
    @zhamoodi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Love this series!

  • @bigbox8992
    @bigbox8992 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The animation is just right.

  • @6alecapristrudel
    @6alecapristrudel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    "Semiconductors are somewhere in between conductors and insulators"
    Oversimplification of the century.

    • @Milkmans_Son
      @Milkmans_Son 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      How about "Semiconductors are a shitload of conductors and insulators"?

    • @lincolnpepper816
      @lincolnpepper816 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      This episode isn't about them, so that's the point. We don't need to know about them right now.

  • @nickthewinner2194
    @nickthewinner2194 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Im truly grateful & blessed

  • @dustinharrison3068
    @dustinharrison3068 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks Crash Course!

  • @user-lh5nf3gf6s
    @user-lh5nf3gf6s 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you helped me soo much

  • @unleashingpotential-psycho9433
    @unleashingpotential-psycho9433 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I love the animations.

    • @artemedutech
      @artemedutech 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      any ideas what software they use for that?

    • @codybrown5071
      @codybrown5071 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Adobe Illustrator and After Effects

  • @Danielagostinho21
    @Danielagostinho21 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Look it's "ElectroBoom" 0:04

  • @pablogarin
    @pablogarin 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love electrobooms channel!

  • @Caterfree10
    @Caterfree10 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ELECTROBOOM WAS ON THE ONE TV, I HECKING LOVE YOU GUYS

  • @tomus0n
    @tomus0n 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You guys are helping to save the life of this English student who has to take a material science GE course >

  • @jamesheydenrych3466
    @jamesheydenrych3466 5 ปีที่แล้ว +111

    Hearing Americans force a British person to pronounce Aluminium as "Aluminum" is just so so wrong

    • @TheChipmunk2008
      @TheChipmunk2008 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I know it was just jarring and wrong

    • @ResortDog
      @ResortDog 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It was consensual.

    • @Hansca
      @Hansca 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Interesting how she got Solder right but mispronounced Aluminium. But then again they've even started to spell it wrong.

    • @rparl
      @rparl 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Hansca I've never heard the L in solder.

    • @Hansca
      @Hansca 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Interesting what you get used to. Americans and some Canadians are the only people I've heard drop the L in solder. It was harsh of me to say that it was wrong to say Aluminum as language is an evolving thing and who am I to say what's right or wrong but it does jolt my brain every time I hear Aluminum and soder.

  • @davidperkins5568
    @davidperkins5568 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting video

  • @mynameisZhenyaArt_
    @mynameisZhenyaArt_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:27, "Charge is flowing in the opposite direction to the electrons", do you mean positive charge?

  • @Rocinante2300
    @Rocinante2300 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Skaaojdcbcusowmfufjsbapdgkrnfhsifjenxicalkdeidkcnzogptjfnfowpqlqpdbfdkfncidnfncidfjepeleifckenrjfudhbricofmsbepfvkdnenkrfkfjepfkvjshefovkcjfeowpwpwpwfhjfeknfidncifkfpdkfocpgjrntrituuffhfhhcfbfhrbfjtjfodkxiemdpdkskdjckxxkdoslzozosodofogodofkjgfocjgjfhdbfkufrjfjcufjfbfndjfjcjdndnfowowpwpjfjfowpakfjcjsoakdfjrjkapsvjfneoladnjfpdshdjcogkssnckgldbsfokftopdkshdofgnfoegsb
    Thank you

  • @VitruvianSasquatch
    @VitruvianSasquatch 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    LEDs are certainly more efficient, but they're only better for the environment if you're using coal rather than a dam to get your power.

    • @heyoladies7118
      @heyoladies7118 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting. Why though?

    • @VitruvianSasquatch
      @VitruvianSasquatch 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@heyoladies7118 The manufacturing processes for semiconductors tend to produce more toxic waste than extracting the raw metals needed for incandescent bulbs. Seeing as hydroelectricity done right has only a localized and minor effect on the environment, the claim that LEDs being more efficient makes them intrinsically better for the environment is a bit simplistic. There are more dimensions to the problem than that.

  • @MrGustaphe
    @MrGustaphe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    The proof that there will never be time travel:
    A) The person who invents the first time machine will be an engineer.
    B) An engineer with access to a time machine would immediately go back in time and slap Benjamin Franklin in the face until he guesses the charge sign of electrons correctly.
    C) Benjamin Franklin did not guess the charge sign of electrons correctly.
    B2) Ergo no engineer went back and slapped him.
    A2) Ergo no engineer ever has access to a time machine
    D) Ergo no first time machine is ever invented.

  • @justinloach5754
    @justinloach5754 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can't believe the script writers made Shini say aluminum. I know both pronunciations are valid in modern dictionaries but even Hank made a point of highlighting how aluminium is the correct form.

  • @princeari92
    @princeari92 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    More more more materials 🙆

  • @Sgt-Gravy
    @Sgt-Gravy 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    will graphite/ graphene/ Carbon be in the next video?

  • @Danilego
    @Danilego 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I didn't know copper was rare, it was the most common ore in minecraft mods :P

  • @apac13
    @apac13 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    HERE!

  • @scott98390
    @scott98390 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Inverse Ohms" sounds so tedius. I hereby decree that the term "nOhms" will now be the standard term for 1/Ω

  • @heronimousbrapson863
    @heronimousbrapson863 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I wonder how electroboom would explain this topic?

  • @camiloiribarren1450
    @camiloiribarren1450 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Haha I just went over this two weeks ago!

  • @dan1204hc
    @dan1204hc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can work and research electrical power, conductors etc following the career of Electrical or Mechanical Engineering.

  • @melissamybubbles6139
    @melissamybubbles6139 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about audio equipment?

  • @amreladawy3784
    @amreladawy3784 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about super conductors?

  • @Ssiva-zf3pc
    @Ssiva-zf3pc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Some body know about Magnus effect?

  • @picklerick8844
    @picklerick8844 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Why don't you make crash course Mathematics?

    • @habeebhabib3160
      @habeebhabib3160 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Because maths takes a lot of preperation since it is so big and branched, they have crash course statistics which is a branch of maths.

    • @picklerick8844
      @picklerick8844 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@habeebhabib3160 Why don't they make something like crash course geometry?

    • @habeebhabib3160
      @habeebhabib3160 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      geometry is also a pretty wide branch of maths, however, they can do that and they should. so I do not know why it is taking them so long.

    • @habeebhabib3160
      @habeebhabib3160 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      do you need help with geometry??

    • @melonlord1414
      @melonlord1414 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's more likely that they will make CC's about smaller branches of maths. Like they do right now about statistics

  • @jamesepace
    @jamesepace 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    We always called the inverse ohms "mhos". Is that not the standard?

    • @heronimousbrapson863
      @heronimousbrapson863 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      James Pace Electronic types use "mhos", but physicists prefer "siemens".

    • @qwaqwa1960
      @qwaqwa1960 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mhos went out like...50 years ago!

    • @jameslugh3641
      @jameslugh3641 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      mhos still used for distance protection in electrical systems.

  • @stareng100
    @stareng100 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So what is on the agenda for the next episode?

  • @SunriseFireberry
    @SunriseFireberry 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I sing of power electric

  • @ResortDog
    @ResortDog 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Copper mines are made not found as cell phones or power lines.

  • @sillybill184
    @sillybill184 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Electroboom in the tv

  • @qwaqwa1960
    @qwaqwa1960 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wolfram?

  • @mahalmahalku5242
    @mahalmahalku5242 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wheres hank

  • @xspager
    @xspager 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    FUUUUUUUL BRIDGE RECTIFIER!!!

  • @JEOGRAPHYSongs
    @JEOGRAPHYSongs 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We are in the midst of an unrestricted ennobling of energy that will clear a path toward the quantum infinite itself :-)

    • @heronimousbrapson863
      @heronimousbrapson863 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      JEOGRAPHY I don't even understand what you said.

    • @JEOGRAPHYSongs
      @JEOGRAPHYSongs 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      It means I'm going to fart so hard my intestines will be unloosened.

  • @facundoezequielabizanda7675
    @facundoezequielabizanda7675 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    please in spanish

  • @rishiprabhuram4368
    @rishiprabhuram4368 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    What’s next?

  • @6alecapristrudel
    @6alecapristrudel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ELECTRONics uses positive current flow, oh the irony, the rage inducing irony.

    • @brianmiller1077
      @brianmiller1077 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe semiconductors?

    • @6alecapristrudel
      @6alecapristrudel 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Brian Miller
      The animation at 1:20 actually describes how holes move in a semiconductor. As you can see no positively charged particle actually moves, since they're locked in a crystal structure. Even though the formal positive charge moves the electrons do all the work.
      The places where you've actually got positively charged particles moving are the electrolytes in batteries and electrolysis cells and in particle accelerators. Maybe also some other places I can't think of right now.

    • @6alecapristrudel
      @6alecapristrudel 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      mwalsher
      I know the convention predates the discovery of the electron but it still ticks me off. Positive current flow is easier for electronics (because of said convention), electron flow makes more sense for electrochemical reactions and the physics behind electronics. Though I've heard old timer electronics guys confusing the two and saying electrons in a vacuum tube flow from anode to cathode....
      Things should have been set straight immediately, sadly it's too late to change the convention now.

    • @melonlord1414
      @melonlord1414 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There has been a 50/50 chance to name the poles right and they missed it. If they did it right, electrons would be positive and the flow would be right.

  • @finalform4971
    @finalform4971 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oxygen Not Included

  • @ianrbuck
    @ianrbuck 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Wait, Brits pronounce the "L" in "solder"?

  • @mallid.1508
    @mallid.1508 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    HIII HANKKK

  • @picklerick8844
    @picklerick8844 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Life is a manifestation of logic.
    Logic needs a language.
    Knowledge requires a teacher.
    Hence make a crash course on Mathematics.

  • @lemiwatts4275
    @lemiwatts4275 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow she is shocking

  • @SidneyM559
    @SidneyM559 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm the 8th comment, cool!

  • @syedrahman5768
    @syedrahman5768 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let’s be real it was mostly Tesla

  • @stanklizard7961
    @stanklizard7961 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Copper is not easy to weld lol

  • @Mic_Glow
    @Mic_Glow 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    (very focused and typing with one hand)

  • @Simbu.
    @Simbu. 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm ok with Americans say Uloominum. Don't be a British and say that. It's bad.

  • @MosesEmmet
    @MosesEmmet 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is awesome, but you have to wonder how all these high powers lines are effecting those who live in close proximity to them...

    • @TheChipmunk2008
      @TheChipmunk2008 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      No effect whatsoever

    • @heronimousbrapson863
      @heronimousbrapson863 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Moses Emmet Considering that electric power has been in use for about 130 years, no effect at all.

    • @davidlugarov9685
      @davidlugarov9685 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheChipmunk2008 there are studies that show otherwise, look em up

    • @TheChipmunk2008
      @TheChipmunk2008 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@davidlugarov9685 I have the only few that do exist are only a correlation and not a causation. The human body does not respond to low frequency electromagnetic radiation.

    • @davidlugarov9685
      @davidlugarov9685 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheChipmunk2008 thats not true, multiple studies show that all kinds of electromagnetic exposure can harm us, even the us navy has an entire study on low frequency em radiation

  • @avi12
    @avi12 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you be my teacher?

  • @alexgg13
    @alexgg13 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    she's really hot

  • @irwainnornossa4605
    @irwainnornossa4605 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video and all, but…
    Use original names for elements, please. This rips my ears. It's wolframium, not that…eeeeh-word. Why it's wolframium? Check periodic table. Element 74. What do you see? W. And W stands for…? It's really not that difficult.
    And the same for aluminium. Not that americanizet butchered version. Then cuprum, argentum, etc.
    And it's röntgen. Not some mysterious X-rays, when nobody really knew. We know now. Thanks to whom? Röntgen. Again. Simple.

  • @coldfinger459sub0
    @coldfinger459sub0 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you pregnant when are you due