I wish ESRI would explain what the term 'pairwise' is supposed to mean and how it applies to the tools named with it, that would help - but muddying the water with weird terms is kinda their thing, esp in the license realm.
I tested the PW clip tool with a 13 polygon feature class and ~73,000 line feature class and the PW clip did not clip all of the lines within the polygon but the OG Clip tool did. Not sure why.
![ละลาย (LALALYE) - DAOU PITTAYA ต้าห์อู๋ พิทยา [OFFICIAL MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wo6r9TgausI/mqdefault.jpg)
thank you
You are very welcome, thanks for commenting.
I wish ESRI would explain what the term 'pairwise' is supposed to mean and how it applies to the tools named with it, that would help - but muddying the water with weird terms is kinda their thing, esp in the license realm.
Yeah, I had no clue what it meant either. It refers to multi threading the process - in pairs I guess.
Wait a minute, morning coffee, a video from Jeff, and I'm first?
You’re my number one fan. 😂🤣
@@GISChops I wear the GIS Chops shirt and my ESRI hat to work sometimes and spread the gospel of Jeff's GIS Chops.
Is it getting creepy yet? Hahahah
Excellent video Jeff!
Ha ha! I’m glad the larger real estate is the chops merch!
Not creepy at all! I wish I had a thousand subscribers like you.
Thanks Michael! I think I got a few more interviews because of you.
Have you ever tested the pairwise clip tool with large polygon dataset. it was a big performance improvement to me.
That’s good to hear. It must be that multithreaded processing.
@@GISChops probably. I’ve tested the regular clip with multi-threaded processing, and it was still not as fast as the pairwise clip…
That’s what I learned as well.
I tested the PW clip tool with a 13 polygon feature class and ~73,000 line feature class and the PW clip did not clip all of the lines within the polygon but the OG Clip tool did. Not sure why.
That is weird.