TAYLOR VS YAMAHA - Which do you prefer?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ม.ค. 2022
  • The most expensive Taylor I’ve ever played: olimpusmusic.com/product/326ce/
    And the Yamaha is here: olimpusmusic.com/product/fgx3/
    olimpusmusic.com
    / olimpusmusic
    / olimpus_music
    Follow me on Spotify: open.spotify.com/artist/3zh50...
    INSTAGRAM ►► @Rob_Chappers
    FACEBOOK ►► officialrobchapman
    Here are some affiliate links to products that I use:
    Thomann
    My guitar ►► redir.love/61EwP3na
    My amp ►► redir.love/Am2rUYK6
    My practice amp ►► redir.love/hGiV1UpQ
    Strings I use ►► redir.love/vFGoL1Ym
    My favourite Reverb/Delay Pedal ►► redir.love/6IwjXx4G
    ➤ Disclaimers
    No comments on these posts have or will be deleted. TH-cam will automatically hide comments that they think are spam for review and then my team need to manually approve these. Please bear with us if your comment is not immediately visible.
    I own/or am endorsed/sponsored or have done paid for advertising by the following brands:
    ►► Snake oil fine instruments, Chapman Guitars, Andertons, Thomann, Ernie Ball, Gravity, Victory, BadCat, Boss/Roland, Orange, Universal Audio ,Vans, Faith, Barefaced Audio, Mooer, Olimpus Music,
    ➤ Tags
    #RobChapman #Chappers #RobChappers
  • เพลง

ความคิดเห็น • 242

  • @Wheels_Unlimited
    @Wheels_Unlimited 2 ปีที่แล้ว +146

    Yamaha has really become the sleeper guitar brand. So much less expensive but they're knocking it out of the park with the sounds! That Yamaha sounds SO GOOD. Yamaha are underrated and Taylor are overrated, in my opinion.

    • @normancole3415
      @normancole3415 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      yahama makes a darn good line of guitars for the price from their lowest to top of the line all are pretty good

    • @deejay.s
      @deejay.s 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Been saying this for years! 🎯

    • @talkychris
      @talkychris 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yamaha iMO certainly offers the best bang for buck.
      Taylor 214CE QS is currently £1350 with I believe laminate Sapele back and sides. Yamaha APX1200II is £1250, has solid front and solid rosewood back and sides. Acoustically there's probably not much in it. Both good mids and highs. The Yamaha excels plugged in. I think it's visually much more appealing too with beautiful inlays.
      In the sub £2000 category Yamaha for me is by far the best option.

    • @MrArchie765
      @MrArchie765 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Couldn’t agree more, I have an AC5R and it sound fantastic!!!

    • @leisezechen5722
      @leisezechen5722 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I'm glad that there are a lot people who buy brands and not guitars. That keeps the price for yamaha guitars moderate.

  • @REDW1NG94
    @REDW1NG94 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    I have a Yamaha A3R that is my number one acoustic guitar. Solid rosewood back and sides, solid spruce top, ebony fingerboard. I love it. I played a Yamaha and Taylor back to back at the store, and even did a blindfold test (inspiration from chappers and the captain) and actually found I preferred the the Yamaha's sound and the way it played, against a Taylor that was 3 times the price.

    • @TheRycooder
      @TheRycooder 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      completely agree. Hate to be so general but Yamaha imho kills Taylors and to me they're very over-rated. Many other acoustics out there that are much better. I have a Blueridge 160A that kills almost every Taylor I've played.

    • @Gman44044
      @Gman44044 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I have ordered A3R, waiting to receive it eagerly

    • @LoftyAssertions
      @LoftyAssertions ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Same here, blindfold test too! Except I went with the FGX3. The pickup and mic mix is also unbelievably real sounding, I've tricked guitarists into thinking it was a condenser recording by boosting the highs on 50% mic, there's just a high noise floor. My favourite guitar of all time and it was $1000 compared to my $7500 k24ce.
      It's so good I'm looking at getting the FSX3 too, or the AC3M. Yamaha are incredibly underrated!

    • @gregorykapanowski9540
      @gregorykapanowski9540 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I agree I played every acoustic in the guitar center. The Yamaha beat the top-of-the-line Taylor in my opinion. The Taylor's were too bright and flat. The Yamaha had such a organic perfectly balanced tone. More warm than bright but each string and note rings clear.

    • @easilyoffended7772
      @easilyoffended7772 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@TheRycooder Taylors have patents others don't you def can tell in the action and playability.... Sound is subjective... But A taylor is generally smoother to play

  • @justice1606
    @justice1606 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    My Yamaha LL16 made me a fanboy and believer. For the money, you truly cannot beat it.

    • @Wobbz9413
      @Wobbz9413 ปีที่แล้ว

      I love my LL16D and LL16/12 too! I played some taylors, Matons, A Gibson when I bought the 16d, and Im convinced I walked out of the shop with the best acoustic there! I think the Epi "Inspired by" range are the only american owned guitar I'd buy these days. As far as factory produced, that is.

  • @dxcman1
    @dxcman1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I love Yamaha's (I have 3 higher end ones)and the gentleman from Malta can really play. I enjoy watching him play... very skilled.

  • @All_who_wander
    @All_who_wander ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the video guys I will say that I think the best comparisons are where you play the same lines on both guitars so that you just really get a feel of how the sound truly compares finger style, strumming, all of the above.

  • @dustinthiessen
    @dustinthiessen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I've never really met a Taylor that I really liked... especially plugged in. They all tend to sound alike. I've mixed probably hundreds of them. That Yamaha is pretty cool though

    • @thesandman775
      @thesandman775 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The electronics aren't great. I'm fact, they're pretty bad in my experience. The unplugged sounds are generally very good, and with proper electronics, they'll compete with any brand. Where Taylors accel is that they're playability is nearly unmatched in the large brands.

    • @Chundynator
      @Chundynator 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      unplugged in my experience they sound great, they just need better electronics

    • @ianpaterson4956
      @ianpaterson4956 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry about that Nick, plenty of them around....

  • @gregterkanian5158
    @gregterkanian5158 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    There's a special place in hell for people who eat greasy chips while playing $2500 guitars.

  • @Matt-li6gn
    @Matt-li6gn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Yamaha. Hands down.

  • @eugenechek7288
    @eugenechek7288 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very cool, as always.

  • @stanislavmigra
    @stanislavmigra 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Guitar here, guitar there ... But Luke's playing, wooop wooop. And lot of it sticks also on you Rob.
    Great video, really enjoying those Malta videos. Keep it up.

  • @aaron.debattista
    @aaron.debattista ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's always fun to compare guitars and you did a spectacular job! I would have loved to see a more like-with-like comparison. A mahogany-top versus a spruce-top is going to muddy the waters even with Mahogany back-and-sides for both guitars. Well done, regardless!!!

  • @mjolnircarlssen4211
    @mjolnircarlssen4211 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    They’re different creatures. I have a Taylor, Martin, and high-end Yamaha. They all have different strengths. Fit and finish, all are a horse apiece. All very meticulously made with quality woods and components. Taylor and Yamaha have Ebony fretboard, and the Martin Richlite…..all of which feel really good. All 3 have quality preamps (ES2, Fishman, Atmosfeel). They all sound great plugged in. They’re all very even, but the Taylor is a little bit thinner with a brighter, higher end. The Martin is the “chunkiest”, and the Yamaha is as close to perfectly balanced of the three. All are comfortable, extremely playable, and the neck on the Martin being the beefiest.
    Overall, for me to rate them:
    1) Yamaha
    2) Martin
    3) Taylor
    Any of the 3 are a solid investment, but in my opinion based on overall build quality and sound, this reflects my personal opinion.

  • @asterisk606
    @asterisk606 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Not sure if it was just the guitar itself, or mainly the difference in pickup positions, or both, but that Taylor sounded amazing plugged in. I've been pretty blind to the acoustic world apparently because Taylor has been making guitars with that system since 2014. That's news to me and I never knew it existed but it's really cool. If the under saddle pickup never caught on leading to the "classic" electro acoustic chime sound, the ES2 would have been the standard for sure if they were invented at the same time.

  • @danielsaturnino5715
    @danielsaturnino5715 2 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    That Taylor has a pick retrieval hole! That's brilliant!

    • @elmaestroco
      @elmaestroco ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Then what's the fun in it? Shaking the guitar for 5 min is part of the amusement :)

  • @thomassawicki2065
    @thomassawicki2065 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    JP Cormier recommended the Yamaha FG5 , and I bought one.
    It sounds better than any Taylor I ever played.
    Listen to this one, it is thin and Treble heavy, no bottom or balance at all.
    There was a shop full of Taylors In my town , I played them all, they were all thin sounding.
    My FG5 is beautiful and balanced. Every type of music sounds good on the Yamaha.

    • @stephenmeeker2489
      @stephenmeeker2489 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Same, same. Yamaha is a dovetail neck with scullpted X-bracing. Sonic projection is full, rich, and clear. Tone is more like a Martin than a Taylor. Had many Taylor's but the FX5 Dreadnought is now my favorite. Comparable to guitars at at least twice the price. Sweet.

  • @jamesbattersby9454
    @jamesbattersby9454 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was lucky enough to get a 324ce for my 40th Birthday last year and it's truly stunning.

  • @krisvind1715
    @krisvind1715 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have never really liked the look of a spruce top, but after playing a few with spruce tops they are just my favorite in terms of sound and resonance

    • @haikat4
      @haikat4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me neither but the aged finish on the Yamaha looks good to me.

  • @JasonPhantom
    @JasonPhantom 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Damn that's clean.

  • @joetechmatrixemail2920
    @joetechmatrixemail2920 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have bought and sold so many acoustic guitars in the past 25 years yet, I keep and gig with my Yamaha's. Taylor is a well crafted guitar but, if you have a tuned ear, you will realize it doesn't hold a candle.

  • @paulkline3011
    @paulkline3011 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a 1972 Yamaha FG200 that I inherited from my Dad. A FG800 and a FG3. All fantastic guitars for me. I had a Martin D15M and sold that to by the FG3. I don't regret it at all. I opted to get the FG3 and not the FGX3 because I only play at home these days and don't have or need an acoustic amp.

  • @callumyocius2958
    @callumyocius2958 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow. Just wow. I have been drooling over Taylor's guitars, and even in thos video, just look wise, that Taylor...phenomenal. however...when it came to the sound. That Yamaha just.....clobbers the Taylor. Am I the only one who thinks that? If I owned both of these guitars, unless I made just tons of money, I'd kick myself every time I picked up the Taylor.

    • @karlburmeister1552
      @karlburmeister1552 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Especially plugged in. To me the plugged in Taylor sound horrible.

  • @SwedeSpeeder
    @SwedeSpeeder 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Robb, I can't say I've ever listened to your music. I just haven't gotten around to it. But damn, I've been watching you on Andertons for god knows how long and I've been watching your channel for a while but, Jesus you play great music. And hearing this little bit on acoustic was just tasty.
    I gotta look into your music. I'm more Dream Theater /Orbit culture but man.

    • @sonjavasey5197
      @sonjavasey5197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I’m not into heavier music…but loving his Clockwork Wolf stuff 👍🏻

  • @victoriousgangster
    @victoriousgangster 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've always wanted a nice Taylor. Always heard good things about them, pricey but they sound great. This one, not so much. I like Yamaha better. More resonance.

  • @cwl1000
    @cwl1000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice to hear Rob play something on an acoustic for a change. 👍

  • @johnv4866
    @johnv4866 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really impressed with Luke's playing. 👏👏👍

    • @LukeGreck
      @LukeGreck 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much kind sir! 🙏

  • @msgn8i11s2
    @msgn8i11s2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have not played that many Taylors but I love my Yamaha CPX-5 so much that I bought a CPX-1000 and that guitar is awesome...

  • @pankajjoshi2032
    @pankajjoshi2032 ปีที่แล้ว

    I own Yamaha LL16D, quite content but now, after 5.5 years later it hursts my shoulder if I play it more or flamenco style. So, now looking at LS36II or LS56II, exceptionally hard to find in the entire country.

  • @nikkmorse
    @nikkmorse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That sounds fresh 🤘🏼😈🤘🏼

  • @SnaketheJake87
    @SnaketheJake87 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've wanted a 900 series Taylor for a long time.

  • @myway9128
    @myway9128 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Yamaha has a 70s acoustic guitar tone to my ear. A bit of a nostalgic vibe like James Taylor era music.

  • @paulshea7022
    @paulshea7022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How can you compare a spruce top to a mahogany top they are so different . Compare like for like would be more helpful.

  • @jeromeleoterry
    @jeromeleoterry 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have both a Taylor 324CE and a Yamaha LL16. The Taylor is nearly 3x the price of the Yamaha, but I actually prefer the Yamaha. Could be because my tastes have changed, and prefer the fuller range of the Yamaha, due to a spruce top / rosewood back and sides, as opposed to the Taylor with a mahogany top / Tasmanian blackwood back and sides. The ES2 Pickup system in the Taylor takes a bunch of work to get a nice tone, and I'm not really sure I like it all that much. The Yamaha pickup system isn't anything spectacular, but is more pleasing to my ears without having to make any EQ changes.
    Having my time back, I would have saved my money and just bought the Yamaha. Both are nice guitars, but I just really dig the Yamaha over the Taylor.

  • @9alt0
    @9alt0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That Taylor just sounds really pretty 😍

  • @thebrowns1017
    @thebrowns1017 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Well. I have a Taylor 312CE 14 fret and it was worth every penny.

  • @corssheehan8566
    @corssheehan8566 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That Taylor is beautiful

  • @angrybritches1854
    @angrybritches1854 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have not played tons of Yamahas, but I own an FGX830C (my first & only guitar). I don't dislike it, but I loved the contoured, ergonomic feel of the Taylor 114CE, the action, and richer tone. It just screams 'YES', to me. Taylors are definitely overpriced, but they can obviously command that price & still remain in business, so the demand for Taylor has always been there. I've yet to fall in love with a Martin.

    • @cugir321
      @cugir321 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have a FS800 that has the best neck I've seen in 20 years....can play it tuned down a whole step with no relief....maybe .002. Essentially zero. Sound is just average unplugged. (Medium strings). Sound is great with a magnetic pickup. a monster playing fast leads. Tuned standard it can be capo'd anywhere without buzz. That's the only problem I've seen with Chinese made Yamaha's....the neck or fingerboard can be a bit off. Can usually be fixed but is the pain in an ass with cheap yammy's. I refret so isn't a big issue for me. I use stainless frets on my refrets...and a zero fret setup with a zero glide nut. It's rare I see a Martin or taylor I really like. They are over rated over priced. Japanese made Yammy's are more consistent then either.

  • @tonyvargfrost400
    @tonyvargfrost400 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The Yamaha sounds so much better, to my ears at least. The Taylor sounds "ploinky" and lacks bass in the tone. Cheers 🍻

  • @raymondattard9052
    @raymondattard9052 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bought 2 guitars from Olimpus music, a Taylor K28e 12 years ago and lately a Yamaha FGX5 which costs less than half the price of the Taylor, got to say that I prefer the Yamaha with regarding sound, maybe because the Koa needs years to warm up, looking forward to try the Yamaha FG9, let me know if you have one coming guys, Viva Malta!

  • @metoo9644
    @metoo9644 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yamaha guitars at that price point sound as good as those expensive brands. Unfortunately, guitar players shop for a brand not not always what sounds best. I am drawn by taylors, martins as much as the other guys, BUT anytime i go at music store and player a few guitars, I end up spending most of the time there on the Yamaha. I own lower end yamaha APX700ii which less the a thousand canadian. Quality, sound amazes me…

  • @ArdaKaraduman
    @ArdaKaraduman 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    So how do these compare to a Godin ?

  • @PhilippeGagne-sl3oj
    @PhilippeGagne-sl3oj 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I tried these both guitare today and i can tell that if i had the chance, i would buy both because they are completely different guitar.
    The sounds of the Taylor sound very smooth and more equilibrate between the High and Low.
    But from my point of view, I just fell in love with the Yamaha which provides such a rich and varied sound that I have no choice but to give my vote to the Yamaha.

  • @BrianPremo
    @BrianPremo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A simple online search will show you that Taylor's are notorious for cracking. They sound great, but I don't want to invest money and time in something that destined to break. Yamaha's on the other hand are built to last, sound great, look great and can rival any Taylor for a fraction of the price.

    • @Wobbz9413
      @Wobbz9413 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes! Noone mentions that!

    • @richurro20
      @richurro20 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Owned 5 Taylor's for over 10 years and none have cracked on me. Probably getting mixed up with Martin.

    • @asandiegoguy
      @asandiegoguy 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Never heard this - I’ve had 4 Taylor’s the oldest being a 2003 714ce. None have any problems.

  • @lucistheband6540
    @lucistheband6540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I can't say I've compared Yamaha with the tailor but I just purchased the Taylor 326 CE Grand Symphony soundhole and truly love it whether it's plugged in or not

  • @GR-yd7bv
    @GR-yd7bv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Im planning on travelling to malta in july. Very hyped but can you share the cons?? Know you love it there!

    • @RobChappers
      @RobChappers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey man, well honestly the driving is very bad… and you can’t drink the tap water! But apart from that I love it here :-)

    • @Nickbaldeagle02
      @Nickbaldeagle02 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      July? Enjoy sweating your balls off.

    • @RobChappers
      @RobChappers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Nickbaldeagle02 Truth

  • @radicalgambino2959
    @radicalgambino2959 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I own both and I prefer my yamaha

  • @Libraman1953
    @Libraman1953 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the sound of Yamaha A5R aoe great. Taylor is good but very expressive and brighter sound

  • @gregmock6808
    @gregmock6808 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the full dreadnaught and D18 style of the yamaha really cuts through the mix......I love yamaha guitars...always have and own a few..I think the Taylor would accompany a vocalist really well...melo balanced tone....both beautiful guitars but that yamaha has the tone for days

  • @Wingman52
    @Wingman52 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Saddle. Nut is at the top. Right?

  • @paulneedham9885
    @paulneedham9885 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think you meant the pickup on the Taylor is behinf the "Saddle"

  • @jamespatrick5872
    @jamespatrick5872 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The nut or the saddle. I believe you meant to say the saddle?

  • @festushaggen2563
    @festushaggen2563 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Yamaha. I traded my Taylor 214ce for my Yamaha FGX3. The build quality and sound isn't even close. For the same $1000, Yamaha blows Taylor and Martin away.

  • @BassWhoopinFishingTeam
    @BassWhoopinFishingTeam ปีที่แล้ว

    Easy. BOTH! I own both and love both!

  • @jonathanhandsmusic
    @jonathanhandsmusic ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yamaha guitars are for playing. Taylor guitars are good, but more like living room or wall ornaments ime. I’ve had a few of each brand and actually prefer the Yamahas. In this video the Yamaha sounds better.

  • @jeremyacton4569
    @jeremyacton4569 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Although I respect the quality and tones of Taylor guitars , I will never be able to afford one, and I have NEVER been disappointed by the quality or tone or costs of my various second-hand-bought Yamaha guitars.
    This session makes me want to give my classical guitars a bit of a rest, and pick up a steel string jumbo again. Thanks for a great presentation, guys!!!

  • @emailjimsylvester
    @emailjimsylvester 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The pickup system in the Yamaha reminds me of my old Ovation. Too much piezo "quack." I wonder if the mic blend knob was turned down too much? I think Yamaha makes very nice guitars to compete in the $300 range, but at higher pricing and quality the Taylor is a more refined instrument.

  • @OneWayTruthLife
    @OneWayTruthLife ปีที่แล้ว

    The difference, I think, is that Taylor has constantly improved. I bought a relatively cheap Taylor 10 years back. Here is a playlist of my original songs with all chords and solos played on the Taylor in different styles: th-cam.com/video/liIE_NgamgQ/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=MarioAlleckna

  • @markharwood7573
    @markharwood7573 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fine playing, chaps.
    Maybe have a run-through to get the levels next time? 🙂
    The Yamaha is a terrific acoustic box. They seem to have edged the sound just a little bit towards that Martin thing. I'm sure the plugged-in sound is better than it is on this video.
    The Taylor has the great ES2. That pickup gets some stick but for me it's a winner.
    My Taylor is a keeper and I do sometimes covet a Gibson, but you just can't go wrong with a Yamaha.

  • @D.Miller
    @D.Miller 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there any ml3/ t-style guitars in the Chapman range with trem systems?

    • @RobChappers
      @RobChappers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ML3 BEA is what you’re after mate

  • @ozarkpipertony8396
    @ozarkpipertony8396 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I prefer Yamaha LL36 and I also have a 1993 Yamaha LL23 and am looking at getting a Yamaha FGX5 Red Label and won't need anything more ever. I also have a Taylor 214 CE Koa back and sides which is the most beautiful guitar Ive ever seen and sounds amazing.

  • @myRmb-vc4zh
    @myRmb-vc4zh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I prefer my higher end Yamaha acoustic. However, there are some Taylor guitars that I enjoy. The Taylor 214 ce sounds really nice to my ears, and my local guitar store got a custom 214ce with a KOA top that sounded really nice. For $1000 the 214ce is my Taylor pick.

  • @gustavos.c4154
    @gustavos.c4154 ปีที่แล้ว

    Name of the song 10:33?

  • @SteveHatzman
    @SteveHatzman 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    To me the best music gear scent is a new Mesa Boogie amp head. Smells like Christmas to me.

  • @RichardCKale
    @RichardCKale หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have an AC3R, and the A5R. Both are outstanding! The A5R might be the best playing guitar I've owned, and at $1600, there's no comparison! I, like a lot of you, played a dozen or so high end Gibson's, Martin's, and Taylor's, before trying the Yamaha. The tone, voice, and electronics, at the price point of the Yamaha, was really a no brainer. So far, they have held their value too, which will be the slam dunk if it holds!

  • @darrylem6157
    @darrylem6157 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't have the best hearing ability but darn that taylor sounds freaking amazing both plugged in and mic! Not taking away from the Yamaha.

  • @cargueone1971
    @cargueone1971 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love my FG5

  • @Matt-pj5hf
    @Matt-pj5hf 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yamaha for me

  • @fowlintent
    @fowlintent 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love the early Taylors, but my take is that you get much more bang for the buck with a higher end Yamaha. And that goes double for the TA (transacoustic) models with built in chorus and reverb. These effects are not electronically amplified, although there is a battery on board, but the "electronics" simply enhance the natural vibration of the top.

  • @kingfisher5150
    @kingfisher5150 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The Yamaha sounds fantastic! The Taylor sounds like you're playing in a tiny box! If anyone thinks the Taylor is better they need to get their ears syringed!

  • @keithday1804
    @keithday1804 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In all fairness; comparing a grand symphony body to a dread is somewhat apples and oranges, but oh well.
    I have a higher end Yamaha AC3M and a Taylor 214 CE DLX limited edition ( quilted sapale back/sides). Those are very comparable IMO. Aesthetics and sound are close. But the Taylor (IMO) wins due to unplugged sound and playability. One thing to note about Taylor is the bolt on neck. A full reset costs about $30c compared to maybe $200 for a glue on neck. I also have a 40 year old Solid top Yamaha dread that is absolutely fantastic.

    • @dustinglass
      @dustinglass 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do you still like the Taylor 214 more than the Yamaha? I have a Yamaha AC3R, and am considering switching to a Taylor 214CE.

  • @wordsmadeofenglish
    @wordsmadeofenglish 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If you were fair in comparing a 2500 taylor to a Yamaha you'd have picked the FG5 not the 3.

    • @Wobbz9413
      @Wobbz9413 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Not reaĺly. The 3 blows that taylor thing away. The 5 would leave it trembling in the gutter!

    • @kimdecell5096
      @kimdecell5096 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Wobbz9413 Taylor's are shit .
      My low end yamaha sounds better than that talor. I'm not joking.

  • @cavalryscout8720
    @cavalryscout8720 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I recently bought a Yamaha FG 850.. all mohagany top, back and sides. It's tone and projection are far superior to a Taylor I owned that cost 4 times as much..
    I did like the Taylor pickup system. But the price to quality ratio is undeniable..

  • @D.Miller
    @D.Miller 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The standards and consumer expectations are set so high, I'd love to see a review that says 'nah this brand is a bit shit'. Rob and Luke, awesome as always thanks for the internetainment

    • @RobChappers
      @RobChappers  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Honestly there aren’t really any really shit products out there any more… or at least none I’d bother reviewing! Back when I was a kid it was very different :-)

  • @servicecatchers3190
    @servicecatchers3190 8 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Who is this luke ?what is his full name

  • @Rick_Kn
    @Rick_Kn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yamaha for the win. I prefer Takamine plugged in.

  • @karlburmeister1552
    @karlburmeister1552 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The plugged in sound on the yamaha sounds far better. You can always add a bit of highs or mids in the eq through an amp or plugin but getting the base of the overall sound there is most of the battle and the yamaha seems to win this one easily.

  • @Gman44044
    @Gman44044 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are you guys comparing Yamaha with a guitar twice its price? Pretty fair comparison I'd say...

  • @breakandrun70
    @breakandrun70 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yamaha Red label has way more projection, just sounds way better. That being said, the Taylor
    does sound muddy. Their two different guitars, with different build, woods.

  • @bradybritto
    @bradybritto 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice 👍

  • @steveburrows101
    @steveburrows101 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not a Taylor fan but the Taylor pickup sounds great.

    • @user-ru6pu3xo7k
      @user-ru6pu3xo7k ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have a taylor gs mini with es 2, its sound in the connection seems very bad to me compared to cort gold where Fishman Flex Blend. Taylor, in my opinion, is very weak in connection. My opinion

  • @BadgerVito
    @BadgerVito 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cosmetically I just can't abide that weird partial cutaway on the Taylor.

  • @rabokel
    @rabokel 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yamaha provides good bang for the buck in my experience.

    • @9alt0
      @9alt0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They make really solid nylon string guitars as well. The cg-171/172sf seems to be the gold standard for entry flamenco (much better than cordoba)

  • @markrobertson8007
    @markrobertson8007 ปีที่แล้ว

    great demo guys i have a yamaha fgx800 really a great concert sound think wild horses i did go the music store and will buy the 214 cek it is a lot lighter and and more rock honky oh i do cringe a little seeing someone eat potato chips and play a taylor

  • @MashaT22
    @MashaT22 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is there a difference of language here? Rob was calling the white part inside the saddle a “nut” when that little piece that’s sits inside the wood bridge is actually called the “saddle” - the nut is under the headstock. At least that’s what we call it here in the US. Are the parts differently named in the UK and/or elsewhere in the world? I play acoustic and am based in the US, so I am genuinely curious because I never heard someone say that before. I know sometimes things are named differently around the world - like the entire elevator/lift debate, lol.

    • @SwedeSpeeder
      @SwedeSpeeder 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think he called it that because an acoustic bridge is basically a big nut, instead of string grooves it's the opposite lol

    • @MashaT22
      @MashaT22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @GOD&GUNS lol I reversed it when I wrote it. I have a brain injury and do that sometimes. But one thing’s for sure - it’s not a nut! I’m gonna go back and edit so my brain fart won’t cause confusion. 😉

    • @MashaT22
      @MashaT22 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SwedeSpeeder 😂🤷🏼‍♀️

  • @lhvent
    @lhvent 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My Yamaha FG830 sounds amazing for the money

  • @Infinityplus1111
    @Infinityplus1111 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Damn man, I dont touch my guitar unless my hands are impeccably clean. I guess I am missing out on that "Potato Chip Grease Mojo."

    • @UserConn
      @UserConn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same here

    • @MrArchie765
      @MrArchie765 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think that’s the first guitar video that I’ve seen where someone was eating and drinking as they reviewed the guitar!!!

    • @jed1166
      @jed1166 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I heard that “chip oil” was great for keeping the fretboard from drying out…

  • @jameswilliford5478
    @jameswilliford5478 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have a Yamaha ll-ta, Yamaha AC5M, Taylor GS mini-e koa and some lower tier Yamahas. My Yamaha ll-ta is the best sounding guitar I've heard, but the little Taylor is so comfortable and easy to play that It's the one I always reach for. Seriously thinking about checking out the Taylor AD22e and the 224ce-k to see how they sound in person.

    • @gavkatz7045
      @gavkatz7045 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which do you play most I’m debating these exact two

    • @billimbriale8535
      @billimbriale8535 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gavkatz7045 He just told you.

    • @MarianoPerez
      @MarianoPerez ปีที่แล้ว

      Have you tried the Yamaha ls series? It will give you the sound signature of the ll in a comfortable smaller body.

    • @jonflores5832
      @jonflores5832 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MarianoPerez tried the LS TA had it for a month and it sounded great in the mids and treble. However the bass wasn’t to my expectations. So went with the LLTA and it sounded much better, but wasn’t as bright. Still prefer the LLTA despite that.

  • @angrybritches1854
    @angrybritches1854 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish I could 'DON'T really play acoustic very much', like that.

  • @Jodesy11
    @Jodesy11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Luke sounds exactly like Bernardo Silva when he speaks

  • @Joseph-qh5xv
    @Joseph-qh5xv 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I love my Yamaha.730s

  • @oldpicker49
    @oldpicker49 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    im 73 i would take a yamaha over taylor anytime

  • @dennisfinch5981
    @dennisfinch5981 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really think it is an unfair contest they are different size bodies on these acoustic guitars, giving them a different sound, the yamaha dreadnaught of course sound will highlight the bass and mids and the taylor grand symphony will be more articulate and cleaner in the higher registry. No contest.

  • @AirCraft1125
    @AirCraft1125 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I sold my Taylor 210ce and bought Yamaha A3R, no doubt, A3R is much better!

  • @Oberkobold
    @Oberkobold 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Taylor sounds kind of boxy to me. Much prefer the Yamaha.

  • @gardnercalibuso
    @gardnercalibuso ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice... Yamaha for me

  • @noamankhurshid3925
    @noamankhurshid3925 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yamaha sounds better believe me don't waste your $$$ for Taylor guitar

    • @susanroycroft89
      @susanroycroft89 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's a very interesting comment, and I am inclined to agree, Every Yamaha Iv'e played ( an' Iv'e been playing for 60 years now) have All been excellent guitar's, & only need little things done to them to make them sound excellent, eg- bone nut and saddĺe ( make sure you do it right) check action and adjust, maybe add a zero fret & you've got a really great guitar in your hands 😊😊😊

  • @allenfowler1794
    @allenfowler1794 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yamaha all the way. I have a 1976 Yamaha FG 300 and a 2013 Martin HD35 and the 300 is my baby...my go to guitar.

  • @matthewi.minnick5845
    @matthewi.minnick5845 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Atmosfeel steals the show! I like the sound of Taylor unplugged, but plugged in, that one sounds bad to my ears. I've hears and played several Taylor's plugged in and unplugged. They've all sounded good unplugged. Plugged in, I actually prefer the ES1. With the right PA system, ES2 can sound ok. But that Atmosfeel on the Yamaha, even on full piezo, sounds more natural than the Taylor to my ears.

    • @All_who_wander
      @All_who_wander ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Love the srt2 in the a models

  • @goraygorgulu4773
    @goraygorgulu4773 ปีที่แล้ว

    At a similar price point; Yamaha > Taylor or mostly any other major brand for that matter. There is no ifs and buts about it in terms of sound, playability and build quality.

  • @danielhocker1945
    @danielhocker1945 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Okay. So. I have been playing for 27 years. I own a lot of nice guitars. I am not a perfect player, but I know my stuff decently. That being said I was going to buy a Martin 000-18 or J45 as my 40th bday present to myself. Then I saw this Taylor 326. Then I played this 326. Then I bought this 326. It is now a year that I have owned it and it sounds even better with a little age. I would not trade it for any other acoustic other than a builders edition 826. Taylors are like the PRS of acoustic. They are polarizing. You either love them and want 10 or you don't. I don't like PRS, but I LOVE my Taylor. So does everyone else who hears or plays it. To each their own. Best 2400 dollars I have ever spent on a piece of musical equipment.

  • @Charlie-hp2oh
    @Charlie-hp2oh ปีที่แล้ว

    that Yam red label is maybe the best dreadnought on earth, I compared it with a lot martins-gibsons-guilds. Taylor dreads are useless anyway.