Thank you very much for having organized this event. So many entries, differents systems and languages. A great challenge ! Happy Christmas retroguys !
Thank you for this challange, and the lot of effort and work put into the presentation. Highly appreciated! I wish you and all the coders a Merry Christmas!
This was an totally open fun challenge. So, if someone has fun to work with emulator only quirks, that is fine. Nevertheless I agree with you, that this is not the same as an entry running on a real machine and it should not be directly compared with such. In a demo scene compo such entries should be disqualified. For a challenge they can take part, but the authors should be aware of it and better, they should note it in their release notes and even better, provide a working alternative. You did excellently within your entry. That's exemplary!
Thank you very much for having organized this event. So many entries, differents systems and languages. A great challenge ! Happy Christmas retroguys !
It was great having you in, pépé! Your contributions have refreshed the whole.
Thank you for organizing this challenge. So many entries! This is amazing!
Great to see all the different entries and approaches. Thank you very much for organising - a superb fun challenge! Merry Christmas to all.
Thank you for this challange, and the lot of effort and work put into the presentation. Highly appreciated! I wish you and all the coders a Merry Christmas!
Thank you for putting all this together Logiker 464! Great fun challenge!
Wooh!!!
Great challenge! Will the source code be made available?
Yes, of course. I just uploaded it. More information will come on my homepage.
Wow, did I count *four* PDP11 assembler programs? :)
Could be! I found 2 PDP-11 (No. 54 BASIC and 60 Assembler) and 3 BK 0010-01 (No. 55, 64 and 81; all assembler) in my list.
I think for an entry to be valid it should work on the original hardware, and not rely on quirks of an emulator
This was an totally open fun challenge. So, if someone has fun to work with emulator only quirks, that is fine. Nevertheless I agree with you, that this is not the same as an entry running on a real machine and it should not be directly compared with such.
In a demo scene compo such entries should be disqualified. For a challenge they can take part, but the authors should be aware of it and better, they should note it in their release notes and even better, provide a working alternative. You did excellently within your entry. That's exemplary!