How I ended up repairing not one, but two (!) COMPAQ Portable III computers

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @verficationaccount
    @verficationaccount ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for showing all of this. Will be very helpful when I get to fixing mine... It´s not booting from 5 1/4 and I have no diagnostic disk yet.

  • @xandercraw
    @xandercraw ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had one of these in the early 90s with windows 3.1 installed, I miss it so much 😢

  • @evanparton734
    @evanparton734 ปีที่แล้ว

    Enjoyed this video...I have currently restored a 386 version ..and in the process of restoring a 286 version...which I have successfully integrated XTIDE(AT) on to the model 2660 mainboard using the 2 empty 28 pin bases ...keep the videos coming ...rgds.

    • @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR
      @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR  ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice :) I have the 386 as well, still looking around for a Portable 486.
      For these 3rd-gen machines, a passive IDE2CF adapter will do as well, they work fine on the standard IDE connector.

    • @evanparton734
      @evanparton734 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR I sent you an email recently...dont know if you received it....asking for detailed photo's of the memory expansion board....are rare piece I think with little if any information in the public domain sadly....good luck finding a portable 486...a must have for a serious collector.

    • @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR
      @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR  ปีที่แล้ว

      @evanparton734 I honestly didn‘t check the emails yet, just read it this very moment. Will send you some pictures of the memory expansion board.

    • @evanparton734
      @evanparton734 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR That would be very much appreciated..totally beyond me to reverse engineer it...but at least I would know more about it..and what I would be searching for. Thanks

    • @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR
      @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@evanparton734 ... and I almost let it go, because of how bad shape the machine was! But then I took it anyway, as I had hoped for a working plasma display. Imagine how surprised I was to find that memory expansion board inside! Sheer luck, I may say :)

  • @SteveMaves
    @SteveMaves ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Early OS/2?

  • @joeventura1
    @joeventura1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Where can I download those parts to print myself?

  • @glendady8879
    @glendady8879 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yeah, Mr. Know-It-All survived.

    • @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR
      @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sort of, this was prerecorded footage, not considering latest poll results yet…

  • @JimLeonard
    @JimLeonard ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm a little confused after watching the entire video. What was wrong with the first unit, was it only the hard drive? What was wrong with the second unit?

    • @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR
      @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Device #1 was the one shown at the beginning (the dirty one). It had ...
      - the missing trim panels (swapped with the original ones from device #2)
      - a dead hard drive (fixed)
      - a dead CMOS battery (fixed)
      - a wrong 3.5" floppy (swapped with the 5.25" drive from device #2)
      - a good plasma panel
      - the 6 MiB memory expansion
      Device #2 (the one I already had upfront), had
      - a defective (but still working so-so plasma panel, not fixed as of now)
      - a dead hard drive (previously replaced with a CF card)
      - the original trim panels (swapped to unit #1, mounted the 3d-printed panels instead)
      - the original 5.25" floppy drive (swapped with the 3.5" drive from unit #1, and completed with the 3d-printed mounting bracket)
      So Unit #1 is now fully complete and restored.
      And Unit #2 is in working condition, with some imperfections.
      Maybe I should have better summarized this then in the video :-)

    • @JimLeonard
      @JimLeonard ปีที่แล้ว

      @@THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR Better late than never :⁠-⁠)

  • @autingo6583
    @autingo6583 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Concurrent DOS? :-D

    • @asanjuas
      @asanjuas ปีที่แล้ว

      yes that is good but this is for 386 , Concurrent DOS XM is more suitable, i am thinking on dr-dos better.

    • @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR
      @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR  ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting choice. But no (not yet…)

  • @Intellivision78
    @Intellivision78 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You can never go wrong with the metric. Do not blame yourself for the non metric lovers..

    • @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR
      @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, it was more like measuring on non-metric dimensions with an analog metric caliper didn‘t make the outcome perfect.
      The „it‘s gonna be ok“ pragmatic approach wasn‘t to the best here.

  • @karljohnson1121
    @karljohnson1121 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lié au SPVM.

    • @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR
      @THEPHINTAGECOLLECTOR  ปีที่แล้ว

      @karljohnson1121 I beg your pardon? French is not my strength, I'm afraid :-)