His output has always been hit and miss. What is good in the vast majority of the characters in his books are well developed and with an interesting back story. I personally didn't rate this one.
Yeah, I agree, his characterisation is generally strong and I do like that in his books. Even so Bart Dawes still felt a bit one dimensional compared to some of his other protagonists and other characters. Jack Torrance from The Shining did the whole spiralling into madness exacerbated by a troubled past thing way better.
It was pretty average, yeah. It’s still a Stephen King book, so worth reading if like me you’re reading through his whole bibliography, but it’s a weak King book.
His output has always been hit and miss. What is good in the vast majority of the characters in his books are well developed and with an interesting back story. I personally didn't rate this one.
Yeah, I agree, his characterisation is generally strong and I do like that in his books. Even so Bart Dawes still felt a bit one dimensional compared to some of his other protagonists and other characters. Jack Torrance from The Shining did the whole spiralling into madness exacerbated by a troubled past thing way better.
so... it's a flop? 😂
It was pretty average, yeah. It’s still a Stephen King book, so worth reading if like me you’re reading through his whole bibliography, but it’s a weak King book.
Steven King kinda legend if I am not wrong
@Naman...123 oh yeah, definitely.