Why Tom Peters Was Too "Weird" For McKinsey

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 12

  • @StrategyU
    @StrategyU  ปีที่แล้ว +3

    18:45 why his approach was att odds with strategy consulting in the early 1980s

  • @rik112
    @rik112 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Really interesting interview. Tom was obviously smart enough to see behind these symbolic management cues to understand how the companies were fundamentally different from others, which gave them a competitive advantage.

  • @jasonroberts1100
    @jasonroberts1100 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tom is my favorite author by a country mile! Little Big Things and Excellence Dividend permanently changed the trajectory of my career. Great interview!!! Thank you for everything Mr. Peters.

  • @Davidkiania
    @Davidkiania ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is really amazing. Grew up professionally reading ‘In search of excellence’, really engaging conversation with a sage.
    Also amazing how corporate caring is an alien concept …

  • @nathjones77
    @nathjones77 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent interview, Tom has always had his finger on the pulse of these companies and is such a brilliant communicator

  • @vperazzoli
    @vperazzoli ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you Paul. Great interview!!

  • @FilipeLosoft
    @FilipeLosoft ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great Interview

  • @carlaserra3438
    @carlaserra3438 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank God for this interview
    I'm a HR technology and Strategy consultant and go crazy with the old structures we sometimes find in old school companies

  • @darksunrise37
    @darksunrise37 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow! What a photograph that would've been a hunched over elderly Hewlett with a youthful energetic engineer working on a seemingly minute yet consequential problem.

  • @nev6250
    @nev6250 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you by any chance have a podcast channel or account? Love your contents

  • @brainwhatwasher
    @brainwhatwasher ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm still looking for a boss that looks at the world in a different way ha

  • @anyvoicespeaks
    @anyvoicespeaks ปีที่แล้ว

    wanted to like this but a very lightweight interview, not much was actually said and I still cant figure out why he was at odds with Mckinsey? He did work there for 5 years. After he published his book. most of the examples of excellent companies he cited failed spectacularily. Maybe people who are good at business stay in business instead of writing books?