I agree with all of your points! This film reminds me of virtual learning. Technology simply cannot replace live performance in a real setting. One significant positive from this film, I feel, is that the CGI-world building experiment was determined to be a complete failure so most movies (thank you Christopher Nolan!) moved as far away from CGI as possible (another positive being that Liam Neeson found the wherewithal to continue to act). I never thought about the Dooku->Jango Fett->Bounty Hunger->robot->killer worms passing down of responsibilities, that is hilarious and really illustrates your point. Your review is MUCH better than the film and anyone with the idea they should watch Attack of the Clones should just watch your video and move on with their lives. Thank you for taking the hit!
I think CGI has improved tenfold since the late 90s-early 2000s. I will always prefer practical effects. There is just a level of tangibility that is physically impossible to capture with CGI. CGI is always used best mixed in with practical effects.
I have to agree with you a hundred percent Andrew. Great description of this movie. I really like the first 3 movies that came out in the 80-90's. Well done.
I agree with all of your points! This film reminds me of virtual learning. Technology simply cannot replace live performance in a real setting. One significant positive from this film, I feel, is that the CGI-world building experiment was determined to be a complete failure so most movies (thank you Christopher Nolan!) moved as far away from CGI as possible (another positive being that Liam Neeson found the wherewithal to continue to act). I never thought about the Dooku->Jango Fett->Bounty Hunger->robot->killer worms passing down of responsibilities, that is hilarious and really illustrates your point. Your review is MUCH better than the film and anyone with the idea they should watch Attack of the Clones should just watch your video and move on with their lives. Thank you for taking the hit!
I think CGI has improved tenfold since the late 90s-early 2000s. I will always prefer practical effects. There is just a level of tangibility that is physically impossible to capture with CGI. CGI is always used best mixed in with practical effects.
@@anthillshapedbox7978 Fortunately for us Christopher Nolan knew this too!
I have to agree with you a hundred percent Andrew. Great description of this movie. I really like the first 3 movies that came out in the 80-90's. Well done.