The day gun manufacturers are held liable for what's done with the guns they make is the day we must insist that politicians be held accountable for the policies that they pass.
Also if the government puts all the gun manufacturers out of business who is going to make firearms for the armed forces which it uses to invade and occupy nations it has no business to do..
And are you going to hold auto makers liable for what is done with their vehicles? Because whether you like it or not, idiots driving cars kill more people every year than guns do. Here's a hint Sparky, a gun by itself is not a danger, the danger comes from the person wielding it, as it is with autos.
@@carlfromtheoc1788 Hey sparky. I don't blame guns for gun fatalities. My point was that if politicians want to do that then we should hold them up to the same standards that they setp.
@@MrJonny0 Nope same BS on both sides nobody wants to get called whatever for rooting for the ''wrong team'' by criticizing your own. Oh you say this about Trump! You are a LIBERAL! Oh you criticize Biden! You're a conservative. It's all a trap. Just like the peer pressure to wear a face diaper.
Citizens have the right own any weapon the government can use against the citizens. The 2nd amendment isn’t about hunting squirrels. It’s about defending our constitutional rights from a corrupt government that choose not to serve the people. A government that serves its people would want them to be well armed.
Also, as I understand it as someone outside of the USA, the Constitution does not grant any rights at all, it affirms them as yours by reason of being a US citizen. The rights in the first 10 amendments are innate (if you will, "God given") and therefore cannot be negated by anyone but God himself, certainly not by any government without a 75% super majority. The implication in the preamble is that it is not only the right, but the civic duty of a citizen to overthrow a government in rebellion against the people, to accomplish which the Second Amendment was written to make this plain and to ensure that the people have the means to exercise that right and duty.. Oh how I wish my own country (New Zealand) was founded on such principles. Keep the faith over there.... Like it or not you are the one true bastion of freedom in the world, the only nation wherein there is no argument about who is in charge... the people. God bless America and all who legally live there..... I wish I were one of them...... and a Merry Christmas to you all...
If he wants to hold gun manufacturers liable for what an individual does with a gun, shouldn’t we hold the government liable for what they do to us and with our money?
exactly right sir. that's like outlawing all vehicles because someone may drink and drive. it's the most idiotic argument in the history of our nation.
Colin, 59 years ago when John Kennedy was killed my father told me this was coming. Sence then I have seen my rights whittled away by power grabing politicians. Your message is exactly right. Keep up the good work. PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW. God bless you brother. God bless America 🇺🇸
Christ, imagine the government coming to your door and saying "hey, you own a ship. Wanna be a pirate for us?" I wish this country still had that kind of energy...
We're on the verge here in GA. I moved here 10 years ago and there are 6 million more people then when I arrived. Most moved to the perimeter in Cobb and Fulton counties. They have been getting bluer by the year.
@@racerdude888 I moved to DeKalb/Lithonia in 98, the price of the avg home has increased by 100k in the Atlanta/Atlanta Metro housing market and has been deemed unaffordable, hopefully that can mitigate the blues trying to move here. Stacy Abrams could never get my vote, the idea of an ounce of gun control is insanity.
@@imjusttrollingyou4014 Yeah unfortunately they're starting to move up to Dahlonega where I live. And yeah the housing market is crazy here also. And I'm praying hard against her winning. The real turning point would be if they flipped the state congress. Then we'd be in trouble
Joetato wasn't the sharpest knife in the drawer when he still had most of his marbles and the hole in his marble bag has gotten even bigger, actually the bottom seam came undone a few years ago and it is empty now.
"Legally" this word alone shows how not free we are. If you must ask the govts permission, you are not free. Period. America and everything we are taught about freedom, fairness, and hard work pays off are lies.
People who oppose Joe Biden in this case are the ones who openly support school shootings,mass killings and violence.It is very clear to see who’s trying to make America safe…..
Thank you Colton Noir for your video! I just had that conversation with some young millennial’s about what you can own verses what the Gov’t says you cannot own under 2A. I had stressed the importance 0f words and The Origin of words and their meaning, prior to being “translated to English.”
Also, for those who didn't know, the AR-15 was a civilian rifle that was created in 1956, around a few years before the military adopted the design, the military liked the design and made a contract with Colt to make a fully-automatic version and it became the M-16 and later the M-4. The notion that the AR-15 is a military rifle is not true.
@Hoffmann-Walter Photography, I know, it's unbelievable how stupid some people are, that they think it stands for "assault rifle" and not a company name.
@@dbptwg We have the right to own ALL guns. Nowhere in the 2A does it differentiate. Only libtatds like you do that. And you do it with the goal of banning them all.
The rich see an economic crisis as a garage sale and also the rich stay rich by investing and diversifying their portfolio with stock, crypto currency investment which is the wisest thing every individual need to do and it is really profitable.
You are right about that do you mind sharing with me how to get intouch with Mrs Amy Robinette. I have little to no knowledge about crypto currencies and I have seen the rise from 100 USD to over 50k USD in the last few years.
People who oppose Joe Biden in this case are the ones who openly support school shootings,mass killings and violence.It is very clear to see who’s trying to make America safe!!
@@tullo5564 mass killings? Oh yeah. The BLM riots, and the lockdown riots and looting. We’re blaming that on guns now? How about the politicians who supported the defunding of the police, or the DA’s who refuse to prosecute the criminals perpetrating the crimes? And when they do prosecute, they let them out on bail. Then they go and commit more crime, because they know the police doesn’t have the manpower, and the corrupt DA’s won’t do anything. States like California and New York, where this is happening, already has the most stringent and restrictive gun legislation active. It’s already hard to legally obtain a firearm, and it takes months at times. The criminals on the other hand, never have to go through that, because they always obtain them on the black market, or in a back alley somewhere. States that allow citizens to constitutional carry, have a far lower crime rate. And the fact the the “president” wants to call even a Glock a “weapon of war,” is just ridiculous. The fact is, he wants to ban all firearms from law abiding citizens, while criminals will still be able to get them, and the crime will get worse. But hey, don’t want to believe me? Move to a country where you can’t own a firearm as a private citizen. China or somewhere. See how that works out. And as far as making America safe, the crime rate has shot up since he’s taken office. Joe Biden and the Democrat party keep pushing crap policies hurt the good, law abiding people; while coddling and helping the criminals.
@@accuratealloys That has all been investigated, and no crime was committed by Jared or his wife. The Bidens could not withstand An investigation like that
buy a battle ship, skip just a cannon, remember gun control is owning as many guns as you can control, the more guns you own the more guns you control, just think of how many cannons are on a battle ship.
All gun laws are an infringement. This wasn't ever about sporting rifles. Or hunting rifles. This was 100% about civilians having the right to defend themselves against tyrannical government who.. obviously are trying to deprive citizens of their ABILITY to even fight the current tyranny.
Somehow you can't bring yourself to note the first few words of the 2nd amendment. Context is everything. You know, at the time the bill of rights was being considered, nobody would have thought it was necessary to protect people's right to own a thing for hunting and for defense. The only reason the second amendment was thought to be necessary was to make sure that the federal government could not prevent states from organizing militias, well regulated militias. The founding fathers weren't protecting the rights of crazy people to shoot kids in school.
@@charlesmrader correct and well said. Almost every day further we go, something or someone else is blatantly setting off alarm bells with the crooks who chose a career to actively sell out the American people and our rights to the highest bidder, who usually has a vested interest in removing that particular right so that they can move unopposed against us chasing their dollars from private and corporate interests..
It's WILD that we live in a country where an entire party doesn't believe in the foundation of everything that made and makes it great. They are so offended by the flag, the constitution, and everything about our nation, yet WILL NOT LEAVE.....
All these clowns put their hands on the bible at every swearing in and tell the biggest effing lie there is. These swearing ins should be done away with. It's all phony BS.
Joe doesn't even know where he is most of the time. Has trouble with stairs, tried to shake hands with people who aren't there, and supports negligently discharging a firearm in the air in your yard.
@@darkstar9008 He sure is hung with that prostitute word, he uses it instead of prosecute, prostate, prostrate! All things he knows nothing about anyway, but...
This from the same man who stated (on national television) that he told his wife to "step out on the porch and shoot that shotgun in the air" to scare off intruders at his home. Sounds like a willfully reckless and dangerous act to me.
Because he is truly afraid of the people flexing their rights. You have a right to own a canon, you have a right to own a gun and you have a right to defend yourself. 🎩 🐍no step on Snek! 🇺🇸🇭🇰
I literally own two cannons lmao. They have been in my family’s possession for at least 130 years and we only use them on 4th of July every few years. Nobody is taking my family’s cannons man, they’re just too damn cool.
The really funny thing about this, is that there was a letter to one of the founding fathers, way back in the day, a private citizen (IIRC a merchant) asking if he was allowed to own a naval cannon or not. The response was along the lines of 'unless you plan to aim it at me, why is it my business'. Trying to use federal laws to override the constitution on the basis of arguing 'well the constitution doesn't cover x' when you have extant examples of what the people who wrote it thought it covered, is the height of stupidity, and relies on a stupid and uneducated public to work. Especially when you consider that the 2nd amendment's original purpose was EXPLICITLY to protect civilians having enough gun to give the finger to an overreaching federal government.
I want people like Biden to be held accountable for the laws that they pass. The next time someone is shot and killed who didn't have a gun to defend themselves because of laws that they passed the family should be able to sue them.
When one of your trusted advisors is the Easter Bunny…. I’m going to say that unless someone can find that hunter who allegedly confronted Brandon and verify the story, it never happened in reality. It was either a conversation with an imaginary friend or an out-right lie.
He was "walking up one of the crick beds" having an imaginary conversation with an imaginary hunter. That was the day he wandered away from the nursing home looking for the ice cream shop.
I just stumbled upon this TH-cam channel and discovered one of the most factually and densely packed videos ever in the span of 6 minutes and 8 seconds. You've just earned another subscriber. Thank you for what you do to educate and protect our 2nd Amendment RIGHTS which are constantly under assault by Joe Biden and his Democrat party.
Dude, you are awesome! We love ya man. Help us out here...wife and I are thinking of pulling our membership now that uscca is giving one-eyed jack a platform and voice...
Just the phrase is bizarre, 'when the 2nd Amendment was passed." It wasn't "passed" it was part of the agreement between States in the process of ratifying the Constitution.
And it was never “passed” as if the federal government of the day was allowing citizens to do this, it’s clarified as a natural right. That makes it a right regardless of what anyone says.
@@beep-beep True. It was passed by the people completely. The people were the government then. Now the government chooses what the people get and don't get, to satisfy a few small brained politicians.
It was actually added 10 years later and only added on because some states threatened to leave, people like Madison in fact I don’t think anyone on the original constitutional convention supported it.
@@GM-en2qr Your history is flawed. Rhode Island didn't agree to the Constitution until 1790, and the Bill of Rights was added in 1791. That's not "added 10 years later." As I said, it was part of the agreement between states in the *process* of ratifying the Constitution which took longer than ten years (from when it was initially introduced and signed in 1787, which is likely the date you're thinking of, when only 39 of 55 delegates signed it because: it didn't include a bill of rights).
“The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.” - Supreme Court justice Joseph Story, nominated to the court **by the man who wrote the second amendment**. That is what the second amendment is for, not hunting, but to safeguard liberty... And who would know better than a supreme court justice that was nominated by the man who wrote it?
@@genejeffries2888 Indeed. Soldiers of the time commonly had smoothbore muzzle loaders. Civilians could have breech loaded rifles, or even repeating, yes, repeating rifles like the Kalthoff design which could fire 30-60 rounds per minute.
The funniest part is when they say “it was made when muskets were around so that’s what you should be allowed to own” as if the goal to increase firing rate was never of consideration in firearms at the time and unfathomable. Yeah, a single shot didn’t turn into a revolving cylinder, a ramrod didn’t turn into a breechblock or break action, and a weapon never had a magazine attached. There were clear goals of rapid fire only held back by primitive technology. if they had the tech we have today they certainly would have used it.
Except they probably knew things would have gotten better. Even at the time there were breakthroughs in firearm tech. And it's not like the founding fathers were idiots who'd look at a musket and think "Yep, this is as good as it gets and nothing is going to top this"
@@NEEDbacon Exactly. You would have to be out of your mind to think that the founding fathers had no forethought about laws they were writing specifically for the future of the country and its longevity.
Not to mention belton flintlocks and other repeating handheld firearms. There's a couple repeating firearms designs that date back well over 100 years before the founding fathers. They were just too costly for the average person to own and were mostly used by rich hunters. That's what Biden and our politicians have wanted for years: the good stuff is available, but limited to only those with money and power.
The girandoni air rifle was a semiautomatic air powered rifle that was in adopted by the Austrian army in 1780. It was later taken on the Lewis and Clark expedition and used to hunt buffalo. It had a magazine capacity of 22 rounds. And could unload all of them within 60sec. I am 100% certain they knew the future firearm capabilities would be impressive compared to what they were used to.
Brandon also keeps repeating the bogus "some good people" lie. A militia would be expected to "show up" with standard arms."You must be a terrible shot" is the standard argument from anyone who is not also being shot at. The average armed home invasion is two or more armed intruders. Plenty of studies showing that even skilled shooters expended more return rounds while being shot at.
Maryland resident here (not by choice, by job). It is a criminal shooting gallery out there, and I am afraid to go many places in Maryland. But, I cannot carry a concealed weapon (might shoot my eye out), but criminals do. Off duty police are afraid to go out in Mayland without their service weapon, but the rest of us are screwed. Hope to move out of tax crazy Maryland this summer - HOORAY - FINALLY! By the way, Maryland has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country, yet look at the out of control shooting/crime rate in Baltimore. Restrictive gun laws work, right? Laws only restrict law-abiding people (Who are not doing the crimes) from protecting themselves from criminals.
Unless it's a CBRN weapon of mutually assured destruction, I don't believe any arm in the military should be exempt from civilian ownership. As a former F-15C pilot, yes, I mean that civilians and militias should be able to own an F-15 (or entire squadron) if they want. Granted there are secret no-export avionics and weapons in US hardware, but an F-15I or F-15K export version should be able to be bought by militias, and carry munitions. Just follow all the same rules regarding FAA, mach limit rules in populated areas, and munitions flight rules. Same goes for Tanks, automatic weapons, rocket launchers, etc. If 2A is restricted using legislation, limits, and technology, it could in time be rendered so inept it may as well not even exist. 2A is designed to prevent tyranny, and it'll forever be under attack by tyrants that recognize it's effectiveness to their addiction to power and control of the masses. Abolish the ATF and regulate crime, not guns.
Civilians are allowed to own military aircraft. Legally I don't think they are allowed to be flown in US airspace while armed though. Finding some place to buy one is the tricky part. I do know there are several fulyl functional attack helicopters in private hands with at least one of those put back together completely by salvaging parts from different hunks sold as demiled scrap. There are also lots of privately owned tanks complete with main guns. The ammo has to have a tax stamp per round as a destructive device. The same goes for grenade launcher ammo. Machine guns are legal to own if it was one registered from that 80s or earlier. Or you can go through hoops and get an FFL and have "dealer samples". There is a lot of stuff politician like Biden like to say are illegal or can't be done that in fact are legal, just very expensive.
Free Americans (as in those not currently incarcerated) must be allowed to own whatever items they can purchase or manufacture. No background check, registration, permit, license required.
We need to appeal laws that protect politicians! Companies that make firearms are not the ones responsible for misuse. Politicians are directly responsible for their corruption!
Mate gotta say you have a very good way of making your point! As an Aussie looking over the ditch you make it very clear! Keep up the good work or you guys are gonna end up like us down here.
I really sincerely hope that all this amazing effort and irreplaceable time you have spent educating everyone is paying off by getting people more involved in what is going on and what is expected to come from these power hungry people. You do amazing work and research on so many different areas I'm sure it can be extremely overwhelming trying to obtain all that information and making sense of it all but please don't give up the people need as many people fighting for our freedoms as possible.
Clear mind, clear message, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Doesn't matter if it's laser beam or black powder rifle.
I don’t know of anyone that’s upset because they can’t spend the day at the proving grounds to test out their new thermonuclear gear. I also don’t know of anyone who can afford it. But if you ask me if we should be allowed to have the same types of guns that are used by the military, it’s a resounding yes, unless I’m proven incompetent or dangerous to others.
@@EricT3769 I tend to think this way, freedom is either free or not. Incompetent, felon, house wife, young adult, or any other person should have the right. The only time I could say someone should not is if they're in jail or in a private place that prohibits. I know people have a felon (bad person) for child support. Big infringement. Yes, it seems odd to people today, but if you're not in jail but served time as a felon, it's as clear as what's been written. Everytime politicians figure a way to infringe is one more step towards a disarmed society, weak and easily controlled. Arm up.
My mother is a diehard, TDS-afflicted, CNN/MSNBC daily watcher. She just recently asked me if she could borrow one of my guns for protection. If she can start seeing the light, anyone can
Tell her to BUY one for herself! Depending on what State you both live in, you could both be charged with felonies if she ever had to protect herself with your firearm. Then both of you would no longer be able to lawfully own them.
@@steverobbins240 Or he could take her to the range to try out rental guns to pick one that she likes, belly up to the sales counter & have her fill out the paperwork while he pays for the gun. It's possible to buy someone else a gun in that manner. It'd be a great Mother's Day gift to his Mom.
Letters of Marque (pronounced like the name Mark, by the way) did allow individuals to become privateers on behalf of the government. In order to do this, yes, they would have to outfit their ships for pitched battle. Thankfully it was pretty common for those ships to already be outfitted with at least a few guns already. Those Letters of Marque could be revoked almost as quickly as they could be written, though, but the ships would be allowed to retain their guns for protection. It'd be interesting to see how the government would react to someone putting cannons on an ocean-going yacht or a larger fishing vessel.
Colion Noir, this is the only thing you need to understand when referencing article 2 of the Bill of Rights. “As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms." "Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American.... [T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people." These were the remarks of Tench Coxe, who was the delegate sent to the continental congress to affirm what the 2nd article meant. When he introduced it to the continental congress, it was already the law of the land. The bill of rights was the law of the land long before the constitution ever started acting out unlawful powers, and today, it is the only law, you just have to read it and understand it. People are the jurisdictional authority in this country, not no fucking government. If you want this to take this country back, all you need is to learn that bill of Rights.
This is what happens when you let lawyers define the constitution. Let's not mince words. The second amendment reminds them I can own everything that they own and there ain't shit they can do about it because the first 12 amendments are rules the government has follow and they were never meant to be altered . EVER!! They're perfect .
The first 18 AR15s manufacturer were all select fire as were the first AR10. They were machine guns before the military was even shown the first prototype. It was later in life that the AR15 platform began being sold in a semi auto only configuration.
I know exactly what is going to happens if this type of person start to control YOUR life, the same that happened in my country. Please americans, don't let them.
All possession based weapon laws are unconstitutional. To be a valid weapon law it would be related to the use of a weapon. Possession based crimes are almost exclusively victimless crimes. Owning but not using in any harmful way an "assault weapon" victimizes who? Victimless crimes are inherently counter to freedom.
@@neovenom9833 Not really because they aren't libial for what idiots with their products. They are only accountable when there is a genuine fault due a manufacturing defect.
Absolutely Correct. There is also a REASON the founding fathers made it the 2ND Amendment and not the 8th or the 15th. It was so important to be able to prevent a tyrannical government that it is number 2 on the list right behind Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion and Freedom of the Press.
What we need is for some attorney to be hired to go into a federal court and fight this. OR is it like some believe they can collect more money saying they are fighting instead of ending the debate?
How many and what size? I build to suit personalized cannon. I currently stock golf ball size swivel guns to 4 1/2” bore mountain howitzer. You can view them on my channel!
Speaking from other side of the world. Never ever give up your guns for whatsoever reasons no matter how reasonable they seems to be. Depriving yourself from means of self defense is literally invitating any bad guys in positions to threaten you, your family and your neighbors to go ahead to have it their ways and it's the worst if happened to be few hundred thousands strong heavily armed group. Speaking from bitter experience of ours at this very moment which been going on for a while now. And you can guess what's our only wish right now is... (your founding fathers did excellent job) edit: oh yeah, was talking about a coup btw. prolly most of you don't even know about it.
"In order to flatten the curve of gun violence, everyone (except for military, police and criminals) will need to turn in their guns for 2 weeks" - Boe Jiden 2nd amendment champion destroyer
Nah. Just 14 days.. to slow the uh.. spread of gun violence. Cmon man. That's reasonable.. right? Just a measly 14 days... - flash forward over 2 years, the government is halfway collapsed and coming for the only people it can leverage any sort of control over..
@@exitoemprendedor3094 They can extend it, but we're done with it. The worthless masks, vaccinations, the closing down of businesses. We're not going through that BS. They've shown their true colors and come November we'll show them ours. RED.
He thinks his exaggerated example is suppose to trigger a “common sense” reaction of “oh yea I guess he’s right” and that may be true for some ignorant people. But in actuality he’s just making a fool of himself since his exaggerated example isn’t so exaggerated or shocking to people that actually know anything about 2A.
Jon My friend you are so,so right on about what you said. He is triggering a response, that is all he is doing as a Life long Politician. Just to get stupid people that don't read the Constitution He only cares about a vote. Be damned your Right under the constitution. Each one of the shots of him speaking is to get people idiots to vote for him. Any of his signing of a bill means nothing. Congress must pass bills. States Rights. He has never seen or been in the real world. Just look back at what he told the NRA when he was vice president. It was to hard for Government to go after people Lieing on the form when you buy a gun. "YA" invite Pro Second Amendment Lobbyist to white house then tell them Government can't do it's job. Brilliant.
Honestly, I don't think it even helps convince the fence sitters. Give how long they've been trying to say "Well the founding fathers wouldn't have known what guns would become so it's outdated". They'd have fucking known, and even approved of ships FULL of cannons being owned. So the 2nd Amendment covering arms being owned 100% would mean cannons. And he's bold face lying saying you can't.
What is bizarre is that a politician who swears to uphold and defend the constitution is elected by people who don't want him to uphold and defend the constitution.
And there are plenty of TH-cam videos on how to disable armored vehicles with rifle fire. Some of it is obsolete but the fact remains that tanks don't like to fight without infantry to cover the blindspots from antitank weapons.
The second amendment was passed when both civilians and military had access to the exact same technology and both owned cannons, small arms, and naval ships with cannons and small arms on them.
@@herpderp1662 Tell you what, if Joe Slow finds himself in my neck of the woods, I have no problem headlining national news as a modern Lee Harvey Oswald.
Former Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall in his " An exposea of the constitution " said the second amendment allows the people to own ANY weapons that they government has, including cannons.
I loved the video thanks again for all you do for all of us. There's so much deprogramming that needs to happen in America today. There are so many new Americans that came here from other countries because we're the last free one.
I own 6 Cannons! No one has said a word about them, on occasion someone will ask for my permission to look at my cannons but you are correct. My cannons are fully functional but I am a collector of all things firearm related from the Civil War until now. Self preservation shall not and will not be infringed, It’s Like breathing, If someone told me it’s illegal to breathe well they are gonna have a very hard time stopping me, same with any of my weapons.
Breechloading cannons were not restricted until the Gun Control Act of 1968, with restriction on “destructive devices” with a bore over .50 inches. Muzzleloading cannon are still legal.
Joe Biden also said: "Those who say the blood of the a the the blood of patriots you know. And all the stuff about how we’re gonna have to... Move against the government. Well the tree of liberty is not water of the blood patriots, what’s happened is that there never been if you wanted or think you need to have weapons to take on the government you need F-15’s and maybe some nuclear weapons." My response: Then stop saying that our government was nearly overthrown on January 6th by a bunch of unarmed rioters wielding face paint and funny hats.
The only argument you need against people saying The People couldn't stand up to the government is to point at Iraq and Afghanistan. Those guys stood up to the USG and its allies with junk AK-47s, fertilizer and mortars improvised from steel pipe.
I love his BS story about hunting in the ‘crick beds’ in Delaware. It is illegal to hunt in Delaware with rifles. Hunting is not now, nor has it ever been about hunting. That’s a secondary benefit.
I clearly get your Point Brother. Its not about us, its about you (The Government). The fundamental law of the land (The Constitution) is very clear that You cannot infringe us for owning and bearing arms.
The day gun manufacturers are held liable for what's done with the guns they make is the day we must insist that politicians be held accountable for the policies that they pass.
Also if the government puts all the gun manufacturers out of business who is going to make firearms for the armed forces which it uses to invade and occupy nations it has no business to do..
Actually makes sense, to me... lol
And are you going to hold auto makers liable for what is done with their vehicles? Because whether you like it or not, idiots driving cars kill more people every year than guns do. Here's a hint Sparky, a gun by itself is not a danger, the danger comes from the person wielding it, as it is with autos.
@@carlfromtheoc1788 Hey sparky. I don't blame guns for gun fatalities. My point was that if politicians want to do that then we should hold them up to the same standards that they setp.
@@carlfromtheoc1788 bingo
Any politician whose "issues" are how bad they think any part of the Bill of Rights is does not represent me and will never have my support.
Or me or mine
Trump banned bumpstocks, passed RED FLAG LAWS and said
''we should take the guns first and due process later''.
@@NoNORADon911
Your point???
@@NoNORADon911 and his own party criticized him for that. I still haven’t seen a single liberal criticize Biden.
@@MrJonny0 Nope same BS on both sides nobody wants to get called whatever for rooting for the ''wrong team'' by criticizing your own. Oh you say this about Trump! You are a LIBERAL! Oh you criticize Biden! You're a conservative.
It's all a trap. Just like the peer pressure to wear a face diaper.
Citizens have the right own any weapon the government can use against the citizens. The 2nd amendment isn’t about hunting squirrels. It’s about defending our constitutional rights from a corrupt government that choose not to serve the people. A government that serves its people would want them to be well armed.
Also, as I understand it as someone outside of the USA, the Constitution does not grant any rights at all, it affirms them as yours by reason of being a US citizen. The rights in the first 10 amendments are innate (if you will, "God given") and therefore cannot be negated by anyone but God himself, certainly not by any government without a 75% super majority. The implication in the preamble is that it is not only the right, but the civic duty of a citizen to overthrow a government in rebellion against the people, to accomplish which the Second Amendment was written to make this plain and to ensure that the people have the means to exercise that right and duty..
Oh how I wish my own country (New Zealand) was founded on such principles.
Keep the faith over there.... Like it or not you are the one true bastion of freedom in the world, the only nation wherein there is no argument about who is in charge... the people.
God bless America and all who legally live there..... I wish I were one of them...... and a Merry Christmas to you all...
"Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry." - Thomas Jefferson
Sovereignty is tyranny.
Who says you can't own a Cannon.
Dam it the picture of my Cannon didn't go thru for some reason
Joe is so old and clueless, he thinks cannons are still in use.
Only commies, who don't count.
If he wants to hold gun manufacturers liable for what an individual does with a gun, shouldn’t we hold the government liable for what they do to us and with our money?
Or car manufacturers for when their vehicles get used by terrorists? If that is the case Toyota owuld be sued to oblivion.
💯
exactly right sir. that's like outlawing all vehicles because someone may drink and drive. it's the most idiotic argument in the history of our nation.
Some guy robbed my house and escaped in a Toyota. Better pony up Toyota, I'm coming for you.
I wonder if they keep that same energy with holding pharmaceutical companies accountable for their faulty vaccines.
Colin,
59 years ago when John Kennedy was killed my father told me this was coming. Sence then I have seen my rights whittled away by power grabing politicians. Your message is exactly right. Keep up the good work. PEOPLE NEED TO KNOW.
God bless you brother. God bless America 🇺🇸
Hello there👋👋,how are you doing today? Hope all is well with you?God bless you!!!❤
Christ, imagine the government coming to your door and saying "hey, you own a ship. Wanna be a pirate for us?" I wish this country still had that kind of energy...
“Give me a fast ship for I intend to take her into harm’s way.”
John Paul Jones
The government does this all the time. The whole military industrial complex is dependent on the government doing this.
@@Madmoody21 Except it doesn't.
The USS Musk reporting for battle.
The country did issue Letter of Margue. Legal pirate. IE a privateer.
As a black man in GA, my deepest fears occur when I imagine Democrats ruining my state.
We're on the verge here in GA. I moved here 10 years ago and there are 6 million more people then when I arrived. Most moved to the perimeter in Cobb and Fulton counties. They have been getting bluer by the year.
@@racerdude888 I moved to DeKalb/Lithonia in 98, the price of the avg home has increased by 100k in the Atlanta/Atlanta Metro housing market and has been deemed unaffordable, hopefully that can mitigate the blues trying to move here. Stacy Abrams could never get my vote, the idea of an ounce of gun control is insanity.
@@imjusttrollingyou4014 Yeah unfortunately they're starting to move up to Dahlonega where I live. And yeah the housing market is crazy here also. And I'm praying hard against her winning. The real turning point would be if they flipped the state congress. Then we'd be in trouble
@@racerdude888 all we can do is vote where we can, North Florida ain't to bad, below Tampa it gets weird.
As a white man in GA., I feel you
Let's be honest, Joe has absolutely no clue what he's saying. He says whatever the person in his earpiece says.
Joetato wasn't the sharpest knife in the drawer when he still had most of his marbles and the hole in his marble bag has gotten even bigger, actually the bottom seam came undone a few years ago and it is empty now.
Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. . .
Potato in chief
Fifty years as a politician and he wants us to believe that he doesn’t know what the 2nd amendment is?
You can legally own a tank too.
Pretty sure he doesnt even know where he is most of the time.
"Legally" this word alone shows how not free we are. If you must ask the govts permission, you are not free. Period. America and everything we are taught about freedom, fairness, and hard work pays off are lies.
People who oppose Joe Biden in this case are the ones who openly support school shootings,mass killings and violence.It is very clear to see who’s trying to make America safe…..
@@tullo5564 troll. Dont engage.
The more they continue to push these gun laws, the more you will see gun sales go up. As it should be!
Talk about a backfire
No new guns for me! A shit ton of more ammo though!!
My Ruger stock has been paying good dividends lately.
Exactly. They have stock in these companies.
They are making themselves richer...
Didnt we hit a high number of sales last year after he stole the election?
Thank you Colton Noir for your video! I just had that conversation with some young millennial’s about what you can own verses what the Gov’t says you cannot own under 2A. I had stressed the importance 0f words and The Origin of words and their meaning, prior to being “translated to English.”
Also, for those who didn't know, the AR-15 was a civilian rifle that was created in 1956, around a few years before the military adopted the design, the military liked the design and made a contract with Colt to make a fully-automatic version and it became the M-16 and later the M-4. The notion that the AR-15 is a military rifle is not true.
@UCDPy6tJKtN8P4sDnDdw3-fw GO AWAY DOUCHE!!!
You are so correct!!!
I didn't know. Tks!
@Hoffmann-Walter Photography, I know, it's unbelievable how stupid some people are, that they think it stands for "assault rifle" and not a company name.
Thank you. I have been telling people the history of the AR15 and they don't believe me. I learned this from an old marine in Iraq.
'I support the 2nd amendment, I just don't think citizens have the right to own and carry guns.'-every politician in a nutshell.
They need guns to defend themselves but you can’t, you pleb
Isn't that what the Chinese president said to Clinton when he was president. That his people have the right to own firearms but we won't let them
If I could, I would. But my temper and fear won't allow it.
@@dbptwg It's wild how you people take "some guns" and always end up going after all guns! 🤷🏽♂️
@@dbptwg We have the right to own ALL guns. Nowhere in the 2A does it differentiate. Only libtatds like you do that. And you do it with the goal of banning them all.
The difference between a Rich person and a Poor person is how they use their time. Your Future is created by what you do Today not your Tomorrow.
The rich see an economic crisis as a garage sale and also the rich stay rich by investing and diversifying their portfolio with stock, crypto currency investment which is the wisest thing every individual need to do and it is really profitable.
You are right about that do you mind sharing with me how to get intouch with Mrs Amy Robinette. I have little to no knowledge about crypto currencies and I have seen the rise from 100 USD to over 50k USD in the last few years.
Thank you so much I will definitely reach out.
Wow, Is amazing to see people who have also invested with Amy Robinette. I thought am the only one she helped through this rough market.
I've heard about Mrs Amy Robinette but was sceptical to invest due to fear and ignorance, anyway can i verify her service ?
He’s a liar and calling him a piece of garbage is an insult to garbage everywhere.
Finally a comment that is absolutely truthful
People who oppose Joe Biden in this case are the ones who openly support school shootings,mass killings and violence.It is very clear to see who’s trying to make America safe!!
Pile of steaming bile = 46
@@tullo5564 mass killings? Oh yeah. The BLM riots, and the lockdown riots and looting. We’re blaming that on guns now? How about the politicians who supported the defunding of the police, or the DA’s who refuse to prosecute the criminals perpetrating the crimes? And when they do prosecute, they let them out on bail. Then they go and commit more crime, because they know the police doesn’t have the manpower, and the corrupt DA’s won’t do anything. States like California and New York, where this is happening, already has the most stringent and restrictive gun legislation active. It’s already hard to legally obtain a firearm, and it takes months at times. The criminals on the other hand, never have to go through that, because they always obtain them on the black market, or in a back alley somewhere.
States that allow citizens to constitutional carry, have a far lower crime rate. And the fact the the “president” wants to call even a Glock a “weapon of war,” is just ridiculous. The fact is, he wants to ban all firearms from law abiding citizens, while criminals will still be able to get them, and the crime will get worse. But hey, don’t want to believe me? Move to a country where you can’t own a firearm as a private citizen. China or somewhere. See how that works out.
And as far as making America safe, the crime rate has shot up since he’s taken office. Joe Biden and the Democrat party keep pushing crap policies hurt the good, law abiding people; while coddling and helping the criminals.
LOL
Joe, why not tell us about Hunter your son, lying on a Federal Firearms Background and getting a firearm illegally.
Also tell us why Jared and Ivanka got $2 billion from Saudi Arabia.
@@accuratealloys That has all been investigated, and no crime was committed by Jared or his wife. The Bidens could not withstand An investigation like that
Once again Colion you nailed it. I'm also member of both USCCA & NRA.
The more Joe Biden talks about "not being allowed to own a cannon" the more interested I get in buying one.
Look at South Bend Replicas.
@@errolgalloway4123 thanks, I'll have to check it out.
buy a battle ship, skip just a cannon, remember gun control is owning as many guns as you can control, the more guns you own the more guns you control, just think of how many cannons are on a battle ship.
Smooth bore black powder are perfectly legal, no permit required.
They're a blast!
“The right to keep and bear arms “”shall not be infringed””. Pretty clear to me. Seems as if the NFA laws already passed are an “infringement”.
Because they are
All gun laws are an infringement. This wasn't ever about sporting rifles. Or hunting rifles. This was 100% about civilians having the right to defend themselves against tyrannical government who.. obviously are trying to deprive citizens of their ABILITY to even fight the current tyranny.
Somehow you can't bring yourself to note the first few words of the 2nd amendment. Context is everything.
You know, at the time the bill of rights was being considered, nobody would have thought it was necessary to protect people's right to own a thing for hunting and for defense. The only reason the second amendment was thought to be necessary was to make sure that the federal government could not prevent states from organizing militias, well regulated militias. The founding fathers weren't protecting the rights of crazy people to shoot kids in school.
@@charlesmrader BlAcK gUn ScArY yOu MuSt HaTe KiDs!!!!!!!!!
@@charlesmrader correct and well said. Almost every day further we go, something or someone else is blatantly setting off alarm bells with the crooks who chose a career to actively sell out the American people and our rights to the highest bidder, who usually has a vested interest in removing that particular right so that they can move unopposed against us chasing their dollars from private and corporate interests..
It's WILD that we live in a country where an entire party doesn't believe in the foundation of everything that made and makes it great. They are so offended by the flag, the constitution, and everything about our nation, yet WILL NOT LEAVE.....
So true, so sad and yet I laughed when I read your comment because the final words caught me by surprise. Well said
"It may sound bizarre?" Why should it? It's the 2nd Amendment of a constitution you SWEAR to protect!! It's your JOB!!
Not to the New World Order. Biden's allegiance is to Klaus Schwab - The Great Reset - you'll own nothing and be happy!
All these clowns put their hands on the bible at every swearing in and tell the biggest effing lie there is. These swearing ins should be done away with. It's all phony BS.
Joe doesn't even know where he is most of the time. Has trouble with stairs, tried to shake hands with people who aren't there, and supports negligently discharging a firearm in the air in your yard.
Check out my parody video about the AR-14 Brandon.
Imagine if the tobacco industry was immune to prostitutes being sued
@@darkstar9008 He sure is hung with that prostitute word, he uses it instead of prosecute, prostate, prostrate! All things he knows nothing about anyway, but...
I believe you are 100pr/cent right !👍🏻
Actually that was blasting a double barrelled shotgun at your door.
Thanks again Colion! Keep up the good work! God Bless!!
"It gonna sound bizzare to claim that I support the second amendment." Might be the first honest and coherent thing I have heard from Biden.
This from the same man who stated (on national television) that he told his wife to "step out on the porch and shoot that shotgun in the air" to scare off intruders at his home. Sounds like a willfully reckless and dangerous act to me.
Because he is truly afraid of the people flexing their rights.
You have a right to own a canon, you have a right to own a gun and you have a right to defend yourself.
🎩
🐍no step on Snek! 🇺🇸🇭🇰
No, no, you *really can* legally own a _cannon!_ It just has to be _muzzle-loading._
God given , no government given
There's $$$ in it for them or they wouldn't do it. Everything a politician does is either
1. Money
2. Re-election which promises $
I wish you guys didn't allow us to be infringed. Divided we all fall.
I literally own two cannons lmao. They have been in my family’s possession for at least 130 years and we only use them on 4th of July every few years.
Nobody is taking my family’s cannons man, they’re just too damn cool.
Colin, throw your hat into the ring. You are articulate and you speak in facts.
Hello there👋👋,how are you doing today? Hope all is well with you?God bless you!!!❤
The really funny thing about this, is that there was a letter to one of the founding fathers, way back in the day, a private citizen (IIRC a merchant) asking if he was allowed to own a naval cannon or not. The response was along the lines of 'unless you plan to aim it at me, why is it my business'.
Trying to use federal laws to override the constitution on the basis of arguing 'well the constitution doesn't cover x' when you have extant examples of what the people who wrote it thought it covered, is the height of stupidity, and relies on a stupid and uneducated public to work.
Especially when you consider that the 2nd amendment's original purpose was EXPLICITLY to protect civilians having enough gun to give the finger to an overreaching federal government.
We literally would've been destroyed in the War of 1812 if we didn't have privately owned cannons to supplement the regular military.
So true, our kids are thinking ‘what’s the big deal’ about losing gun rights, until they need them. And they’re gonna need ‘em.
We currently have a stupid and uneducated public ... and therein lies the problem.
Many people want to be controlled as long as they have their bread and circuses.
@@KS-wt9gj Yep. Just shows they don't know their history and the failings of human nature.
Joe Biden is all about accountability…. For everyone he disagrees with.
Isn’t that what every politician does? Lol
I want people like Biden to be held accountable for the laws that they pass. The next time someone is shot and killed who didn't have a gun to defend themselves because of laws that they passed the family should be able to sue them.
You mean for everyone but himself.
Yes, and you left out "transparent administration"
If you put Biden's brain in a bird 🐦 it would fly backwards. If it could fly at all.
When one of your trusted advisors is the Easter Bunny…. I’m going to say that unless someone can find that hunter who allegedly confronted Brandon and verify the story, it never happened in reality. It was either a conversation with an imaginary friend or an out-right lie.
He was "walking up one of the crick beds" having an imaginary conversation with an imaginary hunter. That was the day he wandered away from the nursing home looking for the ice cream shop.
Q: How do you know a politician is lying?
A: Their mouth is moving
"Politics is the art of making your selfish desires seem like the national interest." -Thomas Sowell
True that! Oh..this cloud looks like a puppy...a dinosaur...a whatever....
They dont even have to talk... Just being a politician is enough.
You come up with that all by yourself
I've always gone with the they're breathing answer
He's not lying. Lying means he knows the truth. He doesn't know anything. The perfect case of plausible deniabilty.
He’s been lying & plagiarizing for almost half a century by design
You just made me look up lie, I had no idea intent was required. Thank you.
Sad but true
More like willful ignorance.
@@j.l.8000 Yeah if you just say something false it isn't automatically a lie. However in this case, Biden is lying.
Didn't a merchant captain ask Madison if he could buy a cannon for self-protection and Madison replied in the affirmative?
I just stumbled upon this TH-cam channel and discovered one of the most factually and densely packed videos ever in the span of 6 minutes and 8 seconds. You've just earned another subscriber. Thank you for what you do to educate and protect our 2nd Amendment RIGHTS which are constantly under assault by Joe Biden and his Democrat party.
Welcome to the club.
Welcome Sir, spread the word to others.
Look, the simple truth is.. They're just going to ban ownership of each and every last thing that you've ever owned in your life.
you'll own nothing and be happy, the motto of the NWO bring by the WEF
Eventually, absolutely everything will be either mandatory or forbidden. Robert Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Dude, you are awesome! We love ya man. Help us out here...wife and I are thinking of pulling our membership now that uscca is giving one-eyed jack a platform and voice...
Just the phrase is bizarre, 'when the 2nd Amendment was passed."
It wasn't "passed" it was part of the agreement between States in the process of ratifying the Constitution.
And it was never “passed” as if the federal government of the day was allowing citizens to do this, it’s clarified as a natural right. That makes it a right regardless of what anyone says.
@@beep-beep True. It was passed by the people completely. The people were the government then. Now the government chooses what the people get and don't get, to satisfy a few small brained politicians.
It was actually added 10 years later and only added on because some states threatened to leave, people like Madison in fact I don’t think anyone on the original constitutional convention supported it.
@@GM-en2qr Your history is flawed. Rhode Island didn't agree to the Constitution until 1790, and the Bill of Rights was added in 1791. That's not "added 10 years later." As I said, it was part of the agreement between states in the *process* of ratifying the Constitution which took longer than ten years (from when it was initially introduced and signed in 1787, which is likely the date you're thinking of, when only 39 of 55 delegates signed it because: it didn't include a bill of rights).
“The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them.” - Supreme Court justice Joseph Story, nominated to the court **by the man who wrote the second amendment**.
That is what the second amendment is for, not hunting, but to safeguard liberty... And who would know better than a supreme court justice that was nominated by the man who wrote it?
Thank You!!! God bless. 👍🏼
"Safeguard Liberty" should be a name. Sounds awesome.
Arguably private citizens had access to MORE ADVANCED weapons than were issued to soldiers at the time of the signing.
@@genejeffries2888 Indeed. Soldiers of the time commonly had smoothbore muzzle loaders. Civilians could have breech loaded rifles, or even repeating, yes, repeating rifles like the Kalthoff design which could fire 30-60 rounds per minute.
@@Divenity Militia member rifles were more accurate than the rifles soldiers carried, if I recall. Grooves inside the barrel made them that way. lol
Maybe we should also hold the pharmaceutical companies liable..........
The funniest part is when they say “it was made when muskets were around so that’s what you should be allowed to own” as if the goal to increase firing rate was never of consideration in firearms at the time and unfathomable. Yeah, a single shot didn’t turn into a revolving cylinder, a ramrod didn’t turn into a breechblock or break action, and a weapon never had a magazine attached. There were clear goals of rapid fire only held back by primitive technology. if they had the tech we have today they certainly would have used it.
Except they probably knew things would have gotten better. Even at the time there were breakthroughs in firearm tech. And it's not like the founding fathers were idiots who'd look at a musket and think "Yep, this is as good as it gets and nothing is going to top this"
@@NEEDbacon Exactly. You would have to be out of your mind to think that the founding fathers had no forethought about laws they were writing specifically for the future of the country and its longevity.
@@NEEDbacon Yep they had puckle guns and pepperbox revolvers back then.
Not to mention belton flintlocks and other repeating handheld firearms. There's a couple repeating firearms designs that date back well over 100 years before the founding fathers. They were just too costly for the average person to own and were mostly used by rich hunters.
That's what Biden and our politicians have wanted for years: the good stuff is available, but limited to only those with money and power.
The girandoni air rifle was a semiautomatic air powered rifle that was in adopted by the Austrian army in 1780. It was later taken on the Lewis and Clark expedition and used to hunt buffalo. It had a magazine capacity of 22 rounds. And could unload all of them within 60sec. I am 100% certain they knew the future firearm capabilities would be impressive compared to what they were used to.
We need a company to do discounts on canons to get more cannons in the hands of people. That would be funny
My Personally Owned Canon would Use "Grape Shot" like a Shotgun: Ball Bearings, Metal Scrap, Nails, Bolts, Nuts. Rocks. Etc !! No Cannon Balls !!
@@davidanderson2973 yeah. Some grapeshot gunranges would be nice.
A lot of people falsely take it for granted that the right to be armed is fictitious.
It’s disgusting so many people cheered when he said he was going to come for gun manufacturers
They need to be dropped into North Korea for an experience.
It truly is sad so many people want to toss away their rights because of the one off nutjobs and criminals that can't help themselves.
He was in front of a partisan crowd. True Believers.
They all received a coupon for a free meal at Mc Ducks
Brandon also keeps repeating the bogus "some good people" lie.
A militia would be expected to "show up" with standard arms."You must be a terrible shot" is the standard argument from anyone who is not also being shot at. The average armed home invasion is two or more armed intruders. Plenty of studies showing that even skilled shooters expended more return rounds while being shot at.
Yep. One study showed that "trained" NYPD has a hit ratio of 10%.
Maryland resident here (not by choice, by job). It is a criminal shooting gallery out there, and I am afraid to go many places in Maryland. But, I cannot carry a concealed weapon (might shoot my eye out), but criminals do. Off duty police are afraid to go out in Mayland without their service weapon, but the rest of us are screwed. Hope to move out of tax crazy Maryland this summer - HOORAY - FINALLY! By the way, Maryland has some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country, yet look at the out of control shooting/crime rate in Baltimore. Restrictive gun laws work, right? Laws only restrict law-abiding people (Who are not doing the crimes) from protecting themselves from criminals.
Unless it's a CBRN weapon of mutually assured destruction, I don't believe any arm in the military should be exempt from civilian ownership. As a former F-15C pilot, yes, I mean that civilians and militias should be able to own an F-15 (or entire squadron) if they want. Granted there are secret no-export avionics and weapons in US hardware, but an F-15I or F-15K export version should be able to be bought by militias, and carry munitions. Just follow all the same rules regarding FAA, mach limit rules in populated areas, and munitions flight rules. Same goes for Tanks, automatic weapons, rocket launchers, etc. If 2A is restricted using legislation, limits, and technology, it could in time be rendered so inept it may as well not even exist. 2A is designed to prevent tyranny, and it'll forever be under attack by tyrants that recognize it's effectiveness to their addiction to power and control of the masses. Abolish the ATF and regulate crime, not guns.
Civilians are allowed to own military aircraft. Legally I don't think they are allowed to be flown in US airspace while armed though. Finding some place to buy one is the tricky part. I do know there are several fulyl functional attack helicopters in private hands with at least one of those put back together completely by salvaging parts from different hunks sold as demiled scrap. There are also lots of privately owned tanks complete with main guns. The ammo has to have a tax stamp per round as a destructive device. The same goes for grenade launcher ammo. Machine guns are legal to own if it was one registered from that 80s or earlier. Or you can go through hoops and get an FFL and have "dealer samples".
There is a lot of stuff politician like Biden like to say are illegal or can't be done that in fact are legal, just very expensive.
Better question: Why does he keep reusing the "Deer in Kevlar vests" remark? Every time he says it I wanna blow my brains out.
Free Americans (as in those not currently incarcerated) must be allowed to own whatever items they can purchase or manufacture. No background check, registration, permit, license required.
We need to appeal laws that protect politicians! Companies that make firearms are not the ones responsible for misuse. Politicians are directly responsible for their corruption!
Mate gotta say you have a very good way of making your point! As an Aussie looking over the ditch you make it very clear! Keep up the good work or you guys are gonna end up like us down here.
Love your message, keep teaching those that don't have a clue!
Hello there👋👋,how are you doing today? Hope all is well with you?God bless you!!!❤
Always remember, it's not about guns, it's about their desire to dominate over and control the peasants. That is you and me in their minds.
Bingo. Rifles are our tickets to freedom and they want us to go the way of Australia.
Thank you Colion. Funny how career politicians don’t understand the second amendment. Appreciate your take on things.
They DO understand it. If you think they don't know what they are doing then you are seriously out of touch.
@@1369vmsmith BINGOOOOO!!!!!!!!
Biden doesn’t understand anything. Have u not scene him?
Being a Politician and protecting peoples rights have as much to do with eachother as a hot dog, and a warm puppy.
They understand it, that's why they twist it 🇺🇲
I really sincerely hope that all this amazing effort and irreplaceable time you have spent educating everyone is paying off by getting people more involved in what is going on and what is expected to come from these power hungry people. You do amazing work and research on so many different areas I'm sure it can be extremely overwhelming trying to obtain all that information and making sense of it all but please don't give up the people need as many people fighting for our freedoms as possible.
Clear mind, clear message, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Doesn't matter if it's laser beam or black powder rifle.
How about owning nukes? Or bombs specifically MOAB? Or a pathogen type weapon, like a virus
@@sweetnightmare1191 maybe find a translator.
I don’t know of anyone that’s upset because they can’t spend the day at the proving grounds to test out their new thermonuclear gear. I also don’t know of anyone who can afford it.
But if you ask me if we should be allowed to have the same types of guns that are used by the military, it’s a resounding yes, unless I’m proven incompetent or dangerous to others.
@@EricT3769
I tend to think this way, freedom is either free or not.
Incompetent, felon, house wife, young adult, or any other person should have the right.
The only time I could say someone should not is if they're in jail or in a private place that prohibits.
I know people have a felon (bad person) for child support. Big infringement.
Yes, it seems odd to people today, but if you're not in jail but served time as a felon, it's as clear as what's been written.
Everytime politicians figure a way to infringe is one more step towards a disarmed society, weak and easily controlled.
Arm up.
@@dbptwg If you’re referring to me, you’d lose that bet.
Funny how he mentioned holding firarm manufacturers "accountable", but they won't hold the crimes accountable who are committing the actual crimes.
It's simple really, guns don't kill people, people kill people.
He wants to hold the gun makers liable because they have money. The persons committing crimes don't have any money. Simple as that. Mo money.
Oddly enough, here in New Zealand where arms are very strictly limited, a muzzle loading cannon is not classed as a firearm.....
2A period...no restrictions...no compromise...fight for it or lose it. FJB
My mother is a diehard, TDS-afflicted, CNN/MSNBC daily watcher. She just recently asked me if she could borrow one of my guns for protection.
If she can start seeing the light, anyone can
Tell her to BUY one for herself! Depending on what State you both live in, you could both be charged with felonies if she ever had to protect herself with your firearm. Then both of you would no longer be able to lawfully own them.
@@steverobbins240 my state allows "gifting" a firearm to immediate family members
@@steverobbins240 Or he could take her to the range to try out rental guns to pick one that she likes, belly up to the sales counter & have her fill out the paperwork while he pays for the gun.
It's possible to buy someone else a gun in that manner.
It'd be a great Mother's Day gift to his Mom.
Please tell me you bought her pepper spray and said "Don't worry, deer don't wear safety goggles, so you'll be fine."
Letters of Marque (pronounced like the name Mark, by the way) did allow individuals to become privateers on behalf of the government. In order to do this, yes, they would have to outfit their ships for pitched battle. Thankfully it was pretty common for those ships to already be outfitted with at least a few guns already. Those Letters of Marque could be revoked almost as quickly as they could be written, though, but the ships would be allowed to retain their guns for protection.
It'd be interesting to see how the government would react to someone putting cannons on an ocean-going yacht or a larger fishing vessel.
Colion Noir, this is the only thing you need to understand when referencing article 2 of the Bill of Rights.
“As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms."
"Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Is it feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man gainst his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American.... [T]he unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people."
These were the remarks of Tench Coxe, who was the delegate sent to the continental congress to affirm what the 2nd article meant. When he introduced it to the continental congress, it was already the law of the land. The bill of rights was the law of the land long before the constitution ever started acting out unlawful powers, and today, it is the only law, you just have to read it and understand it. People are the jurisdictional authority in this country, not no fucking government. If you want this to take this country back, all you need is to learn that bill of Rights.
"Back then you could only own a musket"...... yes, EXACTLY the same technology that was used by the MILITARY of the day...
Yeah not to mention Kentucky long rifles which were far more deadly and accurate at much longer distances.
I literally just saw someone driving down the road with a cannon the other day here in Texas🇺🇸 no joke👍
Hello there👋👋,how are you doing today? Hope all is well with you?God bless you!!!❤
This is what happens when you let lawyers define the constitution. Let's not mince words.
The second amendment reminds them I can own everything that they own and there ain't shit they can do about it because the first 12 amendments are rules the government has follow and they were never meant to be altered . EVER!!
They're perfect .
The first 18 AR15s manufacturer were all select fire as were the first AR10. They were machine guns before the military was even shown the first prototype. It was later in life that the AR15 platform began being sold in a semi auto only configuration.
I know exactly what is going to happens if this type of person start to control YOUR life, the same that happened in my country. Please americans, don't let them.
I hear Cuban's saying that a lot.
Don’t worry we WON’T !! They will take them from my cold dead hands !!
I love and stand on every word you say my American friend.
All possession based weapon laws are unconstitutional. To be a valid weapon law it would be related to the use of a weapon. Possession based crimes are almost exclusively victimless crimes.
Owning but not using in any harmful way an "assault weapon" victimizes who? Victimless crimes are inherently counter to freedom.
Huh, can't sue alcohol companies. For devastating all communities.
Or car companies for all those crashes.
Personal accountability really is Kryptonite to these people.
@@neovenom9833 Not really because they aren't libial for what idiots with their products. They are only accountable when there is a genuine fault due a manufacturing defect.
Absolutely Correct. There is also a REASON the founding fathers made it the 2ND Amendment and not the 8th or the 15th. It was so important to be able to prevent a tyrannical government that it is number 2 on the list right behind Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion and Freedom of the Press.
Hello there👋👋,how are you doing today? Hope all is well with you?God bless you!!!❤
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."
Joseph Goebbels
Isn't that a hitler quote
@@shadeofshattered3 Time for homework.
Sad part about this, as citizens, we may need a cannon before this president is out of office.
day late & a dollar short
Before this guy is out, you won't be able to afford one or much of anything else....
What we need is for some attorney to be hired to go into a federal court and fight this. OR is it like some believe they can collect more money saying they are fighting instead of ending the debate?
Joe and his staff cannot re write the second amendment period !
The more he says we can't own a cannon...the more I want one...
Everyone should own at least 2 or 3 of them !
How many and what size? I build to suit personalized cannon. I currently stock golf ball size swivel guns to 4 1/2” bore mountain howitzer. You can view them on my channel!
Make sure you buy ACME
You're awesome! Much respect sir! Thank you for your videos.
Hello there👋👋,how are you doing today? Hope all is well with you?God bless you!!!❤
Speaking from other side of the world. Never ever give up your guns for whatsoever reasons no matter how reasonable they seems to be. Depriving yourself from means of self defense is literally invitating any bad guys in positions to threaten you, your family and your neighbors to go ahead to have it their ways and it's the worst if happened to be few hundred thousands strong heavily armed group. Speaking from bitter experience of ours at this very moment which been going on for a while now. And you can guess what's our only wish right now is...
(your founding fathers did excellent job)
edit: oh yeah, was talking about a coup btw. prolly most of you don't even know about it.
Cannons are legal right now!
Well said, sir. Best analysis I have heard yet.
"In order to flatten the curve of gun violence, everyone (except for military, police and criminals) will need to turn in their guns for 2 weeks" - Boe Jiden 2nd amendment champion destroyer
I will not comply.
To flatten the government tyranny curve all federal agencies and government systems must shut down for Two weeks.
Nah. Just 14 days.. to slow the uh.. spread of gun violence. Cmon man. That's reasonable.. right? Just a measly 14 days... - flash forward over 2 years, the government is halfway collapsed and coming for the only people it can leverage any sort of control over..
Just like it only took two weeks to "flatten the curve" they will extend that period indefinitely
@@exitoemprendedor3094 They can extend it, but we're done with it. The worthless masks, vaccinations, the closing down of businesses. We're not going through that BS. They've shown their true colors and come November we'll show them ours. RED.
He thinks his exaggerated example is suppose to trigger a “common sense” reaction of “oh yea I guess he’s right” and that may be true for some ignorant people. But in actuality he’s just making a fool of himself since his exaggerated example isn’t so exaggerated or shocking to people that actually know anything about 2A.
Jon
My friend you are so,so right on about what you said. He is triggering a response, that is all he is doing as a Life long Politician. Just to get stupid people that don't read the Constitution
He only cares about a vote. Be damned your Right under the constitution. Each one of the shots of him speaking is to get people idiots to vote for him. Any of his signing of a bill means nothing. Congress must pass bills. States Rights. He has never seen or been in the real world. Just look back at what he told the NRA when he was vice president. It was to hard for Government to go after people Lieing on the form when you buy a gun. "YA" invite Pro Second Amendment Lobbyist to white house then tell them Government can't do it's job.
Brilliant.
Honestly, I don't think it even helps convince the fence sitters. Give how long they've been trying to say "Well the founding fathers wouldn't have known what guns would become so it's outdated". They'd have fucking known, and even approved of ships FULL of cannons being owned. So the 2nd Amendment covering arms being owned 100% would mean cannons. And he's bold face lying saying you can't.
Absolutely correct.
Thank you Collin once again you are the smartest man in the room.
What is bizarre is that a politician who swears to uphold and defend the constitution is elected by people who don't want him to uphold and defend the constitution.
Remember when Joe said: What good is a Asault Weapons against tanks! 2 months later Ukraine made the 2nd Amendment point!!!
And there are plenty of
TH-cam videos on how to disable armored vehicles with rifle fire.
Some of it is obsolete but the fact remains that tanks don't like to fight without infantry to cover the blindspots from antitank weapons.
CN nailed it and I love the humor thrown in.
Hello there👋👋,how are you doing today? Hope all is well with you?God bless you!!!❤
The second amendment was passed when both civilians and military had access to the exact same technology and both owned cannons, small arms, and naval ships with cannons and small arms on them.
If he honestly supported the right. He would have taken HIMSELF OUT BY NOW.
Surprised someone hasnt stepped up yet, JFK was dealt with for FAR less.
@@herpderp1662 Tell you what, if Joe Slow finds himself in my neck of the woods, I have no problem headlining national news as a modern Lee Harvey Oswald.
@@MelodusDethicus I will pray to every possible god for this to be a thing. Tirelessly.
Former Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall in his " An exposea of the constitution " said the second amendment allows the people to own ANY weapons that they government has, including cannons.
Even the left-leaning Washington Post fact-checked that lol.
When you are not American, but you are more American in spirit than the American president...
Why isnt he american? I thought he was born in texas? What could be more american?
the feel when you are not american and know more about the 2nd amendment than an american
@@RootBert397 I am not American and many others that would agree are not...
Paul Revere made them in Canton Massachusetts... oh how times have changed.
To be fair, her probably isn't lying. Lying implies intent. He literally has no clue what he is even saying.
Bingo!
He’s just a puppet. Billionaire elites are the ones pulling the strings
Does that not make it worse?
You would expect a sitting president to know the constitution.
He seriously does support the 2A! For the elite only. Not us poor folk.
I loved the video thanks again for all you do for all of us. There's so much deprogramming that needs to happen in America today. There are so many new Americans that came here from other countries because we're the last free one.
I own 6 Cannons! No one has said a word about them, on occasion someone will ask for my permission to look at my cannons but you are correct. My cannons are fully functional but I am a collector of all things firearm related from the Civil War until now. Self preservation shall not and will not be infringed, It’s Like breathing, If someone told me it’s illegal to breathe well they are gonna have a very hard time stopping me, same with any of my weapons.
Dude! That's impressive! I wanna see the canonical cannons too!
Breechloading cannons were not restricted until the Gun Control Act of 1968, with restriction on “destructive devices” with a bore over .50 inches. Muzzleloading cannon are still legal.
Absolutely, just go to a Civil War re-enactment.
NSA or the BATF should definitely seize the Buddhist canon from the library where I used to work!
Joe Biden also said:
"Those who say the blood of the a the the blood of patriots you know. And all the stuff about how we’re gonna have to... Move against the government. Well the tree of liberty is not water of the blood patriots, what’s happened is that there never been if you wanted or think you need to have weapons to take on the government you need F-15’s and maybe some nuclear weapons."
My response: Then stop saying that our government was nearly overthrown on January 6th by a bunch of unarmed rioters wielding face paint and funny hats.
The only argument you need against people saying The People couldn't stand up to the government is to point at Iraq and Afghanistan. Those guys stood up to the USG and its allies with junk AK-47s, fertilizer and mortars improvised from steel pipe.
I love his BS story about hunting in the ‘crick beds’ in Delaware. It is illegal to hunt in Delaware with rifles. Hunting is not now, nor has it ever been about hunting. That’s a secondary benefit.
"The only thing that hunting has to do with the 2nd Amendment is that it is good practice."
they trying to make the consultation about protecting them and not the people
I clearly get your Point Brother. Its not about us, its about you (The Government). The fundamental law of the land (The Constitution) is very clear that You cannot infringe us for owning and bearing arms.