What was it Really Like to be Part of an AT-TE Crew? - How the Formidable Tank Crews of SWTCW Worked

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 242

  • @darkninjacorporation
    @darkninjacorporation 2 ปีที่แล้ว +241

    I kinda wish we got a TCW episode where we get to know the crew of some armored vehicle like an ATTE or Juggernaut, kinda like Fury. We always just see the vehicle as a plot device or background fodder, as if the crew is only as important as the sum of their parts. You have to imagine those crews had quite a close relationship.
    I have to agree with these other folks, though. The open “turret” of the ATTE has always been and will always be one of the dumbest design choices in Star Wars

    • @arbhall7572
      @arbhall7572 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I would have loved this

    • @SFisher1993
      @SFisher1993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Fury's a freaking badass movie! I've always wanted to see a movie like that focused on walker crewmen!

    • @michaelandreipalon359
      @michaelandreipalon359 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      You're right. We already got a spotlight for a submarine-like stealth ship, why not spotlights for the crew of an experimental walker, an elite gunship group, and/or a bunch of Republic slicers doing some awesome yet surprisingly realistic cyberwarfare?

    • @alejandroelluxray5298
      @alejandroelluxray5298 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @Painfulstinger the turret can be remotely controlled actually, but it appears it wasnt that much of a common practice

    • @olivermeyer2933
      @olivermeyer2933 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Also always wished this my favorite starwars vehicels are the at-te and the laat an episode around crew would be epic

  • @dogloversrule8476
    @dogloversrule8476 2 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    Something I’ve never quite understood is why the cockpit was so exposed when the rest of the vehicle is so heavily armored

    • @gmailquinn
      @gmailquinn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Visibility
      Probably

    • @destarker1340
      @destarker1340 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      How do they not have the camera technology to do deal with that

    • @dogloversrule8476
      @dogloversrule8476 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      They could at least have put some heat ablative armor like on the at-at

    • @CoolMyron
      @CoolMyron 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      i think the gun is modular. There are some versions that have AA guns instead. Maybe its like that so it can be switched out?

    • @alejandroelluxray5298
      @alejandroelluxray5298 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      The cockpit was made of transparisteel, so unless you used heavy firepower, that thing would not break, however I agree than some Armor plating could be added to reduce the vulnerability while also mantaining some visibility in case the camera systems failed

  • @lerneanlion
    @lerneanlion 2 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    Will the one about the crews in the Jaggernauts be next? Or was that already been covered?

    • @forcierlogan
      @forcierlogan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      I hope the next video is about Juggernaut crews

  • @yarnickgoovaerts
    @yarnickgoovaerts 2 ปีที่แล้ว +201

    I can’t be the only one who noticed the AT-TEs at geonosis didn’t have gunners

    • @jpshy1130
      @jpshy1130 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Huh

    • @drew-horst
      @drew-horst 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Only one? More like only clone

    • @nobleman9393
      @nobleman9393 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      The gunners had stealth armour.

    • @quayvaughnford9544
      @quayvaughnford9544 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

      They all got snatched up by the Geonosians

    • @ilpoomatili9549
      @ilpoomatili9549 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Imagine sitting there while the drop ship avoids flak and other guns. Talk about a wild ride.

  • @squilliampills9851
    @squilliampills9851 2 ปีที่แล้ว +328

    so why exactly isnt the main gun turret fully enclosed? they couldve widend the turret ring and put the commander, sorry, "spotter" in the turret with a cupola and remote weapons station. our tanks on earth have better turrets than AT-TEs. also the main gun doesnt appear to be stabilized and since it has legs instead of tracks it cannot fire acurately on the move; real world tanks do often stop to fire, but they are MUCH smaller targets than the AT-TE, so the AT-TE could be taken out by something like a missile or artillery shot. i love the AT-TE, its one of mt favorate things in star wars, but these flaws durastically reduce its effectiveness.

    • @coltonstrickland7750
      @coltonstrickland7750 2 ปีที่แล้ว +67

      But it looks kewl bruv

    • @SilentSpringz
      @SilentSpringz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because not everything is made well by story writers. The tactics ( atleast on shows) fight so retarded. U dont f go cowboy and stand in the open and shoot. Instead all hide behind cover and fight smart. Or u can sneak or fight into a senator building whitout it go heavy alert the second the guards get shot. No cameras? Or link trough voice or whatever its the future man. XD . Or that every world towns look small and live like cavemen but have technology? Tech homes but use swords etc? Or other way arround. Alot makes not much sense to me

    • @drakgatru3715
      @drakgatru3715 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Maybe like the episodes with Ezra aboard on the ATTE of Rex, the computer can be disrupted and the main disable, with the manual operation at least you know what is the problem

    • @wojocolebuilds
      @wojocolebuilds 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      Real world tanks aren't ALL terrain. You can basically put an AT-TE on any planet, and it would be okay. It can walk up the side of the cliff. Or go into open space and act as anti-spacecraft.

    • @FirefliesToMaggots
      @FirefliesToMaggots 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      I would say it's better line of sight to fire so that even in bad weather that computers and cameras cant fire in a trooper can aim it like really big iron sights

  • @isaackim7675
    @isaackim7675 2 ปีที่แล้ว +154

    I still wonder if they ever fired the rear cannons of the AT-TE throughout the war?

    • @tristynbishop6158
      @tristynbishop6158 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I've been wondering the same thing

    • @that1guy338
      @that1guy338 2 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      Most likely, probably during the 2nd battle of genosis when Cody was surrounds by the separatists

    • @FormerBunsenBurner
      @FormerBunsenBurner 2 ปีที่แล้ว +48

      On screen? I doubt the rear guns were even rigged to move. In canon? Probably so.

    • @batsquid4020
      @batsquid4020 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      The one thing I never understood with the AT-TE is why they either didn't have four anti-personal canons in the rear or move the two that were there towards the middle of the rear so they could have an easier time hitting targets on the ground closer to the walker. Cause the cannons couldnt really see the ground.

    • @rosiehawtrey
      @rosiehawtrey 2 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      It's the land dreadnought idea. Guns in every direction - but I'd expect the rear firing weapons to be used for sniping on a breakthrough mission - hitting enemies from one side, while advancing infantry hit them from the other (while the top barbette and bow ball guns target forward) .. The difference between the Vickers and Soviet versions of this concept is this thing is fast enough and maneuverable enough to be useful..and even those would have worked if decent engines had been dropped in with a drivetrain that wasn't made of Edam with delusions of grandeur.

  • @Improboy122
    @Improboy122 2 ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Can’t believe I’ve been watching your TH-cam videos for like 10 years now 😂

    • @geetslys
      @geetslys  2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      Shoutout to all the OG's, love and appreciate you all❤

    • @The7thFleet
      @The7thFleet 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      no regrets

  • @jonumine6250
    @jonumine6250 2 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    A powerful vehicle indeed.
    What if they had them mag locked on top of the Venator's hulls during space combat? Like with the asteroid ambush.
    Extra firepower is always welcomed no?

    • @silcrow1820
      @silcrow1820 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yeah, that makes sense but only when you have a compotent general/admiral onboard who can think out of the box. I dont think the admrials we see everyday can pull off such ideas. Thinking out of box is a rare feat specially when you get a real education on topic. So having concreate ideas on topics also prevents this

    • @tomaskops7119
      @tomaskops7119 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      They use SPHA in hangar of some Venator to increase firepower - As in third movie

    • @jonumine6250
      @jonumine6250 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@tomaskops7119
      That hangar SPHA is good but situational (really close and with the enemy underneath, where the Venator main weapons can't reach.)
      Imagine a row of AT-TEs behind the main weapons, they could assist way better than the SPHA, (In short range as well, but better positioned)
      Or just have SPHAs in the hull as well, this is star wars.
      If real life ww2 admirals could easily attach regular tanks to the sides or on top of a battleship (without breaking it), hell sure they would've done it.

    • @gmailquinn
      @gmailquinn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Though the separatertist used suicide attacks: could direct attack the walkers on the hull

    • @liamroque5883
      @liamroque5883 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Easy targets, yes?

  • @robertagu5533
    @robertagu5533 2 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Sounds like some of these woulda been hand for the Rebellion during the next great war in the franchise. If they can crush starships with massive salvos an mow down enemy infantry by the unit a few companies of these woulda been great for trouble spots like Hoth, Tatooine an the like just for example. They never seemed to have anything much like this. An while we know Rebel infantry must've had their share of mobile an armor units even at points or even eventually from the games, books an comics we hardly or never saw anything much on screen come to think of it

    • @dj11o9er
      @dj11o9er 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Funny enough. In a star wars mobile game, if you chose to play as the Rebels, you could use AT-TEs as a vehicle unit

    • @robertagu5533
      @robertagu5533 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@dj11o9er I'm sure the Stormtroopers woulda all been hesitant to charge any additional times had they tried it against a company of these AT-TEs even once.. literally about the only thing that could try an live sounds like is a wing of TIE Fighters... Though if they can blast enemy frigates an cruisers apart they ought to be able to ALSO shoot down TIEs of all kinds an maybe even threaten small to good sized Star Destroyers too so maybe not. Which is ALSO why their way bigger an younger AT-AT relatives an clumsy AT-AT relatives shouldn't pose too much a threat to some AT-TE crews that know what they're doing right. Definitely not if Elite Clones are crewing them would think then. These things apparently are built to handle the majority of ground based threats

    • @jayvhoncalma3458
      @jayvhoncalma3458 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dj11o9er that AT-TE was significantly different being it's cockpit is now more protected and it's gun got beefier

    • @JohnGeorgeBauerBuis
      @JohnGeorgeBauerBuis 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robertagu5533 TIEs could dodge, but yes, one hit and a TIE is going down or exploding.

  • @rexlumontad5644
    @rexlumontad5644 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Rebel Alliance whenever they see Clone Wars-era vehicles and equipment: "It's free real estate."

  • @echo8474
    @echo8474 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Captain: Gunner you see the AAT over there?
    Gunner: Yes sir.
    Captain: No you don't.
    Gunner: Yes sir. (Boom)

  • @kingbubbafatt9945
    @kingbubbafatt9945 2 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Do you have a specific detailed video like this on the Juggernaut and/or Laat/i? Cool video. AT-TE is by far my favorite republic vehicle

    • @JediSentinal
      @JediSentinal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      youtube channel metanerdz lore has exactly what you want 😉

    • @kingbubbafatt9945
      @kingbubbafatt9945 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JediSentinal thanks man

  • @lucagerulat307
    @lucagerulat307 2 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I think the exposed gunner might be a reason why the empire stopped using it. In a tank battle spotting the enemy first is crucial so an exposed gunner makes sense. Against insurgents you don't need big guns and the exposed gunner is an easy target for sharpshooters.

    • @silcrow1820
      @silcrow1820 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Well, exposed gunner is actually a design flaw that can be fixed pretty easy. The two real problem with AT-TE and other republic era war machines for empire
      1- empire wants republic gone and forgotten. So they dont want to use anything that is left from republic specially in active action zones. Thats one of the main reasons most of the venators or gunships are gone.
      2- tarkin doctrin. They are effective war machines, but they are not scary. They dont crush hopes and plant seeds of fear. Empire didnt want its army to be effective, they wanted it to be look scary enough to make people not even try to oppose it.

    • @CollinMcLean
      @CollinMcLean 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@silcrow1820 3
      The AT-TE was heavily armored but a low stance meant ground based explosives like mines (which tend to be a favorite of guerilla fighters) could damage the undercarriage.

    • @xSoulhunterDKx
      @xSoulhunterDKx ปีที่แล้ว

      The Republic also fielded ATATs in the later stage of the war

    • @RevBDes
      @RevBDes 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's strange because the empire's hovering vehicles often had exposed gunner positions

  • @tristynbishop6158
    @tristynbishop6158 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    AT-TE: can climb up walls
    AT-AT: will fall down and explode when climbing up walls

    • @robertagu5533
      @robertagu5533 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Least it's not the AT-ST: comically tripped by the ancient LOW tech trap of rolling logs... Or a well placed, sufficiently tight rope cable

    • @nobleman9393
      @nobleman9393 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      AT-AT: Imagine having an exposed crew.

    • @Silverswitch1
      @Silverswitch1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How do you know the AT-AT can’t climb walls.

    • @tristynbishop6158
      @tristynbishop6158 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Silverswitch1 it's not even capable of climbing walls because of the weight and height of the AT-AT

    • @Silverswitch1
      @Silverswitch1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tristynbishop6158 don’t be so judgemental.

  • @AngelDust6969
    @AngelDust6969 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    If I were a crew member of an AT-TE, I'd want to be one of the rear gunners.

  • @tom_hopeless4800
    @tom_hopeless4800 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hey Geetsly's. You used a fair amount of artwork in this video but haven't credited any of the creators. Would appreciate some recognition next time if it isn't too much trouble!
    -MatchboxSFM
    01:56
    02:40
    05:28
    06:13
    06:28
    08:12

    • @salmonocz2944
      @salmonocz2944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Nice screenshots

    • @tom_hopeless4800
      @tom_hopeless4800 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@salmonocz2944 It's actually made with Source Filmmaker! Takes a decent amount of time for each one. But thanks! 😄

    • @salmonocz2944
      @salmonocz2944 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tom_hopeless4800 It's not a film though?

    • @tom_hopeless4800
      @tom_hopeless4800 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@salmonocz2944 I have done a few animations but they take a lot longer and you can't post videos on Deviantart lmao

  • @unpaintedarmy
    @unpaintedarmy 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    It's great untill your jedi general sends you to the front with 20 hailfire droids staring you down.

    • @gmailquinn
      @gmailquinn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bot, and incorrect
      More like five and they were expensive to make and arm

    • @unpaintedarmy
      @unpaintedarmy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gmailquinn it was a joke.

  • @prematurebat2365
    @prematurebat2365 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Imagine if the main gunner had a built in Droid gunner or at least a Droid either way.

    • @emeraldcityelicitor2281
      @emeraldcityelicitor2281 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Even extending the controls down to the spotter would be great

  • @Lawrence_Talbot
    @Lawrence_Talbot 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If the main cannon was the most powerful and the most vulnerabel, why not add like a chasis or even durable glass or hell some Transparisteel casing over the gunner seat to protect the gunner? Seems like a silly design flaw and unnessary waste of men that could have been easily remedied.

  • @kyleslavik6324
    @kyleslavik6324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The AT TE is a awesome tank.

  • @indianajones4321
    @indianajones4321 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The AT-TE was awesome as a ground walker and space support unit

  • @princeofpokemon2934
    @princeofpokemon2934 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Working on this machine can be a nightmare. When these things hit the battlefield, they are the first things the droids will target. Because they know just how much damage they can dish out.

    • @alejandroelluxray5298
      @alejandroelluxray5298 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That is, if the walker doesn't blow them up first

    • @FalconWindblader
      @FalconWindblader 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The only one who'd suffer is the very exposed main gunner. For everyone else, it's pretty much a joyride for 2 reasons. One, unlike real life where we have man-portable antitank weaponry so effective to that tanks could be crippled & the crew killed in as little as 2 shots, SW universe doesn't have that kinda thing, thus making being inside the AT-TE very much safe. Two, the AT-TE has 6 anti-personnel guns. Anything, droid or not, stupid or crazy enough to take on the vehicle would be mostly gunned down before they get to do much damage.

  • @rexlumontad5644
    @rexlumontad5644 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Imagine if the Republic and CIS create the mobile suits as the new evolution of walkers during the Clone Wars.
    You Dig Giant Robots! I Dig Giant Robots! We Dig Giant Robots! Chicks Dig Giant Robots!

  • @Vaughn0292
    @Vaughn0292 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Enserio me encanta tu contenido hermano, realmente no se cómo di con tu canal, pero bendito sea el día que lo encontré

  • @cappedpluto7638
    @cappedpluto7638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    By far the worst part of the at te is the exposed gunner on the mass driver cannon. I dont see why the designers would leave that seat exposed. Other than that, the at te is awesome

  • @Voltaic_Fire
    @Voltaic_Fire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I'd be one of the interior turret gunners, I'd get to mow down clankers and not be sniped like the main turret gunner, why they wouldn't put an armoured bubble around that position I don't know.

    • @CaptainPrincess
      @CaptainPrincess 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      probably visibility issues but Id think keeping your gunner on your biggest cannon alive is more important
      but then youd have to consider the clones as people instead of expendable resources to consider that I reckon

  • @johnjr9997
    @johnjr9997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I bet if earth was in the war during the war, the clones would have better music when they walk towards the enemy.
    Imagine your a droid and a AT-TE walks up
    Meanwhile inside the walker
    Driver listening to either dragula or fortunate son

    • @CaptainPrincess
      @CaptainPrincess 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      DIG THROUGH THE DITCHES AND BURN THROUGH THE WITCHES
      I SLAM IN THE BACK OF MY
      AT-TE

    • @johnjr9997
      @johnjr9997 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CaptainPrincess 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

    • @alejandroelluxray5298
      @alejandroelluxray5298 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh they would LOVE it

  • @MrCdog85
    @MrCdog85 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why could they not just put armor around the main gunner? I'd be so pissed if I was a clone assigned to that position.

  • @CaptainPrincess
    @CaptainPrincess 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    AT-TE is my favourite vehicle in the whole setting
    and I would for sure be the dedicated driver/pilot

  • @justjoking5841
    @justjoking5841 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Armoring the front, adding a shield emitter, and turning the smaller guns into the equivalent of an area defense system with toggling controls (auto and manual) plus broadening the turret traversal rate.
    The ATTE would also be massively improved with an enclosed protected turret canopy for the main gunner.
    Having infantry within seems superfluous as smaller versions of the Turbo Tank can easily fit the role of APC or IFV.

    • @FalconWindblader
      @FalconWindblader 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's becuz you're defining the AT-TE as just a tank, when the truth is, it's actually tank, artillery & troop transport rolled into a single package.

  • @Green__Ghost
    @Green__Ghost 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    60kph? I'll believe that when I see it.

  • @brodenabbott832
    @brodenabbott832 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Watching this video makes me wonder how you could build a minifig scale walker, sounds like an exciting challenge

  • @pyeitme508
    @pyeitme508 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Oh ok

  • @forcierlogan
    @forcierlogan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I saw the the title, and got SSSSOOOO HYPED!!!!! This is the exact content I subscribe for from Geets

  • @technic5528
    @technic5528 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great vid!

  • @pyeitme508
    @pyeitme508 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wish for Earth in Star Wars what ifs soon.

  • @jimmysmith2249
    @jimmysmith2249 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Medical AT-TE: Convert the two big bays into a medical station with emergency droids and two field surgeons. Keep all of the weapons, because the seps don't differentiate between combatants and wounded. And have the crew all trained medics to assist the doctors when not engaged in combat or self defence.
    Boom. Forward medical treatment center.

  • @Freesavh1776
    @Freesavh1776 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why didn't they have a fire station inside or have a armored ball around the main gunner? They have space travel for Christ sake! Hell we have internal gunners on our tanks.

  • @the_Dutchdude
    @the_Dutchdude ปีที่แล้ว

    AT-TE Crew: WE ARE INVINCIBLE
    Hailfire Droid: *bonjour*

  • @ancientelixir1311
    @ancientelixir1311 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Watching the shows or even playing the (PS/Xbox/PC) video games, I always jumped into one of these when possible. Why? Because it's iconic and I always in vision myself (in real life) being in one.

  • @davidnobre5660
    @davidnobre5660 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    3:01 Crab droids, tri droids and dwarf spider droids aren't vehicles though xD

  • @Uberdude6666
    @Uberdude6666 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    AT-TE might be my favorite ground vehicle in Star Wars, but the exposed seat on the main gun seems so utterly idiotic! Particularly when the rest of the AT-TE is actually quite functional. And I'm not entirely sure that George Lucan and his concept artists made that a conscious decision because they thought about how Palpatine would have influenced the design process at Rothana heavy engineering to nerf the Republic's main battle-tank...

  • @mattjohnson2667
    @mattjohnson2667 ปีที่แล้ว

    60kpm? That's a gallop. Could you imagine those things doing a full calvary charge, or just get hundreds in a full herd stampede through enemy lines?

  • @_spooT
    @_spooT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    powerful main gun which can be used against a battleship, 360 defense, comfy and stable ride unlike any other, 3 week emergency oxygen, can climb 90 degrees up the side of a mountain like a skyrim horse, 6 ball turrets for extra defense, can run 60 kph. What more could you ask for?

  • @arbhall7572
    @arbhall7572 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I maintain a fully functional ATTE&it's LAAT carrier would easily smack the shit out of an ATAT. Unlike the one in the cartoon, which wasn't in good condition, didn't have its LAAT and was using low grade munitions they scrounge off the black market, instead of their clone war mil-spec munitions.

  • @OthiOthi
    @OthiOthi 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If the mass driver could penetrate battleship armour, why did it struggle against the AT-AT? Did technology really advance that much?

  • @pluto5988
    @pluto5988 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's hard to imagine the AT-TE bolting at 60kmph, It's joints and leg positions aren't optimized to run that that speed....

  • @RevBDes
    @RevBDes 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's a bit disappointing to me that no star wars game enables players to utilize the full crew requirements of the AT-TE and instead usually restricts it to being controlled by a single player.

  • @slicerneons3300
    @slicerneons3300 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best Walker design in concept, a few flaws that should not exist, and all the firepower a crew needs.
    AT-XT still my favorite, but this us clear 2nd.

  • @superjumpbros64
    @superjumpbros64 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I still want that Phase 2 Cody Figure

  • @daviddevlogger
    @daviddevlogger 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you are reading this, pls know that falling down is an accident....but staying down is a choice... but I rather choose to stand up☺️❤️

  • @MandoDaras
    @MandoDaras 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    My favourite Star Wars vehicule after the LAAT gunship

  • @AScottish-AustralianM-84
    @AScottish-AustralianM-84 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am getting the newest version of the Lego AT-TE because I want to get to increase my clone forces against my droid forces because my droid forces have a gunship.

  • @darkaxel1991
    @darkaxel1991 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whatever bureaucrat that let the AT-TE out of the design phase without an armored turret should've been charged with war crimes. At least something to stop small arms fire, so Bjorn Yokelson the insurgent cant prevent the use of the main gun.

  • @Quasihamster
    @Quasihamster ปีที่แล้ว

    foot pedals... as opposed to hand handles. That's important to distinguish!

  • @stevelenox152
    @stevelenox152 ปีที่แล้ว

    The AT-TE shouldn't of been removed from the Imperial army as for my position I'd be happy in any position

  • @iclickog7096
    @iclickog7096 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagine if ATTE windows and main gunner had umbaran sheilds

  • @lonlidood116
    @lonlidood116 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excuse me?! They were inspired by the Arctic *what?!*🤣

  • @joshbull623
    @joshbull623 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It socked bad. These wet tissue paper origami on legs with its 6 dummy laser cannons for show were the coffins of many brave clones who never had a chance.

  • @rakheem351
    @rakheem351 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I know your making a video about the juggernaut you can’t just leave on a cliff hanger like that

  • @kiryucpr4054
    @kiryucpr4054 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "lets make a very well armored movile and all Terrain walker a transport too and put his main gun the most expose and unproctected position of the entire tank >:D"

  • @w.dgaster2231
    @w.dgaster2231 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would want to be either the driver or spotter. I think those would be positions that would be cool to fill

  • @gabrielgaitan4856
    @gabrielgaitan4856 ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder how if a squad of AT-TEs would face off against our main battle tanks?

  • @greyofpta5305
    @greyofpta5305 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Everyone's gangsta until the At-TEs roll up.

  • @royal501stcommando5
    @royal501stcommando5 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Geetsly’s someone is pretending to be you and tried to sell some “prize” want to give you a heads up!

  • @darkfunewolfcoop6768
    @darkfunewolfcoop6768 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always find stupid for the gunner to be outside the vehicle when other weapon were controlled by inside, at least they should have putted some armor arround him to protect it

  • @legoCT-cg7ne
    @legoCT-cg7ne 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want to be part of of every inch in that walker if is drive or guner I still love that Scrapping thing

  • @elijahstinnett2429
    @elijahstinnett2429 ปีที่แล้ว

    They could have put light armor around the main gunner to at least protect him from infantry

  • @owencarey2954
    @owencarey2954 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would love to see this done to the juggernaut, unless there isn’t enough information on it to make a video.

  • @novadust6195
    @novadust6195 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want a bomber crew style game where you crew an AT-TE or AT-AT

  • @what88
    @what88 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    “hard to kill” the 1 rocket that always hits the driver and it’s instantly destroyed

  • @lacyseiberlich523
    @lacyseiberlich523 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    They prolly PMCS it on motorpool Mondays

  • @badgamemaster
    @badgamemaster 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So how many of the Geetsly's cast share name with characters from Star Wars?

  • @gifthorse3675
    @gifthorse3675 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn’t know there were windows on the back, seems unsafe.

  • @hetzer5926
    @hetzer5926 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It seems like for an AT-TE to actually be effective it needs a driver, an assistant driver who controls the forward anti-personal guns, a commander/spotter inside the front cabin, two loaders in the front cabin to load the mass driver cannon, one of them to replace the gunner when they die, the sacrif- I mean, the gunner, someone to man the rear anti-personnel guns, and at least one guy running around fixing things.
    So, at least 8 guys to crew it. So really you’d be able to haul around a single squad per ATTE. Cause I doubt that more than ten guys will fit in there without being in the way of the crew.

    • @hetzer5926
      @hetzer5926 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PodreyJenkin138 driving an ATTE is gonna be difficult, so whoever the driver is their gonna be giving that task their full attention. Their not gonna have time to man the front guns.
      The Assistant is there to do that, but their primary job would be helping the driver know where’s safe to walk and where it’s not, and they’d be scanning the area in front of the tank for mines.
      The Commander is the spotter by default, no sense putting a spotter outside of the tank. Their job is to command the tank, tell it where to go, and what to shoot at, ergo, he’s the guy who’s gonna spot targets.
      Then it’s gonna take at least one guy to load the gun, but since the gunner is in a really bad position, best to bring along a backup who normally works as an assistant loader.
      Then you need someone to man the guns in the back, the assistant driver could feasibility do it, but it’s just a lot easier if someone was back there manning those guns to keep an eye on the back.
      Then there’s the mechanic who’ll fix things when something eventually breaks. ATTE’s are complex machines of war who are constantly getting shot at. Something’s gonna break or malfunction on every deployment. And everyone else has already got a job to do, best bring along a specialist who, in an emergency, could fill in as a driver or loader.
      And last there’s the poor sap who’s gotta man the main gun. I’d prefer that it was an autonomous system that the commander could have controlled, which would cut down two crewmen.
      8 is the ideal number of crewmen to operate an ATTE, 6 is the bare minimum. That covers the Driver, assistant, commander, gunner, a loader, and a mechanic. The rear gunner will have to be filled by one of the passengers. But ideally you’d what that position filled when the tank is deployed, passengers or no passengers.

  • @insignificant3386
    @insignificant3386 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You forgot the rebels configuration.

  • @hazardousharpy3754
    @hazardousharpy3754 ปีที่แล้ว

    everyone talks about how strong these things are but in the show all you ever see them do is blow up

  • @adamstala7816
    @adamstala7816 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd rather rebuild and use a basilisk war Droid

  • @assortedproduce8053
    @assortedproduce8053 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would be the top gunner. If I die, I die.

  • @danielthane6557
    @danielthane6557 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why no music at the end of the video?

  • @TheSithlordluca2
    @TheSithlordluca2 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can you do a video like this on the AT-AT?

  • @CloneScavengerVulpin8389
    @CloneScavengerVulpin8389 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    As a kid i use to have AT-TE wind-up toy.

  • @knightwolf_-
    @knightwolf_- 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imagine a star wars AT TE movie

  • @liljoenyc01
    @liljoenyc01 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It was the tiger tank of Star wars

  • @dmann5938
    @dmann5938 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cover the Juggernaut next

  • @zexalbrony4799
    @zexalbrony4799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    7:33-7:39: And despite how many AT-TE's we saw in Star Wars The Clone Wars, we never saw any IM-6's until Season 6 for some strange reason. Also, first the Gunships(as explained in a previous video) and now the Walkers, how many Republic vehicles carried Medical Droids like the IM-6s with them?
    8:44-8:52: And they served as Command Post you could spawn from in the OG Battlefront game during the Battle of Geonosis level, even if you lost all your other Command Posts.

    • @michaelandreipalon359
      @michaelandreipalon359 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I remember the droid type. Weren't they available during the first months of the Clone Wars as seen in Galactic Battlegrounds: Clone Campaigns?
      (If so, then I will counter it with Venators showing up a bit too early in TCW 2008, when they're implied to be unleashed later on in the war, as shown from the CWMMP works.)
      Problematic, though, if all two are destroyed while your own CPs are either captured or, in the case of the command center for BF I's Geonosis: Spire, also destroyed.
      (Ack, spammers are back! Report!)

    • @zexalbrony4799
      @zexalbrony4799 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@michaelandreipalon359 Oh yeah, they could be destroyed a lot easier than those Techno Union Transport Ships that also could be used as Respond Posts for the Droids. So that gave them another advantage, besides having the Geonosians to boost their fighting force. It always took me forever to destroy those Techno Union Ships, even with an AT-TE.

  • @willwaggenspack6411
    @willwaggenspack6411 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now do the juggernaut

  • @lebaguette3354
    @lebaguette3354 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can it run doom?

  • @markusskram4181
    @markusskram4181 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video ! ❤

  • @kira1138
    @kira1138 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would want to be the main gunner

    • @kira1138
      @kira1138 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice

  • @michaelandreipalon359
    @michaelandreipalon359 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Comfy and daunting, but slow in both movement and fire rate.
    Also, it just doesn't give me some sort of maniacal battle high compared to the otherwise flawed AT-AT.

  • @ghostsstarwars1929
    @ghostsstarwars1929 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question can you do what the new republic military look like and what happened to them??????

  • @loloudbeast
    @loloudbeast 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did the Republic Navy ever use AT-TEs as a means to compensate for the lack of forward facing guns on Venators?

  • @R3LOADlikesgames
    @R3LOADlikesgames 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The AT-TE is definitely my favorite walker tank.

  • @danielcollinspda9936
    @danielcollinspda9936 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    if I was in an AT TE I would be an infantry trooper chilling in the cabin, before I got picked off by a sniper when it was my turn for the gunner seat.

  • @TheNovaStandard
    @TheNovaStandard 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great vid on such a loved piece of machinery, but definitely do a video on the juggernaut next it’s underrated I think.

  • @Nuetral768
    @Nuetral768 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'd probably want to main gun, lots of reasons but especially since I believe that there is no good reason to fight unless you are going to kill or die trying.

  • @lucaskiryucis
    @lucaskiryucis 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like 919

  • @jeremyleemartens801
    @jeremyleemartens801 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Was there any combat kitchens, where clones could eat true meals in combat, to drive motivation in really long battles?

  • @antanasstrakays1117
    @antanasstrakays1117 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gunners