Kaman K-Max Dual Intermeshing Rotor Helicopter Demo - AIN

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
  • Kaman Aerospace has delivered the first new-build K-Max “Aerial Truck” helicopter since the first nine-year production run ended in 2003. The bright orange helicopter is now on its way to northeast China, where it will be used primarily for firefighting. Before packing it up for shipment, Kaman put it through its paces at the factory in Bloomfield, Connecticut. Unless you work there, watching a K-Max’s intermeshing rotors spin up is a sight you don’t see every day.
    #aviation #helicopter #aircraft

ความคิดเห็น • 702

  • @geethsan1567
    @geethsan1567 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1520

    I have never been so anxious for a helicopter.

    • @richardnixon5499
      @richardnixon5499 6 ปีที่แล้ว +72

      I just kept expecting it to chop itself to bits 😂

    • @carlfitzpatrick5864
      @carlfitzpatrick5864 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      This is the second type helicopter built by Kaman with this rotor configuration the other was the husky built for the Air Force back in the 1960’s I think

    • @jamesfieweger8648
      @jamesfieweger8648 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Carl Fitzpatrick, no, it’s far from the second. Kaman has designed and built no fewer than ten different types of intermeshing rotor helicopters.

    • @carlfitzpatrick5864
      @carlfitzpatrick5864 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      James Fieweger which ones are they I’m curious I only new about the two

    • @jamesfieweger8648
      @jamesfieweger8648 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Carl Fitzpatrick, my bad it was only nine. They are the K-125, K-190, K-225, K-1125, HTK, HOK, HUK, HH-43 and the K-MAX.

  • @ryanhampson673
    @ryanhampson673 6 ปีที่แล้ว +484

    K max is the ant of the helicopter world, it’s lifting capacity to weight ratio is nuts.

    • @ecurbbb
      @ecurbbb 6 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      Ryan Hampson so it's wight lifting capacity is how many nuts? Don’t say 69.

    • @jebise1126
      @jebise1126 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      yeah wonder why not more helicopters went with this design... what are pros and cons of it

    • @zachburke8906
      @zachburke8906 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Jebi Se size is probably a pro, stability would likely be one, maybe even reduced vibrations.
      Complexity would likely be a big negative, lower durability.

    • @jebise1126
      @jebise1126 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      no this is very simple design actually...

    • @zachburke8906
      @zachburke8906 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Jebi Se very simple?
      I mean it can’t be that simple, gearing and stuff would make this more complex and more prone to failure than just one rotor, wouldn’t it?

  • @asgpu414
    @asgpu414 6 ปีที่แล้ว +97

    My high school is only 10 min. Away from the factory so I see these K-Max's perform test flights all the time out the window. They are awesome

    • @supremeleader5516
      @supremeleader5516 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Great

    • @atomicwedgie8176
      @atomicwedgie8176 ปีที่แล้ว

      Get your nose back into your studies and quit looking out the window or you'll grow up to be a retard!

    • @z3lrin382
      @z3lrin382 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ah you got a really nice view from your school 🫡

    • @ramzidz6150
      @ramzidz6150 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you are so lucky

  • @dennisbrucemasayon786
    @dennisbrucemasayon786 6 ปีที่แล้ว +738

    Its like chinook on a tight budget😂

    • @xcalibertrekker6693
      @xcalibertrekker6693 6 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Very Very tight budget.

    • @Northernliiights
      @Northernliiights 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      Or a thai hooker with broken ankles.

    • @mrnickbig1
      @mrnickbig1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Actually, it looks like a German Flettner Kolibri Fl-282 military helicopter from WW2, the original eggbeater. th-cam.com/video/cOP_-BcRMRY/w-d-xo.html

    • @EguiulNava
      @EguiulNava 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      On a slim budget xD

    • @joshua.harazin
      @joshua.harazin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@Sk.2500 while the Chinook's rotor discs don't overlap as much, they do overlap due to the increased angle of the front rotor head.

  • @shmookins
    @shmookins 6 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    1:10 I am always constantly surprised by German ingenuity. They were a head of the times in many inventions. Just remarkable.

    • @bazzhm1447
      @bazzhm1447 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dude thats not german.. nazi made kalibri and NOT use 2pack of rotorblade.
      K max purely american inventions. Like bell , its started in and on capitalis garage.

    • @Zothaqqua
      @Zothaqqua ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@bazzhm1447 "Flettner [the German] became the chief designer of Kaman Aircraft and many of the Flettner design concepts are found in Kaman helicopters of later years." -- en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Flettner

    • @nezuminezuminezumi7266
      @nezuminezuminezumi7266 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It Kind of makes your wonder what the world would have been like if the right side won.

    • @foooosh
      @foooosh 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@nezuminezuminezumi7266so you support the side who encouraged ethnic cleansing?

  • @ErikStenbakken
    @ErikStenbakken ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I watched one of these dropping mulch for post fire mitigation. It was alternating loads with a Huey. The K-max was literally doubling load size over the Huey. And at way lower altitude with more nimble delivery. Such an amazing task machine!

  • @testy462
    @testy462 6 ปีที่แล้ว +564

    Lol. Who are the nine people that dislike this? You have a beef with a certain type of helicopter?

    • @Kodamagnum24
      @Kodamagnum24 6 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      I'm not very fond of the fact that its going to be sent to the Chinese.

    • @genaddi1234
      @genaddi1234 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      that's called free market

    • @louiscypher4186
      @louiscypher4186 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      fucking NAZI tech

    • @c4pt1n54no
      @c4pt1n54no 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      @@Kodamagnum24 get over yourself or do us all a favor and don't share your opinion on society, it's very backwards my friend

    • @threeomgthree
      @threeomgthree 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Kodamagnum24 why? Its not even a battle chopper. Its for fighting fires. You are a strange dude.

  • @gnak2
    @gnak2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +345

    shipped to china for firefighting? in north east china
    same north east china where harbin helicopter company is located
    u know they just gonna reverse engineer it

    • @nurbsenvi
      @nurbsenvi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      They will try.

    • @henry2008kim
      @henry2008kim 6 ปีที่แล้ว +74

      Trust me.. no one gonna by jumping to buy a chinese intermeshing helicopter 🙃

    • @steve1978ger
      @steve1978ger 6 ปีที่แล้ว +45

      Sangyoon Kim, idk, that's what they used to say about Japanese cars.

    • @johnweiland9389
      @johnweiland9389 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Has to be perfect replica or its going to crash and burn.

    • @pdx96
      @pdx96 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Skelotor Two I believe it's for the same reason. If you look at the early Japanese automotive industry, it was the copy of the European cars. The Kenmeri Skyline was a copy of an American muscle. Through it all, they had an international team and partnership like Ford and Mazda. Now you see partnerships such as Toyota with Jinbei and an assembly of an international team like Nio. It's the same curve for Korean cars. The reason for such perception is exposure.

  • @WasatchGarandMan
    @WasatchGarandMan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +548

    Engineering marvel, but good Lord does it look horrid

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 6 ปีที่แล้ว +86

      Overwatch That's an opinion, based on an aesthetic standard that is completely arbitrary. It's actually more symmetrical than a conventional helicopter. I actually think it looks pretty cool. Kinda looks like a dragonfly flapping its wings.

    • @greeneggsandsam2014
      @greeneggsandsam2014 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      I think it looks really cool, almost on par with the P-47 Thunderbolt in terms of so-ugly-its-pretty kind of thinking :D

    • @DrArku
      @DrArku 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True, but I guess it's shaped in such a way to let the pilot have better visibility.

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ace Nitro Probably works for Bell or Sikorsky. Sorry, Boeing or UTC.

    • @sixmagpies
      @sixmagpies 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh ...have you met my wife?

  • @Rickster5176
    @Rickster5176 6 ปีที่แล้ว +175

    It's the quietest helicopter I've ever seen.

    • @68404
      @68404 6 ปีที่แล้ว +87

      Do you hear with your eyes?

    • @tomthompson7400
      @tomthompson7400 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      who said that ,,, was it you ,, i saw your ears move.... lol

    • @waynearrington6727
      @waynearrington6727 6 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Yes, it's noise footprint is quite low for an observer on the ground. However, in the cockpit it is very noisy. In the prominent bulge just over the top of the cockpit are blowers to cool engine and transmission oil. Those fans are incredibly noisy and after 8 or 9 hours you are a crazy man from the noise.

    • @GordonGarvey
      @GordonGarvey 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@waynearrington6727 isn't that why one uses noise cancelling headphones?

    • @TankMaster1998
      @TankMaster1998 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @Jay M how do you hear a written statement

  • @HerezCheez
    @HerezCheez 6 ปีที่แล้ว +224

    Suddenly everyone is a mechanical engineer in the comment section.

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      HerezCheez Maybe they are. I am. I don't think this kind of video is attracting mainly fashionistas.

    • @alexhutchins6161
      @alexhutchins6161 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@brainmind4070 I am not a mechanic but I'd be happy if you considered me one.

    • @brainmind4070
      @brainmind4070 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alex Hutchins And you would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for your meddling comment!

    • @Tragicide
      @Tragicide 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      HerezCheez Suddenly some dumbass outta nowhere doesn’t like it when people talk about the topic of the video.

    • @LunaStarFire
      @LunaStarFire 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Im a mechanical design engineer, but working as a process engineer =P

  • @WUZLE
    @WUZLE 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We get these at the airfield I work out. Nothing else makes a sound like a K-Max, they are extremely cool.

  • @oliverwabwire2836
    @oliverwabwire2836 6 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Simple timeless design that works!....if they scale it up by 2 could probably approach Chinook's lifting capacity.....for a fraction of the cost!

    • @greeneggsandsam2014
      @greeneggsandsam2014 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Maybe, but the scale of project it would take to engineer such a scale-up would be massive. Almost all structural materials follow the same rule of thumb: When you double the size, you need to quadruple the strength (don't quote me on that BTW :P).

    • @kempo_95
      @kempo_95 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It would get a lot bigger though. Since it has to be at least the length of the rotor so the 2 sets of blades don't hit each other.

    • @pvosoccer1585
      @pvosoccer1585 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@greeneggsandsam2014 You may be right, due to some square laws in physics and I don't remember the text book I used in college, like "University Physics" and it has a side story of scale and people of the Lilliput, all are fading in my memory. Trying some search on that story:
      study.com/academy/answer/in-spite-of-gulliver-s-physical-strength-he-is-passive-towards-the-lilliputians-what-aspect-of-gulliver-s-travels-does-this-represent.html

  • @oneeco
    @oneeco 6 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    And I just found about this now?!?!

    • @encarn
      @encarn 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      me too

    • @GersonSalvador
      @GersonSalvador 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What about me? Haha

  • @DJSbros
    @DJSbros 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The engineering is astonishing.

  • @henry2008kim
    @henry2008kim 6 ปีที่แล้ว +77

    No approaching from the side with rotors turning i presume..🤔

    • @THR33SIXX3MPYR
      @THR33SIXX3MPYR 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

      I have seen several of these in actual use, they have big letters on the side, "APPROACH FROM FRONT"

    • @jebise1126
      @jebise1126 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      i think its for tall people... lol dont think rotor goes so low anyway.. and you have this "approach from front" sign in this video too

    • @decespugliatorenucleare3780
      @decespugliatorenucleare3780 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      aka "the passenger mower"

    • @pwnmeisterage
      @pwnmeisterage 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The 2:11 "unmanned drone version" developed for military use ... painted a nice dull uniform gray, no obvious safety signage, lol.

  • @archisman20
    @archisman20 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The intermeshing blades!!!! Scary and beautiful at the same time.
    I feel like saying I want one for Christmas 🤣

  • @drdoolittle5724
    @drdoolittle5724 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant - explained the link at last between Fletner and Kaman that even the company did not offer. Thank you.

  • @backyardgarage912
    @backyardgarage912 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The counter-rotating props provide for a smooth smooth ride!

  • @tomthompson7400
    @tomthompson7400 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    what a beautiful machine

  • @jancerny8109
    @jancerny8109 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It's an astonishing machine, if you're used to looking at tail-rotor craft. I wonder why they aren't more widely used. I'm no engineer, but it seems a high lift to weight ratio would be useful for a lot more than cargo. One could equip a version with a roomy cabin, either for an owner who wants luxury in their vehicle--imagine Marine One with intermeshing rotors--or for seating many passengers. I could see a role for short hops in between cities or airports in some places.

    • @Zothaqqua
      @Zothaqqua ปีที่แล้ว +4

      One of the problems is that the tilted rotor discs come low to the ground, making it hard to safely approach the aircraft.

    • @Kate-lz7jq
      @Kate-lz7jq ปีที่แล้ว

      Holiday helicopter camper

    • @JustRememberWhoYoureWorkingFor
      @JustRememberWhoYoureWorkingFor 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Zothaqqua that's the issue I have noticed too

  • @DT__1
    @DT__1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anything that comes out today as a NEW IT APPEARS ITS 100 years old.... what a brightdark “FUTURE” we live in............

  • @Counselor77
    @Counselor77 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I got to see one of these at our local airport the other day and it had a very distinct sound.

  • @TheKruze88
    @TheKruze88 6 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    !1:17 "immigrated to the us" bwhahahah more like "operation paperclip"

    • @tissuepaper9962
      @tissuepaper9962 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The narrator actually said "emigrated", not "immigrated". Two different words there.

    • @claudbenz4232
      @claudbenz4232 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      TissuePaper what's the difference between these 2 words?

    • @Backyard_Brouhaha
      @Backyard_Brouhaha 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      george emigrate is to LEAVE a country. Immigrate is to ENTER a country. So, he emigrated from Germany, and immigrated into the US.
      History nerds: Except not cuz paperclip

  • @ashwanishahrawat4607
    @ashwanishahrawat4607 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Beautiful

  • @pstrzel
    @pstrzel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    One just flew over my house. What a weird sight. I thought it was my washing machine starting a spin cycle off balance.

  • @francismuiruri9064
    @francismuiruri9064 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Science at good work i love it.

  • @lknanml
    @lknanml 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love these. Dual main rotary systems look amazing. KA-50 is still my fav as we can fly it in DCS.

  • @brendaproffitt1011
    @brendaproffitt1011 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Totally incredible it looks..great information on these rotors and the capabilities of it and other helicopters too..Awesome job on this video too..I do greatly appreciate it alot thank you so much for your videos too..

  • @joelmulder
    @joelmulder 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a beauty!
    I wish i could fly one of these some day...

  • @JONOVID
    @JONOVID 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    maybe Kaman Aircraft can re-design the K-Max airframe body, fuselage to put the crew cabin up the top level atop of the passengers and cargo in the level below, with big clamshell doors at the front and the tricycle landing gear inverted so a front retractable passenger ramp can be added to a new fuselage design. a lot of helicopter lifting power there! ,- just a thought.

  • @Agislife1960
    @Agislife1960 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Glad to see they put the K-Max back into production, I never understood why they stopped in the first place.

    • @atomicskull6405
      @atomicskull6405 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The market was saturated, not many customers for a helicopter that only does one thing. There's a worldwide market of about two dozen units tops for something like this. Attrition had reduced the numbers to the point they could produce a few more to replace them but the market is still about two dozen sales give or take.

  • @AngelLestat2
    @AngelLestat2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love the design

  • @scupking
    @scupking 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Saw a demo at a local fly in last year. I think this has to be one of the quietest aircraft.

  • @JoveJoved
    @JoveJoved ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:10 - I'm sold.

  • @reddaB
    @reddaB 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this more dangerous to get out of than a normal helicopter? Because of the blades spinning lower and closer to the floor? Do you have to wait for the blades to stop to exit the craft? Unlike a normal helicopter?

  • @eprn1n2
    @eprn1n2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It’s amazing how much pilot skill is involved in keeping both rotors from hitting each other.

    • @aerialkerala
      @aerialkerala ปีที่แล้ว +4

      No piloting skills are required for keeping the rotors from hitting each other as they are connected and aligned internally with gears.

    • @eprn1n2
      @eprn1n2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aerialkerala Without the skill of the pilots the rotors woud come in contact with each other. Very skilfull

    • @aerialkerala
      @aerialkerala ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eprn1n2 Please see this video and you'll get it: th-cam.com/video/Xz-twheuHxc/w-d-xo.html

    • @eprn1n2
      @eprn1n2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aerialkerala Sorry Aerial. Just joking.

  • @ZeacorZeppelin
    @ZeacorZeppelin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This was a very very informative video

  • @WillPhoneman
    @WillPhoneman 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I saw one for the first time today, what a cool bird!

  • @josephgroves3176
    @josephgroves3176 6 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    'servos in each blade for simplicity'
    Yeah the wiring and control for six servos through an axle and a 3part joint?
    Pull the other one! Maintenance and inspection must be a nightmare

    • @d1oftwins
      @d1oftwins 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That jumped at me too, but I think they know what they doing, simplicity to the engineers of this craft is something different than to you and me. Maybe it is easier the way they did it and it helped them make more things easier at the cost the wiring being difficult (or maybe it even isn't that hard). I don't know enough about this vehicle so I will not be the judge of that.

    • @greeneggsandsam2014
      @greeneggsandsam2014 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Well, to have a mechanical linkage may not be much more complicated, but the whole assembly is made from many moving parts. Murphy's Law applies perfectly here, with a lot of moving, mechanical parts in the normal version, and only two parts in the servo version - the wire and the servo

    • @dallatorretdu
      @dallatorretdu 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      so it does have a slip-ring not a swashplate? That might explain why they made drones out of this

    • @tissuepaper9962
      @tissuepaper9962 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dallatorretdu I don't believe it has a swash plate, because it would operate on the same cyclic+collective system as a single-rotor aircraft. I could be wrong though, I'm no aerospace engineer.

    • @helierez
      @helierez 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      No, it has little flaps called servo tabs that move the blades. Its a way of getting aerodynamic (instead of hydraulic) boost. The tabs are still swahsplate controlled, not electro-mechanical servos in the blade. Still mechanically complex, but you get rid of hydraulic system.

  • @indigodragon7129
    @indigodragon7129 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This craft can maneuver backward's without having to dip it's nose to do so like regular helicopters have to. How neat! 😊

  • @FedericoLucchi
    @FedericoLucchi 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Impressive! I wonder how it rotates on itself since it doesn't have a tail rotor and keeps the two rotors at identical speed...

    • @AINvideo
      @AINvideo  6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      There are control surfaces on the rotor blades, like ailerons. Thanks for watching!

  • @TheNefastor
    @TheNefastor 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very clever design, I love it.

  • @ImNotADeeJay
    @ImNotADeeJay 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Still trying to figure out how do the blades manage to not hit each other

    • @BuffiestFluff
      @BuffiestFluff 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      They're driven by the same motor, so what is essentially 2 timing belts keeps their rotations the same, and as long as they're offset slightly, the belts/engine can keep them in their own individual spin, which does not intersect with the other blade.

    • @haassteambraker9959
      @haassteambraker9959 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The gearing keeps them synchronized. If they stopped being synchronized you'd have much bigger problems.

    • @HerezCheez
      @HerezCheez 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Its the similar mechanic how bullets dont hit the blades in world war 2 helicopter.

    • @laytonpratt
      @laytonpratt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Just Me but when it turns one slows down

  • @Kate-lz7jq
    @Kate-lz7jq ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really elegant machine, so little parts!

  • @decespugliatorenucleare3780
    @decespugliatorenucleare3780 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You gotta say: that shit is pretty nimble. It almost looked like a drone, floating around in such a controlled grace.

  • @draccoman2812
    @draccoman2812 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The perfect combination of thrust and anxiety

  • @Tomiata
    @Tomiata 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Escellent. Yet another great chopper produced in CT!

  • @MtsHumming
    @MtsHumming 6 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Nepal could use some drone version, to lift supplies to hill top village if road is washed out by landslides.

    • @seemeslegit3765
      @seemeslegit3765 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      nepal is one of the poorest countries in the world but. good idea

    • @southpawlibranine3511
      @southpawlibranine3511 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@seemeslegit3765 just because Nepal is poor doesn't mean the government can't afford to buy this. Or even the people. There are a lot of filthy rich people in Nepal too.

    • @seemeslegit3765
      @seemeslegit3765 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@southpawlibranine3511 The rich people don't give a shit about the poor, and after all the earquakes there in the past the tourist industry is struggling. without a magic fairy conjuring up some money the can't afford it

    • @southpawlibranine3511
      @southpawlibranine3511 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@seemeslegit3765 do you know all the Rich people personally. Stop generalising. And by the way the tourism industry last year had the most amount of visitors in the whole history of Nepal visit. Only two years after the quake. So stop making up crap without looking at the hard facts to suit your barely there argument. Iam fortunate enough to be a Nepali who comes from considerable wealth and my family has done a lot for the poor and so has countless other rich people. What have you done?

    • @southpawlibranine3511
      @southpawlibranine3511 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@seemeslegit3765 there's is currently a total of five new luxury hotels being built in the capital city alone. Not to mention a 300 million dollar casino that opened in another city. I wouldnt consider that struggling to attract tourists. I guess the Hilton, Sheraton and other hoteliers are wasting their money. I know the owner of the Hilton personally.

  • @thanosmadtitan7475
    @thanosmadtitan7475 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't know it's strange or coincidence or what, after watching this video for few seconds, I was thinking about german engineering during ww2, and then there is mention of the German invention!

  • @anupnair4156
    @anupnair4156 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Woah!!! Amazing 🚁

  • @iorfidaskye
    @iorfidaskye 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What's the autorotation specs?

  • @Rowanbows
    @Rowanbows 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    german invention - we nailed it again :)

  • @pepperidgefarmremembers6350
    @pepperidgefarmremembers6350 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WOOO IM HAVING ONE OF THESE LAND AT MY HIGHSCHOOL I LOVE LIVING NEAR KAMAN COMPOSITES

  • @BunglowBill
    @BunglowBill 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fascinating

  • @pixamite1
    @pixamite1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing!!!

  • @carlfitzpatrick5864
    @carlfitzpatrick5864 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kaman tested the Kmax at our squadron HSL-32 back in 1992 it was fun watching it fly at the time our squadron was flying the Kaman SH-2F Sea Sprite after the navy rejected the Kmax in1992 our Squadron was decommissioned shortly after that same year.

  • @LectronCircuits
    @LectronCircuits 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome whirlybird. Cheers!

  • @antonioaraujo7684
    @antonioaraujo7684 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    sincronia perfeita... dá até medo...parece que vão bater a qualquer momento!

  • @a1919akelbo
    @a1919akelbo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    -gears fail
    -rotors annihilate each other
    -can't autorotate to safety
    -???
    -Profit

    • @battleoid2411
      @battleoid2411 6 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Wow, you just summed up every aircraft ever

    • @a1919akelbo
      @a1919akelbo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@battleoid2411 i don't think you know what either autorotating or glidding is bud if this thing fails its a literal brick

    • @brianshannahan6983
      @brianshannahan6983 6 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      Two issues with that. First, this helicopter has already done many autorotation trials without problem. Second, the specific failure you are thinking of is not really possible. It would be like your car's axle spontaneously snapping in half. That sort of thing doesn't happen unless maintenance is neglected to an extreme degree. Even then, it would be vastly more likely that something more delicate (like the engine or electronics) would fail first, not a simple mechanical linkage.

    • @a1919akelbo
      @a1919akelbo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@brianshannahan6983 theres a weird little gear at the base of every rotor, it sortof looks like a ratchet, this gear is extremly complex as it has to be able to grip the rotor in one direction but let it spin freely in the other. This gear breaks all the fucking time.

    • @brianshannahan6983
      @brianshannahan6983 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@a1919akelbo Again, two problems with that. First, they specifically moved the controls to a servo-based system on the blades in order to make things mechanically simpler. Second, the helicopter and others like it are already in service and seem to do just fine safety wise. While that type of failure is theoretically possible, I'm inclined to think it's a non-issue.

  • @andrewchan7747
    @andrewchan7747 7 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    So if one rotor fails it will destroy the other one

    • @coopermosshart
      @coopermosshart 7 ปีที่แล้ว +169

      if one of your rotors fail on a regular helicopter you're just a F'd

    • @Cowcow211
      @Cowcow211 7 ปีที่แล้ว +38

      Andrew Chan Rotors on a helicopter are really the last thing to fail. More common problems are things like gearing, engines, controls.
      Keep in mind this is a utility helicopter. So it will be carrying twice the copter's weight. Those rotors habe to be able to stand up to the downforce they gotta pump out for that.
      I wonder how auto rotation works on this thing.

    • @Jurflip2
      @Jurflip2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      It apparently autotates very well. In earlier intermeshing machines there were some directional control issues but these have largely been solved in the Kmax, I believe.

    • @BBalloon
      @BBalloon 6 ปีที่แล้ว +66

      Cooper Hart Wrong The rotors will never hit one another. If you think about it if each rotor spins independently from eachother they will quickly go out of sync. Even a 0.0001% difference in speed one rotor will eventually catch up to the other after enough spins.
      Its much more likely that the rotors spin together like connected gears so that one blade never meets the other.

    • @jebise1126
      @jebise1126 6 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      if rotor fails on any helicopter you are going down anyway.

  • @ojcubz
    @ojcubz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm no engineer but do that blades go from one gear? I'd assume it would be hell to keep those insync otherwise

    • @thejafuu5001
      @thejafuu5001 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      correct, there is only one motor and the rotors are geared together.

  • @youcancode6988
    @youcancode6988 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like this narrator

  • @Shadowsc133
    @Shadowsc133 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This looks safe, reliable and modern.

  • @turboboy1983
    @turboboy1983 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So, what is the benefit of a tail rotor? Isn’t that what causes most helicopter crashes. How come every helo doesn’t have this configuration or the double stacked version?

  • @dicktrolington416
    @dicktrolington416 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Due to its high lift to size ratio would this design work well if it was battery powered?

  • @eartheternal3565
    @eartheternal3565 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So beautiful!

  • @sebamuniz792
    @sebamuniz792 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Frank has another hidden talent

  • @Thebadassowl
    @Thebadassowl 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh my god that's fucking trippy

  • @denisekernan3322
    @denisekernan3322 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    TWIN BLADE REPORTING!

  • @gv9750
    @gv9750 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I IDENTIFY AS AN ORANGE K-MAX HELICOPTER !

  • @brainmind4070
    @brainmind4070 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Kinda looks like a dragonfly flapping its wings.

  • @hugostiglitz6914
    @hugostiglitz6914 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Standing beside one you realise how much noise is generated by a tail rotor. These are very quiet!

  • @ts3871
    @ts3871 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why did they stop production? It seems like a terrific design.

    • @anngo4140
      @anngo4140 ปีที่แล้ว

      People are skeptical cos "weird" in their eyes, so not a lot of orders.

  • @msb3235
    @msb3235 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So soothing to watch from far away but definitely scary to fly in one.

  • @skycorrigan6511
    @skycorrigan6511 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've heard these synchropter's are noticeably more quiet than traditional helicopters. Is that marginally true?

  • @gabrielapetrie
    @gabrielapetrie 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    that's exciting

  • @shinigami117s8
    @shinigami117s8 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    So why isn’t it more popular ??

  • @s0nnyburnett
    @s0nnyburnett 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can't believe how close I live to Kaman and haven't known about them. Overshadowed by Sikorsky I guess.

  • @ka4172
    @ka4172 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Huey lifts 2000kg K Max lift 2700kg this was way more than his own weight.

  • @user-oi8sq6ci8j
    @user-oi8sq6ci8j 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    incredible!

  • @theholydoge8731
    @theholydoge8731 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is like the coolest shit ever

  • @klipklapklop3359
    @klipklapklop3359 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Random dude at the bar back in ww2 : Bet u can't make a helicopter with two blades spinning past each other
    Anton Flettner : Hold my beer

  • @pr4wn5tar
    @pr4wn5tar 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice explanation!

  • @aibpresto
    @aibpresto 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn that is one sexy helicopter

  • @YurkerYT
    @YurkerYT 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can someone explain hot the Heli turns? Usually is by differential thrust, but here if one of the blades spins faster it will collide against the other.

    • @snonsig2688
      @snonsig2688 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      just like any other heli. by turning the rotorblades

  • @samc5898
    @samc5898 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    "Commands pilot Frank Gallagher..."
    .
    He's out again

  • @alexabadi7458
    @alexabadi7458 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I hope they have find a solution for the servos failures.

  • @jennifersenda616
    @jennifersenda616 ปีที่แล้ว

    Actually, because of the blade placement, this is actually called a synchropter

  • @yangguan4070
    @yangguan4070 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Superb innovation

  • @Bart-Did-it
    @Bart-Did-it 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    When it started up I was like “Holy Shit” and wanted to 🏃🏿‍♂️💨 that shit did not look rite lol

  • @robertharrison1601
    @robertharrison1601 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Swanson likes IT

  • @DanielMorales-dz4nv
    @DanielMorales-dz4nv 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why intermeshing blades instead of coaxial blades? What is the difference?

  • @aimusoorii4484
    @aimusoorii4484 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing

  • @FrostyCoug
    @FrostyCoug 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Don’t you forget to change the timing belt at regular intervals on this thing!

  • @natewhitfield4112
    @natewhitfield4112 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you stop turbulence from blowing one of the rotors off balance?

    • @waffles4622
      @waffles4622 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The rotors use a gearbox so this makes them physically impossible for them to hit each other.

  • @PPC4
    @PPC4 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm guessing this could actually be quite fast as you're not going to get unbalanced lift from retreating blade stall? That being said it looks like the rotors turn the wrong way for that.

  • @civedm
    @civedm 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Holy shit watching that thing start up made me feel so damn uneasy. Lol.

  • @khwistal
    @khwistal 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    When the video started I was like damn, its been long since Americans invented some good stuff... not suprised to find out they didn‘t.

  • @markfox1545
    @markfox1545 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    And when a birdstrike or rotor failure causes the rotors to clash and there is no lift so no autorotation...?

    • @davidbergaragonzalez5653
      @davidbergaragonzalez5653 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      A birdstrike wouldn't cause them to clash because they're geared together.