Perhaps I missed this part of the video, but I don't quite understand how the inverse force solution can possibly be valid without consideration for external factors such as the mass of the links. Later on in my robotics course we learned the newton-euler approach and the lagrangian approach to solving the torques which did account for these however I never had the presence of mind to ask about the distinction between these two solutions. What do the torque terms generated by the inverse torque solution truly represent if they are calculated without any consideration for mass/moment of intertia?
Perhaps I missed this part of the video, but I don't quite understand how the inverse force solution can possibly be valid without consideration for external factors such as the mass of the links. Later on in my robotics course we learned the newton-euler approach and the lagrangian approach to solving the torques which did account for these however I never had the presence of mind to ask about the distinction between these two solutions. What do the torque terms generated by the inverse torque solution truly represent if they are calculated without any consideration for mass/moment of intertia?
We are considering a static case with no moments being applied, only forces. All dynamics are thus neglected.
@@biomechlab thank you for clarifying