When a sign says authorized personnel parking only - it means the area is to be used for parking by authorized personnel only so if you are not authorized then aren't allowed to be there whether you are parking or not.
@@kevingould6533 It certainly is......merely that, like all other "A's", it's not absolute. It doesn't exist in a bubble, where one can do/say/record whatever/wherever they want, just because they declare something "public". The "where" is pretty integral, when it comes to any limitations to the 1st, which is why in our country, we have what's referred to as the Public Forum Doctrine. In the simplest of terms, there are 3 Court of Law Affirmed levels of Public Forums - *Traditional* (i.e. parks, public sidewalks, pretty much anything outside that isn't private property) --> Record to your heart's content.....or at least until the park closes - *Limited* (i.e. Post Offices, Courthouses, City Halls, Police Stations, Libraries) --> MAY record, unless policies in place limit such, per THEIR parameters of time, place, and manner. With permission, may continue - *Non* (i.e. Airport terminals, Public Schools, Polling Places, Jail Facilities, Military Bases) Recordings are STRICTLY regulated, if not prohibited. Legally requires permission to record, despite being "payed for with our taxes" Hope that helped
Oh my goodness, that officer just calmly and rationally made you his bit@h. All you could do was snivel and whine like a little girl. I wish you would come to our county courthouse, it has a sign that states that pursuant to the supreme court ruling on local courts, the presiding judge has established the following rules for the courthouse. The first rule states No One May Enter The Courthouse Until Authorized By The Security Officers Assigned, Other rules include. No Audio, and/or video equipment permitted with prior authorization by the chief judge. No Cell Phones without prior authorization. No weapons allowed, weapons include, but are not limited to (and there is a list) All persons entering MUST, upon authorization to enter, proceed through the metal detector. If you walk through the door without authorization, you are told ONE TIME to exit the building until authorized to enter. Any argument, or non compliance gets you a pair of chrome bracelets, and a charge of criminal trespass. And for those that want to argue the trespass, there is a copy of the statute posted, alone with the definition of obstruction for those that believe that obstruction must be a physical act. We don't have a problem with frauditors because they find that the jail time, and the fines are not worth the youtube change. Oh and your camera, and /or cell phone are taken as evidence until they are searched with a court evidentiary warrant. I have seen out of town frauditors come in, and our local youtubers that once tried the script on the courthouse, go tell them how they ended up with their attempt. But you just keep frauditing, maybe one day you will stumble upon our county and get to stay for 90 days at the grey-bar hotel. Come to play, end up with 90 days ! ! !
This jerk doesn't realize that judge's rules have the effect of law and if you disobey them you can be held in contempt and summarily jailed. He also doesn't realize that the judge can make rules for the ENTIRE courthouse. Theis is the general rule in both the federal and state judicial systems. There's NO constutional right to walk into ANY public building and do what you want. Then or course this guy starts that "honor your oath "nonsense all these frauditors do. And of coure he says the signs at the courthouse are "unconstitutional". Right. NO, courts have NOT ruled that you are allowed to come in an film in a courthouse, while ignoring existing rules and regulation governing that courthouse .
If I can't be on land we payed for sell it and give us back our money, Stay tuned for the sign and tell me how I don't have free political speech pertaining to that judge
When I'm walking on a sidewalk and I reach a sign that says no turn on red, do I have wait for the light to change before I turn right and continue walking. Or is that just for cars?
You are incorrect. Judges absolutely CAN make orders restricting recording for the entire court HOUSE, period. And “Authorized Personnel Parking Only” along with a representative of that building VERBALLY INFORMING YOU are all that is needed for you to be notified that you are not allowed to be in that parking lot. Finally, filming or any of the 1A activities are NOT “Civil Rights” they are Constitutional rights. Civil Rights, by DEFINITION, are rights enforced and protected by LAWS in an attempt to guarantee full and equal citizenship for people who have traditionally been discriminated against on the basis of some group characteristic. (Holding a camera is not a group characteristic according to Civil Rights law) civil rights are given and guaranteed by the power of THE STATE, whereas Constitutional rights are “endowed by our creator” and guaranteed by our Constitution. Some examples of Civil Rights are the rights to vote, to a fair trial, to government services, and to a public education. The “right” to record is not a Civil Right, and neither is the “right” to roam around a parking lot that you are clearly not allowed to be in…I can’t believe I have to point any of this out.
please go away you are a bad person and I don't need the grief. Technically you are correct it is my constitutional right, The trespass law was revised here over a year ago and that is our parking lot payed for by our tax dollars. If the judge wants to make orders for the court fine I just want to see the clerk another constitutional right as declared by the supreme court but please feel free to watch someone else who gets the vernacular right every time
@@GemCity937 stating facts doesn’t make someone a bad person but talking to public employees like they are dirt just because you don’t understand laws, and spreading misinformation online about laws and Civil and Constitutional rights are certainly things that one could argue bad people do.
@GemCity937 "please go away you are a bad person I don't need the grief". Informing you politely that everything that you did and said is incorrect does not make a person bad. I thought you were about free speech and protecting the 1st amendment? You claim that you are educating people about their rights. However, you are completely wrong on every point, and the gentleman was merely correcting your misinformation. You really need to learn the difference between civil and constitutional rights. You weren't discriminated against, and your camera is not part of a protected class, which means your civil rights were not involved in this situation. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse for you to act like an entitled jackass.
At 5:45, you were shown the statute that grants judges that ability to make policy for courthouses.... not just courtrooms. Why on earth did you edit that stuff out? You're not cut out for this, ya whiny little creampuff. Have a better weekend. LOL
I see you couldn't get into the courthouse with your phone cam. Poor baby. And no, nobody denied your civil rights. As the security guy pointed out, you can enter but not with your phone. Walk of shame, dude! Ha!
You also might want to educate yourself on what kind of orders a chief judge is allowed to make. By LAW, he is allowed to post an order for the entire COURTHOUSE, and not just the courtroom. And If that confuses you, then read up on the 10th amendment to the US Constitution. That will teach you all about states rights. You might want to educate yourself on these things before making a complete fool of yourself next time, and being forced to do the walk of shame.
If a judge could only make rules for their own courtroom, then wouldn't that invalidate every ruling the Supreme Court has ever made?Just about all the "rights" auditors use for their scams and cons, are based on Supreme Court, and lower court rulings. There is nothing in the Constitution about videotaping or "everybody is a member of the press." Those are just judges' opinions. "Smith v. Cummings" is just a judges' ruling.
"I just follow rules whether I agree with them or not.". That's why these issues persist. If they put a rule on the wall that said you have to strip naked to be allowed in the building, would you comply?
All the gubmt workers have their phones in their pockets. They have their cameras on the walls. If the Jack wagon judge passed a no clothing policy, all the fat parasite employees would be wearing their unies. Start acting up and watch them pull out their phones and start recording. The rules are for us peons.
No, but if they require that you wear shoes and shirt if you want to enter and you refuse to wear your shoes and/or a shirt then you can’t enter. They can set POLICIES for the building they control and if it’s a court house the chief judge can make orders prohibiting activities, like recording, in the entire court HOUSE. That’s they way it is. When you refuse to follow those policies or orders then you can’t come in. If you break those policies after you enter then you can be told to leave, and if you refuse then you are trespassing and can be removed and even arrested. That’s how the law works.
@@rherho1 What makes you think a policy for the staff would infringe on the rights of the owners of the Courthouse? A judge's order doesn't supercede federal law. I never signed an agreement that those policies apply to me, or that I would adhere to them. Employees do that. That judge only has jurisdiction of his/her court ROOM! Even then, cameras are actually allowed to be present in many situations inside courtrooms. Any sign with rules on them are merely laminator policies unless they have a code under them, and even then you need to look that up because often, they cite codes for things that do not even pertain to the rules they wrote. 🙂✌️
@@rherho1 I understand your issue. You just aren't ready to change. You're so set in your mind that authority is above all. It's called "The Dunning-Kruger Effect. You'll come around when you're ready. ✌️🙂
The courts have ruled that a judge's verbal decree is as valid as a written order. When a judge bangs his gavel in court and says "Guilty!", no one is waiting for it to be printed out to be official.
Civil Rights violations, as spelled in the "Civil Rights Act of 1964", very clearly are violations against you because of things you can't change and make you different : race, sex, age, nationality, religion. You can put down a camera, put on, or take off a mask. Things you have control over, are not considered civil rights.Which is one of the reasons why, when a Frauditor claims his civil rights have been violated, he has trouble finding a good civil rights lawyer. Because they recognize, like Gem Nutso here, that he has no case.
@@rherho1 Sure it is, and should be treated as such. I bet your toddler realizes this more than you do. Go ahead. Explain why a camera should be treated as something other than an observer? Maybe you feel that just about anyone is capable of seeing the same things the people actually there could see. How is that an issue? Maybe someone may steal PII using a camera? By openly recording? I'm sure they would secretly record for that purpose but let's go there for a moment. If you're out in public, and you give your PII aloud for someone else to hear, because receiving services requires you to give your PII, you just made your PII public on your own account. It is up to you to protect your PII. Once you give it to a business entity, they are required to keep that information confidential. Maybe you thought of something I hadn't thought of. Let's hear it.
No. As the cop pointed out, if this little whiner is just walking through and keeps walking, no problem. When he lingers and does idiotic stuff like taking video of private vehicles, then it's a problem. He was trespassing.
You know nothing of the cival rights movement so don't go spouting off like your cival rights were violated because they weren't. Also the judge can make the rules for the whole courthouse. If you don't like the rules then don't go in cupcake It's a simple as that. Also i wouldn't listen to Craig for any kind of advice at all. There is a reason why he's in jail, yeah I wouldn't listen to a criminal if I was you Bubba.
@@GemCity937 Consider it advice Frauditing will get you nowhere. It's a really bad internet fad. It's just a branch of the sovereign citizen movement. Claiming to be a journalist doesn't make you one and going around like the rules and laws don't apply to you isn't a good look. Again the judge makes the rules for the courthouse. Don't like it just don't go in it's very simple. No cival rights were violated. Just saying they were doesn't make it so. Do some reading on the cival rights movement will do you a world of good because you're clearly confused. But that's OK, you've just been mislead by other frauditors. Just do better and get off that High horse of yours.
@@GemCity937 Also welcome to the internet. You'll get alot of comments like mine because what you do is for clicks and views is controversial and is typically frowned apon by the American people. Don't like what I said feel free to block me and prove you "want" transparency but hate being transparent yourself. Think about it like this you Pay taxes so you think your the boss of the police. Well i give you clicks and views on TH-cam Which gets you money so its like I'm your boss See how ridiculous it sounds.
Went to Dayton Municipal Courts and Montgomery County Common Pleas Courts yesterday, Feb.14, 2023, to survey our buildings. The Common Pleas Courts were all open and inviting. The Dayton Municipal Courts were ALL strictly closed to any spectator citing "public health and safety concerns", exactly as that unFairborn sign alluded, but without dates. I believe Columbus might have a different say of OH state Constitution Article 1, section 16 already being clearly established.
@@Trumpisaraypest2024 You are mixing the point. Dude, you is a douchebag for clicks and reviews, nothing more. You do not care about reality, only your shallow existence and the need to hear yourself speak.
@@Trumpisaraypest2024 You offer NO reality. Composure is reserved for respectable honesty which you offer none. Was never looking for "it", so you enjoy your celebration of ignorance. Good day
@@bluevon5021 Judges orders are lawful, when they are given through due process. Outside a legal proceeding, judges have no more authority than you or me
@@bluevon5021 If the action of the judge was not in a legal proceeding for everyone that the order is intended for, it is undeniably not through due process
How is it that the definition of someone being corrupt is simply that person enforcing rules and laws? You and this little child are both immature babies.
@GemCity, Hello I've wanted to get into auditing and I live in Dayton. I've been looking to find another like minded person in the area to get through my training wheels phase, and wonder if you would like to be the Batman to my Robin? If you know of a way to contact me privately through YT, I'll give you my contact info, thanks.
The first requirement is that you have a police record, preferably with over 3 years prison time. And lots of felonies, especially violent ones like assault. Otherwise you don't have the attitude for frauditing.
When a sign says authorized personnel parking only - it means the area is to be used for parking by authorized personnel only so if you are not authorized then aren't allowed to be there whether you are parking or not.
Reading comprehension is not one of this frauditors top skills.😆
The officer told him he was allowed to walk through the lot IF he had an acceptable reason.
@@kevingould6533 Which he clearly didn't
@@garyt7193 1A isn't protected in your country?
@@kevingould6533 It certainly is......merely that, like all other "A's", it's not absolute. It doesn't exist in a bubble, where one can do/say/record whatever/wherever they want, just because they declare something "public".
The "where" is pretty integral, when it comes to any limitations to the 1st, which is why in our country, we have what's referred to as the Public Forum Doctrine. In the simplest of terms, there are 3 Court of Law Affirmed levels of Public Forums
- *Traditional* (i.e. parks, public sidewalks, pretty much anything outside that isn't private property) --> Record to your heart's content.....or at least until the park closes
- *Limited* (i.e. Post Offices, Courthouses, City Halls, Police Stations, Libraries) --> MAY record, unless policies in place limit such, per THEIR parameters of time, place, and manner. With permission, may continue
- *Non* (i.e. Airport terminals, Public Schools, Polling Places, Jail Facilities, Military Bases) Recordings are STRICTLY regulated, if not prohibited. Legally requires permission to record, despite being "payed for with our taxes"
Hope that helped
That was one big ass walk of shame you did cupcake. 😂😂🤡
7:48 is that the walk of shame I see 😂😂😂
And talk about pot meets kettle you wittle baybeeeeee😂
Oh my goodness, that officer just calmly and rationally made you his bit@h. All you could do was snivel and whine like a little girl. I wish you would come to our county courthouse, it has a sign that states that pursuant to the supreme court ruling on local courts, the presiding judge has established the following rules for the courthouse. The first rule states No One May Enter The Courthouse Until Authorized By The Security Officers Assigned, Other rules include. No Audio, and/or video equipment permitted with prior authorization by the chief judge. No Cell Phones without prior authorization. No weapons allowed, weapons include, but are not limited to (and there is a list) All persons entering MUST, upon authorization to enter, proceed through the metal detector. If you walk through the door without authorization, you are told ONE TIME to exit the building until authorized to enter. Any argument, or non compliance gets you a pair of chrome bracelets, and a charge of criminal trespass. And for those that want to argue the trespass, there is a copy of the statute posted, alone with the definition of obstruction for those that believe that obstruction must be a physical act. We don't have a problem with frauditors because they find that the jail time, and the fines are not worth the youtube change. Oh and your camera, and /or cell phone are taken as evidence until they are searched with a court evidentiary warrant. I have seen out of town frauditors come in, and our local youtubers that once tried the script on the courthouse, go tell them how they ended up with their attempt. But you just keep frauditing, maybe one day you will stumble upon our county and get to stay for 90 days at the grey-bar hotel. Come to play, end up with 90 days ! ! !
where
This jerk doesn't realize that judge's rules have the effect of law and if you disobey them you can be held in contempt and summarily jailed.
He also doesn't realize that the judge can make rules for the ENTIRE courthouse.
Theis is the general rule in both the federal and state judicial systems.
There's NO constutional right to walk into ANY public building and do what you want.
Then or course this guy starts that "honor your oath "nonsense all these frauditors do.
And of coure he says the signs at the courthouse are "unconstitutional". Right.
NO, courts have NOT ruled that you are allowed to come in an film in a courthouse, while ignoring existing rules and regulation governing that courthouse .
Please contact your local crisis center. I believe that they can help you.
If the sign says no unauthorized vehicles then that means you also. You was not denied service and none of your civil rights was denied.
You’ve stated way too many facts here. You’re going to break what’s left of his brain.
@@rherho1 fhahahahahaahaha
you two clowns would not talk to me that way in peron so I think this is hilarious
If I can't be on land we payed for sell it and give us back our money, Stay tuned for the sign and tell me how I don't have free political speech pertaining to that judge
@@GemCity937 bless your heart
When I'm walking on a sidewalk and I reach a sign that says no turn on red, do I have wait for the light to change before I turn right and continue walking. Or is that just for cars?
If this needs to be explained to you, then you shouldn't be walking on a sidewalk without adult supervision.
change to what? green or red?
I really hope that's sarcasm, because if it isn't, it's an example of the mental health
problem we have in this country today.
You are incorrect. Judges absolutely CAN make orders restricting recording for the entire court HOUSE, period. And “Authorized Personnel Parking Only” along with a representative of that building VERBALLY INFORMING YOU are all that is needed for you to be notified that you are not allowed to be in that parking lot. Finally, filming or any of the 1A activities are NOT “Civil Rights” they are Constitutional rights. Civil Rights, by DEFINITION, are rights enforced and protected by LAWS in an attempt to guarantee full and equal citizenship for people who have traditionally been discriminated against on the basis of some group characteristic. (Holding a camera is not a group characteristic according to Civil Rights law) civil rights are given and guaranteed by the power of THE STATE, whereas Constitutional rights are “endowed by our creator” and guaranteed by our Constitution. Some examples of Civil Rights are the rights to vote, to a fair trial, to government services, and to a public education. The “right” to record is not a Civil Right, and neither is the “right” to roam around a parking lot that you are clearly not allowed to be in…I can’t believe I have to point any of this out.
please go away you are a bad person and I don't need the grief. Technically you are correct it is my constitutional right, The trespass law was revised here over a year ago and that is our parking lot payed for by our tax dollars. If the judge wants to make orders for the court fine I just want to see the clerk another constitutional right as declared by the supreme court but please feel free to watch someone else who gets the vernacular right every time
@@GemCity937 stating facts doesn’t make someone a bad person but talking to public employees like they are dirt just because you don’t understand laws, and spreading misinformation online about laws and Civil and Constitutional rights are certainly things that one could argue bad people do.
@GemCity937 "please go away you are a bad person I don't need the grief". Informing you politely that everything that you did and said is incorrect does not make a person bad.
I thought you were about free speech and protecting the 1st amendment? You claim that you are educating people about their rights. However, you are completely wrong on every point, and the gentleman was merely correcting your misinformation.
You really need to learn the difference between civil and constitutional rights. You weren't discriminated against, and your camera is not part of a protected class, which means your civil rights were not involved in this situation. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse for you to act like an entitled jackass.
@@GemCity937 so you don't like facts a judge has the right to make policies for the entire court house and it is backed by the supreme court
@@GemCity937 limited public forum says they can limit your speech
At 5:45, you were shown the statute that grants judges that ability to make policy for courthouses.... not just courtrooms. Why on earth did you edit that stuff out? You're not cut out for this, ya whiny little creampuff. Have a better weekend. LOL
I live at Buckeye Lake Ohio you are more than welcome to stop anytime love your videos
Thank you so much
We don't care about Supreme Court we got our own judge
you got that right
I see you couldn't get into the courthouse with your phone cam. Poor baby. And no, nobody denied your civil rights. As the security guy pointed out, you can enter but not with your phone. Walk of shame, dude! Ha!
Denies what?
You also might want to educate yourself on what kind of orders a chief judge is allowed to make. By LAW, he is allowed to post an order for the entire COURTHOUSE, and not just the courtroom. And If that confuses you, then read up on the 10th amendment to the US Constitution. That will teach you all about states rights. You might want to educate yourself on these things before making a complete fool of yourself next time, and being forced to do the walk of shame.
If a judge could only make rules for their own courtroom, then wouldn't that
invalidate every ruling the Supreme Court has ever made?Just about all the
"rights" auditors use for their scams and cons, are based on Supreme Court,
and lower court rulings. There is nothing in the Constitution about videotaping
or "everybody is a member of the press." Those are just judges' opinions. "Smith
v. Cummings" is just a judges' ruling.
Are you going to Federal Court to get a court order that orders them to allow you into the courthouse with your phone?
He can’t. The judges order is perfectly legal and Constitutional.
@@rherho1 not
TYFYS
"I just follow rules whether I agree with them or not.". That's why these issues persist.
If they put a rule on the wall that said you have to strip naked to be allowed in the building, would you comply?
All the gubmt workers have their phones in their pockets. They have their cameras on the walls. If the Jack wagon judge passed a no clothing policy, all the fat parasite employees would be wearing their unies. Start acting up and watch them pull out their phones and start recording. The rules are for us peons.
No, but if they require that you wear shoes and shirt if you want to enter and you refuse to wear your shoes and/or a shirt then you can’t enter. They can set POLICIES for the building they control and if it’s a court house the chief judge can make orders prohibiting activities, like recording, in the entire court HOUSE. That’s they way it is. When you refuse to follow those policies or orders then you can’t come in. If you break those policies after you enter then you can be told to leave, and if you refuse then you are trespassing and can be removed and even arrested. That’s how the law works.
@@rherho1 What makes you think a policy for the staff would infringe on the rights of the owners of the Courthouse? A judge's order doesn't supercede federal law.
I never signed an agreement that those policies apply to me, or that I would adhere to them. Employees do that.
That judge only has jurisdiction of his/her court ROOM! Even then, cameras are actually allowed to be present in many situations inside courtrooms.
Any sign with rules on them are merely laminator policies unless they have a code under them, and even then you need to look that up because often, they cite codes for things that do not even pertain to the rules they wrote.
🙂✌️
@@HowardCountyObserver you are wrong, period. Educate yourself.
@@rherho1 I understand your issue. You just aren't ready to change. You're so set in your mind that authority is above all. It's called "The Dunning-Kruger Effect. You'll come around when you're ready.
✌️🙂
I like how assertive you are. You doing well
Truly pathetic “content”. But thanks for the laughs.
Does the statute there require a sign or is verbal communication adequate to establish the element?
it only requires a verbal instruction
It's referred to as common sense. It's a Parking lot.....NOT a Park
The courts have ruled that a judge's verbal decree is as valid as a written order.
When a judge bangs his gavel in court and says "Guilty!", no one is waiting for
it to be printed out to be official.
Gem city camera Karen actually speaking truth to the officer about his civil rights being denied
None of his civil rights was being denied.
You need to learn the difference between civil and constitutional rights!
Civil Rights violations, as spelled in the "Civil Rights Act of 1964", very clearly
are violations against you because of things you can't change and make you
different : race, sex, age, nationality, religion. You can put down a camera,
put on, or take off a mask. Things you have control over, are not considered
civil rights.Which is one of the reasons why, when a Frauditor claims his civil rights
have been violated, he has trouble finding a good civil rights lawyer. Because they
recognize, like Gem Nutso here, that he has no case.
Can't come in with a camera? Do I need a blindfold on too? Afraid we might see you doing something wrong? TOO LATE!
A camera is not the same thing as your eyes. My toddler understands this. 😂
@@rherho1 Sure it is, and should be treated as such. I bet your toddler realizes this more than you do.
Go ahead. Explain why a camera should be treated as something other than an observer?
Maybe you feel that just about anyone is capable of seeing the same things the people actually there could see. How is that an issue?
Maybe someone may steal PII using a camera? By openly recording? I'm sure they would secretly record for that purpose but let's go there for a moment. If you're out in public, and you give your PII aloud for someone else to hear, because receiving services requires you to give your PII, you just made your PII public on your own account. It is up to you to protect your PII. Once you give it to a business entity, they are required to keep that information confidential.
Maybe you thought of something I hadn't thought of. Let's hear it.
Not only can you be back there, it is a public alley
No. As the cop pointed out, if this little whiner is just walking through and keeps walking, no problem. When he lingers and does idiotic stuff like taking video of private vehicles, then it's a problem. He was trespassing.
You know nothing of the cival rights movement so don't go spouting off like your cival rights were violated because they weren't.
Also the judge can make the rules for the whole courthouse.
If you don't like the rules then don't go in cupcake It's a simple as that.
Also i wouldn't listen to Craig for any kind of advice at all.
There is a reason why he's in jail, yeah I wouldn't listen to a criminal if I was you Bubba.
who are you ,why are you talking to me like you know me ? I know about civil you pampered gamer
@@GemCity937
Consider it advice
Frauditing will get you nowhere.
It's a really bad internet fad.
It's just a branch of the sovereign citizen movement.
Claiming to be a journalist doesn't make you one and going around like the rules and laws don't apply to you isn't a good look.
Again the judge makes the rules for the courthouse.
Don't like it just don't go in it's very simple.
No cival rights were violated.
Just saying they were doesn't make it so.
Do some reading on the cival rights movement will do you a world of good because you're clearly confused.
But that's OK, you've just been mislead by other frauditors.
Just do better and get off that High horse of yours.
@@GemCity937
Also welcome to the internet.
You'll get alot of comments like mine because what you do is for clicks and views is controversial and is typically frowned apon by the American people.
Don't like what I said feel free to block me and prove you "want" transparency but hate being transparent yourself.
Think about it like this you Pay taxes so you think your the boss of the police.
Well i give you clicks and views on TH-cam Which gets you money so its like I'm your boss
See how ridiculous it sounds.
@@GemCity937 do you need a safe space?
Very very Good!!!👍 YOU ARE RAD!!! 💯😁💐📸📽🎬🎞📸🌹🇺🇸✌️
You rock!
Well that didnt take long for the nonsense to start and the lies an ignorance. Just wow.
Went to Dayton Municipal Courts and Montgomery County Common Pleas Courts yesterday, Feb.14, 2023, to survey our buildings. The Common Pleas Courts were all open and inviting. The Dayton Municipal Courts were ALL strictly closed to any spectator citing "public health and safety concerns", exactly as that unFairborn sign alluded, but without dates. I believe Columbus might have a different say of OH state Constitution Article 1, section 16 already being clearly established.
@@Trumpisaraypest2024 You are mixing the point. Dude, you is a douchebag for clicks and reviews, nothing more. You do not care about reality, only your shallow existence and the need to hear yourself speak.
@@Trumpisaraypest2024 You offer NO reality. Composure is reserved for respectable honesty which you offer none. Was never looking for "it", so you enjoy your celebration of ignorance. Good day
I love the way you speak to tyrants
When have you ever heard him speak to a tyrant? You do know what that word means, right?
@@rherho1
No he doesn't.
Thing is if any of these frauditors ever did record a real tyrant...they wouldn't be recording anymore after that
@@twiggyramieriez5382 💯
👍👍👍👍👍
These unlawful judge's orders need to be fought
@@bluevon5021 Judges orders are lawful, when they are given through due process. Outside a legal proceeding, judges have no more authority than you or me
@@bluevon5021 If the action of the judge was not in a legal proceeding for everyone that the order is intended for, it is undeniably not through due process
I guess you're not a big fan of the 10th amendment to the constitution then are you?
@@jerrybushman so a judge orders everyone to wear a mask in the county. not everyone in the county is there in the court room. explain
@@mikemcwilliams7801 Judges cannot lawfully order anyone to do anything except in their courtroom during a court proceeding
Follow up on this, please. Fairborn is a tyrant town and needs some lessons. Corrupt from the top down.
Tell me the definition of tyrant.
I guarantee it doesn't mean what you think it does.
How is it that the definition of someone being corrupt is simply that person enforcing rules and laws? You and this little child are both immature babies.
Jack wagon!
Nice try Bro 😂
@GemCity, Hello I've wanted to get into auditing and I live in Dayton. I've been looking to find another like minded person in the area to get through my training wheels phase, and wonder if you would like to be the Batman to my Robin? If you know of a way to contact me privately through YT, I'll give you my contact info, thanks.
The first requirement is that you have a police record, preferably with over 3 years prison time. And lots of felonies, especially violent ones like assault. Otherwise you don't have the attitude for frauditing.