Class 11th - Thermodynamics Process - Work Done in Adiabatic | Thermodynamics | Tutorials Point

Thermodynamics Process - Work Done in Adiabatic
watch more videos at
www.tutorialsp...
Lecture By: Mr. Pradeep Kshetrapal, Tutorials Point India Private Limited

[@TutorialsPoint_]

Watch Playlist on Thermodynamics:
th-cam.com/play/PLWPirh4EWFpGn56dhbMS5veWuVKGU6_QS.html&si=LWzYIjcfft5YQIhn

[@padmajachallagundla5486]

Sometimes mistakes happen but we love ur teaching sir ur really a god came from heaven to make physics far better

[@chetube5789]

PV^gama may be presented as P1V1^gama=P2V2^gama and used appropriately.

[@rjegatheesh1895]

@ 6:15 how sir wrote the equqtion...

[@keerthivasan5184]

Thank you so much sir
Your teaching made it very easy for me to understand sir

[@surendrakverma555]

Great Sir. Regards

[@superbrokeengineer]

Does it have the same answer when we use first law of thermodynamics to find work?

[@chetube5789]

Also P1V1^gama is not equal to RT1 and P2V2^gama is also not equalto RT2.Am I correct Professor

[@radhak1086]

Nice sir

[@Dhumpa10]

Sir,P1 gama and v1 gama is used in adiabatic expression but why not in isothermal process

[@haykelmuktar5590]

In iso thermal T is constantand from PV=NRTwhen T is constant NRT is Constant this gives us PV=constant

[@wgg6427]

The process of the derivation is wrong, you should correct it sir.

[@chetube5789]

PV may be explained in a better way Sir.My humble opinion please.

[@aseem.14]

bruh hes dead

[@triveniroy6942]

💖💕

[@learnwithanjali5505]

Ty sir❤

[@abhinabkumarbarik1470]

Hii... Where r u from???

[@samaybhattacharyya1118]

Ehh, is the derivation even correct? like, how can we take P common when P1 and P2 are two different values? PLEASE PUT DOWN THIS VIDEO OR CORRECT IT. *DON'T MISGUIDE STUDENTS!!!*

[@rishiagrahari4212]

P is not taken common... *k* has been taken out of the integration and then the value of k=PV' is substituted.
You please don't misguide student.

[@anshulsuryawanshi8760]

There is some mistake by him he forgot the fact that p1v1^r=p2v2^r=constant{K} by this the derivation will be done

[@anuanvesh5678]

his explanation is completely irrational,,,, he is just adding up the notations whenever he needs