Engine problem after takeoff. Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 returns to San Francisco. Real ATC
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
- THIS VIDEO IS A RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FOLLOWING SITUATION IN FLIGHT:
19-JUL-2024. An Alaska Airlines Boeing 737-800 (B738), registration N577AS, performing flight ASA528 / AS528 from San Francisco International Airport, CA (USA) to Los Angeles International Airport, CA (USA) during climb out of San Francisco, about at 8000 feet, declared an emergency and requested return to the airport of departure. Later the flight crew reported engine number 2 problem. When they were approaching final the pilot reported that they had some engine indication so they needed to return back.
Join me on Patreon: / you_can_see_atc
#realatc #aviation #airtrafficcontrol
_______________
Timestamps:
00:17 Alaska Boeing 737-800 is climbing out of San Francisco International Airport
00:59 The flight crew declares an emergency. They have engine number 2 problem. They are returning to San Francisco
04:24 Alaska 528 is cleared for the approach at San Francisco Airport
05:08 The pilots contact Tower controller
05:51 Landing at San Francisco Airport. Communications on the ground
_______________
THE VALUE OF THIS VIDEO:
THE MAIN VALUE IS EDUCATION. This reconstruction will be useful for actual or future air traffic controllers and pilots, people who plan to connect life with aviation, who like aviation. With help of this video reconstruction you’ll learn how to use radiotelephony rules, Aviation English language and general English language (for people whose native language is not English) in situation in flight, which was shown. THE MAIN REASON I DO THIS IS TO HELP PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND EVERY EMERGENCY SITUATION, EVERY WORD AND EVERY MOVE OF AIRCRAFT.
SOURCES OF MATERIAL, LICENSES AND PERMISSIONS:
Source of communications - www.liveatc.net/ (I have a permission (Letter) for commercial use of radio communications from LiveATC.net).
Map, aerial pictures (License (ODbL) ©OpenStreetMap -www.openstreet...) Permission for commercial use, royalty-free use.
Radar screen (In new versions of videos) - Made by author.
Text version of communication - Made by Author.
Video editing - Made by author.
HOW I DO VIDEOS:
1) I monitor media, airspace, looking for any non-standard, emergency and interesting situation.
2) I find communications of ATC unit for the period of time I need.
3) I take only phrases between air traffic controller and selected flight.
4) I find a flight path of selected aircraft.
5) I make an animation (early couple of videos don’t have animation) of flight path and aircraft, where the aircraft goes on his route.
6) When I edit video I put phrases of communications to specific points in video (in tandem with animation).
7) Together with my comments (voice and text) I edit and make a reconstruction of emergency, non-standard and interesting situation in flight.
“I’d really prefer to turn left after landing, because if we turn right it’ll take a helluva lot longer.”
4:35 Why read backs are important.
Is there a difference in declaring an emergency or declaring a mayday? Also, it amazes me that the controller caught the 28l vs 28 r mistake given all the communications going on.
No difference. Some people think saying mayday gets the point across better, but it sounds like a cry for help and pilots are way too cool for that. They were probably all set up to land on 28R, she just said the wrong thing on the read back.
Emergency is a general term mostly used in the US
Mayday is a critical issue, PanPan is for abnormal but non-critical issues
This would probably be a PanPan, vs engine off or fire a Mayday
3 controllers asked for fuel. Would it be possible if 1 controller type it on the computer then others can see the fuel information?
Tbh, I’m surprised there aren’t more erroneous alerts that’s causes emergencies.
Engineers and the people who maintain them are very good. Modern airliners are very reliable.
"Can you say fuel remaining in Firkins please?"
When will US ATC finally decide on whether to ask for fuel in minutes or pounds? Seems like every airfield wants something different.
It’s supposed to be expressed in time
Times allows ATC to monitor so they don't stall out, Pounds allows ARFF to coordinate a fire response - every plane burns at a different rate so ATC can't calculate the other
Yall complain about this every single video, Jesus.
Never because TH-cam commenters are the only ones concerned about it.
Well, the crew got everyone on the ground ok so a win. But an emergency?
Likely Company SOP for whatever indication they had - it seems this indication directed for immediate return (vs time troubleshooting and checking) - emergency clarifies their need for priority return
so not an engine problem just an alert
Sounds like a maintenance issue on those CFMs...as in they should have replaced the 737 with an A321 using PW 1100Gs.
The same PW GTF having all but shut down operations for Spirit, etc. since inception into service? The same engine that still has operational and reliability issues? And of course the "haters" would have blamed it all on Boeing.
The CFM is a wonderful engine! I have several thousand hours with them under a wing and all trouble free-love'm on the Boeing, but much preferred the IAE on the Airbus.
Cheers!
@@seanoswa1829 Everything is Boeing's fault and CFM engines SUCK!
Nice! Boeing planes seem to have more issues don’t they as far as incidents
Agree Boeing have some serious issues to work out, but I think the apparent increasing number of 'problems' are confirmation bias at this point. Airbus planes have minor issues like this also.
Boeing has serious problems last 10 years or so @@synmoo
@@user-nu1sq2fz8s I mean it apparently starts when Boeing merging with McDonald Douglas which seems to start the problems it has and the CEO of Boeing is going to step down in 5 months at the end of the year so probably these incidents may still happen I guess.
@@synmoo Comparing issues that Airbus has compared to Boeing it seems like Airbus got their issues under control from what I heard and not much from what I see from Boeing but the CEO did say they're trying.
Too many women.
Lol, two? Someone has an inferiority complex.
..Mr. 1950 is in the comments section....Say hi to Wally and the Beave. 😂
OMG its AŇOTHÉŘ Iph its Bóiñgg
I IZZA ĶŇÕTT ĢOIEŃG
😟😰😩😰😟😰😩😰😟😩😨😨😨😨😦😧😩😰😟😟😳😵😶😵😳😳😨😨😳😵😵😟😰😩😰