Why The Hunchback of Notre Dame is a Near-Masterpiece
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ก.พ. 2025
- Well I'm finally talking about one of Disney's most underappreciated animated film and how it's a near-masterpiece
3:46 Part 1: The Opening
7:07 Part 2: Deeper Than Usual
12:33 Part 3: Frollo
19:05 Part 4: A Nearly Perfect Soundtrack
25:39 Part: An Uneven Tone
33:17 Conclusion
Follow Me On:
Twitter: / blueglare8
Instagram: / blueglare8
The fact that I didn’t mention Tony Jay’s incredible performance as Frollo is very upsetting to me
Imo the most powerful part of hellfire is the latin prayer in the chorus. He's effectively trying to silence the voice of God in his conscience by blaming Esmeralda for his lustful thoughts. But deep down he knows. "Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa"
Now this is PEAK
Obsessed! Great video essay about The disney movie of all time, with great zelda music over top? Clearing my skin, watering my crops
Hunchback of Notredame is my favourite Disney Animated Feature film.. 🏆👍♥️😍
I usually Watched Disney's The Hunchback Of Notre Dame 1 and 2 in 🇺🇲English and Spanish 🇲🇽
🇺🇲Disney's The Hunchback Of Notre Dame (🇲🇽Disney's El Jorobado De Notre Dame)
Why is Disney's Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996) is labeled as tonally inconsistent when they share the same exact tone as Who Framed Roger Rabbit? (1990), The Nightmare Before Christmas (1993), Batman: The Animated Series (1992-1995/1997-2000), X-Men: The Animated Series (1994-2000), Superman: The Animated Series (1996-2002), Spider-Man: The Animated Series (1996-2002), Justice League: The Animated Series (2002-2005), Batman: Mask of The Phantasm (1993), Gargoyles (1994-1996), Corpse Bride (2005), Cowboy Bebop (1999-2002), and Naruto (2002-2005)? Isn't this a clear double standard? Have you guys seen Eddie Murphy's 'The Haunted Mansion' (2003) or the overrated shitty Toy Story 3 (2010)? These movies epitomize tonal inconsistency far more than Disney's Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996).
It would be funny if you made a sequel video about how bad the straight to DVD sequel is. Most of the straight to DVD sequel’s are bad. Except for Cinderella 3. That one is great and is honestly better the the original Cinderella. Lion King 1 1/2 is also pretty decent
Sorry dude the opening scene to TLJ is GOATed.
I personally disagree with you saying that the beginning is the most important part of a story. Imo the ending is the most important part of a story. Obviously every part is important but the ending is the last thing you’re going to leave your fans with. You don’t wanna leave a bitter taste in their mouth. A bad ending can really taint the entire product as a whole. There have been many things where a bad ending has tainted the entire way Something is looked at. A bad beginning isn’t good, but it can be recovered from because there are also a lot of things with not so great beginnings but turn out to be a lot better than they originally seemed. You can’t recover from bad ending because it’s the ending. There’s nothing else after it
Best Disney film of all time in my opinion is Emperors New Groove
Definitely the funniest, super valid choice