How Grids and Patterns Work Together

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ส.ค. 2024
  • Take my course, go to: www.udemy.com/...
    Patterns and grids need to work together in order to create geometric compositions. Understanding how they can work together creatively forms the foundation for most of the complex, innovative and beautiful compositions.
    Join my Facebook group on Islamic geometric design: / islamicgeometricdesign
    My blog: broug.com/blog/

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @schetnikov
    @schetnikov 17 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Eric, your explanation is very good, for it shows how the thought works. The thought is what we need to see when we look at some pattern.

  • @SydMountaineer
    @SydMountaineer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank You, Eric - you explain this in the most effective ways, it allows people to truly understand, so that we can create our own, unique designs.

  • @Connect600
    @Connect600 8 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Islamic geometric patterns are so intricate and beautiful I've seen this in fes and in the mosque hassan two and many other buildings and wood trim in Morocco

  • @jeffharmed1616
    @jeffharmed1616 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A very enlightening study which should go a long way towards deciphering old mozaics and constructing new ones, thank you. I would like to point out that the grid you put up for the Alhambra Patio de los Arrayanes is a gross simplification which does not account for the small golden five-pointed stars that overlap the grid at every intersection of the 4 principal sectors you identified, making it impossible to construct the whole mosaic from your model. There is something else going on, much more complicated than that.

  • @SuperStargazer666
    @SuperStargazer666 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fascinating. I had no idea that the complexity of the designs was overlaid onto a simple grid.

  • @gabrielleauguste5946
    @gabrielleauguste5946 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    EN REGARDANT CES DESSINS FRACTALS ,CELA VOUS DONNE LA DIMENSION DE L'UNIVERS. DU RAYONNEMENT DE L'ÊTRE DIVIN UNIVERSEL.

  • @msaeedakhter
    @msaeedakhter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent explained.

  • @johnbosco1391
    @johnbosco1391 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Realy Amazing

  • @BHAKTIBROPHY
    @BHAKTIBROPHY 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Your book is indispensable.
    Thanks again for sharing your wisdom!
    :)

    • @EricBroug
      @EricBroug  9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you Bhakti, very kind :-)

  • @khad96
    @khad96 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    nice
    thanks you Eric

  • @muskduh
    @muskduh ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video!

  • @BHAKTIBROPHY
    @BHAKTIBROPHY 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I just watched this again. Learn something new every time I watch.
    I was wondering:
    When you create your own pieces from scratch, do you simply start with a point on a piece of paper and then create, for example, the hexagons with a compass and straight edge, and then continue to create that same design over and over with a compass and straight edge? Or do you place a grid that outlines the patterns that will tesselate underneath the paper before you start drawing?
    The reason I ask is because when I use a compass and straight edge, I have a difficult time getting everything lined up perfectly. My compass always seems to be off by a tiny bit. (I do check the compass radius often with a ruler, and I've tried several compasses.)
    I have it in my head that if I start with a grid that's cheating. (Ahh...the mind!)
    Thank you kindly for any insights, Eric.

    • @ficheye00
      @ficheye00 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think if you look at the final products they are not always perfect...

  • @elouahabisaid6573
    @elouahabisaid6573 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice

  • @abroudesmat7715
    @abroudesmat7715 ปีที่แล้ว

    Beautiful

  • @stephenbell2972
    @stephenbell2972 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What are the angles and relative edge lengths of the dark brown quadrilateral in the grid? Six of them apparently fit round a point to form a star (suggesting 60 degrees) but the abutment to the octagon suggests 112.5 for the obtuse angle.

    • @stephenbell2972
      @stephenbell2972 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Got it (I think): angles 60, 75, 112.5 and 112.5. The hexagonal element of the grid is then 2x75, 2x135 and 2x150 angles, with equal angles at opposite corners. This means the hexagon has a "handedness" according to whether the sequence of angles runs 150, 75, 135, 150, 75, 135 clockwise or anticlockwise. Both left and right-handed forms are present in the grid.
      Having made the hexagon at one place in the design, I tried to rotate it around a corner of the octagon to the complementary place and it didn't fit; I had to 'flip' it, which involves thinking outside the plane :)

  • @rildodosreis7332
    @rildodosreis7332 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lindo

  • @dlwatib
    @dlwatib 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    @ 12:36 the "grid" is not so much a true grid as it is a contrasting pattern. The patterns are actually controlled by the facets of the niche.

  • @SamdGG
    @SamdGG 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    How did you create the digital artwork?

    • @EricBroug
      @EricBroug  6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      On a CAD program and Adobe Illustrator

    • @SamdGG
      @SamdGG 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Eric Broug thanks

  • @hopepoemshm8682
    @hopepoemshm8682 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    this comes from Marrakesh

  • @jwampt
    @jwampt 10 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks Eric! Awesome video! Loved the course!
    Highly recommend this database for inspiration: www.tilingsearch.org
    www.tilingsearch.org/cgi-bin/findr.py

  • @sabahadnan9060
    @sabahadnan9060 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    انه الزليج المغربي

  • @spatialanomaly3708
    @spatialanomaly3708 ปีที่แล้ว

    Although quite elegant, the grid method that is illustrated here is not the correct way to form these patterns. When using the grid style the patterns are not considered "sterile". The traditional method is the correct way to do it, simple and elegant.

    • @EricBroug
      @EricBroug  ปีที่แล้ว

      Sterile?

    • @EricBroug
      @EricBroug  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm suspicious of teachers who tell you what is correct and not correct. It's dogmatic. Students should be empowered to make up their own minds.